Aaron Smith naughty boy?
-
THey could have done it with a while heap more class than they did...Smith gets shown as being classless for shagging a chick in a toilet, and only now they are realising the error of thier ways for recording 2 people having sex in a toilet.
Although....the husband thought it was amusing
The husband said he found it quite amusing and wasn't too worried about what Smith had done.
"I almost feel bad for putting the poor bloke in it now," he wrote in an email.But the Missus wanted her 2 minutes in the limelight...
But the wife wanted to speak out, saying the more she thought about it the angrier she became.
"I've never actually reported anything to a newspaper or anything. We don't want to convey the fact that we're narking or gossiping about his private life. It's kinda beside the point." -
Good thing my meagre talent prevented me from representing New Zealand at rugby given my behaviour over the years. I mean, a disabled toilet? What an amateur. Try the halfway line of the Penrith football stadium, the Opera House steps, Royal Botanic gardens and Manly beach, and these were classy girls. Imagine the uproar if someone caught me nailing the tarts.
-
Good thing my meagre talent prevented me from representing New Zealand at rugby given my behaviour over the years. I mean, a disabled toilet? What an amateur. Try the halfway line of the Penrith football stadium, the Opera House steps, Royal Botanic gardens and Manly beach, and these were classy girls. Imagine the uproar if someone caught me nailing the tarts.
-
God, I wish this story would just curl up and die. Even mentioning it in the same breath as the Wellington story and and the Chiefs story is revolting - it is not even in the same stratosphere in terms of seriousness.
And yes, the pervert couple better hope they have no skeletons. Because the thing is, Mr. and Mrs. Moral Highground, that if you were truly outraged, you would have dashed out and fetched an airport official. But instead you stayed in the bathroom, WITH SMALL CHILD, and recorded two people having sex in a toilet. That is not outrage. It is voyeurism or worse, preparation for blackmail.
-
@mimic said in Aaron Smith naughty boy?:
@MN5 said in Aaron Smith naughty boy?:
@Stargazer said in Aaron Smith naughty boy?:
@taniwharugby said in Aaron Smith naughty boy?:
@Stargazer wtf are you on about? did you watch it, no way would anyone recognize her form the image they posted.
You really are a picky little fluffybunny arent you!
Apparently, bolding the word 'him' is too subtle for you?
I meant Smith. He's a man-slut from all I've heard about him over the years.
Dude, the word is "stud".........how can you not know that ? sounds like someone needs a bit of impromptu toilet action.
Hey old timer, no-one under 35 uses that word anymore.
It's called "skux" these days.This post. Is Awesome
it won't be beaten this year.I see they've left no stone unturned in their quest to keep the story going. Turns out that young, rich, famous, athletic guys are always going to be a target of female attention according to Luke McAllisters ex wife....fuck, never would have guessed that......
@MN5 said in Aaron Smith naughty boy?:
@mimic said in Aaron Smith naughty boy?:
@MN5 said in Aaron Smith naughty boy?:
@Stargazer said in Aaron Smith naughty boy?:
@taniwharugby said in Aaron Smith naughty boy?:
@Stargazer wtf are you on about? did you watch it, no way would anyone recognize her form the image they posted.
You really are a picky little fluffybunny arent you!
Apparently, bolding the word 'him' is too subtle for you?
I meant Smith. He's a man-slut from all I've heard about him over the years.
Dude, the word is "stud".........how can you not know that ? sounds like someone needs a bit of impromptu toilet action.
Hey old timer, no-one under 35 uses that word anymore.
It's called "skux" these days.This post. Is Awesome
it won't be beaten this year.I see they've left no stone unturned in their quest to keep the story going. Turns out that young, rich, famous, athletic guys are always going to be a target of female attention according to Luke McAllisters ex wife....fuck, never would have guessed that......
