• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

Star Wars VII ****contains spoilers****

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Off Topic
5.4k Posts 63 Posters 741.4k Views
Star Wars VII ****contains spoilers****
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • Rancid SchnitzelR Offline
    Rancid SchnitzelR Offline
    Rancid Schnitzel
    replied to Virgil on last edited by
    #1538

    @virgil said in Star Wars VII ****contains spoilers****:

    sorry i thought this was a private jerk off circle between just you two.
    Figured you would be off watching something gay like James Bond or Star Trek by now

    Virgil did you actually watch this film 3 times or did you just go to the cinema to get some much needed sleep and time away from the women?

    V 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • V Offline
    V Offline
    Virgil
    replied to Rancid Schnitzel on last edited by
    #1539

    @rancid-schnitzel said in Star Wars VII ****contains spoilers****:

    @virgil said in Star Wars VII ****contains spoilers****:

    sorry i thought this was a private jerk off circle between just you two.
    Figured you would be off watching something gay like James Bond or Star Trek by now

    Virgil did you actually watch this film 3 times or did you just go to the cinema to get some much needed sleep and time away from the women?

    Actually watched it 4 times at the movies
    Another 2 times since it was released on iTunes a couple weeks ago

    Rancid SchnitzelR 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Rancid SchnitzelR Offline
    Rancid SchnitzelR Offline
    Rancid Schnitzel
    replied to Virgil on last edited by
    #1540

    @virgil said in Star Wars VII ****contains spoilers****:

    @rancid-schnitzel said in Star Wars VII ****contains spoilers****:

    @virgil said in Star Wars VII ****contains spoilers****:

    sorry i thought this was a private jerk off circle between just you two.
    Figured you would be off watching something gay like James Bond or Star Trek by now

    Virgil did you actually watch this film 3 times or did you just go to the cinema to get some much needed sleep and time away from the women?

    Actually watched it 4 times at the movies
    Another 2 times since it was released on iTunes a couple weeks ago

    I get it. You're blind, but the music is really awesome.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • MN5M Offline
    MN5M Offline
    MN5
    wrote on last edited by
    #1541

    Virg can you tell us why it's so good? It's Easter we all have a bit of time....

    Rancid SchnitzelR 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • V Offline
    V Offline
    Virgil
    wrote on last edited by
    #1542

    It’s Star Wars.

    MN5M 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Rancid SchnitzelR Offline
    Rancid SchnitzelR Offline
    Rancid Schnitzel
    replied to MN5 on last edited by
    #1543

    @mn5 said in Star Wars VII ****contains spoilers****:

    Virg can you tell us why it's so good? It's Easter we all have a bit of time....

    I second that. Who watches any film six times? I wouldn't watch a porno staring the Sports Illustrated swimsuit models six times.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • MN5M Offline
    MN5M Offline
    MN5
    replied to Virgil on last edited by MN5
    #1544

    @virgil said in Star Wars VII ****contains spoilers****:

    It’s Star Wars.

    Not good enough. I've tried to justify the latest outing by saying just that and I can't. It is literally a hundred times shitter than Phantom Menace.

    Rancid SchnitzelR 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • Rancid SchnitzelR Offline
    Rancid SchnitzelR Offline
    Rancid Schnitzel
    replied to MN5 on last edited by
    #1545

    @mn5 said in Star Wars VII ****contains spoilers****:

    @virgil said in Star Wars VII ****contains spoilers****:

    It’s Star Wars.

    Not good enough. I've tried to justify the latest outing by saying just that and I can't. It is literally a hundred times shitter than Phantom Menace.

    Like you I fail to understand how people can seriously hate the prequels but get serious wood over these new films. There is no logic there.

    MN5M 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • MN5M Offline
    MN5M Offline
    MN5
    replied to Rancid Schnitzel on last edited by MN5
    #1546

    @rancid-schnitzel said in Star Wars VII ****contains spoilers****:

    @mn5 said in Star Wars VII ****contains spoilers****:

    @virgil said in Star Wars VII ****contains spoilers****:

    It’s Star Wars.

    Not good enough. I've tried to justify the latest outing by saying just that and I can't. It is literally a hundred times shitter than Phantom Menace.

    Like you I fail to understand how people can seriously hate the prequels but get serious wood over these new films. There is no logic there.

    The prequels had their fair share of flaws which have been addressed ad nauseum but they absolutely shit all over the latest two in the series. TFA is probably better than Phantom Menace I'll admit but after the latest clusterfuck there's more chance of Steve Smith captaining Oz again than there is of the latest trilogy matching the prequels regardless of how good episode 9 is.

