Skip to content
  • Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

  • Tipping
  • Team Sheets
  • Highlights
  • Results
    • All Blacks

      Search every All Blacks Test. Filter results by year, opposition, location, venue, city and RWC stage

    • Super Rugby

      Search every Super Rugby since match 1996

    • NPC

      Search NPC results. Only first division matches from 1976-2005. All results from the 14 team competition (2006-present) are included

Wallabies v Springboks

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Sports Talk
109 Posts 35 Posters 5.8k Views 2 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • MajorPomM MajorPom

    @kirwan said in Wallabies v Springboks:

    Will Beale be better though? They finally have Beale looking comfortable in a position, dangerous at times, now they move him?

    I think he wants Beale to have more ball. Which I whole heartedly agree with from his point of view. He's the best chance Australia have of creating something out of nothing.

    ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT Crusader
    wrote on last edited by
    #33

    @majorrage said in Wallabies v Springboks:

    @kirwan said in Wallabies v Springboks:

    Will Beale be better though? They finally have Beale looking comfortable in a position, dangerous at times, now they move him?

    I think he wants Beale to have more ball. Which I whole heartedly agree with from his point of view. He's the best chance Australia have of creating something out of nothing.

    I agree he needs more ball, but as we know at 10 you want more steady and directing play rather than off the cuff.

    I’d be concerned about him crabbing across field which he has a tendency to do sometimes. Giteau did it as well when he shifted to 10.

    antipodeanA 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • chimoausC Offline
      chimoausC Offline
      chimoaus
      wrote on last edited by
      #34

      I found it interesting in the media they are talking about Foley being demoted and Cheika saying he took the demotion well. Maybe semantics but wouldn't it be better to come out and say we are going for a different attacking style and Beale is better suited. Or we need to give other players a chance in crucial positions to improve our depth. Shag Is the master in this tactic.

      Seems a bit of a public shaming to say, yeah Foleys been a bit shit and hes been dropped as a result. Would do wonders for the players confidence.

      1 Reply Last reply
      1
      • ACT CrusaderA ACT Crusader

        @majorrage said in Wallabies v Springboks:

        @kirwan said in Wallabies v Springboks:

        Will Beale be better though? They finally have Beale looking comfortable in a position, dangerous at times, now they move him?

        I think he wants Beale to have more ball. Which I whole heartedly agree with from his point of view. He's the best chance Australia have of creating something out of nothing.

        I agree he needs more ball, but as we know at 10 you want more steady and directing play rather than off the cuff.

        I’d be concerned about him crabbing across field which he has a tendency to do sometimes. Giteau did it as well when he shifted to 10.

        antipodeanA Online
        antipodeanA Online
        antipodean
        wrote on last edited by
        #35

        @act-crusader said in Wallabies v Springboks:

        @majorrage said in Wallabies v Springboks:

        @kirwan said in Wallabies v Springboks:

        Will Beale be better though? They finally have Beale looking comfortable in a position, dangerous at times, now they move him?

        I think he wants Beale to have more ball. Which I whole heartedly agree with from his point of view. He's the best chance Australia have of creating something out of nothing.

        I agree he needs more ball, but as we know at 10 you want more steady and directing play rather than off the cuff.

        I’d be concerned about him crabbing across field which he has a tendency to do sometimes. Giteau did it as well when he shifted to 10.

        Agreed. Get him more involved where he's dangerous, at 12 / 15.

        It's a bit rich to blame Foley when other players are pushing passes, giving away penalties, falling off tackles etc.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • StargazerS Offline
          StargazerS Offline
          Stargazer
          wrote on last edited by
          #36

          Pocock ruled out with a neck injury. Pete Samu replaces him in the starting side.

          Looks like the ABs are blamed for the injury 🙄

          David Pocock has been ruled out of Saturday’s Brisbane Test with a neck injury.
          
          New Zealand targeted Pocock heavily in the breakdown in their two Bledisloe Tests and the Kiwis’ treatment left the flanker with neck soreness that he is yet to fully shake off. 
          
