Movie review thread...
-
@Tim sure, link it, because you can bet I'm not trawling through this thousand page thread looking for it
-
Watched Where The Wild Things Are with the boy today. Did not really enjoy it, and neither did he. Very slow, kind of pointless/weird, with no real "end" to the conflict between the Monsters. Not my cup of tea.
-
@Tim said in Re: Movie review thread...:
@mariner4life said in Re: Movie review thread...:
@MN5 i seem to remember a great trailer, but it got absolutely panned when it came out?
It was astonishingly bad. I recommend reading my great review.
Did you like it when Cameron Diaz fucked Javier Bardems car ? that was a definite highlight.
-
@mariner4life said in Re: Movie review thread...:
@Tim sure, link it, because you can bet I'm not trawling through this thousand page thread looking for it
Sadly, it's probably too old to have made the transition to the new site.
-
@Tim said in Re: Movie review thread...:
Master & Commander was fun. Gladiator was very so-so, which is about the best you can say for late career Ridley Scott (have any of you fluffybunnies seen The Counselor? That was easily the most profoundly and unwittingly awful movie of the past decade).
Big Russ was fucking great in the Insider and Romper Stomper. I suspect they gave him the oscar as a corrective to over looking his performance in the Insider.
It was probably the best performance as a scientist I've seen, and as someone who is mostly a cancer researcher now, it's one of the few genuinely inspirering performances I've seen.this was a pretty succinct review from 3 years ago....
-
@taniwharugby said in Re: Movie review thread...:
@Tim said in Re: Movie review thread...:
Master & Commander was fun. Gladiator was very so-so, which is about the best you can say for late career Ridley Scott (have any of you fluffybunnies seen The Counselor? That was easily the most profoundly and unwittingly awful movie of the past decade).
Big Russ was fucking great in the Insider and Romper Stomper. I suspect they gave him the oscar as a corrective to over looking his performance in the Insider.
It was probably the best performance as a scientist I've seen, and as someone who is mostly a cancer researcher now, it's one of the few genuinely inspirering performances I've seen.this was a pretty succinct review from 3 years ago....
Holy shit. Ebert would turn in his grave reading such a brief review. Don't talk yourself up so much next time @Tim
-
-
he may have done another, but that was all I could find....
-
@Tim said in Re: Movie review thread...:
That was just the capsule review summary. I wrote a drunken, rambling rant about it earlier.
the movie might actually make sense if one were to watch it in a drunk and rambling state. I might give that a crack, we've got it for 8 days afterall ( no wi fi at the weekender in the rapa so old school dvd hiring was needed )
-
Black Mass
The word i am looking for is "meh". It was, well, it was okay. I love me a good crime movie. This was not a crime movie.
My main gripe with it is, every single thing that is supposed to have happened is glossed over. The big take down of the mafia took what? 2 minutes? and wasn't mentioned again. His rise to crime lord happened off screen. The thing in Miami that needed a murder got zero explanation. There was zero tension in the move, as there wasn't really an antagonist, unless you count Cory Stohl, who had what, 5 minutes of screen time?
It's not even made very clear what the FBI guys were doing.
I get they were tying to tell 20 years of story in 2 hours, but come on, you need to give something for us to be interested in, or to root for, or hope to go down.
2 corrupt cops out of 5 strong bawston accents
-
is that the one with Johnny Depp? If it is I canned it after about 30mins...granted it was late when I started watching but it didn't grab me to finish it!
-
@taniwharugby yea that's him. You didn't miss much
-
-
-
@Tim I'm hoping you mean the Burt Reynolds one rather than the Adam Sandler one? I'd hate to have to re-evaluate my opinion of you.
Edit: 20th Century films... D'oh!
-
@Catogrande said in Re: Movie review thread...:
@Tim I'm hoping you mean the Burt Reynolds one rather than the Adam Sandler one? I'd hate to have to re-evaluate my opinion of you.
Edit: 20th Century films... D'oh!
Reynolds is in both versions isn't he?
-
@taniwharugby Yeah but they're not both "The Reynolds one"!
