All Blacks 2026
-
https://x.com/nzrugbydatabase/status/2012016200910598494
74%, was more reflective of the circumstances of our opposition.
We were 6-0 against Australia and Ireland, both were very poor when playing us. Could have easily lost all 3 tests to England last year and then they comfortably handled us this year. France C. 2-2 against Argie.
Everyone kept waiting for the turnaround, for the run of good performances, never came. He will feel terrible that the thing he worked so long towards has fallen apart, but there was no evidence things were going to get better.
-
-
my recommendations based on my own professional experience
-
@The-Docter said in All Blacks 2026:
@nzzp fair enough
is it AI? Or did you write that whole thing? It's monstrous - the structure looked AI to me, so I just skipped it frankly.
I think AI is great, but man it generates some verbiage at times
-
my thoughts and inputs though used some AI . it is a bit long agreed. more suggested frameworks. to be honest i usually break assessments down to 6-7 key criteria
-
the point is to be clear of these and measure everyone objectively in the same way
-
@sparky said in All Blacks 2026:
Clayton Macmillan has publicly ruled himself out of an All Blacks coaching role:
Makes sense.
Would be great to see him come into the fold after 2027.
Edit: In saying that, he doesn't actually rule himself out in that article, just says he hasn't given any thought to it.
-
@Mr-Fish said in All Blacks 2026:
@sparky said in All Blacks 2026:
Clayton Macmillan has publicly ruled himself out of an All Blacks coaching role:
Makes sense.
Would be great to see him come into the fold after 2027.
Serious question - why? I don't recall him having outstanding success (or having even been around that long as a coach).
-
All Blacks Head Coach Selection Framework
Executive Search Consultant Recommendations
Date: January 2026
Engagement: New Zealand Rugby Head Coach Recruitment
Executive Summary
Scott Robertson’s departure (74% win rate, two years) proves technical competence without cultural leadership fails at elite level. Critical issues: player disengagement, coaching instability (MacDonald and Holland resignations), declining trajectory (43-10 South Africa loss, defeats to Argentina and England).
Solution: Six evidence-based criteria prioritising culture and coaching partnerships (50% combined). Candidates must bring established coaching relationships (Jamie Joseph + Tony Brown model) or demonstrate compelling assistant recruitment with specific commitments.
Target Pool: Dave Rennie, Jamie Joseph, Joe Schmidt, Warren Gatland, Robbie Deans, elite domestic coaches.
Process: 8-week structured, bias-free selection.
Success Metric: Win 2027 Rugby World Cup.
Six Core Selection Criteria
1. Team Culture Architect (25%)
Build psychologically safe, high-accountability environments where diverse personalities thrive under pressure.
Evidence: Player satisfaction scores, cultural transformation examples, conflict management track record
Assessment: 10+ player references, case study, psychometric testing, behavioural interview
Red Flags: Player departures, defensive responses, authoritarian leadership
2. Curator of Coaching Excellence (25%)
Recruit and retain elite coaching talent through collaborative excellence.
Evidence:
- Coaching team stability (>80% retention)
- Proven partnerships (Joseph-Brown: Highlanders 2015 champions, Japan 2019 RWC)
- Existing elite coaching relationships
Assessment: Specific coaching team proposal with names and preliminary commitments, assistant coach references
Critical: Robertson’s MacDonald departure exposed coaching alignment failures. Candidates must bring partnerships OR specific recruitment commitments—no vague promises.
Red Flags: Assistant turnover, generic proposals, autocratic style
3. Strategic & Tactical Mastery (20%)
Outthink elite coaches in high-stakes environments.
Evidence: 75%+ win rate vs. top-4 nations, tournament success, tactical flexibility, innovation
Assessment: Video analysis of All Blacks performances, live tactical problem-solving, track record review
Red Flags: Limited tier-one success, inflexibility, poor tournament record
4. Authentic Leadership Under Pressure (15%)
Resilience and transparent decision-making under intense scrutiny.
Evidence: Recovery from defeats, transparent communication, learning from failures, media composure
Assessment: Behavioural interview, written post-defeat response, psychometric testing, references
Red Flags: Defensiveness, blame-shifting, poor media relations
5. International Excellence (10%)
Proven track record at international or elite level.
