• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Sports Talk
cricket
947 Posts 62 Posters 100.0k Views
Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • V Offline
    V Offline
    Virgil
    wrote on last edited by
    #759

    Smart move by Warner to face the media for the first time with his wife and girls
    Hard to kick him further when he’s holding one of his little girls.

    Rancid SchnitzelR 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • MiketheSnowM Offline
    MiketheSnowM Offline
    MiketheSnow
    replied to Virgil on last edited by
    #760

    @virgil said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:

    Easy to forget if Warner and co had managed to get away with this and done it again (and again) and it was successful
    Their cheating could have ended careers.
    Their mental disintegration approach has been incredibly ruthless, it has ended several careers.
    The English alone have lost several high profile players who went from being very successful to a shadow of their former selves. They have taken much delight and glee from breaking down other teams. ( Jonathon Trott anyone?)
    That gets all forgotten about when they hold a press conference and bawl their eyes out.

    They have brought this on themselves.

    Exactly. Fuck them all and their X Factor bawling

    1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • Rancid SchnitzelR Offline
    Rancid SchnitzelR Offline
    Rancid Schnitzel
    replied to Virgil on last edited by
    #761

    @virgil said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:

    Smart move by Warner to face the media for the first time with his wife and girls
    Hard to kick him further when he’s holding one of his little girls.

    I hate him even more for that. He's effectively using them as a shield. Cowardly tosser.

    MokeyM 1 Reply Last reply
    15
  • MiketheSnowM Offline
    MiketheSnowM Offline
    MiketheSnow
    replied to MajorRage on last edited by MiketheSnow
    #762

    @majorrage said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:

    Absolutely magnificent PR by team Smith.

    Perfection.

    You'll fall for anything.

    Here's what should have been said

    'As Aussies we're raised to be winners.

    But I lost sight of our values and resorted to winning at any cost.

    For that I will be enternally sorry.

    I accept my punishment and if I ever get another chance to represent my country I will do so to the best of my ability, within the rules, win lose or draw."

    Exit stage left.

    MajorRageM 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.
    replied to mariner4life on last edited by Chris B.
    #763

    @mariner4life said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:

    Lehman goes.

    Real talk, I've had a bit of fun with this over the last couple of days, it's been a good bit of chat about a sporting controversy.

    But Jesus Christ this is fucking ridiculous. I fucking feel for all of them now, even warner. It's fucking ball tampering, not match fixing. Get a grip.

    I don't get the sanctimony in the aussie press at all. Suddenly the "hard edge" is a stick to beat them with, but was celebrated not a couple of months ago. Get fucked.

    I guess I'm not surprised at the severity of the sentences - I thought it would be either six months or a year.

    I follow your point comparing ball tampering with match fixing, but in my mind they're somewhat in the same ballpark (not the crazy dismissals of that video a month or so ago where a whole team is throwing the match), but the Hansie Cronje/ Lou Vincent type of fixing where a couple of guys in a team are conscripted to throw their wickets away. Main difference is that the Aussies were doing it for the team not for their direct personal enrichment.

    Maybe it's closer (ballpark) to having several players in a rugby team caught using PEDs. Basically it's premeditated cheating to try to give your team a significant advantage. As someone points out above, the immediate follow-up (tape rather than sandpaper, etc) wasn't flash either.

    I can understand the anger in Oz as well. It's a bit like if a group of ABs were caught using PEDs - it kind of invalidates some of what has gone before and some of what will happen in the future - at least in terms of internet/media "banter". Every time the Aussies win, there will be "check the ball" comments somewhere. I'd be fucking furious if it was the ABs or the Black Caps.

    And to avoid calls of naivety - I'd already be amazed if there had never been a single AB who has used PEDs - and the same goes for every other major international team.

