@Victor-Meldrew said in Transgender debate, in sport, in general:
@paremata said in Transgender debate, in sport, in general:
The term “assigned at birth” is based around external genitalia obviously. It’s a recent turn of phrase the trans community have adopted along with gender identity to muddy things.
Bit bored so I did some googling. Some surprising figures,
The term has little to do with the trans community and has been around in medical circles for decades. Google shows the sex of around 1 in 200 babies is indeterminate at birth and can weeks before it becomes clear and determined. Surprised by that - perhaps something which isn't talked about?
Even then about 0.2% of births result in genital ambiguity and are classed as intersex. That intersex figure is even higher if you count things like hormone levels & Chromosomes. Surprised by those figures but they are referenced, so assume many are regarded as a medical condition treatable with surgery, drugs etc in the West.
For what it’s worth her school principal thought she was a boy till she was 16 .
Read she suffered real abuse at school as she looked like a boy and often forced to strip to show her genitals or lack thereof. Regarded as a freak, she had a pretty appalling childhood because of the way she was born
When did you first hear the phrase “assigned at birth”? It’s only recently escaped the trans community and medical circles and surfaced on articles about trans people in the media etc .
It’s a silly phrase that is usually a signal you’re dealing with a loon , much like insisting on they/them pronouns.
My mother was a nurse and told me about a couple of kids born on her watch . One had no anus and got a colostomy bag until they gave it surgery before it went to school . Another had six fingers on one one hand and surprisingly wasn’t swaddled in a Canterbury blanket .