Skip to content
  • Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

  • Tipping
  • Team Sheets
  • Highlights
  • Results
    • All Blacks

      Search every All Blacks Test. Filter results by year, opposition, location, venue, city and RWC stage

    • Super Rugby

      Search every Super Rugby since match 1996

    • NPC

      Search NPC results. Only first division matches from 1976-2005. All results from the 14 team competition (2006-present) are included

All Blacks v Springboks

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Rugby Matches
allblacksspringboks
1.1k Posts 95 Posters 79.7k Views 6 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • M Machpants

    @chester-draws As I mentioned in another thread, blanket stats we get from media are almost all pointless. Kick percentage doesn't take into account kick difficulty, missed tackles are expected with rushing/swarming defensive systems, turnovers doesn't take into account the way the ABs are passing so close to contact, fast and in hard areas... I'm not saying that it's not better to have them on the normal 'good' side (no missed tackles, no missed shots, no dropped ball) but as raw numbers they are not great at judging what the team is trying to achieve. Metres run is another one, if the opposition kicks long a lot, you'll get heaps of metres - so what? Some are still useful as pure numbers (scrums, lineouts) but really there is not enough detail to use them to judge a team or a game.

    nzzpN Offline
    nzzpN Offline
    nzzp
    wrote on last edited by
    #33

    @machpants said in All Blacks v Springboks:

    @chester-draws As I mentioned in another thread, blanket stats we get from media are almost all pointless.

    I agree completely. Wayne Smith used to basically ignore them, was only interested in dominant tackles. The stats are misleading, and I'd be very surprised if the coaches relied heavily on them other than as a informative background

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
    • BovidaeB Offline
      BovidaeB Offline
      Bovidae
      wrote on last edited by
      #34

      All stats around possession and territory need to be put into context. For example, time in the opposition's 22 only tells you where you are on the field, not what you are doing with the ball. A clinical attacking team might spend little time in the 22 because they take most of their scoring opportunities, whereas a team devoid of ideas might be camped in the opposition's 22 but never look like scoring a try.

      There are plenty of variations of this quote:

      Statistics are like mini-skirts .. they give you good ideas but they don't reveal everything.

      1 Reply Last reply
      3
      • BovidaeB Bovidae

        Hemopo doesn't have any problems in SR so I don't think his lack of height would be an issue as the reserve lock. I remember seeing Savea winning a throw at the front on Sat (height jokes aside). Read is one of the main lineout targets and is similar to Hemopo. I'd be more worried about Harris finding his target.

        As a comparison, while Etzebeth and Synman are giants, Mostert isn't that tall by Bok standards (1.98 m).

        Chris B.C Offline
        Chris B.C Offline
        Chris B.
        wrote on last edited by
        #35

        @bovidae said in All Blacks v Springboks:

        Hemopo doesn't have any problems in SR so I don't think his lack of height would be an issue as the reserve lock. I remember seeing Savea winning a throw at the front on Sat (height jokes aside). Read is one of the main lineout targets and is similar to Hemopo. I'd be more worried about Harris finding his target.

        As a comparison, while Etzebeth and Synman are giants, Mostert isn't that tall by Bok standards (1.98 m).

        We'd find out if Sam Whitelock went down in the first five minutes and we ended up with Barrett and Hemepo as our locks.

        I don't think it's coincidental that our lineout is pretty great with Retallick and Whitelock as our locks and both well past 2 metres.

        Read is a fantastic technician though. Probably the best third jumper in the world - a bit of a loose forward version of Matfield.

        BovidaeB 1 Reply Last reply
        2
        • Chris B.C Chris B.

          @bovidae said in All Blacks v Springboks:

          Hemopo doesn't have any problems in SR so I don't think his lack of height would be an issue as the reserve lock. I remember seeing Savea winning a throw at the front on Sat (height jokes aside). Read is one of the main lineout targets and is similar to Hemopo. I'd be more worried about Harris finding his target.

          As a comparison, while Etzebeth and Synman are giants, Mostert isn't that tall by Bok standards (1.98 m).

