Skip to content
  • Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

  • Tipping
  • Team Sheets
  • Highlights
  • Results
    • All Blacks

      Search every All Blacks Test. Filter results by year, opposition, location, venue, city and RWC stage

    • Super Rugby

      Search every Super Rugby since match 1996

    • NPC

      Search NPC results. Only first division matches from 1976-2005. All results from the 14 team competition (2006-present) are included

Other Cricket

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Sports Talk
cricket
1.9k Posts 81 Posters 113.5k Views 6 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • nzzpN nzzp

    @mariner4life said in Other Cricket:

    Great win for England this morning in what is a quality series.

    I really wish I didn't have to sleep. This has been a cracking series

    mariner4lifeM Online
    mariner4lifeM Online
    mariner4life
    wrote on last edited by
    #1690

    @nzzp said in Other Cricket:

    @mariner4life said in Other Cricket:

    Great win for England this morning in what is a quality series.

    I really wish I didn't have to sleep. This has been a cracking series

    agreed, i can't even make it through Tour stages let alone all night test cricket

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • MN5M MN5

      @Virgil said in Other Cricket:

      @NTA said in Other Cricket:

      Screenshot_20250715-082300.png

      Hazlewood had a 'mare'!

      Cummins couldn't even be bothered rolling the arm over

      NTAN Offline
      NTAN Offline
      NTA
      wrote on last edited by
      #1691

      @MN5 said in Other Cricket:

      @Virgil said in Other Cricket:

      @NTA said in Other Cricket:

      Screenshot_20250715-082300.png

      Hazlewood had a 'mare'!

      Cummins couldn't even be bothered rolling the arm over

      Boland with the hat trick

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • Daffy JaffyD Daffy Jaffy

        Windies all out for 27. Starc 6 for 9, Boland 3 for 2.

        bayimportsB Offline
        bayimportsB Offline
        bayimports
        wrote on last edited by
        #1692

        @Daffy-Jaffy said in Other Cricket:

        Windies all out for 27. Starc 6 for 9, Boland 3 for 2.

        How can anyone be happy about this? So close and yet we still own that record, feels like Starc let them get a couple of extra runs to ensure the wound never heals lol

        KiwiPieK 1 Reply Last reply
        1
        • NTAN Offline
          NTAN Offline
          NTA
          wrote on last edited by
          #1693

          Caught
          LBW
          Bowled

          The hat trick ball was exactly what you want - top of off

          MN5M 1 Reply Last reply
          2
          • NTAN NTA

            Caught
            LBW
            Bowled

            The hat trick ball was exactly what you want - top of off

            MN5M Offline
            MN5M Offline
            MN5
            wrote on last edited by
            #1694

            @NTA said in Other Cricket:

            Caught
            LBW
            Bowled

            The hat trick ball was exactly what you want - top of off

            It was only against the West Indies though

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • bayimportsB bayimports

              @Daffy-Jaffy said in Other Cricket:

              Windies all out for 27. Starc 6 for 9, Boland 3 for 2.

              How can anyone be happy about this? So close and yet we still own that record, feels like Starc let them get a couple of extra runs to ensure the wound never heals lol

              KiwiPieK Offline
              KiwiPieK Offline
              KiwiPie
              wrote on last edited by
              #1695

              @bayimports said in Other Cricket:

              @Daffy-Jaffy said in Other Cricket:

              Windies all out for 27. Starc 6 for 9, Boland 3 for 2.

              How can anyone be happy about this? So close and yet we still own that record, feels like Starc let them get a couple of extra runs to ensure the wound never heals lol

              It was all bloody Konstas - 2 dropped catches and let one through his legs for the single to get to 27.

              VirgilV Chris B.C bayimportsB 3 Replies Last reply
              5
              • KiwiPieK KiwiPie

                @bayimports said in Other Cricket:

                @Daffy-Jaffy said in Other Cricket:

                Windies all out for 27. Starc 6 for 9, Boland 3 for 2.

                How can anyone be happy about this? So close and yet we still own that record, feels like Starc let them get a couple of extra runs to ensure the wound never heals lol

                It was all bloody Konstas - 2 dropped catches and let one through his legs for the single to get to 27.

                VirgilV Do not disturb
                VirgilV Do not disturb
                Virgil
                wrote on last edited by
                #1696

                @KiwiPie said in Other Cricket:

                @bayimports said in Other Cricket:

                @Daffy-Jaffy said in Other Cricket:

                Windies all out for 27. Starc 6 for 9, Boland 3 for 2.