    Years ago I worked for a bank and probably knew/knew of about 300 various staff, of whom nine were sacked for fingers in the till. There's a proportion of cheats in the population.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • MokeyM Offline
    MokeyM Offline
    Mokey
    replied to Rancid Schnitzel on last edited by
    #764

    @rancid-schnitzel said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:

    @virgil said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:

    Smart move by Warner to face the media for the first time with his wife and girls
    Hard to kick him further when he’s holding one of his little girls.

    I hate him even more for that. He's effectively using them as a shield. Cowardly tosser.

    100% agree. Dragging his wee girls in front of the cameras as props to garner sympathy is beyond disgusting. This is about YOUR cheating, and YOUR bad behaviour on the field, you fucking asshole. Your teammates stood up and took it.

    rotatedR 1 Reply Last reply
    8
  • rotatedR Offline
    rotatedR Offline
    rotated
    replied to Mokey on last edited by rotated
    #765

    @mokey said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:

    @rancid-schnitzel said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:

    @virgil said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:

    Smart move by Warner to face the media for the first time with his wife and girls
    Hard to kick him further when he’s holding one of his little girls.

    I hate him even more for that. He's effectively using them as a shield. Cowardly tosser.

    100% agree. Dragging his wee girls in front of the cameras as props to garner sympathy is beyond disgusting. This is about YOUR cheating, and YOUR bad behaviour on the field, you fucking asshole. Your teammates stood up and took it.

    That comment shows a fundamental lack of understanding of the line.

    See there is this line.

    Getting stuck into Davey about his Mrs on the field? That is absolutely over the line. They aren’t a part of the game, they didn’t ask to be involved - leave them out of this.

    Davey has been caught cheating in an on field incident? Quick get the wife and kids, see if we can get granny Warner out of the nursing home too. Using your wife and kids as a shield in the media is absolutely within the line.

    Your comment criticizing him for using his wife and kids like this is most certainly over the line. Leave them out of this.

    1 Reply Last reply
    9
  • MajorRageM Away
    MajorRageM Away
    MajorRage
    replied to MiketheSnow on last edited by
    #766

    @mikethesnow sorry, I'll fall for anything?

    I think I'm one of the very few that hasn't.

    MiketheSnowM 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Baron Silas GreenbackB Offline
    Baron Silas GreenbackB Offline
    Baron Silas Greenback
    wrote on last edited by Baron Silas Greenback
    #767

    The level of vitriol towards Warner in this thread is ugly....and revealing. Some posters have shown they are cut from the same cloth as the man they are raging about.

    Rancid SchnitzelR 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • Rancid SchnitzelR Offline
    Rancid SchnitzelR Offline
    Rancid Schnitzel
    replied to Baron Silas Greenback on last edited by
    #768

    @baron-silas-greenback said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:

    The level of vitriol towards Warner in this thread is ugly....and revealing. Some posters have shown they are cut from the same cloth as the man they are raging about.

    Can't speak for the others here, but I never ran up to a dismissed batsman and yelled abuse straight in his face nor did I ever cheat. I would also never consider using my kids to shield me from a shit storm that was entirely my own making.

    Warner is a cnut. Simply pointing that out does not then make someone a cnut themselves. That's weird logic right there.

    Baron Silas GreenbackB 1 Reply Last reply
    6
  • Baron Silas GreenbackB Offline
    Baron Silas GreenbackB Offline
    Baron Silas Greenback
    replied to Rancid Schnitzel on last edited by
    #769

    @rancid-schnitzel said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:

    @baron-silas-greenback said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:

    The level of vitriol towards Warner in this thread is ugly....and revealing. Some posters have shown they are cut from the same cloth as the man they are raging about.

    Can't speak for the others here, but I never ran up to a dismissed batsman and yelled abuse straight in his face nor did I ever cheat. I would also never consider using my kids to shield me from a shit storm that was entirely my own making.

    Warner is a cnut. Simply pointing that out does not then make someone a cnut themselves. That's weird logic right there.

