Skip to content
  • Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

  • Tipping
  • Team Sheets
  • Highlights
  • Results
    • All Blacks

      Search every All Blacks Test. Filter results by year, opposition, location, venue, city and RWC stage

    • Super Rugby

      Search every Super Rugby since match 1996

    • NPC

      Search NPC results. Only first division matches from 1976-2005. All results from the 14 team competition (2006-present) are included

Super Rugby News

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Sports Talk
5.2k Posts 139 Posters 1.5m Views 6 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • StargazerS Offline
    StargazerS Offline
    Stargazer
    wrote on last edited by
    #1399

    Is there honestly someone who thinks the Sunwolves will last in this comp? Unless they make some serious changes to the Top League competition that result in the best Japanese players being available for Sunwolves selection and allowing for a proper preseason, they're not going to improve much. Except if they contract a lot more good, non-Japanese players.

    How many people watch their games on tv? Is the Japanese public interested? They seemed to attract a big crowd to their first game in Tokyo, but there were a lot of empty seats in the stadium in Singapore. Travel will also always be a factor. I just don't believe in it. Drop them now, so another team can stay (not the Kings).

    gt12G JayCeeJ 2 Replies Last reply
    1
    • C cheetahsBO

      @taniwharugby said in Super Rugby News:

      @cheetahsBO thing is, do the Cheetahs bring more $$$ to the table than the Sunwolves?

      As at the end of the day, this is going to be a big factor in the decision.

      Thought we were at the stage where we realised diluting the product was causing the huge drop in viewers & attendance.

      I wouldn't pay to watch the Sunwolves have 60 points put on them every weekend.

      taniwharugbyT Offline
      taniwharugbyT Offline
      taniwharugby
      wrote on last edited by
      #1400

      @cheetahsBO but they are looking at expansion of the game, and the Asian market is big, if they can get a competitive team and grow it there, it will be good long term.

      NOt saying it's right, just that I expect that is what they will be wanting/hoping....

      C 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • taniwharugbyT taniwharugby

        @cheetahsBO but they are looking at expansion of the game, and the Asian market is big, if they can get a competitive team and grow it there, it will be good long term.

        NOt saying it's right, just that I expect that is what they will be wanting/hoping....

        C Offline
        C Offline
        cheetahsBO
        wrote on last edited by
        #1401

        @taniwharugby said in Super Rugby News:

        @cheetahsBO but they are looking at expansion of the game, and the Asian market is big, if they can get a competitive team and grow it there, it will be good long term.

        NOt saying it's right, just that I expect that is what they will be wanting/hoping....

        You're right.

        But they're stupid to think it will work. They'll support a competitive national side but not a bunch of also-rans getting pummelled and who are 75% foreigners. Just not gonna work.

        antipodeanA 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • StargazerS Stargazer

          Is there honestly someone who thinks the Sunwolves will last in this comp? Unless they make some serious changes to the Top League competition that result in the best Japanese players being available for Sunwolves selection and allowing for a proper preseason, they're not going to improve much. Except if they contract a lot more good, non-Japanese players.

          How many people watch their games on tv? Is the Japanese public interested? They seemed to attract a big crowd to their first game in Tokyo, but there were a lot of empty seats in the stadium in Singapore. Travel will also always be a factor. I just don't believe in it. Drop them now, so another team can stay (not the Kings).

          gt12G Offline
          gt12G Offline
          gt12
          wrote on last edited by
          #1402

          @Stargazer

          I do, if they can get better players. You've nailed it there.

          But, the non-home home games are empty because they are non-home home games - that's a problem with the bullshit pools.

          It's full and really well supported in Tokyo.

          Now - I'm not quite sure they deserve their spot - but if they get better players (over time), they'll become a force - or st least not get 70 points put on them every game.