                How can anyone be happy about this? So close and yet we still own that record, feels like Starc let them get a couple of extra runs to ensure the wound never heals lol

                It was all bloody Konstas - 2 dropped catches and let one through his legs for the single to get to 27.

                We can claim a moral victory* of sorts, all the runs made in our 26 were off the bat.
                The Windies had 6 extras in their 27 soooooo you could argue their batsmen made the lowest combined runs from the bat only.

                *Ironically it was on the same date 6 years to the day we lost the CWC final to England, moral victories we seem to be good at.

                SmudgeS boobooB 2 Replies Last reply
                0
                • VirgilV Virgil

                  @KiwiPie said in Other Cricket:

                  @bayimports said in Other Cricket:

                  @Daffy-Jaffy said in Other Cricket:

                  Windies all out for 27. Starc 6 for 9, Boland 3 for 2.

                  How can anyone be happy about this? So close and yet we still own that record, feels like Starc let them get a couple of extra runs to ensure the wound never heals lol

                  It was all bloody Konstas - 2 dropped catches and let one through his legs for the single to get to 27.

                  We can claim a moral victory* of sorts, all the runs made in our 26 were off the bat.
                  The Windies had 6 extras in their 27 soooooo you could argue their batsmen made the lowest combined runs from the bat only.

                  *Ironically it was on the same date 6 years to the day we lost the CWC final to England, moral victories we seem to be good at.

                  SmudgeS Offline
                  SmudgeS Offline
                  Smudge
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #1697

                  @Virgil said in Other Cricket:

                  @KiwiPie said in Other Cricket:

                  @bayimports said in Other Cricket:

                  @Daffy-Jaffy said in Other Cricket:

                  Windies all out for 27. Starc 6 for 9, Boland 3 for 2.

                  How can anyone be happy about this? So close and yet we still own that record, feels like Starc let them get a couple of extra runs to ensure the wound never heals lol

                  It was all bloody Konstas - 2 dropped catches and let one through his legs for the single to get to 27.

                  We can claim a moral victory* of sorts, all the runs made in our 26 were off the bat.
                  The Windies had 6 extras in their 27 soooooo you could argue their batsmen made the lowest combined runs from the bat only.

                  *Ironically it was on the same date 6 years to the day we lost the CWC final to England, moral victories we seem to be good at.

                  Lowest amount of runs off the bat in an innings was in 1924.

                  Of South Africa's 30 runs, 19 of them came from the blade.

                  https://www.espncricinfo.com/series/south-africa-tour-of-england-1924-61820/england-vs-south-africa-1st-test-62539/full-scorecard

                  VirgilV 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • SmudgeS Smudge

                    @Virgil said in Other Cricket:

                    @KiwiPie said in Other Cricket:

                    @bayimports said in Other Cricket:

                    @Daffy-Jaffy said in Other Cricket:

                    Windies all out for 27. Starc 6 for 9, Boland 3 for 2.

                    How can anyone be happy about this? So close and yet we still own that record, feels like Starc let them get a couple of extra runs to ensure the wound never heals lol

                    It was all bloody Konstas - 2 dropped catches and let one through his legs for the single to get to 27.

                    We can claim a moral victory* of sorts, all the runs made in our 26 were off the bat.
                    The Windies had 6 extras in their 27 soooooo you could argue their batsmen made the lowest combined runs from the bat only.

                    *Ironically it was on the same date 6 years to the day we lost the CWC final to England, moral victories we seem to be good at.

                    Lowest amount of runs off the bat in an innings was in 1924.

                    Of South Africa's 30 runs, 19 of them came from the blade.

                    https://www.espncricinfo.com/series/south-africa-tour-of-england-1924-61820/england-vs-south-africa-1st-test-62539/full-scorecard

                    VirgilV Do not disturb
                    VirgilV Do not disturb
                    Virgil
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #1698

                    @Smudge said in Other Cricket:

                    @Virgil said in Other Cricket:

                    @KiwiPie said in Other Cricket:

                    @bayimports said in Other Cricket:

                    @Daffy-Jaffy said in Other Cricket:

                    Windies all out for 27. Starc 6 for 9, Boland 3 for 2.

                    How can anyone be happy about this? So close and yet we still own that record, feels like Starc let them get a couple of extra runs to ensure the wound never heals lol

                    It was all bloody Konstas - 2 dropped catches and let one through his legs for the single to get to 27.

                    We can claim a moral victory* of sorts, all the runs made in our 26 were off the bat.
                    The Windies had 6 extras in their 27 soooooo you could argue their batsmen made the lowest combined runs from the bat only.

