• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

Test Cricket World XI

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Sports Talk
cricket
19 Posts 8 Posters 466 Views
Test Cricket World XI
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • MN5M Online
    MN5M Online
    MN5
    wrote on last edited by MN5
    #1

    Having a stab……very possibly missing some obvious choices.

    Yashavsi Jaiwal
    Usman Khawaja
    Kane Williamson
    Joe Root
    Harry Brook
    Kamindu Mendis
    Olly Pope Rishabh Pant ( wk )
    Ravi Ashwin
    Pat Cummins ( c )
    Kasigo Rabada
    Jasprit Bumrah

    Emphasis on young hot shots with a sprinkling of older legends too, older legends who are still performing that is……

    I can’t think of any better than Khawaja and Pope at the moment and a middle order all rounder might be handy too.

    CatograndeC 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • CatograndeC Online
    CatograndeC Online
    Catogrande
    replied to MN5 on last edited by
    #2

    @MN5

    Considering I’d have Smith over Pope for England every day of the week, I’d question his (Pope’s) inclusion.

    MN5M 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • MN5M Online
    MN5M Online
    MN5
    replied to Catogrande on last edited by
    #3

    @Catogrande said in Test Cricket World XI:

    @MN5

    Considering I’d have Smith over Pope for England every day of the week, I’d question his (Pope’s) inclusion.

    I can’t think of any outstanding keeper batsmen in the game at the moment and he’s in NZ and a better option than Blundell so he gets in

    CatograndeC 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • A Offline
    A Offline
    ARHS
    wrote on last edited by
    #4

    Pant?

    MN5M 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • A Offline
    A Offline
    ARHS
    wrote on last edited by
    #5

    I think Smith or Head in for Khawaja. Openers not too dominant currently. Maybe Starc for Cummins. Jadeja close. But that 11 looks pretty good to me based on current positions.

    MN5M 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • MN5M Online
    MN5M Online
    MN5
    replied to ARHS on last edited by
    #6

    @ARHS said in Test Cricket World XI:

    I think Smith or Head in for Khawaja. Openers not too dominant currently. Maybe Starc for Cummins. Jadeja close. But that 11 looks pretty good to me based on current positions.

    Cummins got in as he is the best captaincy option given Root and KW don’t do it anymore.

    World class openers are pretty sparse at the moment.

    Jadeja might get in batting at six given my team is slightly short of bowling options. Holders form has fallen off a cliff and Stokes doesn’t bowl enough to justify inclusion

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • MN5M Online
    MN5M Online
    MN5
    replied to ARHS on last edited by MN5
    #7

    @ARHS said in Test Cricket World XI:

    Pant?

    Yes. A glaring omission and obvious choice.

    He’s in

    We beat India 3-0 in India but I’d still pick four of them in a World XI to only one kiwi and that one kiwi didn’t even play.

    Funny old game cricket….

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • CatograndeC Online
    CatograndeC Online
    Catogrande
    replied to MN5 on last edited by
    #8

    @MN5 said in Test Cricket World XI:

    @Catogrande said in Test Cricket World XI:

    @MN5

    Considering I’d have Smith over Pope for England every day of the week, I’d question his (Pope’s) inclusion.

    I can’t think of any outstanding keeper batsmen in the game at the moment and he’s in NZ and a better option than Blundell so he gets in

    Well ok I guess. Is Kwajah in NZ? Assuming that’s the criteria?

    MN5M 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • MN5M Online
    MN5M Online
    MN5
    replied to Catogrande on last edited by MN5
    #9

    @Catogrande said in Test Cricket World XI:

    @MN5 said in Test Cricket World XI:

    @Catogrande said in Test Cricket World XI:

    @MN5

    Considering I’d have Smith over Pope for England every day of the week, I’d question his (Pope’s) inclusion.

    I can’t think of any outstanding keeper batsmen in the game at the moment and he’s in NZ and a better option than Blundell so he gets in

    Well ok I guess. Is Kwajah in NZ? Assuming that’s the criteria?

    He’s a few hours away. That might be good enough…..

    Ben Duckett might be an option ? He’s in terrific form compared to the other three openers in this test series…….

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • MN5M Online
    MN5M Online
    MN5
    wrote on last edited by
    #10
    This post is deleted!
    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • MN5M Online
    MN5M Online
    MN5
    wrote on last edited by
    #11
    This post is deleted!
    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • B Offline
    B Offline
    bayimports
    wrote on last edited by
    #12

    Wisden’s Test Team of 2024: 1. Yashasvi Jaiswal, 2. Ben Duckett, 3. Kane Williamson, 4. Joe Root, 5. Harry Brook, 6. Kamindu Mendis, 7. Jamie Smith (wk), 8. Ravindra Jadeja, 9. Gus Atkinson, 10. Matt Henry, 11. Jasprit Bumrah (c)

    No aussies, let the venting in the press begin lol

    mariner4lifeM antipodeanA 2 Replies Last reply
    1
  • mariner4lifeM Offline
    mariner4lifeM Offline
    mariner4life
    wrote on last edited by
    #13

    Hazlewood took 35 wickets in 7 tests at 13, but sure, leave him out.

    MN5M 1 Reply Last reply
    4
  • mariner4lifeM Offline
    mariner4lifeM Offline
    mariner4life
    replied to bayimports on last edited by
    #14

    @bayimports said in Test Cricket World XI:

    No aussies, let the venting in the press begin lol

    World Test final is Aus v South Africa

    Number of their players in Wisdens worthless Tst XI of the year? zero

    B 1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • antipodeanA Online
    antipodeanA Online
    antipodean
    replied to bayimports on last edited by
    #15

    @bayimports said in Test Cricket World XI:

    No aussies, let the venting in the press begin lol

    They can get included when they can win a three Test series in India 3-0

    Also, why are there more Indian names than Bumrah for such a donkey team?

    boobooB 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • B Offline
    B Offline
    bayimports
    replied to mariner4life on last edited by
    #16

    @mariner4life yeah absolutely staggering, however I will laugh along with it, but don't help themselves on the credibility front.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • boobooB Offline
    boobooB Offline
    booboo
    replied to antipodean on last edited by booboo
    #17

    @antipodean said in Test Cricket World XI:

    @bayimports said in Test Cricket World XI:

    No aussies, let the venting in the press begin lol

    They can get included when they can win a three Test series in India 3-0

    Also, why are there more Indian names than Bumrah for such a donkey team?

    Because readership rupees?

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • MN5M Online
    MN5M Online
    MN5
    replied to mariner4life on last edited by
    #18

    @mariner4life said in Test Cricket World XI:

    Hazlewood took 35 wickets in 7 tests at 13, but sure, leave him out.

    Shoulda been there ahead of Atkinson. Not Henry though, what a year he’s had

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • dogmeatD Offline
    dogmeatD Offline
    dogmeat
    wrote on last edited by
    #19

    I think it reflects a pretty mediocre year overall for test cricket.

    There are names there that I thought WTF but when you look at their figures it makes sense. Atkinson took 52 wickets at 22.15 in 9 matches. Henry 48 @ 18 Hazlewood 35 @ 13 but missed 40% of Aussies tests.

    Ducket only averages 37 but what opener set the world alight last year. Not any Oz or Saffa.

    Jadeja shades Lyon. Smith looks the tidiest keeper with a good batting record. Hazlewood is the only player that looks an obvious omission, but as I said maybe they figure he breaks too easily. Plus Aussie had a really soft programme. Pakistan Windies and India (minus Josh in the main) at home and two tests against us away.

    1 Reply Last reply
    2

Test Cricket World XI
Sports Talk
cricket
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.