Skip to content
  • Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

  • Tipping
  • Team Sheets
  • Highlights
  • Results
    • All Blacks

      Search every All Blacks Test. Filter results by year, opposition, location, venue, city and RWC stage

    • Super Rugby

      Search every Super Rugby since match 1996

    • NPC

      Search NPC results. Only first division matches from 1976-2005. All results from the 14 team competition (2006-present) are included

Other Cricket

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Sports Talk
cricket
1.9k Posts 81 Posters 90.2k Views 6 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • BovidaeB Offline
    BovidaeB Offline
    Bovidae
    wrote on last edited by
    #1684

    Maybe a match between the bowlers would be more interesting.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
    • NTAN NTA

      Screenshot_20250715-082300.png

      V Offline
      V Offline
      Virgil
      wrote on last edited by
      #1685

      @NTA said in Other Cricket:

      Screenshot_20250715-082300.png

      Hazlewood had a 'mare'!

      MN5M 1 Reply Last reply
      1
      • V Virgil

        @NTA said in Other Cricket:

        Screenshot_20250715-082300.png

        Hazlewood had a 'mare'!

        MN5M Offline
        MN5M Offline
        MN5
        wrote on last edited by
        #1686

        @Virgil said in Other Cricket:

        @NTA said in Other Cricket:

        Screenshot_20250715-082300.png

        Hazlewood had a 'mare'!

        Cummins couldn't even be bothered rolling the arm over

        NTAN 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • mariner4lifeM Online
          mariner4lifeM Online
          mariner4life
          wrote on last edited by
          #1687

          Cracks once again papered over for Australia.
          Khawaja 117 runs at 19
          Konstas 50 runs at 8
          Green 180 runs at 30
          Smith 127 runs at 32
          Head the best with 224 at 37

          While you expect a few to turn around back on Aussie decks, that is another poor return from the top order heading in to an Ashes.

          I think the three most important Shield rounds in history will be played at the start of the Summer.

          1 Reply Last reply
          3
          • mariner4lifeM Online
            mariner4lifeM Online
            mariner4life
            wrote on last edited by
            #1688

            Great win for England this morning in what is a quality series.

            nzzpN 1 Reply Last reply
            2
            • mariner4lifeM mariner4life

              Great win for England this morning in what is a quality series.

              nzzpN Offline
              nzzpN Offline
              nzzp
              wrote on last edited by
              #1689

              @mariner4life said in Other Cricket:

              Great win for England this morning in what is a quality series.

              I really wish I didn't have to sleep. This has been a cracking series

              mariner4lifeM 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • nzzpN nzzp

                @mariner4life said in Other Cricket:

                Great win for England this morning in what is a quality series.

                I really wish I didn't have to sleep. This has been a cracking series

                mariner4lifeM Online
                mariner4lifeM Online
                mariner4life
                wrote on last edited by
                #1690

                @nzzp said in Other Cricket:

                @mariner4life said in Other Cricket:

                Great win for England this morning in what is a quality series.

                I really wish I didn't have to sleep. This has been a cracking series

                agreed, i can't even make it through Tour stages let alone all night test cricket

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • MN5M MN5

                  @Virgil said in Other Cricket:

                  @NTA said in Other Cricket:

                  Screenshot_20250715-082300.png

                  Hazlewood had a 'mare'!

                  Cummins couldn't even be bothered rolling the arm over

                  NTAN Offline
                  NTAN Offline
                  NTA
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #1691

                  @MN5 said in Other Cricket:

                  @Virgil said in Other Cricket:

                  @NTA said in Other Cricket:

                  Screenshot_20250715-082300.png

                  Hazlewood had a 'mare'!

                  Cummins couldn't even be bothered rolling the arm over

                  Boland with the hat trick

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • Daffy JaffyD Daffy Jaffy

                    Windies all out for 27. Starc 6 for 9, Boland 3 for 2.

                    B Offline
                    B Offline
                    bayimports
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #1692

                    @Daffy-Jaffy said in Other Cricket:

                    Windies all out for 27. Starc 6 for 9, Boland 3 for 2.