                    *Ironically it was on the same date 6 years to the day we lost the CWC final to England, moral victories we seem to be good at.

                    Lowest amount of runs off the bat in an innings was in 1924.

                    Of South Africa's 30 runs, 19 of them came from the blade.

                    https://www.espncricinfo.com/series/south-africa-tour-of-england-1924-61820/england-vs-south-africa-1st-test-62539/full-scorecard

                    So in effect we have the 3rd lowest all time score...

                    SmudgeS 1 Reply Last reply
                    1
                    • KiwiPieK KiwiPie

                      @bayimports said in Other Cricket:

                      @Daffy-Jaffy said in Other Cricket:

                      Windies all out for 27. Starc 6 for 9, Boland 3 for 2.

                      How can anyone be happy about this? So close and yet we still own that record, feels like Starc let them get a couple of extra runs to ensure the wound never heals lol

                      It was all bloody Konstas - 2 dropped catches and let one through his legs for the single to get to 27.

                      Chris B.C Online
                      Chris B.C Online
                      Chris B.
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #1699

                      @KiwiPie said in Other Cricket:

                      @bayimports said in Other Cricket:

                      @Daffy-Jaffy said in Other Cricket:

                      Windies all out for 27. Starc 6 for 9, Boland 3 for 2.

                      How can anyone be happy about this? So close and yet we still own that record, feels like Starc let them get a couple of extra runs to ensure the wound never heals lol

                      It was all bloody Konstas - 2 dropped catches and let one through his legs for the single to get to 27.

                      To paraphrase Warnie - "Can't bat, can't field!"

                      I found him pretty annoying vs India and more annoying now!

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      3
                      • VirgilV Virgil

                        @Smudge said in Other Cricket:

                        @Virgil said in Other Cricket:

                        @KiwiPie said in Other Cricket:

                        @bayimports said in Other Cricket:

                        @Daffy-Jaffy said in Other Cricket:

                        Windies all out for 27. Starc 6 for 9, Boland 3 for 2.

                        How can anyone be happy about this? So close and yet we still own that record, feels like Starc let them get a couple of extra runs to ensure the wound never heals lol

                        It was all bloody Konstas - 2 dropped catches and let one through his legs for the single to get to 27.

                        We can claim a moral victory* of sorts, all the runs made in our 26 were off the bat.
                        The Windies had 6 extras in their 27 soooooo you could argue their batsmen made the lowest combined runs from the bat only.

                        *Ironically it was on the same date 6 years to the day we lost the CWC final to England, moral victories we seem to be good at.

                        Lowest amount of runs off the bat in an innings was in 1924.

                        Of South Africa's 30 runs, 19 of them came from the blade.

                        https://www.espncricinfo.com/series/south-africa-tour-of-england-1924-61820/england-vs-south-africa-1st-test-62539/full-scorecard

                        So in effect we have the 3rd lowest all time score...

                        SmudgeS Offline
                        SmudgeS Offline
                        Smudge
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #1700

                        @Virgil said in Other Cricket:

                        @Smudge said in Other Cricket:

                        @Virgil said in Other Cricket:

                        @KiwiPie said in Other Cricket:

                        @bayimports said in Other Cricket:

                        @Daffy-Jaffy said in Other Cricket:

                        Windies all out for 27. Starc 6 for 9, Boland 3 for 2.

                        How can anyone be happy about this? So close and yet we still own that record, feels like Starc let them get a couple of extra runs to ensure the wound never heals lol

                        It was all bloody Konstas - 2 dropped catches and let one through his legs for the single to get to 27.

                        We can claim a moral victory* of sorts, all the runs made in our 26 were off the bat.
                        The Windies had 6 extras in their 27 soooooo you could argue their batsmen made the lowest combined runs from the bat only.

                        *Ironically it was on the same date 6 years to the day we lost the CWC final to England, moral victories we seem to be good at.

                        Lowest amount of runs off the bat in an innings was in 1924.

                        Of South Africa's 30 runs, 19 of them came from the blade.

                        https://www.espncricinfo.com/series/south-africa-tour-of-england-1924-61820/england-vs-south-africa-1st-test-62539/full-scorecard

                        So in effect we have the 3rd lowest all time score...

                        You have my support on that.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        1
                        • KiwiPieK KiwiPie

                          @bayimports said in Other Cricket:

                          @Daffy-Jaffy said in Other Cricket:

                          Windies all out for 27. Starc 6 for 9, Boland 3 for 2.