    NepiaN 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • BovidaeB Offline
    BovidaeB Offline
    Bovidae
    wrote on last edited by
    #1547

    I was critical of TLJ after seeing it twice at the theatre but I am interested in seeing the special features of the BR release as the director Rian Johnson explains a lot of the plot points and decisions made. The doco also doesn't shy away from Mark Hamill's unhappiness with the script.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • NepiaN Offline
    NepiaN Offline
    Nepia
    replied to MN5 on last edited by
    #1548

    @mn5 said in Star Wars VII ****contains spoilers****:

    @rancid-schnitzel said in Star Wars VII ****contains spoilers****:

    @mn5 said in Star Wars VII ****contains spoilers****:

    @virgil said in Star Wars VII ****contains spoilers****:

    It’s Star Wars.

    Not good enough. I've tried to justify the latest outing by saying just that and I can't. It is literally a hundred times shitter than Phantom Menace.

    Like you I fail to understand how people can seriously hate the prequels but get serious wood over these new films. There is no logic there.

    The prequels had their fair share of flaws which have been addressed ad nauseum but they absolutely shit all over the latest two in the series. TFA is probably better than Phantom Menace I'll admit but after the latest clusterfuck there's more chance of Steve Smith captaining Oz again than there is of the latest trilogy matching the prequels regardless of how good episode 9 is.

    You've been trolling this quite steadily with some merit, but c'mon man, you've got to keep some semblance of realism.

    MN5M 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • MN5M Offline
    MN5M Offline
    MN5
    replied to Nepia on last edited by
    #1549

    @nepia said in Star Wars VII ****contains spoilers****:

    @mn5 said in Star Wars VII ****contains spoilers****:

    @rancid-schnitzel said in Star Wars VII ****contains spoilers****:

    @mn5 said in Star Wars VII ****contains spoilers****:

    @virgil said in Star Wars VII ****contains spoilers****:

    It’s Star Wars.

    Not good enough. I've tried to justify the latest outing by saying just that and I can't. It is literally a hundred times shitter than Phantom Menace.

    Like you I fail to understand how people can seriously hate the prequels but get serious wood over these new films. There is no logic there.

    The prequels had their fair share of flaws which have been addressed ad nauseum but they absolutely shit all over the latest two in the series. TFA is probably better than Phantom Menace I'll admit but after the latest clusterfuck there's more chance of Steve Smith captaining Oz again than there is of the latest trilogy matching the prequels regardless of how good episode 9 is.

    You've been trolling this quite steadily with some merit, but c'mon man, you've got to keep some semblance of realism.

    Trolling is saying Daniel Braid was a much better player than Richie McCaw.

    What I'm doing is stating facts.

    NepiaN 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • NepiaN Offline
    NepiaN Offline
    Nepia
    replied to MN5 on last edited by
    #1550

    @mn5 said in Star Wars VII ****contains spoilers****:

    @nepia said in Star Wars VII ****contains spoilers****:

    @mn5 said in Star Wars VII ****contains spoilers****:

    @rancid-schnitzel said in Star Wars VII ****contains spoilers****:

    @mn5 said in Star Wars VII ****contains spoilers****:

    @virgil said in Star Wars VII ****contains spoilers****:

    It’s Star Wars.

    Not good enough. I've tried to justify the latest outing by saying just that and I can't. It is literally a hundred times shitter than Phantom Menace.

    Like you I fail to understand how people can seriously hate the prequels but get serious wood over these new films. There is no logic there.

    The prequels had their fair share of flaws which have been addressed ad nauseum but they absolutely shit all over the latest two in the series. TFA is probably better than Phantom Menace I'll admit but after the latest clusterfuck there's more chance of Steve Smith captaining Oz again than there is of the latest trilogy matching the prequels regardless of how good episode 9 is.

    You've been trolling this quite steadily with some merit, but c'mon man, you've got to keep some semblance of realism.

    Trolling is saying Daniel Braid was a much better player than Richie McCaw.

    What I'm doing is stating facts.

    The Phantom Menace in this analogy is the reserve from the the Auckland club team that Braid is affiliated to and played for a few times as an 18 year old.