                    How can anyone be happy about this? So close and yet we still own that record, feels like Starc let them get a couple of extra runs to ensure the wound never heals lol

                    KiwiPieK 1 Reply Last reply
                    1
                    • NTAN Offline
                      NTAN Offline
                      NTA
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #1693

                      Caught
                      LBW
                      Bowled

                      The hat trick ball was exactly what you want - top of off

                      MN5M 1 Reply Last reply
                      2
                      • NTAN NTA

                        Caught
                        LBW
                        Bowled

                        The hat trick ball was exactly what you want - top of off

                        MN5M Offline
                        MN5M Offline
                        MN5
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #1694

                        @NTA said in Other Cricket:

                        Caught
                        LBW
                        Bowled

                        The hat trick ball was exactly what you want - top of off

                        It was only against the West Indies though

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • B bayimports

                          @Daffy-Jaffy said in Other Cricket:

                          Windies all out for 27. Starc 6 for 9, Boland 3 for 2.

                          How can anyone be happy about this? So close and yet we still own that record, feels like Starc let them get a couple of extra runs to ensure the wound never heals lol

                          KiwiPieK Offline
                          KiwiPieK Offline
                          KiwiPie
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #1695

                          @bayimports said in Other Cricket:

                          @Daffy-Jaffy said in Other Cricket:

                          Windies all out for 27. Starc 6 for 9, Boland 3 for 2.

                          How can anyone be happy about this? So close and yet we still own that record, feels like Starc let them get a couple of extra runs to ensure the wound never heals lol

                          It was all bloody Konstas - 2 dropped catches and let one through his legs for the single to get to 27.

                          V Chris B.C B 3 Replies Last reply
                          5
                          • KiwiPieK KiwiPie

                            @bayimports said in Other Cricket:

                            @Daffy-Jaffy said in Other Cricket:

                            Windies all out for 27. Starc 6 for 9, Boland 3 for 2.

                            How can anyone be happy about this? So close and yet we still own that record, feels like Starc let them get a couple of extra runs to ensure the wound never heals lol

                            It was all bloody Konstas - 2 dropped catches and let one through his legs for the single to get to 27.

                            V Offline
                            V Offline
                            Virgil
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #1696

                            @KiwiPie said in Other Cricket:

                            @bayimports said in Other Cricket:

                            @Daffy-Jaffy said in Other Cricket:

                            Windies all out for 27. Starc 6 for 9, Boland 3 for 2.

                            How can anyone be happy about this? So close and yet we still own that record, feels like Starc let them get a couple of extra runs to ensure the wound never heals lol

                            It was all bloody Konstas - 2 dropped catches and let one through his legs for the single to get to 27.

                            We can claim a moral victory* of sorts, all the runs made in our 26 were off the bat.
                            The Windies had 6 extras in their 27 soooooo you could argue their batsmen made the lowest combined runs from the bat only.

                            *Ironically it was on the same date 6 years to the day we lost the CWC final to England, moral victories we seem to be good at.

                            SmudgeS boobooB 2 Replies Last reply
                            0
                            • V Virgil

                              @KiwiPie said in Other Cricket:

                              @bayimports said in Other Cricket:

                              @Daffy-Jaffy said in Other Cricket:

                              Windies all out for 27. Starc 6 for 9, Boland 3 for 2.

                              How can anyone be happy about this? So close and yet we still own that record, feels like Starc let them get a couple of extra runs to ensure the wound never heals lol

                              It was all bloody Konstas - 2 dropped catches and let one through his legs for the single to get to 27.

                              We can claim a moral victory* of sorts, all the runs made in our 26 were off the bat.
                              The Windies had 6 extras in their 27 soooooo you could argue their batsmen made the lowest combined runs from the bat only.

                              *Ironically it was on the same date 6 years to the day we lost the CWC final to England, moral victories we seem to be good at.

                              SmudgeS Offline
                              SmudgeS Offline
                              Smudge
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #1697

                              @Virgil said in Other Cricket:

                              @KiwiPie said in Other Cricket:

                              @bayimports said in Other Cricket:

                              @Daffy-Jaffy said in Other Cricket:

                              Windies all out for 27. Starc 6 for 9, Boland 3 for 2.

                              How can anyone be happy about this? So close and yet we still own that record, feels like Starc let them get a couple of extra runs to ensure the wound never heals lol

                              It was all bloody Konstas - 2 dropped catches and let one through his legs for the single to get to 27.