          We'd find out if Sam Whitelock went down in the first five minutes and we ended up with Barrett and Hemepo as our locks.

          I don't think it's coincidental that our lineout is pretty great with Retallick and Whitelock as our locks and both well past 2 metres.

          Read is a fantastic technician though. Probably the best third jumper in the world - a bit of a loose forward version of Matfield.

          BovidaeB Offline
          BovidaeB Offline
          Bovidae
          wrote on last edited by
          #36

          @chris-b Chicago vs Ireland showed we do need specialist locks but BBBR won't be there so they'll start with Whitelock and Barrett. The debate is over the reserve lock.

          I'll put it another way, who is better as a lineout jumper - Hemopo or Tuipulotu? I'd say Hemopo despite being the shorter of the two. I would have selected Franklin in the original squad myself. Problem solved.

          Chris B.C 1 Reply Last reply
          1
          • BovidaeB Bovidae

            @chris-b Chicago vs Ireland showed we do need specialist locks but BBBR won't be there so they'll start with Whitelock and Barrett. The debate is over the reserve lock.

            I'll put it another way, who is better as a lineout jumper - Hemopo or Tuipulotu? I'd say Hemopo despite being the shorter of the two. I would have selected Franklin in the original squad myself. Problem solved.

            Chris B.C Offline
            Chris B.C Offline
            Chris B.
            wrote on last edited by
            #37

            @bovidae I'm reacting to your comment that Hemepo's height probably wouldn't be an issue as the reserve lock.

            I think it would be an issue, but not one we necessarily have an alternative to.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • taniwharugbyT taniwharugby

              @jk not only that, but he was slower than @MN5

              MN5M Offline
              MN5M Offline
              MN5
              wrote on last edited by
              #38

              @taniwharugby said in All Blacks v Springboks:

              @jk not only that, but he was slower than @MN5

              That's pretty much impossible unless you're standing still

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • ShadowTrooperS Offline
                ShadowTrooperS Offline
                ShadowTrooper
                wrote on last edited by
                #39

                I don't like BBBR not being there, makes me feel uneasy

                A 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • StargazerS Offline
                  StargazerS Offline
                  Stargazer
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #40
                  Assistant coach Ian Foster confirmed today multiple players who were overlooked last week are back in contention.
                  
                  "Sonny [Bill Williams] had his scan yesterday and he's all clear, ready to go, but he was sick this morning so he didn't train but the good news is his scan's all clear.
                  
                  "He's in contention to play, it's just some bug or something."
                  
                  Foster said there were other key figures also in contention to play after getting a week off in Nelson.
                  
                  "Sam Cane is in the mix, Ryan Crotty is the same."
                  
                  There was also positive signs coming from hooker Dane Coles, who hasn't played rugby since a season-ending knee injury on last year's end-of-year tour.
                  
                  "Every week he's getting closer and closer so it's exciting and he's starting to believe that now too.
                  
                  "He's got that glint in his eye and he's asking questions and looking for stuff - it's nice to see."
                  
                  However, there's still concern around Brodie Retallick, who is likely to miss up to six weeks of rugby due to a shoulder injury.
                  
                  "Brodie hasn't had his scan yet so I don't know."
                  
                  Ngani Laumape was another casualty of the 46-24 win, suffering a grade one knee ligament injury and is expected to be out for two to three weeks.
                  

                  https://www.tvnz.co.nz/one-news/sport/rugby/all-blacks-injury-updates-sbw-and-crotty-clear-coles-closer-but-mystery-still-surrounding-retallick

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • ShadowTrooperS ShadowTrooper

                    I don't like BBBR not being there, makes me feel uneasy

                    A Offline
                    A Offline
                    akan004
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #41

                    @shadowtrooper said in All Blacks v Springboks:

                    I don't like BBBR not being there, makes me feel uneasy

                    Not so concerned about this game but I hope he will be back for the return match in South Africa.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    1
                    • taniwharugbyT Offline
                      taniwharugbyT Offline
                      taniwharugby
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #42

                      Seems odd it is 2 full work days and he has not had a scan yet...can't get an appointment or waiting for the ACC number...

