Skip to content
  • Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

  • Tipping
  • Team Sheets
  • Highlights
  • Results
    • All Blacks

      Search every All Blacks Test. Filter results by year, opposition, location, venue, city and RWC stage

    • Super Rugby

      Search every Super Rugby since match 1996

    • NPC

      Search NPC results. Only first division matches from 1976-2005. All results from the 14 team competition (2006-present) are included

Chiefs v Blues

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Rugby Matches
chiefsblues
115 Posts 31 Posters 3.1k Views 2 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • A Offline
    A Offline
    ARHS
    wrote on last edited by
    #103

    Nock has a great pass, just not a great tactician or kicker. I don't get the heavy criticism of Christie.
    I assume that team tactics mean having the collision points in the opposition half, so a lot more kicks by 9. But they need to get contestable to work.

    TimT 1 Reply Last reply
    1
    • A ARHS

      Nock has a great pass, just not a great tactician or kicker. I don't get the heavy criticism of Christie.
      I assume that team tactics mean having the collision points in the opposition half, so a lot more kicks by 9. But they need to get contestable to work.

      TimT Away
      TimT Away
      Tim
      wrote on last edited by
      #104

      @ARHS said in Chiefs v Blues:

      Nock has a great pass, just not a great tactician or kicker.

      Nock has all the skills, but has never been able to execute them. despite excelling at times - the turnover at Eden Park against the Hurricanes last year was a notable example.

      His passing is excellent, he has sometime been very good to the ruck or poor, same with his box kicking which has been good or poor.

      A very frustrating player. That was the performance profile that we expected from the Blues for a long time. Reversion to that mean is unacceptable.

      1 Reply Last reply
      4
      • M Online
        M Online
        Mr Fish
        wrote on last edited by
        #105

        Nock can't kick, Christie can't pass. It's a tough world.

        A 1 Reply Last reply
        1
        • M Mr Fish

          Nock can't kick, Christie can't pass. It's a tough world.

          A Offline
          A Offline
          African Monkey
          wrote on last edited by
          #106

          @Mr-Fish said in Chiefs v Blues:

          Nock can't kick, Christie can't pass. It's a tough world.

          I wouldn't say Nock can't kick. He's got a big box kick. Just tends to overcook his kicks sometimes.

          taniwharugbyT 1 Reply Last reply
          1
          • A African Monkey

            @Mr-Fish said in Chiefs v Blues:

            Nock can't kick, Christie can't pass. It's a tough world.

            I wouldn't say Nock can't kick. He's got a big box kick. Just tends to overcook his kicks sometimes.

            taniwharugbyT Offline
            taniwharugbyT Offline
            taniwharugby
            wrote on last edited by
            #107

            @African-Monkey yea he certainly has a.kicking game, but like most of his game, inconsistent.

            1 Reply Last reply
            1
            • nzzpN Online
              nzzpN Online
              nzzp
              wrote on last edited by
              #108

              Crikey!

              https://www.nzherald.co.nz/sport/rugby/super-rugby/chiefs-fined-for-conversion-interference-during-super-rugby-pacific-win-over-blues/YUXCQEOT2ZFW5B6RNGHVGXDZWY/

              1 Reply Last reply
              2
              • M Offline
                M Offline
                Machpants
                wrote on last edited by
                #109

                That should be a points loss, disgusting

                nzzpN 1 Reply Last reply
                4
                • M Machpants

                  That should be a points loss, disgusting

                  nzzpN Online
                  nzzpN Online
                  nzzp
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #110

                  @Machpants said in Chiefs v Blues:

                  That should be a points loss, disgusting

                  You can't ding the team for that. The individual should lose pitchside privileges for some time though - it's a muppet thing to do... twice!

                  M antipodeanA 2 Replies Last reply
                  1
                  • nzzpN nzzp

                    @Machpants said in Chiefs v Blues:

                    That should be a points loss, disgusting

                    You can't ding the team for that. The individual should lose pitchside privileges for some time though - it's a muppet thing to do... twice!

                    M Offline
                    M Offline
                    Machpants
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #111

                    @nzzp said in Chiefs v Blues:

                    @Machpants said in Chiefs v Blues:

                    That should be a points loss, disgusting

                    You can't ding the team for that. The individual should lose pitchside privileges for some time though - it's a muppet thing to do... twice!

                    Disagree, they're part of the team. It affected the game, and it's cheating.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    1
                    • DuluthD Offline
                      DuluthD Offline
                      Duluth
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #112

                      I looked at the footage. You can't see the incidents because they are showing replays. But you can tell that the trainer had to move a decent distance to get to the ball, particularly the second time

                      I hope they checked previous matches too

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • YeetyaahY Online
                        YeetyaahY Online
                        Yeetyaah
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #113

                        Some supreme shithousery really. But is what it is and the club has been fined.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • BonesB Offline
                          BonesB Offline
                          Bones
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #114

                          Dick thing to do and I wouldn't be against it being reclassified as a loss for the chiefs... but I don't really understand players getting rid of the ball post try anyway, so lesson learned on both sides.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          1
                          • nzzpN nzzp

                            @Machpants said in Chiefs v Blues:

                            That should be a points loss, disgusting

                            You can't ding the team for that. The individual should lose pitchside privileges for some time though - it's a muppet thing to do... twice!

                            antipodeanA Offline
                            antipodeanA Offline
                            antipodean
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #115

                            @nzzp said in Chiefs v Blues:

                            @Machpants said in Chiefs v Blues:

                            That should be a points loss, disgusting

                            You can't ding the team for that. The individual should lose pitchside privileges for some time though - it's a muppet thing to do... twice!

                            The rot starts at the top: “We have co-operated fully with Sanzaar on this matter and accept responsibility for the technical breach and the outcome of this process,” Graafhuis said. “As this is an employment matter, we will not be making any further comment.”

                            What a great catch-all comment that is as practically everything can be considered an employment matter.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            Reply
                            • Reply as topic
                            Log in to reply
                            • Oldest to Newest
                            • Newest to Oldest
                            • Most Votes


                            • Login

                            • Don't have an account? Register

                            • Search
                            • First post
                              Last post
                            0
                            • Categories
                            • Search