                              We can claim a moral victory* of sorts, all the runs made in our 26 were off the bat.
                              The Windies had 6 extras in their 27 soooooo you could argue their batsmen made the lowest combined runs from the bat only.

                              *Ironically it was on the same date 6 years to the day we lost the CWC final to England, moral victories we seem to be good at.

                              Lowest amount of runs off the bat in an innings was in 1924.

                              Of South Africa's 30 runs, 19 of them came from the blade.

                              https://www.espncricinfo.com/series/south-africa-tour-of-england-1924-61820/england-vs-south-africa-1st-test-62539/full-scorecard

                              V 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • SmudgeS Smudge

                                @Virgil said in Other Cricket:

                                @KiwiPie said in Other Cricket:

                                @bayimports said in Other Cricket:

                                @Daffy-Jaffy said in Other Cricket:

                                Windies all out for 27. Starc 6 for 9, Boland 3 for 2.

                                How can anyone be happy about this? So close and yet we still own that record, feels like Starc let them get a couple of extra runs to ensure the wound never heals lol

                                It was all bloody Konstas - 2 dropped catches and let one through his legs for the single to get to 27.

                                We can claim a moral victory* of sorts, all the runs made in our 26 were off the bat.
                                The Windies had 6 extras in their 27 soooooo you could argue their batsmen made the lowest combined runs from the bat only.

                                *Ironically it was on the same date 6 years to the day we lost the CWC final to England, moral victories we seem to be good at.

                                Lowest amount of runs off the bat in an innings was in 1924.

                                Of South Africa's 30 runs, 19 of them came from the blade.

                                https://www.espncricinfo.com/series/south-africa-tour-of-england-1924-61820/england-vs-south-africa-1st-test-62539/full-scorecard

                                V Offline
                                V Offline
                                Virgil
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #1698

                                @Smudge said in Other Cricket:

                                @Virgil said in Other Cricket:

                                @KiwiPie said in Other Cricket:

                                @bayimports said in Other Cricket:

                                @Daffy-Jaffy said in Other Cricket:

                                Windies all out for 27. Starc 6 for 9, Boland 3 for 2.

                                How can anyone be happy about this? So close and yet we still own that record, feels like Starc let them get a couple of extra runs to ensure the wound never heals lol

                                It was all bloody Konstas - 2 dropped catches and let one through his legs for the single to get to 27.

                                We can claim a moral victory* of sorts, all the runs made in our 26 were off the bat.
                                The Windies had 6 extras in their 27 soooooo you could argue their batsmen made the lowest combined runs from the bat only.

                                *Ironically it was on the same date 6 years to the day we lost the CWC final to England, moral victories we seem to be good at.

                                Lowest amount of runs off the bat in an innings was in 1924.

                                Of South Africa's 30 runs, 19 of them came from the blade.

                                https://www.espncricinfo.com/series/south-africa-tour-of-england-1924-61820/england-vs-south-africa-1st-test-62539/full-scorecard

                                So in effect we have the 3rd lowest all time score...

                                SmudgeS 1 Reply Last reply
                                1
                                • KiwiPieK KiwiPie

                                  @bayimports said in Other Cricket:

                                  @Daffy-Jaffy said in Other Cricket:

                                  Windies all out for 27. Starc 6 for 9, Boland 3 for 2.

                                  How can anyone be happy about this? So close and yet we still own that record, feels like Starc let them get a couple of extra runs to ensure the wound never heals lol

                                  It was all bloody Konstas - 2 dropped catches and let one through his legs for the single to get to 27.

                                  Chris B.C Offline
                                  Chris B.C Offline
                                  Chris B.
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #1699

                                  @KiwiPie said in Other Cricket:

                                  @bayimports said in Other Cricket:

                                  @Daffy-Jaffy said in Other Cricket:

                                  Windies all out for 27. Starc 6 for 9, Boland 3 for 2.

                                  How can anyone be happy about this? So close and yet we still own that record, feels like Starc let them get a couple of extra runs to ensure the wound never heals lol

                                  It was all bloody Konstas - 2 dropped catches and let one through his legs for the single to get to 27.

                                  To paraphrase Warnie - "Can't bat, can't field!"

                                  I found him pretty annoying vs India and more annoying now!

