Skip to content
  • Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

  • Tipping
  • Team Sheets
  • Highlights
  • Results
    • All Blacks

      Search every All Blacks Test. Filter results by year, opposition, location, venue, city and RWC stage

    • Super Rugby

      Search every Super Rugby since match 1996

    • NPC

      Search NPC results. Only first division matches from 1976-2005. All results from the 14 team competition (2006-present) are included

All Blacks v Ireland II

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Rugby Matches
allblacksireland
1.1k Posts 87 Posters 324.8k Views 5 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • C cgrant

    @RoninWC said in Ireland II:

    My own $0.02 worth on the team selection:

    1. W. Crockett
    2. D. Coles
    3. O. Franks
    4. B. Retallick
    5. S. Whitelock
    6. J. Kaino
    7. S. Cane
    8. K Read
    9. A. Smith
    10. B. Barrett
    11. J. Savea
    12. A. Lienart-Brown
    13. M. Fekitoa
    14. I. Dagg
    15. B. Smith

    Reserves
    16. C. Taylor
    17. J. Moody
    18. C. Faumuina
    19. L. Squire
    20. A. Savea
    21. T. Perenara
    22. L. Sopoaga

    Personally this is my team. I think Smith and Barrett need to start as they are our clear No. 1's in their respective positions.
    I would rather see Sopoaga on the bench as I think he brings a steady hand whereas I don't think Cruden really offers anything off the bench.

    And yes, I've gone for speed off the bench with both Squire and Ardie.

    Crockett staying 70 minutes on the field against Itaty makes me guess that Moody will start.
    The Chicago game pointed out that the AB need a specialist lock on the bench.

    antipodeanA Offline
    antipodeanA Offline
    antipodean
    wrote on last edited by
    #64

    @cgrant said in Ireland II:

    Crockett staying 70 minutes on the field against Itaty makes me guess that Moody will start.
    The Chicago game pointed out that the AB need a specialist lock on the bench.

    And fewer injuries during the game. Also, a full complement on the field at all times might help the cause.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • C cgrant

      @RoninWC said in Ireland II:

      My own $0.02 worth on the team selection:

      1. W. Crockett
      2. D. Coles
      3. O. Franks
      4. B. Retallick
      5. S. Whitelock
      6. J. Kaino
      7. S. Cane
      8. K Read
      9. A. Smith
      10. B. Barrett
      11. J. Savea
      12. A. Lienart-Brown
      13. M. Fekitoa
      14. I. Dagg
      15. B. Smith

      Reserves
      16. C. Taylor
      17. J. Moody
      18. C. Faumuina
      19. L. Squire
      20. A. Savea
      21. T. Perenara
      22. L. Sopoaga

      Personally this is my team. I think Smith and Barrett need to start as they are our clear No. 1's in their respective positions.
      I would rather see Sopoaga on the bench as I think he brings a steady hand whereas I don't think Cruden really offers anything off the bench.

      And yes, I've gone for speed off the bench with both Squire and Ardie.

      Crockett staying 70 minutes on the field against Itaty makes me guess that Moody will start.
      The Chicago game pointed out that the AB need a specialist lock on the bench.

      MajorPomM Offline
      MajorPomM Offline
      MajorPom
      wrote on last edited by
      #65

      @cgrant said in Ireland II:

      @RoninWC said in Ireland II:

      My own $0.02 worth on the team selection:

      1. W. Crockett
      2. D. Coles
      3. O. Franks
      4. B. Retallick
      5. S. Whitelock
      6. J. Kaino
      7. S. Cane
      8. K Read
      9. A. Smith
      10. B. Barrett
      11. J. Savea
      12. A. Lienart-Brown
      13. M. Fekitoa
      14. I. Dagg
      15. B. Smith

      Reserves
      16. C. Taylor
      17. J. Moody
      18. C. Faumuina
      19. L. Squire
      20. A. Savea
      21. T. Perenara
      22. L. Sopoaga

      Personally this is my team. I think Smith and Barrett need to start as they are our clear No. 1's in their respective positions.
      I would rather see Sopoaga on the bench as I think he brings a steady hand whereas I don't think Cruden really offers anything off the bench.

