Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket
-
@rancid-schnitzel said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:
@baron-silas-greenback said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:
The level of vitriol towards Warner in this thread is ugly....and revealing. Some posters have shown they are cut from the same cloth as the man they are raging about.
Can't speak for the others here, but I never ran up to a dismissed batsman and yelled abuse straight in his face nor did I ever cheat. I would also never consider using my kids to shield me from a shit storm that was entirely my own making.
Warner is a cnut. Simply pointing that out does not then make someone a cnut themselves. That's weird logic right there.
If it was simply a case of pointing that out....then you would be right. But it isnt.
I think Warner is in all a nasty peice of work on thd field. But I can see context and scale.@baron-silas-greenback And for the record I have spoken to someone who has played with and against Warner about the very topic of sledging and abuse. And he is indeed pretty feral. Off the field he is apparently a bloody nice guy and less arrogant than most of his teamates. But nothing more than a number of other players. He just gets pumped on the field and crosses the line more often than others.
The reaction to him over this is disgusting and more feral than Warner. -
@rancid-schnitzel said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:
@baron-silas-greenback said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:
The level of vitriol towards Warner in this thread is ugly....and revealing. Some posters have shown they are cut from the same cloth as the man they are raging about.
Can't speak for the others here, but I never ran up to a dismissed batsman and yelled abuse straight in his face nor did I ever cheat. I would also never consider using my kids to shield me from a shit storm that was entirely my own making.
Warner is a cnut. Simply pointing that out does not then make someone a cnut themselves. That's weird logic right there.
If it was simply a case of pointing that out....then you would be right. But it isnt.
I think Warner is in all a nasty peice of work on thd field. But I can see context and scale.@baron-silas-greenback said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:
@rancid-schnitzel said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:
@baron-silas-greenback said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:
The level of vitriol towards Warner in this thread is ugly....and revealing. Some posters have shown they are cut from the same cloth as the man they are raging about.
Can't speak for the others here, but I never ran up to a dismissed batsman and yelled abuse straight in his face nor did I ever cheat. I would also never consider using my kids to shield me from a shit storm that was entirely my own making.
Warner is a cnut. Simply pointing that out does not then make someone a cnut themselves. That's weird logic right there.
If it was simply a case of pointing that out....then you would be right. But it isnt.
I think Warner is in all a nasty peice of work on thd field. But I can see context and scale.What would be appropriate context and scale on this thread? Can you give examples of where this line was crossed? I don't see how the abuse he is copping here is any worse than any other sportsman who get shit on TSF.
-
I haven't seen any posters say that Davey's wife mum or sister are bush pigs. Even during the fuss over his wife I didn't read any rude comments directly aimed at her, I didn't for example read anyone say she was a slut or whore for example. I think it's safe to say we've all stayed behind the line Warner crossed with Quinton de Kock
-
@baron-silas-greenback said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:
@rancid-schnitzel said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:
@baron-silas-greenback said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:
The level of vitriol towards Warner in this thread is ugly....and revealing. Some posters have shown they are cut from the same cloth as the man they are raging about.
Can't speak for the others here, but I never ran up to a dismissed batsman and yelled abuse straight in his face nor did I ever cheat. I would also never consider using my kids to shield me from a shit storm that was entirely my own making.
Warner is a cnut. Simply pointing that out does not then make someone a cnut themselves. That's weird logic right there.
If it was simply a case of pointing that out....then you would be right. But it isnt.
I think Warner is in all a nasty peice of work on thd field. But I can see context and scale.What would be appropriate context and scale on this thread? Can you give examples of where this line was crossed? I don't see how the abuse he is copping here is any worse than any other sportsman who get shit on TSF.
@rancid-schnitzel said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:
@baron-silas-greenback said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:
@rancid-schnitzel said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:
@baron-silas-greenback said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:
The level of vitriol towards Warner in this thread is ugly....and revealing. Some posters have shown they are cut from the same cloth as the man they are raging about.
