All Blacks v Springboks I
-
@His-Bobness said in All Blacks v Springboks I:
@Frank Not at 10 against the Boks. But he should be introduced gradually ASAP - either off the bench next week or starting as fullback
I disagree with this. If you’re in the squad for a position, you should be able to start against anybody. End of.
I can’t think of a Pat Howard debut by any player in recent memory. Tom Taylor, Sopoaga were both thrown in 10 vs big opposition without issue.
We’ve become so accustomed to super rugby standouts given 15 minute debuts that we think it’s the right thing to do. Why?
-
@MajorRage Fair enough, too. I guess I was more predicting what Razor will do, not what he should do.
The ultra-cautious selections have been become the standard operating procedure - perhaps a legacy of the NZR’s panicky, knee-jerk mismanagement of Foster between Covid and the 2023 World Cup. -
@Frank said in All Blacks v Springboks I:
However, I would say Beauden is the one 10 you know who won't go to pieces under pressure.
He goes to pieces under pressure plenty, I really don't buy that. Have we forgotten he's the ultimate for getting caught in the backfield and shovelling a pass ( or attempted pass) to a player in often a worse position?
-
I thought it was a great Test match. Normally, I’d like to reaffirm such an occasion by giving it as much time and space as possible: watching the game multiple times, comparing it to other Tests, sifting through numbers and footage before writing a (too) long review of the match at hand. But as I’m suffering (yes, suffering) from a combination of work and rugby fatigue, no such time could be afforded. Fortunately, the ABs are once again showing what to do in times like this: why slog away when it’s easier and more efficient to do things as quickly as possible?
Stop overwriting, stop overplaying
I’m sure everyone remembers my treatise written after last year’s French Test on the AB set-piece attack. It was an avalanche of information: YouTube videos with time stamps, picture frames, and words, so many words. In a way, it mimicked what was happening on the field, the ABs trying to overwhelm their opposition with an avalanche of possession, carries and passing. Against the biggest sides in Test rugby, South Africa and France, the All Blacks simply tried to do too much in 2024.A lot of passing (186 on average), more than their fair share of 22 entries (8.3) but not a lot of purchase from those entries (2.3 points per entry): this was the story of 2024. On Saturday against the Springboks, however, a very different picture appeared.
Way less passing (125), way more kicking (34) and, most importantly, the appearance of brutal efficiency when entering the opposition 22 (4.2 points per entry). So less really is more?
The tragedy of Jason Holland
In last year’s verbose review, I tried to finish somewhat succinctly: “If the Hurricane lineout strike is going to return to Test rugby in 2025, Jason Holland will need to find a way of sharpening it, where it can finally cut through South African and French Test defences.”As if Holland took that little comment personally, we saw the set-up for the arrow attack return in the very first minute of Saturday’s Test. But rather than some elaborate midfield play, Barrett went for the simple first-phase cross-kick, directly attacking the defensively weak Willie Le Roux in the simplest way possible.
The real Wayne Smith-doctrine: play to space as quickly as possibleThings do not have to be complicated to work well. Why try to go through the Springbok midfield defence – by far the best in the world – if you can simply go around it, targeting the obvious backline weakness?
Holland has seemingly learned a lot from last year’s often overcomplicated Test campaign, as simplicity and straightforwardness are key terms in this year’s set-piece attack. 15 minutes later, with another lineout on the opposition 22, another set-piece strike embodied the same principles. Target the slower Bok seams with your best hole runners (Jordan/Jordie Barrett) and find out what happens. As it happened, the secondary runner (Jordie) wasn't even necessary to finish the play.
Not all Boks are great defenders so the goal is to isolate and target themIf Jason Holland’s main responsibility is to create strike plays, then I think it’s fair to say he’s more than earning his coin at the minute, with an increase in redzone efficiency against a side like the Springboks. Whether he'll get much credit for this is still up in the air. But as the Greek tragedies have taught us, future glory never comes from a clear and easy path.
Finishing the job
I guess I could keep going, looking at defensive patterns, some individual performances, and what may happen next week. Big occasions can tempt you like that: you want to be elaborate, give it the attention it really deserves, keep basking in its light for as long as possible.But if Robertson and his coaches have seemingly learned anything from last year, it’s that the bigger arena doesn’t necessarily require a more complex playbook. Rather, it requires cutting back and doing the simple things well: kick for territory, make your tackles, attack opposition ball. Try the easy things first before making it harder for yourself.
And since they so obviously want all of us on their journey with them, perhaps I should try taking a page out of their book. Keep it nice and simple, and just see what happens.
-
@Mauss said in All Blacks v Springboks I:
it’s that the bigger arena doesn’t necessarily require a more complex playbook.
This.
Great sides just do the basics with a low error rate, over and over. Bokke were surprisingly poor at unforced errors - and basic mistakes
-
Guys....we won!!!
