QF Chiefs v Blues
-
@Canes4life said in QF Chiefs v Blues:
@mariner4life said in QF Chiefs v Blues:
you are literally the first person to utter your irrelevant team's name. Off you pop to your little thread.
We weren't irrelevant when we clobbered you a few weeks back and sent you back to Hamilton with your tail between your legs.
we were under strength so doesn't count
@ploughboy said in QF Chiefs v Blues:
@Canes4life said in QF Chiefs v Blues:
@mariner4life said in QF Chiefs v Blues:
you are literally the first person to utter your irrelevant team's name. Off you pop to your little thread.
We weren't irrelevant when we clobbered you a few weeks back and sent you back to Hamilton with your tail between your legs.
we were under strength so doesn't count
Oh yeah that's right, the Chiefs are nothing without DMac.
-
AI summary of thread: the Blues are playing the Chiefs but it is all irrelevant because the Canes are 15 Chuck Norris(es) with Terminator T1000 skeletal frames. They never lose, they just sometimes are "understrength".
-
Actually...
This forum thread, initially about the Chiefs vs. Blues quarter-final match, quickly devolves into a heated debate about the Hurricanes (Canes).
The discussion begins with a neutral wish for a good game and no All Black injuries. However, it quickly shifts when a user, Canes4life, suggests that Hurricanes supporters would want the Chiefs to win. This sparks a back-and-forth with Duluth about the Hurricanes' past struggles against the Blues and their performance with "understrength" teams.
The conversation then veers significantly off-topic, with mariner4life expressing frustration that the Chiefs vs. Blues thread has become a discussion about the Hurricanes, coining the term "Yellow and black virus." This leads to further jabs between the users, with Canes4life and ploughboy debating whether the Hurricanes' past wins against other teams "count" if those teams were "under strength."
The thread is summarized humorously by nostrildamus as: "the Blues are playing the Chiefs but it is all irrelevant because the Canes are 15 Chuck Norris(es) with Terminator T1000 skeletal frames. They never lose, they just sometimes are 'understrength'."
-
@sparky said in QF Chiefs v Blues:
I've no strong views on who I want to win this one. So good luck to both teams and fingers crossed there will be no injured All Blacks afterwards.
If you're a Canes supporter, you want the Chiefs to win.
-
@Canes4life What an arrogant dickhead you are if you think you can tell people whether they are or aren't a supporter of a particular team.
Don't post like an absolute knobhead.
@sparky said in QF Chiefs v Blues:
@Canes4life What an arrogant dickhead you are if you think you can tell people whether they are or aren't a supporter of a particular team.
Don't post like an absolute knobhead.
Who the fk do you even support then?
-
@sparky said in QF Chiefs v Blues:
@Canes4life What an arrogant dickhead you are if you think you can tell people whether they are or aren't a supporter of a particular team.
Don't post like an absolute knobhead.
Who the fk do you even support then?
-
Wasn't gonna post about it, but how has a Canes shitfight in a Chiefs v Blues thread taken over
-
Wasn't gonna post about it, but how has a Canes shitfight in a Chiefs v Blues thread taken over
@African-Monkey Just here to entertain.
-
@Canes4life Not you, pal.
@sparky said in QF Chiefs v Blues:
@Canes4life Not you, pal.
The reason for my initial response was purely thinking you hadn’t understood the playoff structure and assuming you were a Canes fan, then you want the Chiefs to win because it means we get an extra life. How the fuck is that being arrogant you twit?
-
Wasn't gonna post about it, but how has a Canes shitfight in a Chiefs v Blues thread taken over
@African-Monkey said in QF Chiefs v Blues:
Wasn't gonna post about it, but how has a Canes shitfight in a Chiefs v Blues thread taken over
I don’t know man, what was a pretty innocent initial response has obviously been taken out of context by the Fern’s crazies.
-
@sparky said in QF Chiefs v Blues:
@Canes4life Not you, pal.
The reason for my initial response was purely thinking you hadn’t understood the playoff structure and assuming you were a Canes fan, then you want the Chiefs to win because it means we get an extra life. How the fuck is that being arrogant you twit?
-
@Canes4life Nah, I want my team to win every match, quadruply so against an Australian team.
@sparky said in QF Chiefs v Blues:
@Canes4life Nah, I want my team to win every match, quadruply so against an Australian team.
So you harp on like a twit when you’re a Canes fan. And you’d rather not have a second life if we lose? Logical.
-
@sparky said in QF Chiefs v Blues:
@Canes4life Nah, I want my team to win every match, quadruply so against an Australian team.
So you harp on like a twit when you’re a Canes fan. And you’d rather not have a second life if we lose? Logical.
@Canes4life It will diminish my happiness if we lose that's for sure.
And I don't really like the idea of any team simply being given a loser's pass in knock out rugby. But I suspect you disagree.
Anyway, I humbly suggest it's time to read the room and for us both to buzz off. I suspect we have more than overstayed our welcome in the Chiefs Vs Blues match thread.
-
@Bovidae said in QF Chiefs v Blues:
Will be a big crowd as 10K tickets have been sold on the first day of public sales.
What's the peak capacity of the stadium? I don't recall it being that big
@canefan said in QF Chiefs v Blues:
@Bovidae said in QF Chiefs v Blues:
Will be a big crowd as 10K tickets have been sold on the first day of public sales.
What's the peak capacity of the stadium? I don't recall it being that big
25K.