                      M UniteU 2 Replies Last reply
                      4
                      • taniwharugbyT Offline
                        taniwharugbyT Offline
                        taniwharugby
                        wrote on last edited by taniwharugby
                        #43

                        The steady decline of Springboks rugby in recent years. We often talk about the cyclical nature of sport - well, they have been trending one way.

                        South Africa vs everyone since 2013
                        New Zealand: played eight, lost seven, won one
                        Australia: played eight, lost four, won two
                        Argentina: played 11, lost three, won eight (prior to 2014 SA lost to Argentina only once)
                        Wales: played seven, lost four, won three (prior to 2014 SA lost to Wales only once)
                        Ireland: played five, lost three, won two
                        England: played five, lost two, won three
                        Scotland: played two, won two
                        Italy: lost one, won two
                        France played four, won four
                        Japan played one, lost one – SA had never lost to Japan before

                        Chester DrawsC 1 Reply Last reply
                        2
                        • taniwharugbyT taniwharugby

                          Seems odd it is 2 full work days and he has not had a scan yet...can't get an appointment or waiting for the ACC number...

                          M Offline
                          M Offline
                          Machpants
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #44

                          @taniwharugby said in All Blacks v Springboks:

                          Seems odd it is 2 full work days and he has not had a scan yet...can't get an appointment or waiting for the ACC number...

                          More likely it's sore and/or swollen enough that they can't do a proper scan yet. Sometimes you have to wait for things to settle before a scan.

                          taniwharugbyT 1 Reply Last reply
                          1
                          • M Machpants

                            @taniwharugby said in All Blacks v Springboks:

                            Seems odd it is 2 full work days and he has not had a scan yet...can't get an appointment or waiting for the ACC number...

                            More likely it's sore and/or swollen enough that they can't do a proper scan yet. Sometimes you have to wait for things to settle before a scan.

                            taniwharugbyT Offline
                            taniwharugbyT Offline
                            taniwharugby
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #45

                            @machpants that unfortunately likely points to it being a bit more serious?

                            SapetyviS 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • M Offline
                              M Offline
                              Machpants
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #46

                              I don't know TBH, I just know that scans sometimes have to be left until the effected area has settled, whether that means BBBR has a major, no idea.

                              P 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • taniwharugbyT taniwharugby

                                @machpants that unfortunately likely points to it being a bit more serious?

                                SapetyviS Offline
                                SapetyviS Offline
                                Sapetyvi
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #47

                                @taniwharugby I don't think so, a joint can easily get swollen enough without major damage. Think of an ankle sprain, it might look very bad the next morning and then be fine a week later.

                                taniwharugbyT 1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • taniwharugbyT taniwharugby

                                  The steady decline of Springboks rugby in recent years. We often talk about the cyclical nature of sport - well, they have been trending one way.

                                  South Africa vs everyone since 2013
                                  New Zealand: played eight, lost seven, won one
                                  Australia: played eight, lost four, won two
                                  Argentina: played 11, lost three, won eight (prior to 2014 SA lost to Argentina only once)
                                  Wales: played seven, lost four, won three (prior to 2014 SA lost to Wales only once)
                                  Ireland: played five, lost three, won two
                                  England: played five, lost two, won three
                                  Scotland: played two, won two
                                  Italy: lost one, won two
                                  France played four, won four
                                  Japan played one, lost one – SA had never lost to Japan before

                                  Chester DrawsC Offline
                                  Chester DrawsC Offline
                                  Chester Draws
                                  wrote on last edited by Chester Draws
                                  #48

                                  @taniwharugby Those are some seriously sobering stats for Bok fans! I knew it was bad, but I'd not seen it laid out that clearly.

                                  It would be worse, but the French have been poor for a few years, giving them at least one country they can beat reliably.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • SapetyviS Sapetyvi

                                    @taniwharugby I don't think so, a joint can easily get swollen enough without major damage. Think of an ankle sprain, it might look very bad the next morning and then be fine a week later.