Billed as the biggest test on NZ soil since the 2011 RWC Final - or maybe Lions III
We didn't lose the Eden Park voodoo. We stopped the rot vs the Jaapies. We're the number 1 team in the world and we're leading The Rugby Championship - with 2/3 home games to come.
Saw an article today suggesting we're a year ahead of Rassie in developing players for the next RWC.
Maybe the worm is turning!
Channel the Eagles: Take it easy. Don't let the sound of your own wheels drive you crazy!
-
@His-Bobness To channel The Dude - I hate the fucking Eagles, man!
-
@Chris-B said in All Blacks v Springboks I:
Guys....we won!!!
Billed as the biggest test on NZ soil since the 2011 RWC Final - or maybe Lions III
We didn't lose the Eden Park voodoo. We stopped the rot vs the Jaapies. We're the number 1 team in the world and we're leading The Rugby Championship - with 2/3 home games to come.
Saw an article today suggesting we're a year ahead of Rassie in developing players for the next RWC.
Maybe the worm is turning!
Channel the Eagles: Take it easy. Don't let the sound of your own wheels drive you crazy!
Tell Razor Life in the Fastlane, surely make you lose your mind!!
-
@Chris-B said in All Blacks v Springboks I:
@His-Bobness To channel The Dude - I hate the fucking Eagles, man!
Well you did bring them up...
-
@Chris-B stoked that we won.
But this is not a vintage side. Lots of errors and poor decision making. Bokke were uncharacteristically bad with unforced errors.
We won, but like a lot of our victories it was far from comfortable - despite some early points.
-
@KiwiMurph said in All Blacks v Springboks I:
@tubbyj said in All Blacks v Springboks I:
@pakman said in All Blacks v Springboks I:
@Canes4life said in All Blacks v Springboks I:
Loving the balance of the loosies for once
Parker at 6 looks to the manor born.
Wally getting back to 100.
RD at 7 hitting rucks rather than the usual seagulling.
Parker and Sititi no doubt but agree with earlier poster Savea was a bit anonymous at 7 and only really had a impact on the game when he moved to 8. Is he better suited to impact off the the bench with a Lakai or Papali'i starting at 7?
There is simply no way Ardie is going to benched so I think the current set up is the best option they have going forward with I suspect Lakai the guy to take the bench loose forward spot.
Agreed. My personal preference, though, would be to let Lakai have a shot starting at 7, Parker at 6 and RD at 8. Then let Wally loose early in second and RD can switch to 7.
-
@canefan said in All Blacks v Springboks I:
Just happened to switch onto The Breakdown. Mils and Marshall both thought we kicked too much from 9. They both wanted to see more kicking from 10, more manipulation of their back three. I can't believe it
You disagree with less 9 box kicking?
I don’t agree with you!
-
@MajorRage said in All Blacks v Springboks I:
@canefan said in All Blacks v Springboks I:
Just happened to switch onto The Breakdown. Mils and Marshall both thought we kicked too much from 9. They both wanted to see more kicking from 10, more manipulation of their back three. I can't believe it
You disagree with less 9 box kicking?
I don’t agree with you!
If you read my posts you will know I HATE box kicks and felt we overegged on them big time. I just can't believe they said something so commonsensical! (Of course, Goldie tried to make the counterargument, loyal company man that he is
)
-
@nzzp Yeah - but, we've got a propensity to measure everything against our 2015 team.
Which was the culmination of 12 years of building a team around some guys who turned out to be all time greats.
Our history is littered with teams with plenty of journeymen - stumbling and bumbling, but generally staying on the right side of the ledger.
Ce;ebrate this one!
-
@Chris-B said in All Blacks v Springboks I:
@nzzp Yeah - but, we've got a propensity to measure everything against our 2015 team.
Which was the culmination of 12 years of building a team around some guys who turned out to be all time greats.
Our history is littered with teams with plenty of journeymen - stumbling and bumbling, but generally staying on the right side of the ledger.
Ce;ebrate this one!
Yep I don’t think we’ll see another side like the 2015 one in our lifetime. So many greats in that team.
This is a growing team that have shown glimpses of potential, we all just have to be patient.
-
@Canes4life said in All Blacks v Springboks I:
@Chris-B said in All Blacks v Springboks I:
@nzzp Yeah - but, we've got a propensity to measure everything against our 2015 team.
Which was the culmination of 12 years of building a team around some guys who turned out to be all time greats.
Our history is littered with teams with plenty of journeymen - stumbling and bumbling, but generally staying on the right side of the ledger.
Ce;ebrate this one!
Yep I don’t think we’ll see another side like the 2015 one in our lifetime. So many greats in that team.
This is a growing team that have shown glimpses of potential, we all just have to be patient.
That first 20 minutes was a tease. I want to see them play with that sort of clarity and purpose for closer to 80 minutes