Skip to content
  • Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

  • Tipping
  • Team Sheets
  • Highlights
  • Results
    • All Blacks

      Search every All Blacks Test. Filter results by year, opposition, location, venue, city and RWC stage

    • Super Rugby

      Search every Super Rugby since match 1996

    • NPC

      Search NPC results. Only first division matches from 1976-2005. All results from the 14 team competition (2006-present) are included

All Blacks vs Springboks II

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Rugby Matches
allblacksspringboks
1.6k Posts 110 Posters 26.6k Views 3 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • nostrildamusN nostrildamus

    @Snowy said in All Blacks vs Springboks II:

    @family-man said in All Blacks vs Springboks II:

    A Georgian ref next game I see 🤷‍♂️

    Well having just read all of the first test thread and the Black ferns one, we can rest assured that if any calls go our way @MiketheSnow will be sure to point them out.

    maybe he thinks we got the rub, maybe he thinks AB fans are getting cocky and he wants to correct? But for the second, I am not sure, the related threads have been fairly pessimistic!

    SnowyS Offline
    SnowyS Offline
    Snowy
    wrote on last edited by
    #110

    @nostrildamus said in All Blacks vs Springboks II:

    maybe he thinks we got the rub,

    Like home sides do generally. When read in sequence it was remarkable exercise in cherry picking decisions (which is why I remarked).

    Dickson didn't seem to be as pedantic as usual, and it ended up at 10 penalties each (I think) so read into that what you will.

    boobooB 1 Reply Last reply
    3
    • SnowyS Snowy

      @nostrildamus said in All Blacks vs Springboks II:

      maybe he thinks we got the rub,

      Like home sides do generally. When read in sequence it was remarkable exercise in cherry picking decisions (which is why I remarked).

      Dickson didn't seem to be as pedantic as usual, and it ended up at 10 penalties each (I think) so read into that what you will.

      boobooB Offline
      boobooB Offline
      booboo
      wrote on last edited by
      #111

      @Snowy said in All Blacks vs Springboks II:

      @nostrildamus said in All Blacks vs Springboks II:

      maybe he thinks we got the rub,

      Like home sides do generally. When read in sequence it was remarkable exercise in cherry picking decisions (which is why I remarked).

      Dickson didn't seem to be as pedantic as usual, and it ended up at 10 penalties each (I think) so read into that what you will.

      The Springboks are obviously cheats consistently flouting the law and deservedly penalised, whilst he was unreasonably harsh on us.

      SnowyS taniwharugbyT 2 Replies Last reply
      8
      • boobooB booboo

        @Snowy said in All Blacks vs Springboks II:

        @nostrildamus said in All Blacks vs Springboks II:

        maybe he thinks we got the rub,

        Like home sides do generally. When read in sequence it was remarkable exercise in cherry picking decisions (which is why I remarked).

        Dickson didn't seem to be as pedantic as usual, and it ended up at 10 penalties each (I think) so read into that what you will.

        The Springboks are obviously cheats consistently flouting the law and deservedly penalised, whilst he was unreasonably harsh on us.

        SnowyS Offline
        SnowyS Offline
        Snowy
        wrote on last edited by
        #112

        @booboo said in All Blacks vs Springboks II:

        @Snowy said in All Blacks vs Springboks II:

        @nostrildamus said in All Blacks vs Springboks II:

        maybe he thinks we got the rub,

        Like home sides do generally. When read in sequence it was remarkable exercise in cherry picking decisions (which is why I remarked).

        Dickson didn't seem to be as pedantic as usual, and it ended up at 10 penalties each (I think) so read into that what you will.

        The Springboks are obviously cheats consistently flouting the law and deservedly penalised, whilst he was unreasonably harsh on us.

        That's exactly how I read it too!

        1 Reply Last reply
        3
        • boobooB booboo

          @Snowy said in All Blacks vs Springboks II:

          @nostrildamus said in All Blacks vs Springboks II:

          maybe he thinks we got the rub,

          Like home sides do generally. When read in sequence it was remarkable exercise in cherry picking decisions (which is why I remarked).

          Dickson didn't seem to be as pedantic as usual, and it ended up at 10 penalties each (I think) so read into that what you will.

          The Springboks are obviously cheats consistently flouting the law and deservedly penalised, whilst he was unreasonably harsh on us.

          taniwharugbyT Offline
          taniwharugbyT Offline
          taniwharugby
          wrote on last edited by
          #113

          @booboo said in All Blacks vs Springboks II:

          @Snowy said in All Blacks vs Springboks II:

          @nostrildamus said in All Blacks vs Springboks II:

          maybe he thinks we got the rub,

          Like home sides do generally. When read in sequence it was remarkable exercise in cherry picking decisions (which is why I remarked).

