• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

Movie review thread...

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Off Topic
19.8k Posts 163 Posters 3.2m Views
Movie review thread...
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • NTAN Offline
    NTAN Offline
    NTA
    wrote on last edited by
    #2497

    [quote name='Luigi' timestamp='1365751038' post='358960']<br />
    Oblivion: Tom's latest action outing. Fantastic to look at it but despite a plot that promises lots of twists, you see everything coming a mile off.<br />
    [/quote]<br />
    <br />
    Yeah first thing I asked when it opened to awesome scenes:<br />
    <br />
    [spoiler]If mankind was so badly buttfucked, how the fuck did they make those enormous fucking water sucking things?[/spoiler]

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • canefanC Online
    canefanC Online
    canefan
    wrote on last edited by
    #2498

    Finally got to see Dredd. Great gory adaptation, sooo much better than Sly's take

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • NTAN Offline
    NTAN Offline
    NTA
    wrote on last edited by
    #2499

    [quote name='canefan' timestamp='1366455506' post='361044']Finally got to see Dredd. Great gory adaptation, sooo much better than Sly's take[/quote]<br />
    <br />
    Can rent for $7 on Google movies - worth it? I am a 2000AD fan

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • canefanC Online
    canefanC Online
    canefan
    wrote on last edited by
    #2500

    [quote name='NTA' timestamp='1366458799' post='361061']<br />
    Can rent for $7 on Google movies - worth it? I am a 2000AD fan<br />
    [/quote]I wasn't an avid reader of the comics, but it seemed like a pretty faithful reproduction. Its a boy film so not for a couple's night in. I think you'll love it (got a 78% from rotten tomatoes)

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugby
    wrote on last edited by
    #2501

    Saw Jack Reacher, was decent enough, if not a bit long for what it was, or maybe it was trying to be a bit more than what it was...

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • mimicM Offline
    mimicM Offline
    mimic
    wrote on last edited by
    #2502

    [quote name='taniwharugby' timestamp='1366486995' post='361076']Saw Jack Reacher, was decent enough, if not a bit long for what it was, or maybe it was trying to be a bit more than what it was...[/quote]<br />
    <br />
    Have u read the book? <br />
    I liked the movie.. Would've preferred the rock as jack reacher but that's just me lol

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • KirwanK Offline
    KirwanK Offline
    Kirwan
    wrote on last edited by
    #2503

    [quote name='NTA' timestamp='1366458799' post='361061']<br />
    <br />
    Can rent for $7 on Google movies - worth it? I am a 2000AD fan[/quote]<br />
    <br />
    Yep, no nonsense, pretty faithful adaption. No origin story is a big plus, just a day in the life of.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugby
    wrote on last edited by
    #2504

    [quote name='mimic' timestamp='1366529856' post='361147']<br />
    Have u read the book?<br />
    I liked the movie.. Would've preferred the rock as jack reacher but that's just me lol<br />
    [/quote]<br />
    <br />
    NAh not read the books, but know the issues those who have read have with tom playing the role<br />
    <br />
    Funnily I was talking with Mrs TR this morning about it explaining the physical aspect of Reacher, and said The rock woulda suited the character better.<br />
    <br />
    I assume Cruise will make more as he has the rights to more o fthe books doesnt he?

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • L Offline
    L Offline
    Luigi
    wrote on last edited by
    #2505

    [quote name='taniwharugby' timestamp='1366531607' post='361155']<br />
    NAh not read the books, but know the issues those who have read have with tom playing the role<br />
    <br />
    Funnily I was talking with Mrs TR this morning about it explaining the physical aspect of Reacher, and said The rock woulda suited the character better.<br />
    <br />
    I assume Cruise will make more as he has the rights to more o fthe books doesnt he?<br />
    [/quote]<br />
    <br />
    Yes, Cruise has rights to the character so it will depend on how commercially successful the franchise could be. Alternatively, TC could just produce on a sequel with someone else in the lead role.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • MokeyM Offline
    MokeyM Offline
    Mokey
    wrote on last edited by
    #2506

    Watched Heat tonight. (Oldie heist movie with Al Pacino/Robert De Niro). Quite long at 164 mins, reckon there were quite a few bits they could have cut, especially at the start. Definitely got better as it went along, and the actual heist sequence was great.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugby
    wrote on last edited by
    #2507

    [quote name='Luigi' timestamp='1366535863' post='361169']Alternatively, TC could just produce on a sequel with someone else in the lead role.<br />
    [/quote]<br />
    <br />
    You reckon he'd do that though?

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • nostrildamusN Offline
    nostrildamusN Offline
    nostrildamus
    wrote on last edited by
    #2508

    Nah, i think Cruise can only see himself as the main action figure, and hollywood holds on to its action men way too long. And he has a sci fi crush so cannot help himself. But if I joined a religion written by a sci fi writer, I would damn well choose a better sci fi writer! (Although I think Heinlein would do my little religious weirdo cult heart in).