Can't speak for the others here, but I never ran up to a dismissed batsman and yelled abuse straight in his face nor did I ever cheat. I would also never consider using my kids to shield me from a shit storm that was entirely my own making.
Warner is a cnut. Simply pointing that out does not then make someone a cnut themselves. That's weird logic right there.
If it was simply a case of pointing that out....then you would be right. But it isnt.
I think Warner is in all a nasty peice of work on thd field. But I can see context and scale.What would be appropriate context and scale on this thread? Can you give examples of where this line was crossed? I don't see how the abuse he is copping here is any worse than any other sportsman who get shit on TSF.
No. Read back for yourself. If you still think this is still a appropriate level of vitriol... good on ya.
-
I haven't seen any posters say that Davey's wife mum or sister are bush pigs. Even during the fuss over his wife I didn't read any rude comments directly aimed at her, I didn't for example read anyone say she was a slut or whore for example. I think it's safe to say we've all stayed behind the line Warner crossed with Quinton de Kock
@canefan said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:
I haven't seen any posters say that Davey's wife mum or sister are bush pigs. Even during the fuss over his wife I didn't read any rude comments directly aimed at her, I didn't for example read anyone say she was a slut or whore for example. I think it's safe to say we've all stayed behind the line Warner crossed with Quinton de Kock
You would be wrong then.
-
@canefan said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:
I haven't seen any posters say that Davey's wife mum or sister are bush pigs. Even during the fuss over his wife I didn't read any rude comments directly aimed at her, I didn't for example read anyone say she was a slut or whore for example. I think it's safe to say we've all stayed behind the line Warner crossed with Quinton de Kock
You would be wrong then.
@baron-silas-greenback said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:
@canefan said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:
I haven't seen any posters say that Davey's wife mum or sister are bush pigs. Even during the fuss over his wife I didn't read any rude comments directly aimed at her, I didn't for example read anyone say she was a slut or whore for example. I think it's safe to say we've all stayed behind the line Warner crossed with Quinton de Kock
You would be wrong then.
In your opinion...without providing any evidence.
-
@rancid-schnitzel said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:
@baron-silas-greenback said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:
@rancid-schnitzel said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:
@baron-silas-greenback said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:
The level of vitriol towards Warner in this thread is ugly....and revealing. Some posters have shown they are cut from the same cloth as the man they are raging about.
Can't speak for the others here, but I never ran up to a dismissed batsman and yelled abuse straight in his face nor did I ever cheat. I would also never consider using my kids to shield me from a shit storm that was entirely my own making.
Warner is a cnut. Simply pointing that out does not then make someone a cnut themselves. That's weird logic right there.
If it was simply a case of pointing that out....then you would be right. But it isnt.
I think Warner is in all a nasty peice of work on thd field. But I can see context and scale.What would be appropriate context and scale on this thread? Can you give examples of where this line was crossed? I don't see how the abuse he is copping here is any worse than any other sportsman who get shit on TSF.
No. Read back for yourself. If you still think this is still a appropriate level of vitriol... good on ya.
@baron-silas-greenback said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:
@rancid-schnitzel said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:
@baron-silas-greenback said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:
@rancid-schnitzel said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:
@baron-silas-greenback said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:
The level of vitriol towards Warner in this thread is ugly....and revealing. Some posters have shown they are cut from the same cloth as the man they are raging about.
Can't speak for the others here, but I never ran up to a dismissed batsman and yelled abuse straight in his face nor did I ever cheat. I would also never consider using my kids to shield me from a shit storm that was entirely my own making.
Warner is a cnut. Simply pointing that out does not then make someone a cnut themselves. That's weird logic right there.
If it was simply a case of pointing that out....then you would be right. But it isnt.
I think Warner is in all a nasty peice of work on thd field. But I can see context and scale.What would be appropriate context and scale on this thread? Can you give examples of where this line was crossed? I don't see how the abuse he is copping here is any worse than any other sportsman who get shit on TSF.
No. Read back for yourself. If you still think this is still a appropriate level of vitriol... good on ya.
What was written yesterday or today that was so bad that posters here should be accused of being on the same level as him?