          Dickson didn't seem to be as pedantic as usual, and it ended up at 10 penalties each (I think) so read into that what you will.

          The Springboks are obviously cheats consistently flouting the law and deservedly penalised were not penalised anywhere near enough, whilst he was unreasonably harsh on us.

          Fixed

          1 Reply Last reply
          6
          • ACT CrusaderA Offline
            ACT CrusaderA Offline
            ACT Crusader
            wrote on last edited by ACT Crusader
            #114

            I’m not so harsh on Dickson’s performance. I agreed with every penalty he called on South Africa.

            Fortunately this upcoming test, the ref will have no bearing on the outcome of the match given we will win by 20.

            1 Reply Last reply
            4
            • canefanC Offline
              canefanC Offline
              canefan
              wrote on last edited by
              #115

              https://www.1news.co.nz/2025/09/09/secret-weapon-all-blacks-great-in-camp-ahead-of-boks-rematch/?fbclid=IwY2xjawMslWFleHRuA2FlbQIxMQBicmlkETFDcmg3TUZrSWx0TWV5VVdFAR6UVn5GZ9amXzsFRFUIz9vWZs9Z-XzrU__6sz2vDKRrm81psSGt297vT3cKIg_aem_73WMYwWc-eczaxhX2o-Tkg

              It's DEFCON1 so they bring out the GOAT

              1 Reply Last reply
              5
              • BonesB Online
                BonesB Online
                Bones
                wrote on last edited by
                #116

                Yeah have to say Dickson has improved markedly from the world cup, as has his training regime it appears. Still wouldn't want to see him reffing another PI nation against an "upper tier" team.

                1 Reply Last reply
                2
                • BovidaeB Offline
                  BovidaeB Offline
                  Bovidae
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #117

                  Xavier Roe is still training with the squad, so plenty of halfbacks in Wellington.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  2
                  • K Offline
                    K Offline
                    kev
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #118

                    Apart for the first 20 minutes, our kicking game was average. To me we took the foot off the throat with the Boks gradually working their way back into the game.

                    Justin Marshall ( don’t usually quote him ) said we lacked variation i.e. we could have kicked from 1st and 2nd as well.

                    I like the way Ireland do it - moving the point of attack around first and then from center field they kick long into corners. That’s how I remember.

                    Hate the box kick but recognise the issue with static ball and players getting smashed in the carry. Has to be something better?

                    ACT CrusaderA 1 Reply Last reply
                    5
                    • K kev

                      Apart for the first 20 minutes, our kicking game was average. To me we took the foot off the throat with the Boks gradually working their way back into the game.

                      Justin Marshall ( don’t usually quote him ) said we lacked variation i.e. we could have kicked from 1st and 2nd as well.

                      I like the way Ireland do it - moving the point of attack around first and then from center field they kick long into corners. That’s how I remember.

                      Hate the box kick but recognise the issue with static ball and players getting smashed in the carry. Has to be something better?

                      ACT CrusaderA Offline
                      ACT CrusaderA Offline
                      ACT Crusader
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #119

                      @kev said in All Blacks vs Springboks II:

                      Apart for the first 20 minutes, our kicking game was average. To me we took the foot off the throat with the Boks gradually working their way back into the game.

                      Justin Marshall ( don’t usually quote him ) said we lacked variation i.e. we could have kicked from 1st and 2nd as well.

                      I like the way Ireland do it - moving the point of attack around first and then from center field they kick long into corners. That’s how I remember.

                      Hate the box kick but recognise the issue with static ball and players getting smashed in the carry. Has to be something better?

                      A well executed box kick has quite a few advantages especially when the ball is slow and the conditions aren’t great.

                      What I would like to see more from the ABs is attacking their secondary defensive line because we showed in glimpses that we could open it up. The Aussies did as well in both of their tests. There are opportunities to make decent metres if we show a bit of imagination from 1st 5.

                      canefanC 1 Reply Last reply
                      3
                      • ACT CrusaderA ACT Crusader

                        @kev said in All Blacks vs Springboks II:

                        Apart for the first 20 minutes, our kicking game was average. To me we took the foot off the throat with the Boks gradually working their way back into the game.

                        Justin Marshall ( don’t usually quote him ) said we lacked variation i.e. we could have kicked from 1st and 2nd as well.

                        I like the way Ireland do it - moving the point of attack around first and then from center field they kick long into corners. That’s how I remember.

                        Hate the box kick but recognise the issue with static ball and players getting smashed in the carry. Has to be something better?

                        A well executed box kick has quite a few advantages especially when the ball is slow and the conditions aren’t great.

                        What I would like to see more from the ABs is attacking their secondary defensive line because we showed in glimpses that we could open it up. The Aussies did as well in both of their tests. There are opportunities to make decent metres if we show a bit of imagination from 1st 5.