Reminds me of the advice Lydiard gave Snell. Can't remember the exact words but it was along the lines of... sacrifice romance now and concentrate on training, because when you're a champion you'll get all the girls
-
@antipodean Probably almost as bad as if someone discovered where they're buried?
@Bones said in Aaron Smith naughty boy?:
@antipodean Probably almost as bad as if someone discovered where they're buried?
-
@Bones said in Aaron Smith naughty boy?:
@antipodean Probably almost as bad as if someone discovered where they're buried?
@antipodean Not even a tyre track in sight.
-
Good thing my meagre talent prevented me from representing New Zealand at rugby given my behaviour over the years. I mean, a disabled toilet? What an amateur. Try the halfway line of the Penrith football stadium, the Opera House steps, Royal Botanic gardens and Manly beach, and these were classy girls. Imagine the uproar if someone caught me nailing the tarts.
@antipodean said in Aaron Smith naughty boy?:
Good thing my meagre talent prevented me from representing New Zealand at rugby given my behaviour over the years. I mean, a disabled toilet? What an amateur. Try the halfway line of the Penrith football stadium, the Opera House steps, Royal Botanic gardens and Manly beach, and these were classy girls. Imagine the uproar if someone caught me nailing the tarts.
Hey - there's nothing wrong with a disabled toilet. I've ticked that one off, although it was at a wedding reception, so a bit more romance than an airport.
-
I am looking forward to 6 weeks time when the headline reads ' Smith didn't flush chain and now has a little turd on the way' when the girl comes forward now she is knocked up.
-
Good thing my meagre talent prevented me from representing New Zealand at rugby given my behaviour over the years. I mean, a disabled toilet? What an amateur. Try the halfway line of the Penrith football stadium, the Opera House steps, Royal Botanic gardens and Manly beach, and these were classy girls. Imagine the uproar if someone caught me nailing the tarts.
@antipodean said in Aaron Smith naughty boy?:
Good thing my meagre talent prevented me from representing New Zealand at rugby given my behaviour over the years. I mean, a disabled toilet? What an amateur. Try the halfway line of the Penrith football stadium, the Opera House steps, Royal Botanic gardens and Manly beach, and these were classy girls. Imagine the uproar if someone caught me nailing the tarts.
I'll see that and raise with Great Wall of China. Top class.
-
@antipodean said in Aaron Smith naughty boy?:
Good thing my meagre talent prevented me from representing New Zealand at rugby given my behaviour over the years. I mean, a disabled toilet? What an amateur. Try the halfway line of the Penrith football stadium, the Opera House steps, Royal Botanic gardens and Manly beach, and these were classy girls. Imagine the uproar if someone caught me nailing the tarts.
I'll see that and raise with Great Wall of China. Top class.
@Grins said in Aaron Smith naughty boy?:
@antipodean said in Aaron Smith naughty boy?:
Good thing my meagre talent prevented me from representing New Zealand at rugby given my behaviour over the years. I mean, a disabled toilet? What an amateur. Try the halfway line of the Penrith football stadium, the Opera House steps, Royal Botanic gardens and Manly beach, and these were classy girls. Imagine the uproar if someone caught me nailing the tarts.
I'll see that and raise with Great Wall of China. Top class.
On the wall or up against it?
-
Aaron Smith got screwed – and Stuff could end up getting sued
By Natalya King
October 8, 2016
Aaron Smith’s indiscretions have been the biggest media story of the week. But lawyer Natalya King believes both the couple who made the recording and the outlets which broke the story may have committed an invasion of privacy.Amidst the red-eyed rage that greeted the news that All Blacks have sex – and sometimes have sex with women who are not their partners (what a shock) – there was one somewhat unexpected voice of calm. The New Zealand Herald reports that, discussing the matter on the Paul Henry Show, Judith Collins admitted “the situation wasn’t her business.”
Quite. In fact, the law might go so far as to say not only was it not Judith’s business, or yours or mine for that matter, but that recording Aaron Smith’s escapade and sending it into a news outlet was actually an invasion of his privacy.