Evidence: International experience (preferred) or elite domestic success with World Cup cycle understanding
Assessment: Performance benchmarks, World Cup strategy presentation
6. Player Engagement (5%)
Clear, authentic communication building trust with professional athletes.
Evidence: Player testimonials, transparent selection communication, squad harmony management
Assessment: Player panel interview, written communication test, references
8-Week Selection Process
Week 1: Panel formation, global candidate search, psychometric assessments commence
Weeks 3-5: Video interviews, tactical case studies, cultural presentations, coaching team proposals with specific names, shortlist to 3-4
Weeks 5-7: Full-day interviews, live tactical analysis, 10+ reference checks, coaching team presentations with preliminary commitments, player panel interviews
Weeks 7-8: Panel recommendation to Board, contract negotiation (head coach + assistant budgets), parallel assistant contracting, public announcement with confirmed team
Key Performance Indicators
Cultural (Primary):
- Player engagement >90% (quarterly)
- Zero assistant departures
- Positive culture trajectory
Performance (Secondary):
- 2026: >80% win rate, Rugby Championship top 2
- 2027: Win World Cup (minimum quarter-final)
Critical Success Factors
- Evidence-based appointment — No “jobs for the boys,” transparent rationale
- Coaching partnerships — Joseph-Brown model OR specific commitments
- World Cup readiness — Clear pathway, tournament track record
Final Recommendation
Robertson proved technical excellence without cultural leadership and coaching cohesion fails. This 8-week process prioritises culture and partnerships whilst ensuring rigour and maximum preparation time before June 2026.
The All Blacks deserve a coach capable of restoring World Cup-winning excellence.
Next Steps:
- Board endorses framework (72 hours)
- Execute 8-week process (February-March 2026)
- Announce with confirmed coaching team (late March 2026)
Best-practice executive search methodology applied to elite sports leadership.
-
this is more user friendly and ultimately where you get the board to focus on
-
@ShaquilleOatmeal said in All Blacks 2026:
@zedsdeadbaby said in All Blacks 2026:
On the issue of whether Razor wasn’t willing to fix things - go back to when Kirk is addressing the media with his own remarks (before questions). He seemed to suggest there was some back and forth on changes/the way forward but then felt it was no longer possible.
Maybe Razor as was mentioned above refused to accept his own shortcomings
Robertson either didn’t think there was anything wrong or didn’t have a satisfactory solution to the issues. And if he did have a solution, wouldn’t he have at least begun to implement it already
Yeah. I can certainly see how he might have argued that the feedback was disgruntled players or that they were ‘close’ (his hypothetical words not mine) to clicking/a grand slam but Kirk clearly saw the bullshit
-
@Bones said in All Blacks 2026:
@Mr-Fish said in All Blacks 2026:
@sparky said in All Blacks 2026:
Clayton Macmillan has publicly ruled himself out of an All Blacks coaching role:
Makes sense.
Would be great to see him come into the fold after 2027.
Serious question - why? I don't recall him having outstanding success (or having even been around that long as a coach).
Across McMillan's seasons in charge, the Chiefs were the most consistent side (four finals and one semi-final from five years). Didn't result in any silverware but was clearly doing something right.
If winning a Super title is the only requirement then NZ wouldn't have very many options.
McMillan would be a good assistant with a potential eye to the future.
-
Things are unravelling for him at Munster currently so…
-
@nzzp said in All Blacks 2026:
Concerns raised. Razor has many strenths, but I am not sure articulating a plan to a board is one of them. I suspect he struggles to write well - hence his (reported) request to speak to the board.
He doesn't speak particularly well either.
-
@zedsdeadbaby said in All Blacks 2026:
Things are unravelling for him at Munster currently so…
Yeah that last sentence from @Mr-Fish did feel a bit shark jumpy.
-
@zedsdeadbaby said in All Blacks 2026:
Things are unravelling for him at Munster currently so…
Things unravelled for GH in Wales too. I can't remember how Shag left things? Smith basically gave the ABs job away. Things don't always go smooth all the time. It will be the board's job to work out who can be best suited to the role. I would ask Graham Henry and Shag their opinions for starters. And actually pay attention this time
-
@zedsdeadbaby said in All Blacks 2026:
Things are unravelling for him at Munster currently so…
A couple of close losses recently. But you look at the team list compared to Leinster. They should never lose.
