• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

Star Wars VII ****contains spoilers****

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Off Topic
5.4k Posts 63 Posters 741.0k Views
Star Wars VII ****contains spoilers****
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • CrucialC Offline
    CrucialC Offline
    Crucial
    wrote on last edited by
    #1137

    Of all the silly overthought fan theories about SW I have finally read something that makes sense and could well be the 'big reveal'.

    It basically boils down to Luke saying to Rey 'I am your son'.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • MN5M Offline
    MN5M Offline
    MN5
    wrote on last edited by
    #1138

    0_1500443052302_FB_IMG_1500442869254.jpg

    mariner4lifeM 1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • mariner4lifeM Offline
    mariner4lifeM Offline
    mariner4life
    replied to MN5 on last edited by
    #1139

    @MN5 to be fair, i think it's less the two dads, and more

    One dad died after like a week, and the other one cut off his legs and left him burned to fuck on the edge of a lava river, didn't even put him out of his misery (dick move OWK).

    That would fuck anyone up.

    CatograndeC Rancid SchnitzelR 2 Replies Last reply
    1
  • CatograndeC Offline
    CatograndeC Offline
    Catogrande
    replied to mariner4life on last edited by
    #1140

    @mariner4life said in Star Wars VII ****contains spoilers****:

    @MN5 to be fair, i think it's less the two dads, and more

    One dad died after like a week, and the other one cut off his legs and left him burned to fuck on the edge of a lava river, didn't even put him out of his misery (dick move OWK).

    That would fuck anyone up.

    You're just making excuses because the truth doesn't fit your neoliberal narrative.

    Wake up.

    mariner4lifeM 1 Reply Last reply
    6
  • mariner4lifeM Offline
    mariner4lifeM Offline
    mariner4life
    replied to Catogrande on last edited by
    #1141

    @Catogrande said in Star Wars VII ****contains spoilers****:

    @mariner4life said in Star Wars VII ****contains spoilers****:

    @MN5 to be fair, i think it's less the two dads, and more

    One dad died after like a week, and the other one cut off his legs and left him burned to fuck on the edge of a lava river, didn't even put him out of his misery (dick move OWK).

    That would fuck anyone up.

    You're just making excuses because the truth doesn't fit your neoliberal narrative.

    Wake up.

    It's broken families, not gay families that ruin a man's life you fucking nazi #blacksuiteddeathlordslivesmatter

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • KirwanK Offline
    KirwanK Offline
    Kirwan
    wrote on last edited by
    #1142

    Fake news, Tarkin exploded planets. Vader was not a fan of the Death Star. Sad.

    mariner4lifeM 1 Reply Last reply
    6
  • mariner4lifeM Offline
    mariner4lifeM Offline
    mariner4life
    replied to Kirwan on last edited by
    #1143

    @Kirwan said in Star Wars VII ****contains spoilers****:

    Fake news, Tarkin exploded planets. Vader was not a fan of the Death Star. Sad.

    See! You bigots instantly went after the black (suited) guy while conveniently ignoring the evil old white guy.

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • MN5M Offline
    MN5M Offline
    MN5
    wrote on last edited by MN5
    #1144

    In other news my sons are whinging that they only have three new Star Wars movies to watch in three years ( provided Last Jedi is released as planned )

    Cry me a river you little fuckers, how do you think 1983-1999 was for me ?

    mariner4lifeM 1 Reply Last reply
    5
  • mariner4lifeM Offline
    mariner4lifeM Offline
    mariner4life
    replied to MN5 on last edited by
    #1145

    @MN5 said in Star Wars VII ****contains spoilers****:

    In other news my sons are whinging that they only have three new Star Wars movies to watch in three years ( provided Last Jedi is released as planned )

    Cry me a river you little fuckers, how do you think 1983-1999 was for me ?

    You meant 2015 right?