-
@baron-silas-greenback said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:
@rancid-schnitzel said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:
@baron-silas-greenback said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:
@rancid-schnitzel said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:
@baron-silas-greenback said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:
The level of vitriol towards Warner in this thread is ugly....and revealing. Some posters have shown they are cut from the same cloth as the man they are raging about.
Can't speak for the others here, but I never ran up to a dismissed batsman and yelled abuse straight in his face nor did I ever cheat. I would also never consider using my kids to shield me from a shit storm that was entirely my own making.
Warner is a cnut. Simply pointing that out does not then make someone a cnut themselves. That's weird logic right there.
If it was simply a case of pointing that out....then you would be right. But it isnt.
I think Warner is in all a nasty peice of work on thd field. But I can see context and scale.What would be appropriate context and scale on this thread? Can you give examples of where this line was crossed? I don't see how the abuse he is copping here is any worse than any other sportsman who get shit on TSF.
No. Read back for yourself. If you still think this is still a appropriate level of vitriol... good on ya.
What was written yesterday or today that was so bad that posters here should be accused of being on the same level as him?
@rancid-schnitzel said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:
@baron-silas-greenback said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:
@rancid-schnitzel said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:
@baron-silas-greenback said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:
@rancid-schnitzel said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:
@baron-silas-greenback said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:
The level of vitriol towards Warner in this thread is ugly....and revealing. Some posters have shown they are cut from the same cloth as the man they are raging about.
Can't speak for the others here, but I never ran up to a dismissed batsman and yelled abuse straight in his face nor did I ever cheat. I would also never consider using my kids to shield me from a shit storm that was entirely my own making.
Warner is a cnut. Simply pointing that out does not then make someone a cnut themselves. That's weird logic right there.
If it was simply a case of pointing that out....then you would be right. But it isnt.
I think Warner is in all a nasty peice of work on thd field. But I can see context and scale.What would be appropriate context and scale on this thread? Can you give examples of where this line was crossed? I don't see how the abuse he is copping here is any worse than any other sportsman who get shit on TSF.
No. Read back for yourself. If you still think this is still a appropriate level of vitriol... good on ya.
What was written yesterday or today that was so bad that posters here should be accused of being on the same level as him?
I'd bet that anything said on TSF about Warner, Smith, Bancroft, and the Aussie cricket team in general, is about 1000x more tame than the shitstorm raging at home this week
-
Whatever happened between Candice Warner and Sonny Bill Williams and multiple others has no place on the cricket pitch.
@canerbry said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:
Whatever happened between Candice Warner and Sonny Bill Williams and multiple others has no place on the cricket pitch.
@snowy said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:
@mariner4life said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:
It was all in defense of a lady!
That is his wife you are referring to right?
The lady bit?
She married David fucking Warner. I did get your point but "lady" might be the wrong term.I could go on a rant about personal responsibility here but I will save you all by not doing it.
@nta said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:
@mariner4life lol **yeah she's kind of a skank, but Warner isn't the brightest.
If he wants to throw a hotdog down that hallway, that's his well-paid-for-mouthing-off-and-whacking-a-ball-with-a-stick choice.**
@mn5 said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:
**'Kind of a skank.....'
That's like saying Don Bradman was kinda good.**
@crucial said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:
@taniwharugby said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:
fark, I have no idea what the story was about DDD's missus...guess I should ask Uncle Google!
...and all his mates
@chester-draws said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:
Stay classy San Diego....
I'm pretty sure she did all the degrading she could manage -- to herself -- well before this thread started.
If calling a spade a spade earns a "knob end" then so be it.
@Snowy @jegga @canefan @Virgil @Rancid-Schnitzel @Sneakdefreak @KiwiMurph
I stopped looking after I found the first half dozen or so. If you had any kind of memory or had bothered to read the thread it was pretty bloody obvious. So I was corrct and you lot were wrong, you are welcome. Learn the lesson and move on.
-
@canerbry said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:
Whatever happened between Candice Warner and Sonny Bill Williams and multiple others has no place on the cricket pitch.