      And yes, I've gone for speed off the bench with both Squire and Ardie.

      Crockett staying 70 minutes on the field against Itaty makes me guess that Moody will start.
      The Chicago game pointed out that the AB need a specialist lock on the bench.

      I'll up that and say it pointed out that we needed a specialist lock starting.

      nostrildamusN 1 Reply Last reply
      4
      • MajorPomM MajorPom

        @cgrant said in Ireland II:

        @RoninWC said in Ireland II:

        My own $0.02 worth on the team selection:

        1. W. Crockett
        2. D. Coles
        3. O. Franks
        4. B. Retallick
        5. S. Whitelock
        6. J. Kaino
        7. S. Cane
        8. K Read
        9. A. Smith
        10. B. Barrett
        11. J. Savea
        12. A. Lienart-Brown
        13. M. Fekitoa
        14. I. Dagg
        15. B. Smith

        Reserves
        16. C. Taylor
        17. J. Moody
        18. C. Faumuina
        19. L. Squire
        20. A. Savea
        21. T. Perenara
        22. L. Sopoaga

        Personally this is my team. I think Smith and Barrett need to start as they are our clear No. 1's in their respective positions.
        I would rather see Sopoaga on the bench as I think he brings a steady hand whereas I don't think Cruden really offers anything off the bench.

        And yes, I've gone for speed off the bench with both Squire and Ardie.

        Crockett staying 70 minutes on the field against Itaty makes me guess that Moody will start.
        The Chicago game pointed out that the AB need a specialist lock on the bench.

        I'll up that and say it pointed out that we needed a specialist lock starting.

        nostrildamusN Online
        nostrildamusN Online
        nostrildamus
        wrote on last edited by
        #66

        @MajorRage and what is Sam Whitelock's win loss as an AB ratio? Must be not too shabby.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • J Offline
          J Offline
          Jimmy Jimmy
          wrote on last edited by
          #67

          Taniwha, if he has done those things then that is good. I always felt uneasy about the possibility that the top AB tryscorer may have been someone who permed his hair.

          We will have to leave the number of tries at 49 but leave the name blank like Lance Armstrong had his name excised from the record books.

          A good day's work boys.

          1 Reply Last reply
          1
          • StargazerS Stargazer

            I don't see what's wrong with Howlett having "mixed emotions" about that win. Can't he be happy for his Irish friends, only because they beat his old team? To me, it seems the media are just making this into something it's not.

            boobooB Online
            boobooB Online
            booboo
            wrote on last edited by
            #68

            @Stargazer said in Ireland II:

            I don't see what's wrong with Howlett having "mixed emotions" about that win. Can't he be happy for his Irish friends, only because they beat his old team? To me, it seems the media are just making this into something it's not.

            @Stargazer you are waaay too serious

            1 Reply Last reply
            4
            • Billy TellB Offline
              Billy TellB Offline
              Billy Tell
              wrote on last edited by
              #69

              Dare I ask what we do if we lose.... 😞

              Would need a big rethink of selection and tactics IMO.

              I think we'll win - for starters we are not going to gift (I hope) Ireland territory and possession again by having no functioning lineout and charity levels of indiscipline. If Ireland have to work for their points rather than being handed them on a platter, it should be much more interesting. At the end of the day, we played like rubbish and still got 29 points, and I don't see Ireland putting 40 points past us again (and if they do, then we have big problems).

              kiwiinmelbK ACT CrusaderA 2 Replies Last reply
              0
              • P Offline
                P Offline
                pakman
                wrote on last edited by
                #70

                I should add that the chances of Ireland getting away with only four penalties against them in a game are extremely slim!