    MN5M 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • MN5M Offline
    MN5M Offline
    MN5
    replied to mariner4life on last edited by MN5
    #1146

    @mariner4life said in Star Wars VII ****contains spoilers****:

    @MN5 said in Star Wars VII ****contains spoilers****:

    In other news my sons are whinging that they only have three new Star Wars movies to watch in three years ( provided Last Jedi is released as planned )

    Cry me a river you little fuckers, how do you think 1983-1999 was for me ?

    You meant 2015 right?

    Did you hate the prequels that much?

    It's still fucken Star Wars. Even the not so good ones are better than most great movies.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Rancid SchnitzelR Offline
    Rancid SchnitzelR Offline
    Rancid Schnitzel
    replied to mariner4life on last edited by
    #1147

    @mariner4life said in Star Wars VII ****contains spoilers****:

    @MN5 to be fair, i think it's less the two dads, and more

    One dad died after like a week, and the other one cut off his legs and left him burned to fuck on the edge of a lava river, didn't even put him out of his misery (dick move OWK).

    That would fuck anyone up.

    He was already too far gone when dad chopped him up. The real nefarious influence wasn't the dads, but the creepy old guy. Can also blame Mace Windu for not making him a Jedi Master. Classic case of reverse racism.

    Btw, is their any truth to the rumour that the guy cast as Han Solo is such a shit actor that they had to call in an acting coach?

    KirwanK 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • CrucialC Offline
    CrucialC Offline
    Crucial
    wrote on last edited by
    #1148

    It will be interesting to see where they go with the force though. Part of the 'charm' of the original was that it was clear cut good v bad. You are one of either. Audiences didn't need to decipher nuances in the characters. They either deserved a blaster between the eyes or they didn't. That's why the 'Han shot first' scene was changed. Han had to also play along and be clearly a good guy.
    Now the talk is that Luke has worked out that the force is one thing and being pious one way or another will not end well. 'The one who brings balance' no longer means the good guy that eliminates the bad guy but the guy who sits in the middle.

    mariner4lifeM 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • mariner4lifeM Offline
    mariner4lifeM Offline
    mariner4life
    replied to Crucial on last edited by
    #1149

    @Crucial said in Star Wars VII ****contains spoilers****:

    It will be interesting to see where they go with the force though. Part of the 'charm' of the original was that it was clear cut good v bad. You are one of either. Audiences didn't need to decipher nuances in the characters. They either deserved a blaster between the eyes or they didn't. That's why the 'Han shot first' scene was changed. Han had to also play along and be clearly a good guy.
    Now the talk is that Luke has worked out that the force is one thing and being pious one way or another will not end well. 'The one who brings balance' no longer means the good guy that eliminates the bad guy but the guy who sits in the middle.

    Anakin was the guy who brought balance. He made sure there were only two jedi, and two sith left at the end of RoTS.
    Then when Luke started using the force, he killed OWK, so there was still two each.
    Then when Yoda died, he killed the Emporer so there was only 1 each
    Then he remembered he was a good bloke really, so he died to only leave old Lukey as the only bloke around.
    Did his best to balance everything up all the time, and kept copping shit for it.

    CrucialC 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • CrucialC Offline
    CrucialC Offline
    Crucial
    replied to mariner4life on last edited by
    #1150

    @mariner4life said in Star Wars VII ****contains spoilers****:

    @Crucial said in Star Wars VII ****contains spoilers****:

    It will be interesting to see where they go with the force though. Part of the 'charm' of the original was that it was clear cut good v bad. You are one of either. Audiences didn't need to decipher nuances in the characters. They either deserved a blaster between the eyes or they didn't. That's why the 'Han shot first' scene was changed. Han had to also play along and be clearly a good guy.
    Now the talk is that Luke has worked out that the force is one thing and being pious one way or another will not end well. 'The one who brings balance' no longer means the good guy that eliminates the bad guy but the guy who sits in the middle.

    Anakin was the guy who brought balance. He made sure there were only two jedi, and two sith left at the end of RoTS.
    Then when Luke started using the force, he killed OWK, so there was still two each.
    Then when Yoda died, he killed the Emporer so there was only 1 each
    Then he remembered he was a good bloke really, so he died to only leave old Lukey as the only bloke around.
    Did his best to balance everything up all the time, and kept copping shit for it.