@snowy said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:
@mariner4life said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:
It was all in defense of a lady!
That is his wife you are referring to right?
The lady bit?
She married David fucking Warner. I did get your point but "lady" might be the wrong term.I could go on a rant about personal responsibility here but I will save you all by not doing it.
@nta said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:
@mariner4life lol **yeah she's kind of a skank, but Warner isn't the brightest.
If he wants to throw a hotdog down that hallway, that's his well-paid-for-mouthing-off-and-whacking-a-ball-with-a-stick choice.**
@mn5 said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:
**'Kind of a skank.....'
That's like saying Don Bradman was kinda good.**
@crucial said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:
@taniwharugby said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:
fark, I have no idea what the story was about DDD's missus...guess I should ask Uncle Google!
...and all his mates
@chester-draws said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:
Stay classy San Diego....
I'm pretty sure she did all the degrading she could manage -- to herself -- well before this thread started.
If calling a spade a spade earns a "knob end" then so be it.
@Snowy @jegga @canefan @Virgil @Rancid-Schnitzel @Sneakdefreak @KiwiMurph
I stopped looking after I found the first half dozen or so. If you had any kind of memory or had bothered to read the thread it was pretty bloody obvious. So I was corrct and you lot were wrong, you are welcome. Learn the lesson and move on.
@baron-silas-greenback Yep. I think Warner is a dick. Note the bit about personal responsibility. He is reaping what he sowed.
-
@canerbry said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:
Whatever happened between Candice Warner and Sonny Bill Williams and multiple others has no place on the cricket pitch.
@snowy said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:
@mariner4life said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:
It was all in defense of a lady!
That is his wife you are referring to right?
The lady bit?
She married David fucking Warner. I did get your point but "lady" might be the wrong term.I could go on a rant about personal responsibility here but I will save you all by not doing it.
@nta said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:
@mariner4life lol **yeah she's kind of a skank, but Warner isn't the brightest.
If he wants to throw a hotdog down that hallway, that's his well-paid-for-mouthing-off-and-whacking-a-ball-with-a-stick choice.**
@mn5 said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:
**'Kind of a skank.....'
That's like saying Don Bradman was kinda good.**
@crucial said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:
@taniwharugby said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:
fark, I have no idea what the story was about DDD's missus...guess I should ask Uncle Google!
...and all his mates
@chester-draws said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:
Stay classy San Diego....
I'm pretty sure she did all the degrading she could manage -- to herself -- well before this thread started.
If calling a spade a spade earns a "knob end" then so be it.
@Snowy @jegga @canefan @Virgil @Rancid-Schnitzel @Sneakdefreak @KiwiMurph
I stopped looking after I found the first half dozen or so. If you had any kind of memory or had bothered to read the thread it was pretty bloody obvious. So I was corrct and you lot were wrong, you are welcome. Learn the lesson and move on.
@baron-silas-greenback said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:
@canerbry said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:
Whatever happened between Candice Warner and Sonny Bill Williams and multiple others has no place on the cricket pitch.
@snowy said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:
@mariner4life said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:
It was all in defense of a lady!
That is his wife you are referring to right?
The lady bit?
She married David fucking Warner. I did get your point but "lady" might be the wrong term.I could go on a rant about personal responsibility here but I will save you all by not doing it.
@nta said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:
@mariner4life lol **yeah she's kind of a skank, but Warner isn't the brightest.
If he wants to throw a hotdog down that hallway, that's his well-paid-for-mouthing-off-and-whacking-a-ball-with-a-stick choice.**
@mn5 said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:
**'Kind of a skank.....'
That's like saying Don Bradman was kinda good.**
@crucial said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:
@taniwharugby said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:
fark, I have no idea what the story was about DDD's missus...guess I should ask Uncle Google!
...and all his mates
@chester-draws said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:
Stay classy San Diego....
I'm pretty sure she did all the degrading she could manage -- to herself -- well before this thread started.
If calling a spade a spade earns a "knob end" then so be it.