                CrucialC 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • P pakman

                  I should add that the chances of Ireland getting away with only four penalties against them in a game are extremely slim!

                  CrucialC Offline
                  CrucialC Offline
                  Crucial
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #71

                  @pakman said in Ireland II:

                  I should add that the chances of Ireland getting away with only four penalties against them in a game are extremely slim!

                  Yeah, I don't know how 'clean' Ireland really were against us but the ref was a green one and we have the far more 'confident' Peyper this time. I don't think Peyper has ever been one to swallow the whistle.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • M Offline
                    M Offline
                    mooshld
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #72

                    The areas I think we need to sharpen are aerial defense. Bringing Dagg back will help in this. A bit of steel in the rucks, improved midfield defense, and a bit of street smarts. Getting choke tackled is just lazy get your body position right and that should never happen. Not like its a new tactic for the Irish we just were lazy and played into it.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • Billy TellB Billy Tell

                      Dare I ask what we do if we lose.... 😞

                      Would need a big rethink of selection and tactics IMO.

                      I think we'll win - for starters we are not going to gift (I hope) Ireland territory and possession again by having no functioning lineout and charity levels of indiscipline. If Ireland have to work for their points rather than being handed them on a platter, it should be much more interesting. At the end of the day, we played like rubbish and still got 29 points, and I don't see Ireland putting 40 points past us again (and if they do, then we have big problems).

                      kiwiinmelbK Offline
                      kiwiinmelbK Offline
                      kiwiinmelb
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #73

                      @Billy-Tell said in Ireland II:

                      Dare I ask what we do if we lose.... 😞

                      Would need a big rethink of selection and tactics IMO.

                      I think we'll win - for starters we are not going to gift (I hope) Ireland territory and possession again by having no functioning lineout and charity levels of indiscipline. If Ireland have to work for their points rather than being handed them on a platter, it should be much more interesting. At the end of the day, we played like rubbish and still got 29 points, and I don't see Ireland putting 40 points past us again (and if they do, then we have big problems).

                      I think that is the thing , to beat this current Allblacks team you are going to have to score a shit load of points . Because we usually score plenty . The days of Nh teams thinking they can take us through slotting penalties and defending are over and I think they all know it now. They put 40 on us last time ,
                      Have they got that in them again ?

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • taniwharugbyT Offline
                        taniwharugbyT Offline
                        taniwharugby
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #74

                        Looking more likely Whitelock is ok for this week, or Romano too I guess, as Fifita has been sent back to NZ (apologies if already mentioned)

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • D Offline
                          D Offline
                          Derm McCrum
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #75

                          In a surprise move, Schmidt may start a good few of Match Squad 2 (for Canada game) for the test against New Zealand to widen the test experience of the entire series squad. Match Squad 1 will then play against Australia who are banking on facing a NZ-battered Ireland team to continue their hopes of achieving a clean sweep in their November tour.

                          Billy TellB 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • D Derm McCrum

                            In a surprise move, Schmidt may start a good few of Match Squad 2 (for Canada game) for the test against New Zealand to widen the test experience of the entire series squad. Match Squad 1 will then play against Australia who are banking on facing a NZ-battered Ireland team to continue their hopes of achieving a clean sweep in their November tour.

                            Billy TellB Offline
                            Billy TellB Offline
                            Billy Tell
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #76

                            @Pot-Hale said in Ireland II:

                            In a surprise move, Schmidt may start a good few of Match Squad 2 (for Canada game) for the test against New Zealand to widen the test experience of the entire series squad. Match Squad 1 will then play against Australia who are banking on facing a NZ-battered Ireland team to continue their hopes of achieving a clean sweep in their November tour.

                            I'd be surprised. Doubt the Irish fans would be too happy about a less than full strength side being sent out to face NZ. From the Canada game you can make starting arguments for bealham, Healy, dillane, obrien, omahony. None of the backs strike me as first XV material with the possible exception of Earls.