                        canefanC Offline
                        canefanC Offline
                        canefan
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #120

                        @ACT-Crusader it helps if your 10 isn't gun shy about taking the ball to the line, and he has something in his bag other than dinky chip kicks and grubbers...

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        2
                        • M Online
                          M Online
                          Mr Fish
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #121

                          If someone more educated on kicking tactics could enlighten me...

                          What are the advantages of a box kick compared to passing to the 10 and the 10 kicking and up-and-under? Only ones I can think of are that the forwards can immediately follow up (instead of having to wait to be put on side), and that you can (potentially) get slightly more distance from a box kick.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • P Offline
                            P Offline
                            pakman
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #122

                            If the 9 from a lineout/maul does a box kick with long hang time it can potentially come down a couple of metres from touch, making recipient very vulnerable to being bundled into touch.
                            Seem to recall Conor Murray being great on that in test one of last Boks Lions series.

                            F 1 Reply Last reply
                            3
                            • F Offline
                              F Offline
                              Frank
                              wrote on last edited by Frank
                              #123

                              What is the main reason the Bok dominated territory?

                              BonesB ACT CrusaderA 2 Replies Last reply
                              0
                              • F Frank

                                What is the main reason the Bok dominated territory?

                                BonesB Online
                                BonesB Online
                                Bones
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #124

                                @Frank said in All Blacks vs Springboks II:

                                What is the main reason the Bok dominated territory?

                                They were in the AB half more than their own.

                                F 1 Reply Last reply
                                13
                                • BonesB Bones

                                  @Frank said in All Blacks vs Springboks II:

                                  What is the main reason the Bok dominated territory?

                                  They were in the AB half more than their own.

                                  F Offline
                                  F Offline
                                  Frank
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #125

                                  @Bones said in All Blacks vs Springboks II:

                                  @Frank said in All Blacks vs Springboks II:

                                  What is the main reason the Bok dominated territory?

                                  They were in the AB half more than their own.

                                  BRILLIANT!!!!

                                  BonesB 1 Reply Last reply
                                  3
                                  • F Frank

                                    @Bones said in All Blacks vs Springboks II:

                                    @Frank said in All Blacks vs Springboks II:

                                    What is the main reason the Bok dominated territory?

                                    They were in the AB half more than their own.

                                    BRILLIANT!!!!

                                    BonesB Online
                                    BonesB Online
                                    Bones
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #126

                                    @Frank said in All Blacks vs Springboks II:

                                    @Bones said in All Blacks vs Springboks II:

                                    @Frank said in All Blacks vs Springboks II:

                                    What is the main reason the Bok dominated territory?

                                    They were in the AB half more than their own.

                                    BRILLIANT!!!!

                                    I caught this week's Breakdown.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    12
                                    • F Frank

                                      What is the main reason the Bok dominated territory?

                                      ACT CrusaderA Offline
                                      ACT CrusaderA Offline
                                      ACT Crusader
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #127

                                      @Frank said in All Blacks vs Springboks II:

                                      What is the main reason the Bok dominated territory?

                                      It was really only the latter part of the second half that they dominated territory. From memory they recycled the ball more with less errors. I don’t think their kicking game was the main reason.
                                      They had a better halfback on which also helped.

                                      canefanC 1 Reply Last reply
                                      1
                                      • ACT CrusaderA ACT Crusader

                                        @Frank said in All Blacks vs Springboks II:

                                        What is the main reason the Bok dominated territory?

                                        It was really only the latter part of the second half that they dominated territory. From memory they recycled the ball more with less errors. I don’t think their kicking game was the main reason.
                                        They had a better halfback on which also helped.

                                        canefanC Offline
                                        canefanC Offline
                                        canefan
                                        wrote on last edited by canefan
                                        #128

                                        @ACT-Crusader said in All Blacks vs Springboks II:

                                        @Frank said in All Blacks vs Springboks II:

                                        What is the main reason the Bok dominated territory?

                                        It was really only the latter part of the second half that they dominated territory. From memory they recycled the ball more with less errors. I don’t think their kicking game was the main reason.
                                        They had a better halfback on which also helped.

                                        Our increased reliance on box kicks, and their decreasing distance gained over time, along with what seemed less success with winning the ball back from those "contestable" kicks, along with the drop in Bok errors you describe, seemed to pin us into our half for a long time

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        3
                                        • No QuarterN Offline
                                          No QuarterN Offline
                                          No Quarter
                                          wrote on last edited by No Quarter
                                          #129

                                          We will probably complain about box kicks less when Roigard is back, as he is generally excellent and gets a lot more distance than all of our other 9s.

                                          BonesB 1 Reply Last reply
                                          4
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Search
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Search