          Furthermore, they'll get really good support from the non-Japanese people if we get a real draw - I'll pay to go to any game against NZ opposition.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • StargazerS Stargazer

            Player: Nicolas Sanchez
            Team: Jaguares
            Position: Fly Half
            Date of Incident: 11 March 2017
            Nature of Offence: Law 10.4(e) Dangerous tackling of an Opponent
            Elapsed time in match when incident occurred: 38:28

            Nicolas Sanchez of the Jaguares has been cited for alleged foul play during a Super Rugby match at the weekend.

            Sanchez is alleged to have contravened Law 10.4(e) Dangerous tackling of an Opponent during the match between the Jaguares and Lions at Velez Sarsfield in Buenos Aires on 11 March 2017.

            The referee for the match, Nick Briant, awarded a penalty for the incident which occurred in the 38th minute.

            Upon further review of the match footage, the Citing Commissioner deemed in his opinion the incident had met the red card threshold for foul play.

            The Case is to be considered in the first instance by the SANZAAR Foul Play Review Committee which will take place on Monday 13 March via video-conference.

            All SANZAAR disciplinary matters are in the first instance referred to the Foul Play Review Committee to provide the option of expediting the judicial process.

            For a matter to be dispensed with at this hearing, the person appearing must plead guilty and accept the penalty offered by the Foul Play Review Committee.

            Check: 38:28 into the game (43:12 in video)

            StargazerS Offline
            StargazerS Offline
            Stargazer
            wrote on last edited by
            #1403

            @Stargazer said in Super Rugby News:

            Player: Nicolas Sanchez
            Team: Jaguares
            Position: Fly Half
            Date of Incident: 11 March 2017
            Nature of Offence: Law 10.4(e) Dangerous tackling of an Opponent
            Elapsed time in match when incident occurred: 38:28

            Nicolas Sanchez of the Jaguares has been cited for alleged foul play during a Super Rugby match at the weekend.

            Sanchez is alleged to have contravened Law 10.4(e) Dangerous tackling of an Opponent during the match between the Jaguares and Lions at Velez Sarsfield in Buenos Aires on 11 March 2017.

            The referee for the match, Nick Briant, awarded a penalty for the incident which occurred in the 38th minute.

            Upon further review of the match footage, the Citing Commissioner deemed in his opinion the incident had met the red card threshold for foul play.

            The Case is to be considered in the first instance by the SANZAAR Foul Play Review Committee which will take place on Monday 13 March via video-conference.

            All SANZAAR disciplinary matters are in the first instance referred to the Foul Play Review Committee to provide the option of expediting the judicial process.

            For a matter to be dispensed with at this hearing, the person appearing must plead guilty and accept the penalty offered by the Foul Play Review Committee.

            Check: 38:28 into the game (43:12 in video)

            Sanchez banned for one week

            antipodeanA 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • C cheetahsBO

              @taniwharugby said in Super Rugby News:

              @cheetahsBO but they are looking at expansion of the game, and the Asian market is big, if they can get a competitive team and grow it there, it will be good long term.

              NOt saying it's right, just that I expect that is what they will be wanting/hoping....

              You're right.

              But they're stupid to think it will work. They'll support a competitive national side but not a bunch of also-rans getting pummelled and who are 75% foreigners. Just not gonna work.

              antipodeanA Offline
              antipodeanA Offline
              antipodean
              wrote on last edited by
              #1404

              @cheetahsBO said in Super Rugby News:

              @taniwharugby said in Super Rugby News:

              @cheetahsBO but they are looking at expansion of the game, and the Asian market is big, if they can get a competitive team and grow it there, it will be good long term.

              NOt saying it's right, just that I expect that is what they will be wanting/hoping....

              You're right.

              But they're stupid to think it will work. They'll support a competitive national side but not a bunch of also-rans getting pummelled and who are 75% foreigners. Just not gonna work.

              The support for their national team has increased as they've got better from having >100 points scored against them...