In the legal sense, an invasion of privacy is the “highly offensive” disclosure of private facts. That is, if Aaron had a reasonable expectation of privacy in the facts of the event, and if the average person considered that the publicity given to those facts was highly offensive then Stuff (or the couple who enthusiastically recorded the incident) may well find themselves on the wrong end of an invasion of privacy claim.
smithss
Absent some voluntary disclosure by way of, for example, an intentionally leaked sex tape, it’s usually pretty clear that sex between two consenting adults is a private matter. And yes, I know, part of the appeal in having sex in a toilet cubicle is the risk of getting caught, but when ahem push comes to shove, it’s a little difficult to see how one’s sexual activity in a confined and indoor space with four walls is anything other than a private fact.
Some, including Stuff, the aforementioned receiver of the amorous audio-recording, have asserted that the toilet cubicle was a public place, but that’s not quite true. Aside from the obvious problem that the entire purpose of a closed door is to create a private space, Christchurch Airport is a private business that prohibits filming within the airport without its express permission, and without payment of a “location charge”.
See also: Eight key learnings from the Aaron Smith toilet sex scandal
Even if it were correct to say that the airport is a public space (and good luck getting a judge on board with that one), that doesn’t mean that Smith’s sexual activity automatically loses its private status. The law still protects a degree of privacy in public – for context, the UK Courts found that photos of Naomi Campbell on the street outside a drug treatment centre were disclosure of a private fact,¹ and the New Zealand courts have protected as private a conversation between an allegedly intoxicated driver and her husband following a car crash on a public highway in New Zealand.²
Just like Naomi Campbell (albeit probably not quite like Naomi Campbell) one issue for Aaron Smith has been his celebrity status. All Blacks, so the theory goes, give up their right to privacy as soon as they get Steve’s call. But that’s not quite right either. In the eyes of the law, a person’s right to privacy can be eroded if there’s some legitimate public concern in the matter. Legitimate public concern, according to the courts, covers issues like public health and safety, or the conduct of the government. That might automatically mean that some well-known figures, like politicians, have a lesser right to privacy, but on the sliding scale of celebrity status vs public concern, an All Black and his sexual proclivities are fairly low level. Put another way, two people using a disabled toilet as a space in which to carry out their infidelity might be distasteful, but it’s not a matter of national importance.
Put in that context, the only remaining question is whether the publicity of Aaron’s tryst in the toilet – and its accompanying audiotape – was highly offensive. For my part, when John Key’s commenting on your sex life it’s gone well beyond that.
-
Aaron Smith got screwed – and Stuff could end up getting sued
By Natalya King
October 8, 2016
Aaron Smith’s indiscretions have been the biggest media story of the week. But lawyer Natalya King believes both the couple who made the recording and the outlets which broke the story may have committed an invasion of privacy.Amidst the red-eyed rage that greeted the news that All Blacks have sex – and sometimes have sex with women who are not their partners (what a shock) – there was one somewhat unexpected voice of calm. The New Zealand Herald reports that, discussing the matter on the Paul Henry Show, Judith Collins admitted “the situation wasn’t her business.”
Quite. In fact, the law might go so far as to say not only was it not Judith’s business, or yours or mine for that matter, but that recording Aaron Smith’s escapade and sending it into a news outlet was actually an invasion of his privacy.
In the legal sense, an invasion of privacy is the “highly offensive” disclosure of private facts. That is, if Aaron had a reasonable expectation of privacy in the facts of the event, and if the average person considered that the publicity given to those facts was highly offensive then Stuff (or the couple who enthusiastically recorded the incident) may well find themselves on the wrong end of an invasion of privacy claim.
smithss
Absent some voluntary disclosure by way of, for example, an intentionally leaked sex tape, it’s usually pretty clear that sex between two consenting adults is a private matter. And yes, I know, part of the appeal in having sex in a toilet cubicle is the risk of getting caught, but when ahem push comes to shove, it’s a little difficult to see how one’s sexual activity in a confined and indoor space with four walls is anything other than a private fact.