          After the Auckland Bledisloe Test, Pocock could barely move his neck and nearly a fortnight later he is still suffering stiffness amid concerns for his long-term health. 
          
          The flanker will be replaced in the starting side by Pete Samu.
          

          http://www.rugby.com.au/news/2018/09/07/pocock-out-springboks

          jeggaJ M boobooB 3 Replies Last reply
          0
          • StargazerS Stargazer

            Pocock ruled out with a neck injury. Pete Samu replaces him in the starting side.

            Looks like the ABs are blamed for the injury 🙄

            David Pocock has been ruled out of Saturday’s Brisbane Test with a neck injury.
            
            New Zealand targeted Pocock heavily in the breakdown in their two Bledisloe Tests and the Kiwis’ treatment left the flanker with neck soreness that he is yet to fully shake off. 
            
            After the Auckland Bledisloe Test, Pocock could barely move his neck and nearly a fortnight later he is still suffering stiffness amid concerns for his long-term health. 
            
            The flanker will be replaced in the starting side by Pete Samu.
            

            http://www.rugby.com.au/news/2018/09/07/pocock-out-springboks

            jeggaJ Offline
            jeggaJ Offline
            jegga
            wrote on last edited by jegga
            #37

            @stargazer said in Wallabies v Springboks:

            Pocock ruled out with a neck injury. Pete Samu replaces him in the starting side.

            Looks like the ABs are blamed for the injury 🙄

            David Pocock has been ruled out of Saturday’s Brisbane Test with a neck injury.
            
            New Zealand targeted Pocock heavily in the breakdown in their two Bledisloe Tests and the Kiwis’ treatment left the flanker with neck soreness that he is yet to fully shake off. 
            
            After the Auckland Bledisloe Test, Pocock could barely move his neck and nearly a fortnight later he is still suffering stiffness amid concerns for his long-term health. 
            
            The flanker will be replaced in the starting side by Pete Samu.
            

            http://www.rugby.com.au/news/2018/09/07/pocock-out-springboks

            Carrying the weight of the world on your shoulders will do that to your neck.

            1 Reply Last reply
            13
            • chimoausC Offline
              chimoausC Offline
              chimoaus
              wrote on last edited by
              #38

              Lucky they have the 6 million dollar man in their side, I'm sure he will easily cover the work of Pocock.

              1 Reply Last reply
              4
              • BovidaeB Offline
                BovidaeB Offline
                Bovidae
                wrote on last edited by
                #39

                There is more balance in that loose forward trio but Hooper will need to play a little tighter.

                1 Reply Last reply
                2
                • StargazerS Stargazer

                  Pocock ruled out with a neck injury. Pete Samu replaces him in the starting side.

                  Looks like the ABs are blamed for the injury 🙄

                  David Pocock has been ruled out of Saturday’s Brisbane Test with a neck injury.
                  
                  New Zealand targeted Pocock heavily in the breakdown in their two Bledisloe Tests and the Kiwis’ treatment left the flanker with neck soreness that he is yet to fully shake off. 
                  
                  After the Auckland Bledisloe Test, Pocock could barely move his neck and nearly a fortnight later he is still suffering stiffness amid concerns for his long-term health. 
                  
                  The flanker will be replaced in the starting side by Pete Samu.
                  

                  http://www.rugby.com.au/news/2018/09/07/pocock-out-springboks

                  M Offline
                  M Offline
                  Machpants
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #40

                  @stargazer said in Wallabies v Springboks:

                  Pocock ruled out with a neck injury. Pete Samu replaces him in the starting side.

                  Looks like the ABs are blamed for the injury 🙄

                  David Pocock has been ruled out of Saturday’s Brisbane Test with a neck injury.
                  
                  New Zealand targeted Pocock heavily in the breakdown in their two Bledisloe Tests and the Kiwis’ treatment left the flanker with neck soreness that he is yet to fully shake off. 
                  
                  After the Auckland Bledisloe Test, Pocock could barely move his neck and nearly a fortnight later he is still suffering stiffness amid concerns for his long-term health. 
                  
