Skip to content
  • Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

  • Tipping
  • Team Sheets
  • Highlights
  • Results
    • All Blacks

      Search every All Blacks Test. Filter results by year, opposition, location, venue, city and RWC stage

    • Super Rugby

      Search every Super Rugby since match 1996

    • NPC

      Search NPC results. Only first division matches from 1976-2005. All results from the 14 team competition (2006-present) are included

Wallabies v Springboks

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Sports Talk
109 Posts 35 Posters 5.8k Views 2 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • NTAN NTA

    @nzzp with the way "finishers" are being used these days, you could get his fitness to a point where he's a 40 minute player and worth every second.

    NepiaN Offline
    NepiaN Offline
    Nepia
    wrote on last edited by
    #20

    @nta said in Wallabies v Springboks:

    @nzzp with the way "finishers" are being used these days, you could get his fitness to a point where he's a 40 minute player and worth every second.

    Actually, he could be the Aussie Tongan-Frizell with 10-20 minute cameos.

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
    • antipodeanA antipodean

      @sapetyvi One wonders why the coach here couldn't achieve that from him.

      SapetyviS Offline
      SapetyviS Offline
      Sapetyvi
      wrote on last edited by
      #21

      @antipodean I think he has also matured there, I remember one season at the Tahs he lost noticeable weight, but got it back during the season.
      There is nothing the coach can do if a player goes home and eats like shit, that change needs to come from the player.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • G Offline
        G Offline
        Gumboot
        wrote on last edited by
        #22

        Cheap-shot specialist Kepu dumped. Good.

        NTAN 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • G Gumboot

          Cheap-shot specialist Kepu dumped. Good.

          NTAN Offline
          NTAN Offline
          NTA
          wrote on last edited by NTA
          #23

          @gumboot well it was only fair after cheap shot merchant Moody got a rest in Nelson. 😉

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • MajorPomM Offline
            MajorPomM Offline
            MajorPom
            wrote on last edited by
            #24

            I’ll now be watching this hopefully after seeing that 10-12 axis. Nice move by Cheika, roll the dice.

            Didn’t think Foley did much wrong, but doesn’t quite look himself at mo

            KirwanK 1 Reply Last reply
            1
            • MajorPomM MajorPom

              I’ll now be watching this hopefully after seeing that 10-12 axis. Nice move by Cheika, roll the dice.

              Didn’t think Foley did much wrong, but doesn’t quite look himself at mo

              KirwanK Offline
              KirwanK Offline
              Kirwan
              wrote on last edited by
              #25

              @majorrage said in Wallabies v Springboks:

              I’ll now be watching this hopefully after seeing that 10-12 axis. Nice move by Cheika, roll the dice.

              Didn’t think Foley did much wrong, but doesn’t quite look himself at mo

              I’ve nver been a fan of Foley but I thought he’s was one of the better Aussies. Saved a try last game with great defense, Real put your body on the line stuff. And set up a try soon after with a nice break. Seems odd to drop him.

              MajorPomM 1 Reply Last reply
              3
              • KirwanK Kirwan

                @majorrage said in Wallabies v Springboks:

                I’ll now be watching this hopefully after seeing that 10-12 axis. Nice move by Cheika, roll the dice.

                Didn’t think Foley did much wrong, but doesn’t quite look himself at mo

                I’ve nver been a fan of Foley but I thought he’s was one of the better Aussies. Saved a try last game with great defense, Real put your body on the line stuff. And set up a try soon after with a nice break. Seems odd to drop him.

                MajorPomM Offline
                MajorPomM Offline
                MajorPom
                wrote on last edited by
                #26

                @kirwan said in Wallabies v Springboks:

                @majorrage said in Wallabies v Springboks:

                I’ll now be watching this hopefully after seeing that 10-12 axis. Nice move by Cheika, roll the dice.

                Didn’t think Foley did much wrong, but doesn’t quite look himself at mo

                I’ve nver been a fan of Foley but I thought he’s was one of the better Aussies. Saved a try last game with great defense, Real put your body on the line stuff. And set up a try soon after with a nice break. Seems odd to drop him.

                Yeah not disagreeing with those moments, but he just didn’t seem to really spark the back line like he has in previous.

