• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

All Blacks vs Springboks II

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Rugby Matches
allblacksspringboks
1.6k Posts 110 Posters 7.9k Views
All Blacks vs Springboks II
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • canefanC Offline
    canefanC Offline
    canefan
    replied to ACT Crusader last edited by
    #120

    @ACT-Crusader it helps if your 10 isn't gun shy about taking the ball to the line, and he has something in his bag other than dinky chip kicks and grubbers...

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • M Offline
    M Offline
    Mr Fish
    wrote last edited by
    #121

    If someone more educated on kicking tactics could enlighten me...

    What are the advantages of a box kick compared to passing to the 10 and the 10 kicking and up-and-under? Only ones I can think of are that the forwards can immediately follow up (instead of having to wait to be put on side), and that you can (potentially) get slightly more distance from a box kick.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • P Offline
    P Offline
    pakman
    wrote last edited by
    #122

    If the 9 from a lineout/maul does a box kick with long hang time it can potentially come down a couple of metres from touch, making recipient very vulnerable to being bundled into touch.
    Seem to recall Conor Murray being great on that in test one of last Boks Lions series.

    F 1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • F Offline
    F Offline
    Frank
    wrote last edited by Frank
    #123

    What is the main reason the Bok dominated territory?

    BonesB ACT CrusaderA 2 Replies Last reply
    0
  • BonesB Online
    BonesB Online
    Bones
    replied to Frank last edited by
    #124

    @Frank said in All Blacks vs Springboks II:

    What is the main reason the Bok dominated territory?

    They were in the AB half more than their own.

    F 1 Reply Last reply
    13
  • F Offline
    F Offline
    Frank
    replied to Bones last edited by
    #125

    @Bones said in All Blacks vs Springboks II:

    @Frank said in All Blacks vs Springboks II:

    What is the main reason the Bok dominated territory?

    They were in the AB half more than their own.

    BRILLIANT!!!!

    BonesB 1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • BonesB Online
    BonesB Online
    Bones
    replied to Frank last edited by
    #126

    @Frank said in All Blacks vs Springboks II:

    @Bones said in All Blacks vs Springboks II:

    @Frank said in All Blacks vs Springboks II:

    What is the main reason the Bok dominated territory?

    They were in the AB half more than their own.

    BRILLIANT!!!!

    I caught this week's Breakdown.

    1 Reply Last reply
    12
  • ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT Crusader
    replied to Frank last edited by
    #127

    @Frank said in All Blacks vs Springboks II:

    What is the main reason the Bok dominated territory?

    It was really only the latter part of the second half that they dominated territory. From memory they recycled the ball more with less errors. I don’t think their kicking game was the main reason.
    They had a better halfback on which also helped.

    canefanC 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • canefanC Offline
    canefanC Offline
    canefan
    replied to ACT Crusader last edited by canefan
    #128

    @ACT-Crusader said in All Blacks vs Springboks II:

    @Frank said in All Blacks vs Springboks II:

    What is the main reason the Bok dominated territory?

    It was really only the latter part of the second half that they dominated territory. From memory they recycled the ball more with less errors. I don’t think their kicking game was the main reason.
    They had a better halfback on which also helped.

    Our increased reliance on box kicks, and their decreasing distance gained over time, along with what seemed less success with winning the ball back from those "contestable" kicks, along with the drop in Bok errors you describe, seemed to pin us into our half for a long time

    1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • No QuarterN Offline
    No QuarterN Offline
    No Quarter
    wrote last edited by No Quarter
    #129

    We will probably complain about box kicks less when Roigard is back, as he is generally excellent and gets a lot more distance than all of our other 9s.

    BonesB 1 Reply Last reply
    4
  • BonesB Online
    BonesB Online
    Bones
    replied to No Quarter last edited by
    #130

    @No-Quarter said in All Blacks vs Springboks II:

    We will probably complain about box kicks less when Roigard is back, as he is generally excellent and gets a lot more distance than all of our other 9s.

    Fakatava is also very good at them, which makes it even stranger with his complete shutout after signing on again.

    G 1 Reply Last reply
    5
  • G Offline
    G Offline
    game_film
    replied to Bones last edited by
    #131

    @Bones I can’t figure this one out. Would love for someone to educate me on what he’s missing, or does he just play for the wrong team.

    BonesB MiketheSnowM 2 Replies Last reply
    2
  • BonesB Online
    BonesB Online
    Bones
    replied to game_film last edited by
    #132

    @game_film said in All Blacks vs Springboks II:

    @Bones I can’t figure this one out. Would love for someone to educate me on what he’s missing, or does he just play for the wrong team.

    Thought he played really well in SR. Built nicely throughout the season, signed with NZR, positive media....then poof, nowhere to be seen.

    NepiaN 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • MiketheSnowM Offline
    MiketheSnowM Offline
    MiketheSnow
    replied to game_film last edited by
    #133

    @game_film said in All Blacks vs Springboks II:

    @Bones I can’t figure this one out. Would love for someone to educate me on what he’s missing, or does he just play for the wrong team.

    Fakatavaiknow

    BonesB G 2 Replies Last reply
    8
  • BonesB Online
    BonesB Online
    Bones
    replied to MiketheSnow last edited by
    #134

    @MiketheSnow said in All Blacks vs Springboks II:

    @game_film said in All Blacks vs Springboks II:

    @Bones I can’t figure this one out. Would love for someone to educate me on what he’s missing, or does he just play for the wrong team.

    Fakatavaiknow

    Special

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • G Offline
    G Offline
    game_film
    replied to MiketheSnow last edited by
    #135

    @MiketheSnow I’ve never connected his name in that way. But now I can’t unhear it. Bravo.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • NepiaN Offline
    NepiaN Offline
    Nepia
    replied to Bones last edited by
    #136

    @Bones said in All Blacks vs Springboks II:

    @game_film said in All Blacks vs Springboks II:

    @Bones I can’t figure this one out. Would love for someone to educate me on what he’s missing, or does he just play for the wrong team.

    Thought he played really well in SR. Built nicely throughout the season, signed with NZR, positive media....then poof, nowhere to be seen.

    Maybe the coaches are just that spiteful, Sotutu can't get a run because of his phone etiquette, and Fakatava turned Razor down when he tried to woo him to the Crusaders. 🎣

    R 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • F Offline
    F Offline
    frugby
    replied to pakman last edited by
    #137

    @pakman said in All Blacks vs Springboks II:

    If the 9 from a lineout/maul does a box kick with long hang time it can potentially come down a couple of metres from touch, making recipient very vulnerable to being bundled into touch.
    Seem to recall Conor Murray being great on that in test one of last Boks Lions series.

    Yep, easier to pin a side on the sideline. Often the theory is not even to catch the box kick, but to nail the receiver and then drive over the ruck.

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • mariner4lifeM Offline
    mariner4lifeM Offline
    mariner4life
    wrote last edited by
    #138

    and that's our problem, not distance, but height. We kick it the required distance, but nowhere near high enough to get our chasers to arrive. So it's an uncontested catch and a simple 7-10m return.

    KiwiMurphK 1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • ShaquilleOatmealS Offline
    ShaquilleOatmealS Offline
    ShaquilleOatmeal
    wrote last edited by
    #139

    Or the ball goes into touch, seemingly on purpose, gifting the opposition a lineout 30 metres out from the goal line.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1

All Blacks vs Springboks II
Rugby Matches
allblacksspringboks
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.