@Snowy @jegga @canefan @Virgil @Rancid-Schnitzel @Sneakdefreak @KiwiMurph
I stopped looking after I found the first half dozen or so. If you had any kind of memory or had bothered to read the thread it was pretty bloody obvious. So I was corrct and you lot were wrong, you are welcome. Learn the lesson and move on.
So nothing from yesterday or today then? Or was your post referring to comments written about his wife over a week ago?
-
@canerbry said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:
Whatever happened between Candice Warner and Sonny Bill Williams and multiple others has no place on the cricket pitch.
@snowy said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:
@mariner4life said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:
It was all in defense of a lady!
That is his wife you are referring to right?
The lady bit?
She married David fucking Warner. I did get your point but "lady" might be the wrong term.I could go on a rant about personal responsibility here but I will save you all by not doing it.
@nta said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:
@mariner4life lol **yeah she's kind of a skank, but Warner isn't the brightest.
If he wants to throw a hotdog down that hallway, that's his well-paid-for-mouthing-off-and-whacking-a-ball-with-a-stick choice.**
@mn5 said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:
**'Kind of a skank.....'
That's like saying Don Bradman was kinda good.**
@crucial said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:
@taniwharugby said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:
fark, I have no idea what the story was about DDD's missus...guess I should ask Uncle Google!
...and all his mates
@chester-draws said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:
Stay classy San Diego....
I'm pretty sure she did all the degrading she could manage -- to herself -- well before this thread started.
If calling a spade a spade earns a "knob end" then so be it.
@Snowy @jegga @canefan @Virgil @Rancid-Schnitzel @Sneakdefreak @KiwiMurph
I stopped looking after I found the first half dozen or so. If you had any kind of memory or had bothered to read the thread it was pretty bloody obvious. So I was corrct and you lot were wrong, you are welcome. Learn the lesson and move on.
@baron-silas-greenback I didn't say anything about you being right or wrong. You are the one who seems to enjoy saying others are wrong and you are right. Thanks for providing evidence to support your opinion.
-
@baron-silas-greenback said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:
@canerbry said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:
Whatever happened between Candice Warner and Sonny Bill Williams and multiple others has no place on the cricket pitch.
@snowy said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:
@mariner4life said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:
It was all in defense of a lady!
That is his wife you are referring to right?
The lady bit?
She married David fucking Warner. I did get your point but "lady" might be the wrong term.I could go on a rant about personal responsibility here but I will save you all by not doing it.
@nta said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:
@mariner4life lol **yeah she's kind of a skank, but Warner isn't the brightest.
If he wants to throw a hotdog down that hallway, that's his well-paid-for-mouthing-off-and-whacking-a-ball-with-a-stick choice.**
@mn5 said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:
**'Kind of a skank.....'
That's like saying Don Bradman was kinda good.**
@crucial said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:
@taniwharugby said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:
fark, I have no idea what the story was about DDD's missus...guess I should ask Uncle Google!
...and all his mates
@chester-draws said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:
Stay classy San Diego....
I'm pretty sure she did all the degrading she could manage -- to herself -- well before this thread started.
If calling a spade a spade earns a "knob end" then so be it.
@Snowy @jegga @canefan @Virgil @Rancid-Schnitzel @Sneakdefreak @KiwiMurph
I stopped looking after I found the first half dozen or so. If you had any kind of memory or had bothered to read the thread it was pretty bloody obvious. So I was corrct and you lot were wrong, you are welcome. Learn the lesson and move on.
So nothing from yesterday or today then? Or was your post referring to comments written about his wife over a week ago?
@rancid-schnitzel said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:
@baron-silas-greenback said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:
@canerbry said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:
Whatever happened between Candice Warner and Sonny Bill Williams and multiple others has no place on the cricket pitch.
@snowy said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:
@mariner4life said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:
It was all in defense of a lady!
That is his wife you are referring to right?
The lady bit?
She married David fucking Warner. I did get your point but "lady" might be the wrong term.I could go on a rant about personal responsibility here but I will save you all by not doing it.