                1 Reply Last reply
                1
                • KirwanK Offline
                  KirwanK Offline
                  Kirwan
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #27

                  Will Beale be better though? They finally have Beale looking comfortable in a position, dangerous at times, now they move him?

                  CatograndeC BovidaeB MajorPomM 3 Replies Last reply
                  1
                  • KirwanK Kirwan

                    Will Beale be better though? They finally have Beale looking comfortable in a position, dangerous at times, now they move him?

                    CatograndeC Offline
                    CatograndeC Offline
                    Catogrande
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #28

                    @kirwan said in Wallabies v Springboks:

                    Will Beale be better though? They finally have Beale looking comfortable in a position, dangerous at times, now they move him?

                    Cheika desperately rolling the dice in hope rather than expectation?

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • SapetyviS Offline
                      SapetyviS Offline
                      Sapetyvi
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #29

                      Foley needs to get a rest at some point and not much options available at the moment. Toomua will probably slot a lot at first five to give Beale some freedom tho.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • G Offline
                        G Offline
                        Gunner
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #30

                        Beale at 10, boom or bust....he could cause havoc and set the backline alight, or he could just as easily self implode ala Kwade.

                        Might be worth watching.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • KirwanK Kirwan

                          Will Beale be better though? They finally have Beale looking comfortable in a position, dangerous at times, now they move him?

                          BovidaeB Offline
                          BovidaeB Offline
                          Bovidae
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #31

                          @kirwan said in Wallabies v Springboks:

                          Will Beale be better though? They finally have Beale looking comfortable in a position, dangerous at times, now they move him?

                          On the plus side at least the loose forwards will be closer when Beale inevitably misses tackles down his channel.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          1
                          • KirwanK Kirwan

                            Will Beale be better though? They finally have Beale looking comfortable in a position, dangerous at times, now they move him?

                            MajorPomM Offline
                            MajorPomM Offline
                            MajorPom
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #32

                            @kirwan said in Wallabies v Springboks:

                            Will Beale be better though? They finally have Beale looking comfortable in a position, dangerous at times, now they move him?

                            I think he wants Beale to have more ball. Which I whole heartedly agree with from his point of view. He's the best chance Australia have of creating something out of nothing.

                            ACT CrusaderA 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • MajorPomM MajorPom

                              @kirwan said in Wallabies v Springboks:

                              Will Beale be better though? They finally have Beale looking comfortable in a position, dangerous at times, now they move him?

                              I think he wants Beale to have more ball. Which I whole heartedly agree with from his point of view. He's the best chance Australia have of creating something out of nothing.

                              ACT CrusaderA Offline
                              ACT CrusaderA Offline
                              ACT Crusader
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #33

                              @majorrage said in Wallabies v Springboks:

                              @kirwan said in Wallabies v Springboks:

                              Will Beale be better though? They finally have Beale looking comfortable in a position, dangerous at times, now they move him?

                              I think he wants Beale to have more ball. Which I whole heartedly agree with from his point of view. He's the best chance Australia have of creating something out of nothing.

                              I agree he needs more ball, but as we know at 10 you want more steady and directing play rather than off the cuff.

                              I’d be concerned about him crabbing across field which he has a tendency to do sometimes. Giteau did it as well when he shifted to 10.

                              antipodeanA 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • chimoausC Offline
                                chimoausC Offline
                                chimoaus
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #34

                                I found it interesting in the media they are talking about Foley being demoted and Cheika saying he took the demotion well. Maybe semantics but wouldn't it be better to come out and say we are going for a different attacking style and Beale is better suited. Or we need to give other players a chance in crucial positions to improve our depth. Shag Is the master in this tactic.

                                Seems a bit of a public shaming to say, yeah Foleys been a bit shit and hes been dropped as a result. Would do wonders for the players confidence.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                1
                                • ACT CrusaderA ACT Crusader

                                  @majorrage said in Wallabies v Springboks:

                                  @kirwan said in Wallabies v Springboks:

                                  Will Beale be better though? They finally have Beale looking comfortable in a position, dangerous at times, now they move him?

                                  I think he wants Beale to have more ball. Which I whole heartedly agree with from his point of view. He's the best chance Australia have of creating something out of nothing.

                                  I agree he needs more ball, but as we know at 10 you want more steady and directing play rather than off the cuff.