                  The flanker will be replaced in the starting side by Pete Samu.
                  

                  http://www.rugby.com.au/news/2018/09/07/pocock-out-springboks

                  It's a fair point, there would ahve been 2 or 3 yellow cards vs ABs if those neck rolls had been done a couple of years ago, when they were the current hobby-horse of the IRB. It seems refs can only have one area to target for cards at a time, high shots as it stands now.

                  taniwharugbyT 1 Reply Last reply
                  1
                  • M Machpants

                    @stargazer said in Wallabies v Springboks:

                    Pocock ruled out with a neck injury. Pete Samu replaces him in the starting side.

                    Looks like the ABs are blamed for the injury 🙄

                    David Pocock has been ruled out of Saturday’s Brisbane Test with a neck injury.
                    
                    New Zealand targeted Pocock heavily in the breakdown in their two Bledisloe Tests and the Kiwis’ treatment left the flanker with neck soreness that he is yet to fully shake off. 
                    
                    After the Auckland Bledisloe Test, Pocock could barely move his neck and nearly a fortnight later he is still suffering stiffness amid concerns for his long-term health. 
                    
                    The flanker will be replaced in the starting side by Pete Samu.
                    

                    http://www.rugby.com.au/news/2018/09/07/pocock-out-springboks

                    It's a fair point, there would ahve been 2 or 3 yellow cards vs ABs if those neck rolls had been done a couple of years ago, when they were the current hobby-horse of the IRB. It seems refs can only have one area to target for cards at a time, high shots as it stands now.

                    taniwharugbyT Offline
                    taniwharugbyT Offline
                    taniwharugby
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #41

                    @machpants his neck woulda still hurt though.... 😉

                    Thing is, when you are at the breakdown the way he is, you are gonna take plenty of legit hits while trying to pilfer the ball.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    5
                    • A Offline
                      A Offline
                      akan004
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #42

                      Not one Aussie journo has commented on Hoopah's neck roll on Ardie or Bonocock's head high on Beauden.

                      antipodeanA 1 Reply Last reply
                      1
                      • A akan004

                        Not one Aussie journo has commented on Hoopah's neck roll on Ardie or Bonocock's head high on Beauden.

                        antipodeanA Online
                        antipodeanA Online
                        antipodean
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #43

                        @akan004 said in Wallabies v Springboks:

                        Not one Aussie journo has commented on Hoopah's neck roll on Ardie or Bonocock's head high on Beauden.

                        That is strange when they were vociferous in their condemnation about the questionable tactics utilised to unseat McCaw...

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        6
                        • taniwharugbyT Offline
                          taniwharugbyT Offline
                          taniwharugby
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #44

                          having a big cry now.

                          Reap what you sow fellas, granted Franks probably should have had a YC, but that wouldnt have stopped the aftermath as it is now.

                          https://www.foxsports.com.au/rugby/wallabies/david-pocock-neck-injury-david-campese-slams-world-rugby-michael-hooper-weighs-in/news-story/886467dd23b4949d15ce2e91ae253380

                          MajorPomM 1 Reply Last reply
                          1
                          • taniwharugbyT taniwharugby

                            having a big cry now.

                            Reap what you sow fellas, granted Franks probably should have had a YC, but that wouldnt have stopped the aftermath as it is now.

                            https://www.foxsports.com.au/rugby/wallabies/david-pocock-neck-injury-david-campese-slams-world-rugby-michael-hooper-weighs-in/news-story/886467dd23b4949d15ce2e91ae253380

                            MajorPomM Offline
                            MajorPomM Offline
                            MajorPom
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #45

                            @taniwharugby I don't have a problem here with either Campo or Hooper comments.

                            They've lost a player to an injury which wasn't punished, when all World Rugby guidelines suggest it should have been. They have a right to be pissed off.

                            A 1 Reply Last reply
                            5
                            • MajorPomM MajorPom

                              @taniwharugby I don't have a problem here with either Campo or Hooper comments.

                              They've lost a player to an injury which wasn't punished, when all World Rugby guidelines suggest it should have been. They have a right to be pissed off.