    If it was simply a case of pointing that out....then you would be right. But it isnt.
    I think Warner is in all a nasty peice of work on thd field. But I can see context and scale.

    Baron Silas GreenbackB Rancid SchnitzelR 2 Replies Last reply
    0
  • DonsteppaD Offline
    DonsteppaD Offline
    Donsteppa
    wrote on last edited by
    #770

    Thought I read somewhere that Warner’s family had been travelling with him, so the kids at the airport are no surprise.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Baron Silas GreenbackB Offline
    Baron Silas GreenbackB Offline
    Baron Silas Greenback
    replied to Baron Silas Greenback on last edited by Baron Silas Greenback
    #771

    @baron-silas-greenback And for the record I have spoken to someone who has played with and against Warner about the very topic of sledging and abuse. And he is indeed pretty feral. Off the field he is apparently a bloody nice guy and less arrogant than most of his teamates. But nothing more than a number of other players. He just gets pumped on the field and crosses the line more often than others.
    The reaction to him over this is disgusting and more feral than Warner.

    boobooB 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Rancid SchnitzelR Offline
    Rancid SchnitzelR Offline
    Rancid Schnitzel
    replied to Baron Silas Greenback on last edited by
    #772

    @baron-silas-greenback said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:

    @rancid-schnitzel said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:

    @baron-silas-greenback said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:

    The level of vitriol towards Warner in this thread is ugly....and revealing. Some posters have shown they are cut from the same cloth as the man they are raging about.

    Can't speak for the others here, but I never ran up to a dismissed batsman and yelled abuse straight in his face nor did I ever cheat. I would also never consider using my kids to shield me from a shit storm that was entirely my own making.

    Warner is a cnut. Simply pointing that out does not then make someone a cnut themselves. That's weird logic right there.

    If it was simply a case of pointing that out....then you would be right. But it isnt.
    I think Warner is in all a nasty peice of work on thd field. But I can see context and scale.

    What would be appropriate context and scale on this thread? Can you give examples of where this line was crossed? I don't see how the abuse he is copping here is any worse than any other sportsman who get shit on TSF.

    Baron Silas GreenbackB 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • canefanC Offline
    canefanC Offline
    canefan
    wrote on last edited by canefan
    #773

    I haven't seen any posters say that Davey's wife mum or sister are bush pigs. Even during the fuss over his wife I didn't read any rude comments directly aimed at her, I didn't for example read anyone say she was a slut or whore for example. I think it's safe to say we've all stayed behind the line Warner crossed with Quinton de Kock

    Baron Silas GreenbackB 1 Reply Last reply
    4
  • Baron Silas GreenbackB Offline
    Baron Silas GreenbackB Offline
    Baron Silas Greenback
    replied to Rancid Schnitzel on last edited by
    #774

    @rancid-schnitzel said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:

    @baron-silas-greenback said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:

    @rancid-schnitzel said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:

    @baron-silas-greenback said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:

    The level of vitriol towards Warner in this thread is ugly....and revealing. Some posters have shown they are cut from the same cloth as the man they are raging about.

    Can't speak for the others here, but I never ran up to a dismissed batsman and yelled abuse straight in his face nor did I ever cheat. I would also never consider using my kids to shield me from a shit storm that was entirely my own making.

    Warner is a cnut. Simply pointing that out does not then make someone a cnut themselves. That's weird logic right there.

    If it was simply a case of pointing that out....then you would be right. But it isnt.
    I think Warner is in all a nasty peice of work on thd field. But I can see context and scale.

    What would be appropriate context and scale on this thread? Can you give examples of where this line was crossed? I don't see how the abuse he is copping here is any worse than any other sportsman who get shit on TSF.

    No. Read back for yourself. If you still think this is still a appropriate level of vitriol... good on ya.