    MN5M 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • MN5M Offline
    MN5M Offline
    MN5
    replied to Nepia on last edited by
    #1551

    @nepia said in Star Wars VII ****contains spoilers****:

    @mn5 said in Star Wars VII ****contains spoilers****:

    @nepia said in Star Wars VII ****contains spoilers****:

    @mn5 said in Star Wars VII ****contains spoilers****:

    @rancid-schnitzel said in Star Wars VII ****contains spoilers****:

    @mn5 said in Star Wars VII ****contains spoilers****:

    @virgil said in Star Wars VII ****contains spoilers****:

    It’s Star Wars.

    Not good enough. I've tried to justify the latest outing by saying just that and I can't. It is literally a hundred times shitter than Phantom Menace.

    Like you I fail to understand how people can seriously hate the prequels but get serious wood over these new films. There is no logic there.

    The prequels had their fair share of flaws which have been addressed ad nauseum but they absolutely shit all over the latest two in the series. TFA is probably better than Phantom Menace I'll admit but after the latest clusterfuck there's more chance of Steve Smith captaining Oz again than there is of the latest trilogy matching the prequels regardless of how good episode 9 is.

    You've been trolling this quite steadily with some merit, but c'mon man, you've got to keep some semblance of realism.

    Trolling is saying Daniel Braid was a much better player than Richie McCaw.

    What I'm doing is stating facts.

    The Phantom Menace in this analogy is the reserve from the the Auckland club team that Braid is affiliated to and played for a few times as an 18 year old.

    The Last Jedi is someone with no arms and legs trying to play rugby.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • V Offline
    V Offline
    Virgil
    wrote on last edited by
    #1552

    Your not helping your case.

    MN5M Rancid SchnitzelR 2 Replies Last reply
    0
  • MN5M Offline
    MN5M Offline
    MN5
    replied to Virgil on last edited by
    #1553

    @virgil said in Star Wars VII ****contains spoilers****:

    Your not helping your case.

    I think I am. I can also get 100% in a your/you're test.

    1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • Rancid SchnitzelR Offline
    Rancid SchnitzelR Offline
    Rancid Schnitzel
    replied to Virgil on last edited by
    #1554

    @virgil said in Star Wars VII ****contains spoilers****:

    Your not helping your case.

    With respect Virgil you haven't exactly put forward a compelling argument yourself.

    MN5M 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • MN5M Offline
    MN5M Offline
    MN5
    replied to Rancid Schnitzel on last edited by
    #1555

    @rancid-schnitzel said in Star Wars VII ****contains spoilers****:

    @virgil said in Star Wars VII ****contains spoilers****:

    Your not helping your case.

    With respect Virgil you haven't exactly put forward a compelling argument yourself.

    Thats putting it mildly.....

    I love Virgs work and often we agree on a lot but every now and again we're at loggerheads. I think I've made my feelings for this flick pretty clear and, tragically, not even the 'It's Star Wars' argument can save it which for me personally is heartbreaking.

    Positive points ?

    More compelling performances from R n R.

    Probably Mark Hamills best performance as LS.

    Snoke a great bad guy ( Still not as good as the Emperor )

    A kick ass fight with the Red Guards

    .....

    Rancid SchnitzelR 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Rancid SchnitzelR Offline
    Rancid SchnitzelR Offline
    Rancid Schnitzel
    replied to MN5 on last edited by
    #1556

    @mn5 said in Star Wars VII ****contains spoilers****:

    @rancid-schnitzel said in Star Wars VII ****contains spoilers****:

    @virgil said in Star Wars VII ****contains spoilers****:

    Your not helping your case.

    With respect Virgil you haven't exactly put forward a compelling argument yourself.

    Thats putting it mildly.....

    I love Virgs work and often we agree on a lot but every now and again we're at loggerheads. I think I've made my feelings for this flick pretty clear and, tragically, not even the 'It's Star Wars' argument can save it which for me personally is heartbreaking.

    Positive points ?

    More compelling performances from R n R.

    Probably Mark Hamills best performance as LS.

    Snoke a great bad guy ( Still not as good as the Emperor )

    A kick ass fight with the Red Guards

    .....

    I would say this: Ben Solo is a very interesting character (and well acted) but not Kylo Ren. What I mean is that Kylo Ren is only cool with the mask and mystery. When he takes the mask off he's a joke.

    I think they really missed a cool character ark here. They should have started with Ben turning in VII.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • V Offline
    V Offline
    Virgil
    wrote on last edited by
    #1557

    Thanks to you ladies I’m watching it again tonight, need me to # every scene as I go?

    MN5M Rancid SchnitzelR 2 Replies Last reply
    0

Star Wars VII ****contains spoilers****
Off Topic
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.