• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

Womens RWC 2025

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Sports Talk
839 Posts 39 Posters 2.9k Views
Womens RWC 2025
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • RoninWCR Offline
    RoninWCR Offline
    RoninWC
    wrote last edited by
    #295

    Black Ferns team v South Africa (Test caps):

    1. Chryss Viliko (16)

    2. Georgia Ponsonby (34)

    3. Veisinia Mahutariki-Fakalelu (2)

    4. Maiakawanakaulani Roos (35)

    5. Alana Bremner (32)

    6. Liana Mikaele-Tu’u (32)

    7. Jorja Miller (5)

    8. Kaipo Olsen-Baker (13)

    9. Maia Joseph (13)

    10. Ruahei Demant (48) – co-captain

    11. Portia Woodman-Wickliffe (31)

    12. Theresa Setefano (22)

    13. Stacey Waaka (29)

    14. Braxton Sorensen-McGee (6)

    15. Renee Holmes (26)

    16. Atlanta Lolohea (8)

    17. Awhina Tangen-Wainohu (8)

    18. Kate Henwood (12)

    19. Laura Bayfield (4)

    20. Kennedy Tukuafu (32) – co-captain

    21. Iritana Hohaia (18)

    22. Amy du Plessis (22)

    23. Ayesha Leti-I’iga (28)

    Unavailable due to injury: Logo-I-Pulotu Lemapu-Atai’i Sylvia Brunt (head).

    1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • P Offline
    P Offline
    pourfasse
    wrote last edited by
    #296

    Amy Du Plessis ! Good news. J'aime la voir jouer, she had good lines.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • BonesB Online
    BonesB Online
    Bones
    wrote last edited by
    #297

    No Risi?

    SnowyS 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • SnowyS Offline
    SnowyS Offline
    Snowy
    replied to Bones last edited by
    #298

    @Bones said in Womens RWC 2025:

    No Risi?

    A bit odd and there doesn’t seem to be any comment on it anywhere.

    AI says: “ This decision is part of the Black Ferns' overall team rotation and tactical planning for the knockout stages of the tournament. ” but fuck knows where it made that up from.

    RoninWCR 1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • BovidaeB Offline
    BovidaeB Offline
    Bovidae
    wrote last edited by
    #299

    They look to be rotating the props, although Kalounivale did go off injured. She isn't listed as being unavailable though. I don't remember Henwood playing TH before.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • RoninWCR Offline
    RoninWCR Offline
    RoninWC
    replied to Snowy last edited by
    #300

    @Snowy said in Womens RWC 2025:

    @Bones said in Womens RWC 2025:

    No Risi?

    A bit odd and there doesn’t seem to be any comment on it anywhere.

    AI says: “ This decision is part of the Black Ferns' overall team rotation and tactical planning for the knockout stages of the tournament. ” but fuck knows where it made that up from.

    Definitely looks like rotation. Risi has clearly been our best halfback since coming into the 15's from the 7's.

    Last game against Ireland, she did look a bit gassed and her passing wasn't as good as it has been. A rest will probably do her good and this game should help choose who is her back up, Joseph or Hohaia.

    Disappointed that Leti-I'inga isn't getting another start as she really sparked things when she replaced Portia against Ireland.

    SnowyS 1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • SnowyS Offline
    SnowyS Offline
    Snowy
    replied to RoninWC last edited by
    #301

    @RoninWC said in Womens RWC 2025:

    @Snowy said in Womens RWC 2025:

    @Bones said in Womens RWC 2025:

    No Risi?

    A bit odd and there doesn’t seem to be any comment on it anywhere.

    AI says: “ This decision is part of the Black Ferns' overall team rotation and tactical planning for the knockout stages of the tournament. ” but fuck knows where it made that up from.

    Definitely looks like rotation.

    It does, but I couldn’t find a person actually saying it, just a glorified waffle iron (anyone remember when “fuzzy logic” was a thing?)