@nta said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:
@mariner4life lol **yeah she's kind of a skank, but Warner isn't the brightest.
If he wants to throw a hotdog down that hallway, that's his well-paid-for-mouthing-off-and-whacking-a-ball-with-a-stick choice.**
@mn5 said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:
**'Kind of a skank.....'
That's like saying Don Bradman was kinda good.**
@crucial said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:
@taniwharugby said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:
fark, I have no idea what the story was about DDD's missus...guess I should ask Uncle Google!
...and all his mates
@chester-draws said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:
Stay classy San Diego....
I'm pretty sure she did all the degrading she could manage -- to herself -- well before this thread started.
If calling a spade a spade earns a "knob end" then so be it.
@Snowy @jegga @canefan @Virgil @Rancid-Schnitzel @Sneakdefreak @KiwiMurph
I stopped looking after I found the first half dozen or so. If you had any kind of memory or had bothered to read the thread it was pretty bloody obvious. So I was corrct and you lot were wrong, you are welcome. Learn the lesson and move on.
So nothing from yesterday or today then? Or was your post referring to comments written about his wife over a week ago?
My post and the one I was responding yo are self evident.
-
@rancid-schnitzel said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:
@baron-silas-greenback said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:
@canerbry said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:
Whatever happened between Candice Warner and Sonny Bill Williams and multiple others has no place on the cricket pitch.
@snowy said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:
@mariner4life said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:
It was all in defense of a lady!
That is his wife you are referring to right?
The lady bit?
She married David fucking Warner. I did get your point but "lady" might be the wrong term.I could go on a rant about personal responsibility here but I will save you all by not doing it.
@nta said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:
@mariner4life lol **yeah she's kind of a skank, but Warner isn't the brightest.
If he wants to throw a hotdog down that hallway, that's his well-paid-for-mouthing-off-and-whacking-a-ball-with-a-stick choice.**
@mn5 said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:
**'Kind of a skank.....'
That's like saying Don Bradman was kinda good.**
@crucial said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:
@taniwharugby said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:
fark, I have no idea what the story was about DDD's missus...guess I should ask Uncle Google!
...and all his mates
@chester-draws said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:
Stay classy San Diego....
I'm pretty sure she did all the degrading she could manage -- to herself -- well before this thread started.
If calling a spade a spade earns a "knob end" then so be it.
@Snowy @jegga @canefan @Virgil @Rancid-Schnitzel @Sneakdefreak @KiwiMurph
I stopped looking after I found the first half dozen or so. If you had any kind of memory or had bothered to read the thread it was pretty bloody obvious. So I was corrct and you lot were wrong, you are welcome. Learn the lesson and move on.
So nothing from yesterday or today then? Or was your post referring to comments written about his wife over a week ago?
My post and the one I was responding yo are self evident.
@baron-silas-greenback said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:
@rancid-schnitzel said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:
@baron-silas-greenback said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:
@canerbry said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:
Whatever happened between Candice Warner and Sonny Bill Williams and multiple others has no place on the cricket pitch.
@snowy said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:
@mariner4life said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:
It was all in defense of a lady!
That is his wife you are referring to right?
The lady bit?
She married David fucking Warner. I did get your point but "lady" might be the wrong term.I could go on a rant about personal responsibility here but I will save you all by not doing it.
@nta said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:
@mariner4life lol **yeah she's kind of a skank, but Warner isn't the brightest.
If he wants to throw a hotdog down that hallway, that's his well-paid-for-mouthing-off-and-whacking-a-ball-with-a-stick choice.**
@mn5 said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:
**'Kind of a skank.....'
That's like saying Don Bradman was kinda good.**
@crucial said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:
@taniwharugby said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:
fark, I have no idea what the story was about DDD's missus...guess I should ask Uncle Google!
...and all his mates
@chester-draws said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:
Stay classy San Diego....
I'm pretty sure she did all the degrading she could manage -- to herself -- well before this thread started.
If calling a spade a spade earns a "knob end" then so be it.