    Rancid SchnitzelR 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Baron Silas GreenbackB Offline
    Baron Silas GreenbackB Offline
    Baron Silas Greenback
    replied to canefan on last edited by
    #775

    @canefan said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:

    I haven't seen any posters say that Davey's wife mum or sister are bush pigs. Even during the fuss over his wife I didn't read any rude comments directly aimed at her, I didn't for example read anyone say she was a slut or whore for example. I think it's safe to say we've all stayed behind the line Warner crossed with Quinton de Kock

    You would be wrong then.

    KiwiMurphK 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • KiwiMurphK Offline
    KiwiMurphK Offline
    KiwiMurph
    replied to Baron Silas Greenback on last edited by
    #776

    @baron-silas-greenback said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:

    @canefan said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:

    I haven't seen any posters say that Davey's wife mum or sister are bush pigs. Even during the fuss over his wife I didn't read any rude comments directly aimed at her, I didn't for example read anyone say she was a slut or whore for example. I think it's safe to say we've all stayed behind the line Warner crossed with Quinton de Kock

    You would be wrong then.

    In your opinion...without providing any evidence.

    1 Reply Last reply
    8
  • Rancid SchnitzelR Offline
    Rancid SchnitzelR Offline
    Rancid Schnitzel
    replied to Baron Silas Greenback on last edited by
    #777

    @baron-silas-greenback said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:

    @rancid-schnitzel said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:

    @baron-silas-greenback said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:

    @rancid-schnitzel said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:

    @baron-silas-greenback said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:

    The level of vitriol towards Warner in this thread is ugly....and revealing. Some posters have shown they are cut from the same cloth as the man they are raging about.

    Can't speak for the others here, but I never ran up to a dismissed batsman and yelled abuse straight in his face nor did I ever cheat. I would also never consider using my kids to shield me from a shit storm that was entirely my own making.

    Warner is a cnut. Simply pointing that out does not then make someone a cnut themselves. That's weird logic right there.

    If it was simply a case of pointing that out....then you would be right. But it isnt.
    I think Warner is in all a nasty peice of work on thd field. But I can see context and scale.

    What would be appropriate context and scale on this thread? Can you give examples of where this line was crossed? I don't see how the abuse he is copping here is any worse than any other sportsman who get shit on TSF.

    No. Read back for yourself. If you still think this is still a appropriate level of vitriol... good on ya.

    What was written yesterday or today that was so bad that posters here should be accused of being on the same level as him?

    canefanC 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • canefanC Offline
    canefanC Offline
    canefan
    replied to Rancid Schnitzel on last edited by
    #778

    @rancid-schnitzel said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:

    @baron-silas-greenback said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:

    @rancid-schnitzel said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:

    @baron-silas-greenback said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:

    @rancid-schnitzel said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:

    @baron-silas-greenback said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:

    The level of vitriol towards Warner in this thread is ugly....and revealing. Some posters have shown they are cut from the same cloth as the man they are raging about.

    Can't speak for the others here, but I never ran up to a dismissed batsman and yelled abuse straight in his face nor did I ever cheat. I would also never consider using my kids to shield me from a shit storm that was entirely my own making.

    Warner is a cnut. Simply pointing that out does not then make someone a cnut themselves. That's weird logic right there.

    If it was simply a case of pointing that out....then you would be right. But it isnt.
    I think Warner is in all a nasty peice of work on thd field. But I can see context and scale.

    What would be appropriate context and scale on this thread? Can you give examples of where this line was crossed? I don't see how the abuse he is copping here is any worse than any other sportsman who get shit on TSF.

    No. Read back for yourself. If you still think this is still a appropriate level of vitriol... good on ya.

    What was written yesterday or today that was so bad that posters here should be accused of being on the same level as him?

    I'd bet that anything said on TSF about Warner, Smith, Bancroft, and the Aussie cricket team in general, is about 1000x more tame than the shitstorm raging at home this week

    1 Reply Last reply
    0

Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket
Sports Talk
cricket
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.