                              A Offline
                              A Offline
                              akan004
                              wrote on last edited by akan004
                              #46

                              @majorrage I have a problem with Hooper's comments since he did the same thing to Ardie.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              4
                              • StargazerS Offline
                                StargazerS Offline
                                Stargazer
                                wrote on last edited by Stargazer
                                #47

                                Typical losers' mentality from the Aussies. Always blame someone else.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                8
                                • StargazerS Stargazer

                                  Pocock ruled out with a neck injury. Pete Samu replaces him in the starting side.

                                  Looks like the ABs are blamed for the injury 🙄

                                  David Pocock has been ruled out of Saturday’s Brisbane Test with a neck injury.
                                  
                                  New Zealand targeted Pocock heavily in the breakdown in their two Bledisloe Tests and the Kiwis’ treatment left the flanker with neck soreness that he is yet to fully shake off. 
                                  
                                  After the Auckland Bledisloe Test, Pocock could barely move his neck and nearly a fortnight later he is still suffering stiffness amid concerns for his long-term health. 
                                  
                                  The flanker will be replaced in the starting side by Pete Samu.
                                  

                                  http://www.rugby.com.au/news/2018/09/07/pocock-out-springboks

                                  boobooB Offline
                                  boobooB Offline
                                  booboo
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #48

                                  @stargazer said in Wallabies v Springboks:

                                  Pocock ruled out with a neck injury. Pete Samu replaces him in the starting side.

                                  Looks like the ABs are blamed for the injury 🙄

                                  David Pocock has been ruled out of Saturday’s Brisbane Test with a neck injury.
                                  
                                  New Zealand targeted Pocock heavily in the breakdown in their two Bledisloe Tests and the Kiwis’ treatment left the flanker with neck soreness that he is yet to fully shake off. 
                                  
                                  After the Auckland Bledisloe Test, Pocock could barely move his neck and nearly a fortnight later he is still suffering stiffness amid concerns for his long-term health. 
                                  
                                  The flanker will be replaced in the starting side by Pete Samu.
                                  

                                  http://www.rugby.com.au/news/2018/09/07/pocock-out-springboks

                                  Good. Suck it up losers.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  2
                                  • BovidaeB Offline
                                    BovidaeB Offline
                                    Bovidae
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #49

                                    And now Folau is out.

                                    Wallabies fullback Israel Folau has been ruled out of Saturday night's Rugby Championship test against South Africa in Brisbane.

                                    Folau injured his ankle against the All Blacks in Sydney and missed the Wallabies' Auckland test last week, but was on track to return to the side in Brisbane.

                                    However, he pulled up sore on Saturday morning and withdrew from the team, with Dane Haylett-Petty moving to fullback, Jack Maddocks coming onto the wing and Tom Banks making his way into the squad.

                                    taniwharugbyT 1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • antipodeanA Online
                                      antipodeanA Online
                                      antipodean
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #50

                                      No Bono Cockwomble. No Folau. No Foley.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • BovidaeB Bovidae

                                        And now Folau is out.

                                        Wallabies fullback Israel Folau has been ruled out of Saturday night's Rugby Championship test against South Africa in Brisbane.

                                        Folau injured his ankle against the All Blacks in Sydney and missed the Wallabies' Auckland test last week, but was on track to return to the side in Brisbane.

                                        However, he pulled up sore on Saturday morning and withdrew from the team, with Dane Haylett-Petty moving to fullback, Jack Maddocks coming onto the wing and Tom Banks making his way into the squad.

                                        taniwharugbyT Offline
                                        taniwharugbyT Offline
                                        taniwharugby
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #51

                                        @bovidae did we kick him in the ankle?

                                        NTAN 1 Reply Last reply
                                        2
                                        • taniwharugbyT taniwharugby

                                          @bovidae did we kick him in the ankle?

                                          NTAN Offline
                                          NTAN Offline
                                          NTA
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #52

                                          @taniwharugby you rolled his ankle

                                          PaekakboyzP 1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Search
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Search