@Snowy @jegga @canefan @Virgil @Rancid-Schnitzel @Sneakdefreak @KiwiMurph
I stopped looking after I found the first half dozen or so. If you had any kind of memory or had bothered to read the thread it was pretty bloody obvious. So I was corrct and you lot were wrong, you are welcome. Learn the lesson and move on.
So nothing from yesterday or today then? Or was your post referring to comments written about his wife over a week ago?
My post and the one I was responding yo are self evident.
So your post today was in response to comments made over a week ago? Didn't get that impression but thanks for clarification.
-
@baron-silas-greenback said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:
@rancid-schnitzel said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:
@baron-silas-greenback said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:
@rancid-schnitzel said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:
@baron-silas-greenback said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:
@canerbry said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:
Whatever happened between Candice Warner and Sonny Bill Williams and multiple others has no place on the cricket pitch.
@snowy said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:
@mariner4life said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:
It was all in defense of a lady!
That is his wife you are referring to right?
The lady bit?
She married David fucking Warner. I did get your point but "lady" might be the wrong term.I could go on a rant about personal responsibility here but I will save you all by not doing it.
@nta said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:
@mariner4life lol **yeah she's kind of a skank, but Warner isn't the brightest.
If he wants to throw a hotdog down that hallway, that's his well-paid-for-mouthing-off-and-whacking-a-ball-with-a-stick choice.**
@mn5 said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:
**'Kind of a skank.....'
That's like saying Don Bradman was kinda good.**
@crucial said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:
@taniwharugby said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:
fark, I have no idea what the story was about DDD's missus...guess I should ask Uncle Google!
...and all his mates
@chester-draws said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:
Stay classy San Diego....
I'm pretty sure she did all the degrading she could manage -- to herself -- well before this thread started.
If calling a spade a spade earns a "knob end" then so be it.
@Snowy @jegga @canefan @Virgil @Rancid-Schnitzel @Sneakdefreak @KiwiMurph
I stopped looking after I found the first half dozen or so. If you had any kind of memory or had bothered to read the thread it was pretty bloody obvious. So I was corrct and you lot were wrong, you are welcome. Learn the lesson and move on.
So nothing from yesterday or today then? Or was your post referring to comments written about his wife over a week ago?
My post and the one I was responding yo are self evident.
So your post today was in response to comments made over a week ago? Didn't get that impression but thanks for clarification.
No it was in response to the post I quoted. Pretty obvious really.
Stop being intentionally dense
-
@snowy said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:
The scrutiny of past acts was always going to happen.
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/sport/news/article.cfm?c_id=4&objectid=12020357
" an innocent way of a player taking an energy boost on the field in hot, strength-sapping conditions."
Really?
I've never eaten pure sugar out of my pocket.....
@canefan said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:
I've never eaten pure sugar out of my pocket.....
Old story. It was gum. How would seven packets of sugar help you tamper the ball anyway???
-
I don't normally give a fuck about cricket but somethings really are beyond the pale imho.
I mean 150 posts and not one picture of the chick in question?
What are we animals?
ffs
I went back to see what I posted that might have been a dig at Warner, I don’t know anything about the guy and until this test series had never heard of him . I had heard of his wife though.The only I could find was a post with a photo the guys wife posed for in a modelling shoot. Not sure how that’s a dig at him particularly given the pictures I’ve seen of him suggest he is punching well above his weight and given that she’s a part time model she consented to the photo shoot.
@jegga said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:
I don't normally give a fuck about cricket but somethings really are beyond the pale imho.
I mean 150 posts and not one picture of the chick in question?
What are we animals?
ffs
-
@baron-silas-greenback said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:
@rancid-schnitzel said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:
@baron-silas-greenback said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:
@rancid-schnitzel said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:
@baron-silas-greenback said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:
@canerbry said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:
Whatever happened between Candice Warner and Sonny Bill Williams and multiple others has no place on the cricket pitch.
@snowy said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:
@mariner4life said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:
It was all in defense of a lady!
That is his wife you are referring to right?
The lady bit?