Some, including Stuff, the aforementioned receiver of the amorous audio-recording, have asserted that the toilet cubicle was a public place, but that’s not quite true. Aside from the obvious problem that the entire purpose of a closed door is to create a private space, Christchurch Airport is a private business that prohibits filming within the airport without its express permission, and without payment of a “location charge”.
See also: Eight key learnings from the Aaron Smith toilet sex scandal
Even if it were correct to say that the airport is a public space (and good luck getting a judge on board with that one), that doesn’t mean that Smith’s sexual activity automatically loses its private status. The law still protects a degree of privacy in public – for context, the UK Courts found that photos of Naomi Campbell on the street outside a drug treatment centre were disclosure of a private fact,¹ and the New Zealand courts have protected as private a conversation between an allegedly intoxicated driver and her husband following a car crash on a public highway in New Zealand.²
Just like Naomi Campbell (albeit probably not quite like Naomi Campbell) one issue for Aaron Smith has been his celebrity status. All Blacks, so the theory goes, give up their right to privacy as soon as they get Steve’s call. But that’s not quite right either. In the eyes of the law, a person’s right to privacy can be eroded if there’s some legitimate public concern in the matter. Legitimate public concern, according to the courts, covers issues like public health and safety, or the conduct of the government. That might automatically mean that some well-known figures, like politicians, have a lesser right to privacy, but on the sliding scale of celebrity status vs public concern, an All Black and his sexual proclivities are fairly low level. Put another way, two people using a disabled toilet as a space in which to carry out their infidelity might be distasteful, but it’s not a matter of national importance.
Put in that context, the only remaining question is whether the publicity of Aaron’s tryst in the toilet – and its accompanying audiotape – was highly offensive. For my part, when John Key’s commenting on your sex life it’s gone well beyond that.
@Bones Interesting, and notice that this is not being reported on Stuff and all the Aaron Smith articles seems to have miraculously disappeared. Who can sue though because if it's only Smith (or his partner) they will just be wanting to put this all behind them now.
I'm just glad the terrible stuff I got up to when I was his age was pre internet and before anyone had the ability to record things. Imagine anyone on here how it would feel to have your prime minister condemn you.
this is making my blood boil now and if he pisses off overseas I'll be ropeable but won't blame him.
Being called out by a pony tail puller because a pious person says your're special because your face is on a weetbix packet. makes no sense.
-
I was nearly going to comment a while back that Stuff seemed to have seen sense and had let some real news take precedence, but it now looks like they are running for cover.
Good job.
The last line of that article is bang on. What the fuck was Key making comment for anyway? -
Please please someone sue the pompous filming family, the media outlets and John Key and let's at least attempt to set the world right about what's actually news and privacy.
Thought the ABs threw him under a bus too actually.
@Siam said in Aaron Smith naughty boy?:
Please please someone sue the pompous filming family, the media outlets and John Key and let's at least attempt to set the world right about what's actually news and privacy.
Thought the ABs threw him under a bus too actually.
How about that old fucker who tried to take John Key, and in another instance, John Banks to task in court? He could finally do something useful
-
and AS seems able to control what he says at least, and has made headlines for shutting down his twitter account...so yeah, pretty much exactly like Trump
-
Please please someone sue the pompous filming family, the media outlets and John Key and let's at least attempt to set the world right about what's actually news and privacy.
Thought the ABs threw him under a bus too actually.
@Siam said in Aaron Smith naughty boy?:
Please please someone sue the pompous filming family, the media outlets and John Key and let's at least attempt to set the world right about what's actually news and privacy.
Thought the ABs threw him under a bus too actually.
My sentiments exactly. Sue the pants off the bloody couple and reveal their names.