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • StargazerS Stargazer

                @Stargazer said in Super Rugby News:

                Player: Nicolas Sanchez
                Team: Jaguares
                Position: Fly Half
                Date of Incident: 11 March 2017
                Nature of Offence: Law 10.4(e) Dangerous tackling of an Opponent
                Elapsed time in match when incident occurred: 38:28

                Nicolas Sanchez of the Jaguares has been cited for alleged foul play during a Super Rugby match at the weekend.

                Sanchez is alleged to have contravened Law 10.4(e) Dangerous tackling of an Opponent during the match between the Jaguares and Lions at Velez Sarsfield in Buenos Aires on 11 March 2017.

                The referee for the match, Nick Briant, awarded a penalty for the incident which occurred in the 38th minute.

                Upon further review of the match footage, the Citing Commissioner deemed in his opinion the incident had met the red card threshold for foul play.

                The Case is to be considered in the first instance by the SANZAAR Foul Play Review Committee which will take place on Monday 13 March via video-conference.

                All SANZAAR disciplinary matters are in the first instance referred to the Foul Play Review Committee to provide the option of expediting the judicial process.

                For a matter to be dispensed with at this hearing, the person appearing must plead guilty and accept the penalty offered by the Foul Play Review Committee.

                Check: 38:28 into the game (43:12 in video)

                Sanchez banned for one week

                antipodeanA Offline
                antipodeanA Offline
                antipodean
                wrote on last edited by
                #1405

                @Stargazer One week? Did the piston wristed gibbon on the judiciary look at the video? Holy fcukballs.

                CrucialC 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • antipodeanA antipodean

                  @Stargazer One week? Did the piston wristed gibbon on the judiciary look at the video? Holy fcukballs.

                  CrucialC Offline
                  CrucialC Offline
                  Crucial
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #1406

                  @antipodean said in Super Rugby News:

                  @Stargazer One week? Did the piston wristed gibbon on the judiciary look at the video? Holy fcukballs.

                  He is probably having the same problem I am 'video is unavailable'

                  StargazerS 1 Reply Last reply
                  5
                  • CrucialC Crucial

                    @antipodean said in Super Rugby News:

                    @Stargazer One week? Did the piston wristed gibbon on the judiciary look at the video? Holy fcukballs.

                    He is probably having the same problem I am 'video is unavailable'

                    StargazerS Offline
                    StargazerS Offline
                    Stargazer
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #1407

                    @Crucial That's weird; when I posted the link to the decision on Sanchez' citing, the video was still available.

                    Here's another link: http://www.espn.com.ar/video/clip/_/id/3025524

                    CrucialC 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • StargazerS Stargazer

                      @Crucial That's weird; when I posted the link to the decision on Sanchez' citing, the video was still available.

                      Here's another link: http://www.espn.com.ar/video/clip/_/id/3025524

                      CrucialC Offline
                      CrucialC Offline
                      Crucial
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #1408

                      @Stargazer said in Super Rugby News:

                      @Crucial That's weird; when I posted the link to the decision on Sanchez' citing, the video was still available.

                      Here's another link: http://www.espn.com.ar/video/clip/_/id/3025524

                      That's awesome. For once the jumping player that creates the danger gets cited.
                      The judiciry would have got into a right tangle though if neither player caught the ball because Sanchez lands on his head.
                      Double Red?

                      Same issue as with the Leitch RC. Once they decide low entry point it will always only be one week unless the player has form.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • StargazerS Stargazer

                        Is there honestly someone who thinks the Sunwolves will last in this comp? Unless they make some serious changes to the Top League competition that result in the best Japanese players being available for Sunwolves selection and allowing for a proper preseason, they're not going to improve much. Except if they contract a lot more good, non-Japanese players.

                        How many people watch their games on tv? Is the Japanese public interested? They seemed to attract a big crowd to their first game in Tokyo, but there were a lot of empty seats in the stadium in Singapore. Travel will also always be a factor. I just don't believe in it. Drop them now, so another team can stay (not the Kings).