    You can't ignore the fact he was a whiny bitch though.

    mariner4lifeM 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • mariner4lifeM Offline
    mariner4lifeM Offline
    mariner4life
    replied to Crucial on last edited by
    #1151

    @Crucial said in Star Wars VII ****contains spoilers****:

    @mariner4life said in Star Wars VII ****contains spoilers****:

    @Crucial said in Star Wars VII ****contains spoilers****:

    It will be interesting to see where they go with the force though. Part of the 'charm' of the original was that it was clear cut good v bad. You are one of either. Audiences didn't need to decipher nuances in the characters. They either deserved a blaster between the eyes or they didn't. That's why the 'Han shot first' scene was changed. Han had to also play along and be clearly a good guy.
    Now the talk is that Luke has worked out that the force is one thing and being pious one way or another will not end well. 'The one who brings balance' no longer means the good guy that eliminates the bad guy but the guy who sits in the middle.

    Anakin was the guy who brought balance. He made sure there were only two jedi, and two sith left at the end of RoTS.
    Then when Luke started using the force, he killed OWK, so there was still two each.
    Then when Yoda died, he killed the Emporer so there was only 1 each
    Then he remembered he was a good bloke really, so he died to only leave old Lukey as the only bloke around.
    Did his best to balance everything up all the time, and kept copping shit for it.

    You can't ignore the fact he was a whiny bitch though.

    doing the right thing is haaaaaard

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • KirwanK Offline
    KirwanK Offline
    Kirwan
    replied to Rancid Schnitzel on last edited by
    #1152

    @Rancid-Schnitzel said in Star Wars VII ****contains spoilers****:

    @mariner4life said in Star Wars VII ****contains spoilers****:

    @MN5 to be fair, i think it's less the two dads, and more

    One dad died after like a week, and the other one cut off his legs and left him burned to fuck on the edge of a lava river, didn't even put him out of his misery (dick move OWK).

    That would fuck anyone up.

    He was already too far gone when dad chopped him up. The real nefarious influence wasn't the dads, but the creepy old guy. Can also blame Mace Windu for not making him a Jedi Master. Classic case of reverse racism.

    Btw, is their any truth to the rumour that the guy cast as Han Solo is such a shit actor that they had to call in an acting coach?

    That was one of the rumours, but the whole thing sounds like a shit show.

    They hired directors known for improvising on set and got annoyed when they went off script. That said, some of leaks said it felt like an Ace Ventura film. Yikes.

    Warren Beauty has had good things to say about the guy as an actor for the film he did with him. But maybe he’s been miscast?

    Seems like a pointless movie to me. We had a young Han Solo film already, it was called A New Hope.

    CrucialC Rancid SchnitzelR MN5M 3 Replies Last reply
    0
  • CrucialC Offline
    CrucialC Offline
    Crucial
    replied to Kirwan on last edited by
    #1153

    @Kirwan said in Star Wars VII ****contains spoilers****:

    @Rancid-Schnitzel said in Star Wars VII ****contains spoilers****:

    @mariner4life said in Star Wars VII ****contains spoilers****:

    @MN5 to be fair, i think it's less the two dads, and more

    One dad died after like a week, and the other one cut off his legs and left him burned to fuck on the edge of a lava river, didn't even put him out of his misery (dick move OWK).

    That would fuck anyone up.

    He was already too far gone when dad chopped him up. The real nefarious influence wasn't the dads, but the creepy old guy. Can also blame Mace Windu for not making him a Jedi Master. Classic case of reverse racism.

    Btw, is their any truth to the rumour that the guy cast as Han Solo is such a shit actor that they had to call in an acting coach?

    That was one of the rumours, but the whole thing sounds like a shit show.

    They hired directors known for improvising on set and got annoyed when they went off script. That said, some of leaks said it felt like an Ace Ventura film. Yikes.