                                    taniwharugbyT Offline
                                    taniwharugbyT Offline
                                    taniwharugby
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #49

                                    @sapetyvi hopefully the case, add in that he tried to play on gives hope...just such a shame that a player in some form fast becoming a great has been injured half the year and could be out for a time again.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • taniwharugbyT taniwharugby

                                      Seems odd it is 2 full work days and he has not had a scan yet...can't get an appointment or waiting for the ACC number...

                                      UniteU Offline
                                      UniteU Offline
                                      Unite
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #50

                                      @taniwharugby said in All Blacks v Springboks:

                                      Seems odd it is 2 full work days and he has not had a scan yet...can't get an appointment or waiting for the ACC number...

                                      I though the same bloody thing!

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • M Machpants

                                        I don't know TBH, I just know that scans sometimes have to be left until the effected area has settled, whether that means BBBR has a major, no idea.

                                        P Offline
                                        P Offline
                                        pakman
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #51

                                        @machpants said in All Blacks v Springboks:

                                        I don't know TBH, I just know that scans sometimes have to be left until the effected area has settled, whether that means BBBR has a major, no idea.

                                        Rotator cuff injuries are tricky. Last year Rieko thought he had one, but amazingly recovered. Everyone's RC gets a bit shagged over time (by 60) if they live an active life, but it doesn't need to be 100% to play high level sport. Pat Rafter went years with a dodgy RC, electing to do daily rubber band exercises rather than get it repaired surgically (six months out).

                                        Main thing with BBBR is that it is correctly assessed. If out till EOYT, fine so long as then 90%. Or surgery now, to be back for Super Rugby. But most definitely not rushed back quickly/too soon and reinjured requiring surgery which could have been avoided.

                                        ACT CrusaderA kiwiinmelbK 2 Replies Last reply
                                        1
                                        • P pakman

                                          @machpants said in All Blacks v Springboks:

                                          I don't know TBH, I just know that scans sometimes have to be left until the effected area has settled, whether that means BBBR has a major, no idea.

                                          Rotator cuff injuries are tricky. Last year Rieko thought he had one, but amazingly recovered. Everyone's RC gets a bit shagged over time (by 60) if they live an active life, but it doesn't need to be 100% to play high level sport. Pat Rafter went years with a dodgy RC, electing to do daily rubber band exercises rather than get it repaired surgically (six months out).

                                          Main thing with BBBR is that it is correctly assessed. If out till EOYT, fine so long as then 90%. Or surgery now, to be back for Super Rugby. But most definitely not rushed back quickly/too soon and reinjured requiring surgery which could have been avoided.

                                          ACT CrusaderA Offline
                                          ACT CrusaderA Offline
                                          ACT Crusader
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #52

                                          @pakman said in All Blacks v Springboks:

                                          @machpants said in All Blacks v Springboks:

                                          I don't know TBH, I just know that scans sometimes have to be left until the effected area has settled, whether that means BBBR has a major, no idea.

                                          Rotator cuff injuries are tricky. Last year Rieko thought he had one, but amazingly recovered. Everyone's RC gets a bit shagged over time (by 60) if they live an active life, but it doesn't need to be 100% to play high level sport. Pat Rafter went years with a dodgy RC, electing to do daily rubber band exercises rather than get it repaired surgically (six months out).

                                          Main thing with BBBR is that it is correctly assessed. If out till EOYT, fine so long as then 90%. Or surgery now, to be back for Super Rugby. But most definitely not rushed back quickly/too soon and reinjured requiring surgery which could have been avoided.

                                          I went to a lunch a few years ago and Rafter was there. He said the amount of shoulder massaging he got each day to help him manage his RC/shoulder issues was ridiculous

                                          I think with Squire, Read, Whitelock and S. Barrett our lineout options are fine. Even if we lost Whitelock early and brought in either Paddy or Hemp, I think our lineout will function okay.

                                          The Irish game showed that Retallick (and Whitelock) are the key cogs to our work in the tight. Good time for others to step it up which I think they will.

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          2
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Search
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Search