                            I think Australia will rotate against France anyway.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • dogmeatD Offline
                              dogmeatD Offline
                              dogmeat
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #77

                              Having a full width field will alter the dynamics of the game.

                              Still gotta give Ireland a starters chance though with the monkey off their back.

                              (AB's by >30 πŸ™‚ )

                              D 1 Reply Last reply
                              1
                              • HoorooH Offline
                                HoorooH Offline
                                Hooroo
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #78

                                I swear, if the AB's are paying anything over $1:50 head to head, I will smack it. I just can't see us losing this at all

                                SammyCS 1 Reply Last reply
                                2
                                • kiwiinmelbK Offline
                                  kiwiinmelbK Offline
                                  kiwiinmelb
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #79

                                  Ireland are a very good side,

                                  But if they win or push us to the limit in this one , they are even better than I thought ,

                                  Not intended as arrogance but no one has pushed us for a while once we are in that backs to the wall situation ,

                                  Cant wait

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  1
                                  • HoorooH Hooroo

                                    I swear, if the AB's are paying anything over $1:50 head to head, I will smack it. I just can't see us losing this at all

                                    SammyCS Offline
                                    SammyCS Offline
                                    SammyC
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #80

                                    @Hooroo said in Ireland II:

                                    I swear, if the AB's are paying anything over $1:50 head to head, I will smack it. I just can't see us losing this at all

                                    that will never happen, without checking TAB i reckon we wont be any more than $1.20

                                    HoorooH 1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • SammyCS SammyC

                                      @Hooroo said in Ireland II:

                                      I swear, if the AB's are paying anything over $1:50 head to head, I will smack it. I just can't see us losing this at all

                                      that will never happen, without checking TAB i reckon we wont be any more than $1.20

                                      HoorooH Offline
                                      HoorooH Offline
                                      Hooroo
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #81

                                      @SammyC said in Ireland II:

                                      @Hooroo said in Ireland II:

                                      I swear, if the AB's are paying anything over $1:50 head to head, I will smack it. I just can't see us losing this at all

                                      that will never happen, without checking TAB i reckon we wont be any more than $1.20

                                      Pussies!

                                      SammyCS 1 Reply Last reply
                                      3
                                      • HoorooH Hooroo

                                        @SammyC said in Ireland II:

                                        @Hooroo said in Ireland II:

                                        I swear, if the AB's are paying anything over $1:50 head to head, I will smack it. I just can't see us losing this at all

                                        that will never happen, without checking TAB i reckon we wont be any more than $1.20

                                        Pussies!

                                        SammyCS Offline
                                        SammyCS Offline
                                        SammyC
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #82

                                        @Hooroo said in Ireland II:

                                        @SammyC said in Ireland II:

                                        @Hooroo said in Ireland II:

                                        I swear, if the AB's are paying anything over $1:50 head to head, I will smack it. I just can't see us losing this at all

                                        that will never happen, without checking TAB i reckon we wont be any more than $1.20

                                        Pussies!

                                        Agreed!

                                        HoorooH 1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • Billy TellB Billy Tell

                                          Dare I ask what we do if we lose.... 😞

                                          Would need a big rethink of selection and tactics IMO.

                                          I think we'll win - for starters we are not going to gift (I hope) Ireland territory and possession again by having no functioning lineout and charity levels of indiscipline. If Ireland have to work for their points rather than being handed them on a platter, it should be much more interesting. At the end of the day, we played like rubbish and still got 29 points, and I don't see Ireland putting 40 points past us again (and if they do, then we have big problems).

                                          ACT CrusaderA Offline
                                          ACT CrusaderA Offline
                                          ACT Crusader
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #83

                                          @Billy-Tell said in Ireland II:

                                          Dare I ask what we do if we lose.... 😞

                                          Not enough Hurricanes would be one view. Extra emphasis on the one....

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          4
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Search
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Search