She married David fucking Warner. I did get your point but "lady" might be the wrong term.I could go on a rant about personal responsibility here but I will save you all by not doing it.
@nta said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:
@mariner4life lol **yeah she's kind of a skank, but Warner isn't the brightest.
If he wants to throw a hotdog down that hallway, that's his well-paid-for-mouthing-off-and-whacking-a-ball-with-a-stick choice.**
@mn5 said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:
**'Kind of a skank.....'
That's like saying Don Bradman was kinda good.**
@crucial said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:
@taniwharugby said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:
fark, I have no idea what the story was about DDD's missus...guess I should ask Uncle Google!
...and all his mates
@chester-draws said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:
Stay classy San Diego....
I'm pretty sure she did all the degrading she could manage -- to herself -- well before this thread started.
If calling a spade a spade earns a "knob end" then so be it.
@Snowy @jegga @canefan @Virgil @Rancid-Schnitzel @Sneakdefreak @KiwiMurph
I stopped looking after I found the first half dozen or so. If you had any kind of memory or had bothered to read the thread it was pretty bloody obvious. So I was corrct and you lot were wrong, you are welcome. Learn the lesson and move on.
So nothing from yesterday or today then? Or was your post referring to comments written about his wife over a week ago?
My post and the one I was responding yo are self evident.
So your post today was in response to comments made over a week ago? Didn't get that impression but thanks for clarification.
No it was in response to the post I quoted. Pretty obvious really.
Stop being intentionally dense
@baron-silas-greenback said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:
@baron-silas-greenback said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:
@rancid-schnitzel said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:
@baron-silas-greenback said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:
@rancid-schnitzel said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:
@baron-silas-greenback said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:
@canerbry said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:
Whatever happened between Candice Warner and Sonny Bill Williams and multiple others has no place on the cricket pitch.
@snowy said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:
@mariner4life said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:
It was all in defense of a lady!
That is his wife you are referring to right?
The lady bit?
She married David fucking Warner. I did get your point but "lady" might be the wrong term.I could go on a rant about personal responsibility here but I will save you all by not doing it.
@nta said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:
@mariner4life lol **yeah she's kind of a skank, but Warner isn't the brightest.
If he wants to throw a hotdog down that hallway, that's his well-paid-for-mouthing-off-and-whacking-a-ball-with-a-stick choice.**
@mn5 said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:
**'Kind of a skank.....'
That's like saying Don Bradman was kinda good.**
@crucial said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:
@taniwharugby said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:
fark, I have no idea what the story was about DDD's missus...guess I should ask Uncle Google!
...and all his mates
@chester-draws said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:
Stay classy San Diego....
I'm pretty sure she did all the degrading she could manage -- to herself -- well before this thread started.
If calling a spade a spade earns a "knob end" then so be it.
@Snowy @jegga @canefan @Virgil @Rancid-Schnitzel @Sneakdefreak @KiwiMurph
I stopped looking after I found the first half dozen or so. If you had any kind of memory or had bothered to read the thread it was pretty bloody obvious. So I was corrct and you lot were wrong, you are welcome. Learn the lesson and move on.
So nothing from yesterday or today then? Or was your post referring to comments written about his wife over a week ago?
My post and the one I was responding yo are self evident.
So your post today was in response to comments made over a week ago? Didn't get that impression but thanks for clarification.
No it was in response to the post I quoted. Pretty obvious really.
Stop being intentionally dense
So wtf was the original post today in response to?
-
@canefan said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:
I've never eaten pure sugar out of my pocket.....
Old story. It was gum. How would seven packets of sugar help you tamper the ball anyway???
@barbarian Why would anyone pick up gum with a spoon?
-
@canefan said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:
I've never eaten pure sugar out of my pocket.....
Old story. It was gum. How would seven packets of sugar help you tamper the ball anyway???
@barbarian said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:
How would seven packets of sugar help you tamper the ball anyway???
According to the article : "Sugar granules could be used as an abrasive to help scuff up the ball,".
I suspect it more like the Du Plessis one though. Using the sugar to add shine like he did with the mint lollies?