                                  I’d be concerned about him crabbing across field which he has a tendency to do sometimes. Giteau did it as well when he shifted to 10.

                                  antipodeanA Offline
                                  antipodeanA Offline
                                  antipodean
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #35

                                  @act-crusader said in Wallabies v Springboks:

                                  @majorrage said in Wallabies v Springboks:

                                  @kirwan said in Wallabies v Springboks:

                                  Will Beale be better though? They finally have Beale looking comfortable in a position, dangerous at times, now they move him?

                                  I think he wants Beale to have more ball. Which I whole heartedly agree with from his point of view. He's the best chance Australia have of creating something out of nothing.

                                  I agree he needs more ball, but as we know at 10 you want more steady and directing play rather than off the cuff.

                                  I’d be concerned about him crabbing across field which he has a tendency to do sometimes. Giteau did it as well when he shifted to 10.

                                  Agreed. Get him more involved where he's dangerous, at 12 / 15.

                                  It's a bit rich to blame Foley when other players are pushing passes, giving away penalties, falling off tackles etc.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • StargazerS Offline
                                    StargazerS Offline
                                    Stargazer
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #36

                                    Pocock ruled out with a neck injury. Pete Samu replaces him in the starting side.

                                    Looks like the ABs are blamed for the injury 🙄

                                    David Pocock has been ruled out of Saturday’s Brisbane Test with a neck injury.
                                    
                                    New Zealand targeted Pocock heavily in the breakdown in their two Bledisloe Tests and the Kiwis’ treatment left the flanker with neck soreness that he is yet to fully shake off. 
                                    
                                    After the Auckland Bledisloe Test, Pocock could barely move his neck and nearly a fortnight later he is still suffering stiffness amid concerns for his long-term health. 
                                    
                                    The flanker will be replaced in the starting side by Pete Samu.
                                    

                                    http://www.rugby.com.au/news/2018/09/07/pocock-out-springboks

                                    jeggaJ M boobooB 3 Replies Last reply
                                    0
                                    • StargazerS Stargazer

                                      Pocock ruled out with a neck injury. Pete Samu replaces him in the starting side.

                                      Looks like the ABs are blamed for the injury 🙄

                                      David Pocock has been ruled out of Saturday’s Brisbane Test with a neck injury.
                                      
                                      New Zealand targeted Pocock heavily in the breakdown in their two Bledisloe Tests and the Kiwis’ treatment left the flanker with neck soreness that he is yet to fully shake off. 
                                      
                                      After the Auckland Bledisloe Test, Pocock could barely move his neck and nearly a fortnight later he is still suffering stiffness amid concerns for his long-term health. 
                                      
                                      The flanker will be replaced in the starting side by Pete Samu.
                                      

                                      http://www.rugby.com.au/news/2018/09/07/pocock-out-springboks

                                      jeggaJ Offline
                                      jeggaJ Offline
                                      jegga
                                      wrote on last edited by jegga
                                      #37

                                      @stargazer said in Wallabies v Springboks:

                                      Pocock ruled out with a neck injury. Pete Samu replaces him in the starting side.

                                      Looks like the ABs are blamed for the injury 🙄

                                      David Pocock has been ruled out of Saturday’s Brisbane Test with a neck injury.
                                      
                                      New Zealand targeted Pocock heavily in the breakdown in their two Bledisloe Tests and the Kiwis’ treatment left the flanker with neck soreness that he is yet to fully shake off. 
                                      
                                      After the Auckland Bledisloe Test, Pocock could barely move his neck and nearly a fortnight later he is still suffering stiffness amid concerns for his long-term health. 
                                      
                                      The flanker will be replaced in the starting side by Pete Samu.
                                      

                                      http://www.rugby.com.au/news/2018/09/07/pocock-out-springboks

                                      Carrying the weight of the world on your shoulders will do that to your neck.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      13
                                      • chimoausC Offline
                                        chimoausC Offline
                                        chimoaus
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #38

                                        Lucky they have the 6 million dollar man in their side, I'm sure he will easily cover the work of Pocock.

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        4
                                        • BovidaeB Offline
                                          BovidaeB Offline
                                          Bovidae
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #39

                                          There is more balance in that loose forward trio but Hooper will need to play a little tighter.

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          2
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Search
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Search