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • L Offline
    L Offline
    Luigi
    wrote on last edited by
    #2509

    [quote name='Mokey' timestamp='1366536609' post='361172']<br />
    Watched Heat tonight. (Oldie heist movie with Al Pacino/Robert De Niro). Quite long at 164 mins, reckon there were quite a few bits they could have cut, especially at the start. Definitely got better as it went along, and the actual heist sequence was great.<br />
    [/quote]<br />
    <br />
    Only a girl could write that.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • L Offline
    L Offline
    Luigi
    wrote on last edited by
    #2510

    [quote name='nostrildamus' timestamp='1366553497' post='361204']<br />
    Nah, i think Cruise can only see himself as the main action figure, and hollywood holds on to its action men way too long. And he has a sci fi crush so cannot help himself. But if I joined a religion written by a sci fi writer, I would damn well choose a better sci fi writer! (Although I think Heinlein would do my little religious weirdo cult heart in).<br />
    [/quote]<br />
    <br />
    We were talking specifically about Jack Reacher though.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • nostrildamusN Offline
    nostrildamusN Offline
    nostrildamus
    wrote on last edited by
    #2511

    true but I was referring to Oblivion on last page. Reacher, no way would I want to watch him in that, he was too small in Mission Impossible, let alone for Reacher!

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • PaekakboyzP Offline
    PaekakboyzP Offline
    Paekakboyz
    wrote on last edited by
    #2512

    [quote name='Mokey' timestamp='1366536609' post='361172']<br />
    Watched Heat tonight. (Oldie heist movie with Al Pacino/Robert De Niro). Quite long at 164 mins, reckon there were quite a few bits they could have cut, especially at the start. Definitely got better as it went along, and the actual heist sequence was great.<br />
    [/quote]<br />
    <br />
    Less foreplay more action!!? Good on ya Mokey <img src='http://www.daimenhutchison.com/rugby/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/hi.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt=':hi:' />

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • NepiaN Offline
    NepiaN Offline
    Nepia
    wrote on last edited by
    #2513

    Watched Red Dawn last night ... was a huge fan of the original (as a 10 year old I guess) so was keen to see how this one stacked up.<br />
    As an action movie it wasn't too bad, the action scenes were a wee bit more believable than Olympus Has Fallen (sheesh I really am on an retro 80s like movie watch at the moment).<br />
    <br />
    It suffered from the main actor, well the main one who wasn't Thor, being completely unsuited for the role - no charisma whatsoever. Thor was pretty good though, and there is some decent eye candy in the form of Tyra from FNL and the blond Aussie chick from Home and Away.<br />
    <br />
    There was one hilarious Hollywood stereotype this movie followed, huge spoiler so read it here:<br />
    [Spoiler]The ethnic characters all got killed off. First the hispanic guy gets killed, the first of the Wolverines to do so, then black and guy and the hispanic girl get killed together (I didn't even know the girl was killed initially), and the last black guy has a chip planted in him and presumably dies fighting the North Koreans while leading them away from the Wolverines.The only white person of the Wolverines who dies is Thor.[/Spoiler]

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • NepiaN Offline
    NepiaN Offline
    Nepia
    wrote on last edited by
    #2514

    [quote name='mimic' timestamp='1366529856' post='361147']<br />
    Have u read the book?<br />
    I liked the movie.. Would've preferred the rock as jack reacher but that's just me lol<br />
    [/quote]<br />
    I haven't read the books and will probably watch the movie on, er, um, DVD ... but if the Rock was in it I'd most likely go to the cinema to see it.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • ToddyT Offline
    ToddyT Offline
    Toddy
    wrote on last edited by
    #2515

    I can't watch Jack Reacher. I can't stand the thought of Tom Cruise playing the role. <img src='http://www.daimenhutchison.com/rugby/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/knuppel2.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt=':knuppel:' /><br />
    <br />
    Always thought Liam Neeson would do a good job.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • CrucialC Offline
    CrucialC Offline
    Crucial
    wrote on last edited by
    #2516

    [quote name='taniwharugby' timestamp='1366531607' post='361155']<br />
    NAh not read the books, but know the issues those who have read have with tom playing the role<br />
    <br />
    Funnily I was talking with Mrs TR this morning about it explaining the physical aspect of Reacher, and said The rock woulda suited the character better.<br />
    <br />
    I assume Cruise will make more as he has the rights to more o fthe books doesnt he?<br />
    [/quote]<br />
    <br />
    See, I can't even picture the Rock as Reacher unless he changed his look a lot.<br />
    <br />
    In the books a great deal is made of Reacher being a) a big bastard; <img src='http://www.daimenhutchison.com/rugby/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/cool.png' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='B)' /> not great looking but somehow attractive to women c) pretty slow and laconic except with bursts of rapid 'survival' fighting.<br />
    <br />
    Cruise is probably the very last person I would picture as Reacher. A dishevelled Gerard Butler could possibly fit my mental picture.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0

Movie review thread...
Off Topic
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.