    Warren Beauty has had good things to say about the guy as an actor for the film he did with him. But maybe he’s been miscast?

    Seems like a pointless movie to me. We had a young Han Solo film already, it was called A New Hope.

    I'm torn between having the Han/Chewie background story become canon or leaving it as a bunch of rumours. Also the Han/Lando background. In a way it is quite cool to have them as unconfirmed legends.

    KirwanK 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • KirwanK Offline
    KirwanK Offline
    Kirwan
    replied to Crucial on last edited by
    #1154

    I'm torn between having the Han/Chewie background story become canon or leaving it as a bunch of rumours. Also the Han/Lando background. In a way it is quite cool to have them as unconfirmed legends.

    Yeah, whatever can imagine would probably be cooler than what they end up doing.

    And it’s the main thing that was wrong with the prequels, stretching out a backstory.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Rancid SchnitzelR Offline
    Rancid SchnitzelR Offline
    Rancid Schnitzel
    replied to Kirwan on last edited by
    #1155

    @Kirwan said in Star Wars VII ****contains spoilers****:

    @Rancid-Schnitzel said in Star Wars VII ****contains spoilers****:

    @mariner4life said in Star Wars VII ****contains spoilers****:

    @MN5 to be fair, i think it's less the two dads, and more

    One dad died after like a week, and the other one cut off his legs and left him burned to fuck on the edge of a lava river, didn't even put him out of his misery (dick move OWK).

    That would fuck anyone up.

    He was already too far gone when dad chopped him up. The real nefarious influence wasn't the dads, but the creepy old guy. Can also blame Mace Windu for not making him a Jedi Master. Classic case of reverse racism.

    Btw, is their any truth to the rumour that the guy cast as Han Solo is such a shit actor that they had to call in an acting coach?

    That was one of the rumours, but the whole thing sounds like a shit show.

    They hired directors known for improvising on set and got annoyed when they went off script. That said, some of leaks said it felt like an Ace Ventura film. Yikes.

    Warren Beauty has had good things to say about the guy as an actor for the film he did with him. But maybe he’s been miscast?

    Seems like a pointless movie to me. We had a young Han Solo film already, it was called A New Hope.

    Yeah Im not too keen on this. Would much prefer a Boba Fett movie or even Knights of the Old Republic.

    A Wedge film would also be cool. He's one of my favourite characters.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • MN5M Offline
    MN5M Offline
    MN5
    replied to Kirwan on last edited by
    #1156

    @Kirwan said in Star Wars VII ****contains spoilers****:

    @Rancid-Schnitzel said in Star Wars VII ****contains spoilers****:

    @mariner4life said in Star Wars VII ****contains spoilers****:

    @MN5 to be fair, i think it's less the two dads, and more

    One dad died after like a week, and the other one cut off his legs and left him burned to fuck on the edge of a lava river, didn't even put him out of his misery (dick move OWK).

    That would fuck anyone up.

    He was already too far gone when dad chopped him up. The real nefarious influence wasn't the dads, but the creepy old guy. Can also blame Mace Windu for not making him a Jedi Master. Classic case of reverse racism.

    Btw, is their any truth to the rumour that the guy cast as Han Solo is such a shit actor that they had to call in an acting coach?

    That was one of the rumours, but the whole thing sounds like a shit show.

    They hired directors known for improvising on set and got annoyed when they went off script. That said, some of leaks said it felt like an Ace Ventura film. Yikes.

    Warren Beauty has had good things to say about the guy as an actor for the film he did with him. But maybe he’s been miscast?

    Seems like a pointless movie to me. We had a young Han Solo film already, it was called A New Hope.

    I can handle some of my favourite film series going to shit ( Jaws, Alien, Bond, Indiana Jones )......

    I would go fucken postal if Star Wars released a truly bad flick.

    CrucialC Rancid SchnitzelR boobooB 3 Replies Last reply
    0

Star Wars VII ****contains spoilers****
Off Topic
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.