                        JayCeeJ Offline
                        JayCeeJ Offline
                        JayCee
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #1409

                        @Stargazer I didn't realize until the end of last season that the best players weren't made available for the Sunwolves - they are essentially the Brumbies of Japanese rugby. With that model, they are never going to be competitive.

                        R 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • JayCeeJ JayCee

                          @Stargazer I didn't realize until the end of last season that the best players weren't made available for the Sunwolves - they are essentially the Brumbies of Japanese rugby. With that model, they are never going to be competitive.

                          R Offline
                          R Offline
                          Rugger Quizzes
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #1410

                          @JayCee Kensuke Hatakeyama is one who hasn't been involved the last 2 years. Don't know why, has played 70 odd tests and has been an automatic selection for Japan at TH prop for several years. Presumably Suntory pays him enough? Kosei Ono another Suntory player not involved who has played a lot of tests, and is arguably Japan's first choice at 10.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          1
                          • DuluthD Offline
                            DuluthD Offline
                            Duluth
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #1411

                            Almost no facts in this article about which Aussie team should go. But speculation about a merger:
                            Rebels confident, Brumbies in firing line

                            The Brumbies finances and those old fraud allegations should make them favourite to go. However, it would be a shame to throw away the 20+ year history. Maybe the Rebels organisation can take over the name? The Victorian Brumbies?

                            antipodeanA 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • DuluthD Duluth

                              Almost no facts in this article about which Aussie team should go. But speculation about a merger:
                              Rebels confident, Brumbies in firing line

                              The Brumbies finances and those old fraud allegations should make them favourite to go. However, it would be a shame to throw away the 20+ year history. Maybe the Rebels organisation can take over the name? The Victorian Brumbies?

                              antipodeanA Offline
                              antipodeanA Offline
                              antipodean
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #1412

                              @Duluth Practically everyone here is talking merger between Brumbies and Rebels.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              1
                              • TimT Away
                                TimT Away
                                Tim
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #1413

                                Shouldn't they have a second side in Sydney? Based in North Sydney?

                                antipodeanA H 2 Replies Last reply
                                0
                                • TimT Tim

                                  Shouldn't they have a second side in Sydney? Based in North Sydney?

                                  antipodeanA Offline
                                  antipodeanA Offline
                                  antipodean
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #1414

                                  @Tim If they had a second side in Sydney (which is South Randwick based in Southern NSW), then it should be in Western Sydney, where the talent is.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  1
                                  • TimT Tim

                                    Shouldn't they have a second side in Sydney? Based in North Sydney?

                                    H Offline
                                    H Offline
                                    hydro11
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #1415

                                    @Tim said in Super Rugby News:

                                    Shouldn't they have a second side in Sydney? Based in North Sydney?

                                    It's about TV revenue and having a team there doesn't help to grow that pie.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • antipodeanA Offline
                                      antipodeanA Offline
                                      antipodean
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #1416

                                      alt text

                                      MajorStokesM 1 Reply Last reply
                                      12
                                      • antipodeanA antipodean

                                        alt text

                                        MajorStokesM Offline
                                        MajorStokesM Offline
                                        MajorStokes
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #1417

                                        I don't even see why the Sunwolves were added. There is probably more money in the Japanese league than there is in super rugby as it is.

                                        Unless JAL / ANA sponsored it.

                                        Chris B.C 1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • MajorStokesM MajorStokes

                                          I don't even see why the Sunwolves were added. There is probably more money in the Japanese league than there is in super rugby as it is.

                                          Unless JAL / ANA sponsored it.

                                          Chris B.C Offline
                                          Chris B.C Offline
                                          Chris B.
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #1418

                                          @MajorRage Large potential TV audience in Japan if they can be persuaded to watch = big bucks for everyone else.

                                          Sing along..."It's all about the money..it's all about the dum dum duddy dum dum.."

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Search
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Search