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  3
                                  • V Virgil

                                    @Smudge said in Other Cricket:

                                    @Virgil said in Other Cricket:

                                    @KiwiPie said in Other Cricket:

                                    @bayimports said in Other Cricket:

                                    @Daffy-Jaffy said in Other Cricket:

                                    Windies all out for 27. Starc 6 for 9, Boland 3 for 2.

                                    How can anyone be happy about this? So close and yet we still own that record, feels like Starc let them get a couple of extra runs to ensure the wound never heals lol

                                    It was all bloody Konstas - 2 dropped catches and let one through his legs for the single to get to 27.

                                    We can claim a moral victory* of sorts, all the runs made in our 26 were off the bat.
                                    The Windies had 6 extras in their 27 soooooo you could argue their batsmen made the lowest combined runs from the bat only.

                                    *Ironically it was on the same date 6 years to the day we lost the CWC final to England, moral victories we seem to be good at.

                                    Lowest amount of runs off the bat in an innings was in 1924.

                                    Of South Africa's 30 runs, 19 of them came from the blade.

                                    https://www.espncricinfo.com/series/south-africa-tour-of-england-1924-61820/england-vs-south-africa-1st-test-62539/full-scorecard

                                    So in effect we have the 3rd lowest all time score...

                                    SmudgeS Offline
                                    SmudgeS Offline
                                    Smudge
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #1700

                                    @Virgil said in Other Cricket:

                                    @Smudge said in Other Cricket:

                                    @Virgil said in Other Cricket:

                                    @KiwiPie said in Other Cricket:

                                    @bayimports said in Other Cricket:

                                    @Daffy-Jaffy said in Other Cricket:

                                    Windies all out for 27. Starc 6 for 9, Boland 3 for 2.

                                    How can anyone be happy about this? So close and yet we still own that record, feels like Starc let them get a couple of extra runs to ensure the wound never heals lol

                                    It was all bloody Konstas - 2 dropped catches and let one through his legs for the single to get to 27.

                                    We can claim a moral victory* of sorts, all the runs made in our 26 were off the bat.
                                    The Windies had 6 extras in their 27 soooooo you could argue their batsmen made the lowest combined runs from the bat only.

                                    *Ironically it was on the same date 6 years to the day we lost the CWC final to England, moral victories we seem to be good at.

                                    Lowest amount of runs off the bat in an innings was in 1924.

                                    Of South Africa's 30 runs, 19 of them came from the blade.

                                    https://www.espncricinfo.com/series/south-africa-tour-of-england-1924-61820/england-vs-south-africa-1st-test-62539/full-scorecard

                                    So in effect we have the 3rd lowest all time score...

                                    You have my support on that.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    1
                                    • KiwiPieK KiwiPie

                                      @bayimports said in Other Cricket:

                                      @Daffy-Jaffy said in Other Cricket:

                                      Windies all out for 27. Starc 6 for 9, Boland 3 for 2.

                                      How can anyone be happy about this? So close and yet we still own that record, feels like Starc let them get a couple of extra runs to ensure the wound never heals lol

                                      It was all bloody Konstas - 2 dropped catches and let one through his legs for the single to get to 27.

                                      B Offline
                                      B Offline
                                      bayimports
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #1701

                                      @KiwiPie said in Other Cricket:

                                      @bayimports said in Other Cricket:

                                      @Daffy-Jaffy said in Other Cricket:

                                      Windies all out for 27. Starc 6 for 9, Boland 3 for 2.

                                      How can anyone be happy about this? So close and yet we still own that record, feels like Starc let them get a couple of extra runs to ensure the wound never heals lol

                                      It was all bloody Konstas - 2 dropped catches and let one through his legs for the single to get to 27.

                                      it seems some media feel our pain

                                      https://www.thepost.co.nz/sport/360757966/misfield-australian-rookie-means-nz-keep-lowest-test-score-record

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • CyclopsC Offline
                                        CyclopsC Offline
                                        Cyclops
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #1702

                                        I'm still more annoyed about the South Africans letting the Aussies off the hook, from 21/9 to 50 odd all out.

                                        The crazy thing about our 26 is that we dragged it out for 27 overs. Almost a whole session!

                                        V 1 Reply Last reply
                                        2
                                        • SmudgeS Offline
                                          SmudgeS Offline
                                          Smudge
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #1703

                                          90 secs or so on that 1955 test can be found here from 14m 52s in:

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          2
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Search
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Search