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • chimoausC Offline
    chimoausC Offline
    chimoaus
    replied to kiwiinmelb last edited by
    #302

    @kiwiinmelb said in Womens RWC 2025:

    Just watched the mini match, some impressive ball skills by our girls.
    Very fun to watch

    Is it just me but is the actual spectator experience in the woman's game better than the men's at the moment? Lots of backline play, lots of great tries, far less box kicking and aerial ping pong. I for one have been loving the tournament so far and look forward to the finals.

    1 Reply Last reply
    5
  • J Offline
    J Offline
    JA
    wrote last edited by
    #303

    Agreed, some of the tries, particularly in the Black Ferns games have been genuinely top shelf and yes way less box kicking. I feel there is more tolerance for losing a bit of ground over a few rucks but still hanging onto it and building into something.

    With the men's game , it's generally an immediate kick for a slow ruck or getting caught behind the advantage line.

    One thing that does nag at the back of my head is the quality of one on one tackling. Maybe unfairly but makes you think if it's actually a great run or just a shit tackle attempt. I feel it's the latter a lot of the time.

    Not specific to the women game, e.g. Marx missing Jordan but feel it happens more frequently with the games I've watched.

    chimoausC 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • chimoausC Offline
    chimoausC Offline
    chimoaus
    replied to JA last edited by
    #304

    @JA Yeah, I suspect the non-stop kicking is a counter to rush defence which often results in lost territory if you spread it wide. Not sure how to solve that, maybe trial the offside line being 5m back from the ruck, not sure. What would be interesting to see in the production is an offside line from the ruck similar to you get in NFL with the 10 yard line. It would be interesting to see how often rush defence are offside.

    BonesB 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • BonesB Online
    BonesB Online
    Bones
    replied to chimoaus last edited by
    #305

    @chimoaus sounds like an absolute nightmare to referee, especially at amateur level.

    chimoausC 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • chimoausC Offline
    chimoausC Offline
    chimoaus
    replied to Bones last edited by
    #306

    @Bones Yeah, likely why it has never happened. Just trying to think how do they create more space in the mens game as rush D has really caused this new kicking battle where teams would almost rather be on defence and cause a turnover or penalty then have the ball.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • boobooB Offline
    boobooB Offline
    booboo
    wrote last edited by
    #307

    I've always wondered why they don't try an inside ball, like Sititi to Jordan last week, more often.

    If the rush is on the outside try and go inside it.

    Maybe I'm missing where it's been tried, or they've analysed it doesn't work, but I've not seen it.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • M Offline
    M Offline
    mohikamo
    wrote last edited by
    #308

    A good kicking game will stop the rush D.
    That's why they kick, the problem is most of the kicking is shit, and just hands possession over.
    You do not want any of those off the cuff shit kicks; the kicks have to be precise, very precise.
    That mean's it'll have to be planned and practiced in training.
    Probably want a 90% + regain possession rate.
    Kick and regain once or twice early in a game and the D will have to back off to cover.
    And that'll be the end of the rush D.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • K Offline
    K Offline
    kidcalder
    wrote last edited by
    #309

    Amy Du Plessis out of tournament and a replacement to be called in

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • BovidaeB Offline
    BovidaeB Offline
    Bovidae
    wrote last edited by
    #310

    Kelsey Teneti would be the ideal replacement - centre and wing cover.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • canefanC Offline
    canefanC Offline
    canefan
    wrote last edited by
    #311

    BFs are loaded, headed by youngsters Miller and Sorensen McGhee. She's the niece of Kurt and Dane Sorensen. 5 relatives that have played for the Kiwis. Mad genetics

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • sparkyS Offline
    sparkyS Offline
    sparky
    wrote last edited by
    #312

    South Africa with 86% possession after 15 minutes but going mostly side to side.

    0-0.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • KiwiMurphK Offline
    KiwiMurphK Offline
    KiwiMurph
    wrote last edited by
    #313

    BFs won't have to worry about a replacement if they cant get themselves into this game. They have no ball.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • BonesB Online
    BonesB Online
    Bones
    wrote last edited by
    #314

    So far playing like Razor stepped in to coach this week. 50 tackles to SA's 3.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1

Womens RWC 2025
Sports Talk
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.