                          How can anyone be happy about this? So close and yet we still own that record, feels like Starc let them get a couple of extra runs to ensure the wound never heals lol

                          It was all bloody Konstas - 2 dropped catches and let one through his legs for the single to get to 27.

                          bayimportsB Offline
                          bayimportsB Offline
                          bayimports
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #1701

                          @KiwiPie said in Other Cricket:

                          @bayimports said in Other Cricket:

                          @Daffy-Jaffy said in Other Cricket:

                          Windies all out for 27. Starc 6 for 9, Boland 3 for 2.

                          How can anyone be happy about this? So close and yet we still own that record, feels like Starc let them get a couple of extra runs to ensure the wound never heals lol

                          It was all bloody Konstas - 2 dropped catches and let one through his legs for the single to get to 27.

                          it seems some media feel our pain

                          https://www.thepost.co.nz/sport/360757966/misfield-australian-rookie-means-nz-keep-lowest-test-score-record

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • CyclopsC Offline
                            CyclopsC Offline
                            Cyclops
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #1702

                            I'm still more annoyed about the South Africans letting the Aussies off the hook, from 21/9 to 50 odd all out.

                            The crazy thing about our 26 is that we dragged it out for 27 overs. Almost a whole session!

                            VirgilV 1 Reply Last reply
                            2
                            • SmudgeS Offline
                              SmudgeS Offline
                              Smudge
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #1703

                              90 secs or so on that 1955 test can be found here from 14m 52s in:

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              2
                              • CyclopsC Cyclops

                                I'm still more annoyed about the South Africans letting the Aussies off the hook, from 21/9 to 50 odd all out.

                                The crazy thing about our 26 is that we dragged it out for 27 overs. Almost a whole session!

                                VirgilV Do not disturb
                                VirgilV Do not disturb
                                Virgil
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #1704

                                @Cyclops said in Other Cricket:

                                I'm still more annoyed about the South Africans letting the Aussies off the hook, from 21/9 to 50 odd all out.

                                The crazy thing about our 26 is that we dragged it out for 27 overs. Almost a whole session!

                                Not to mention we had the Poms 8/23 in that Auckland test a few years ago. They managed to get to 58 thanks to a lower order bowler

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • VirgilV Virgil

                                  @KiwiPie said in Other Cricket:

                                  @bayimports said in Other Cricket:

                                  @Daffy-Jaffy said in Other Cricket:

                                  Windies all out for 27. Starc 6 for 9, Boland 3 for 2.

                                  How can anyone be happy about this? So close and yet we still own that record, feels like Starc let them get a couple of extra runs to ensure the wound never heals lol

                                  It was all bloody Konstas - 2 dropped catches and let one through his legs for the single to get to 27.

                                  We can claim a moral victory* of sorts, all the runs made in our 26 were off the bat.
                                  The Windies had 6 extras in their 27 soooooo you could argue their batsmen made the lowest combined runs from the bat only.

                                  *Ironically it was on the same date 6 years to the day we lost the CWC final to England, moral victories we seem to be good at.

                                  boobooB Offline
                                  boobooB Offline
                                  booboo
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #1705

                                  @Virgil said in Other Cricket:

                                  lost

                                  Lost?

                                  VirgilV 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • MN5M Offline
                                    MN5M Offline
                                    MN5
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #1706

                                    The way Zimbabwe play I wouldn’t bet against them having a crack at that 26

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • boobooB booboo

                                      @Virgil said in Other Cricket:

                                      lost

                                      Lost?

                                      VirgilV Do not disturb
                                      VirgilV Do not disturb
                                      Virgil
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #1707

                                      @booboo said in Other Cricket:

                                      @Virgil said in Other Cricket:

                                      lost

                                      Lost?

                                      Robbed
                                      Cheated
                                      Didnt win but didnt lose

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • sparkyS Offline
                                        sparkyS Offline
                                        sparky
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #1708

                                        Gilbert Enoka has been hired by the England Cricket team until next year's Ashes tour of Australia.

                                        https://www.skysports.com/amp/cricket/news/12173/13400086/england-vs-india-ben-stokes-ready-for-fourth-test-battle-as-he-hails-impact-of-new-ex-new-zealand-rugby-coach

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • 1kiwi1 Offline
                                          1kiwi1 Offline
                                          1kiwi
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #1709

                                          Joe Root has overtaken Jacques Kallis (13289) so is now the third highest run scorer in test cricket history.

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          2
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Search
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Search