@nostrildamus said in England Vs All Blacks:
@jimmyb said in England Vs All Blacks:
I’m just not sure how Foster can inherit a team he’d already been coaching for 7 years.
Fair enough but
Razor on the other hand has to develop a 2nd row
He had Scott (2016!) and Vaa'i (2020) and Pat (2014!!)
entire backrow
more like get rid of the entire Blues backrow
two halfbacks
He inherited Cam and Christie (the latter Foster preferred at the 2023 RWC Final but am I still bitter, me?)
a 10
inherited BB (2012) and DMac (2016)? And resurrected with a passport, Richie M (2017)?
a centre pairing
recycled QT (2021) and LF (2022) oh and get rid of any Blues players
and a back three.
Reece (2019) and Clarke (2020) and Jordan (2020) were new, really?
Foster had his squad handed to him on a platter and only needed to tweak a few small elements
There I agree, but Foster did have a hand in composing the original platter.
Thanks for the above, I hadn't realized many of the above have been ABs for so long.
Maybe that is also part of the problem!
It’s definitely part of the problem.
I’m not sure how to format the responses to specific parts of the post but, and without wanting to be too argumentative:
Second row: Va’ai can hardly be called a Foster project. I think he had less than 10 caps by end of 23. An aging PT is nothing but a bench option
Backrow: Akira Ioane was never the answer. Sotutu was also binned by Foster and co. Dalton yes I’ll give you that.
Halfback: Cam had what, 2 caps by the end of RWC? Shoehorning Roigard into the 23 RWC squad then not using him is hardly inheriting a player. Inheriting Christie is not a positive
10: yes two tens that can’t play 10. I’d take the argument if one of them was an international quality 10.
Back three: A past it winger in Reece, Clarke who was so out of form he wasn’t in the RWC team, and a 15 that can’t play 15?