• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

Cricket - NZ vs Sri Lanka

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Sports Talk
cricket
740 Posts 53 Posters 22.5k Views
Cricket - NZ vs Sri Lanka
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • DonsteppaD Offline
    DonsteppaD Offline
    Donsteppa
    replied to MN5 on last edited by Donsteppa
    #159

    @mn5 said in Cricket - NZ vs Sri Lanka:

    @donsteppa said in Cricket - NZ vs Sri Lanka:

    @cyclops said in Cricket - NZ vs Sri Lanka:

    Highest ever score while carrying bat I believe. Cook number two and Turner 3.

    An incredibly impressive feat of concentration to bat for that long and that well. Especially with ten others falling by the wayside at the other end.

    91, 50, 50, 49 and 43 isn't really falling by the wayside.

    And yet he outlasted all. I'm in awe of that level of concentration/survival/run scoring/sheer ability to bat that long without stuffing up.

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • MN5M Online
    MN5M Online
    MN5
    replied to Donsteppa on last edited by MN5
    #160

    @donsteppa said in Cricket - NZ vs Sri Lanka:

    @mn5 said in Cricket - NZ vs Sri Lanka:

    @donsteppa said in Cricket - NZ vs Sri Lanka:

    @mn5 said in Cricket - NZ vs Sri Lanka:

    @mokey said in Cricket - NZ vs Sri Lanka:

    @virgil I'm sure I don't know what you mean...

    Twelve overs for the Lankans to face. I nominate Southee and Wagner full throttle since they did nothing with the bat.

    Fuck old mate Southee gets shit on here. He got six fucken wickets!!!!

    Says the man still merrily bagging Santner who has been out injured for nearly a year...!

    You mean the all rounder who's not actually that good at either discipline?

    So like many all rounders in NZ cricketing history, with a few notable exceptions?

    Neesham and Anderson haven't played in a while, perhaps they need a few passing swipes at? šŸ™‚

    The Neesh could get hundies though....

    DonsteppaD 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • rotatedR Offline
    rotatedR Offline
    rotated
    replied to Cyclops on last edited by
    #161

    @cyclops said in Cricket - NZ vs Sri Lanka:

    @mokey said in Cricket - NZ vs Sri Lanka:

    @cyclops Also first NZer to do so in NZ apparently.

    Yep, Turner did it once at Lords and once in Kingston I think. The Kingston one was the double ton, part of the 72 series where he got 2 doubles along with Terry Jarvis.
    Fantastic series that was for NZ. (Been talking about it all today)

    The difference between Latham carrying his bat and Turner is you know Turner was playing for that individual achievement from about 5 down.

    1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • MokeyM Offline
    MokeyM Offline
    Mokey
    replied to Mokey on last edited by
    #162

    @mokey said in Cricket - NZ vs Sri Lanka:

    @mn5 Hardly. He heard my instruction of he needs six more, and said of course ma'am. Here's the first.

    And the second, ma'am. hope that meets with your approval.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • DonsteppaD Offline
    DonsteppaD Offline
    Donsteppa
    wrote on last edited by
    #163

    Sri Lanka batting like they have Christmas shopping to do tomorrow šŸ™‚

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • DamoD Offline
    DamoD Offline
    Damo
    wrote on last edited by
    #164

    Sri Lanka look like they're not even really trying. Fancy getting out hooking at 13/2 when 280 runs behind?

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • MN5M Online
    MN5M Online
    MN5
    replied to Mokey on last edited by
    #165

    @mokey said in Cricket - NZ vs Sri Lanka:

    @mn5 Hardly. He heard my instruction of he needs six more, and said of course ma'am. Here's the first.

    ....and the second. Only four to go

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • DonsteppaD Offline
    DonsteppaD Offline
    Donsteppa
    replied to MN5 on last edited by
    #166

    @mn5 said in Cricket - NZ vs Sri Lanka:

    @donsteppa said in Cricket - NZ vs Sri Lanka:

    @mn5 said in Cricket - NZ vs Sri Lanka:

    @donsteppa said in Cricket - NZ vs Sri Lanka:

    @mn5 said in Cricket - NZ vs Sri Lanka:

    @mokey said in Cricket - NZ vs Sri Lanka:

    @virgil I'm sure I don't know what you mean...

    Twelve overs for the Lankans to face. I nominate Southee and Wagner full throttle since they did nothing with the bat.

    Fuck old mate Southee gets shit on here. He got six fucken wickets!!!!

    Says the man still merrily bagging Santner who has been out injured for nearly a year...!

    You mean the all rounder who's not actually that good at either discipline?

    So like many all rounders in NZ cricketing history, with a few notable exceptions?

    Neesham and Anderson haven't played in a while, perhaps they need a few passing swipes at? šŸ™‚

    The Neesh could get hundies though....

    With the ball as well as the bat...

    MN5M 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • MN5M Online
    MN5M Online
    MN5
    replied to Donsteppa on last edited by
    #167

    @donsteppa said in Cricket - NZ vs Sri Lanka:

    @mn5 said in Cricket - NZ vs Sri Lanka:

    @donsteppa said in Cricket - NZ vs Sri Lanka:

    @mn5 said in Cricket - NZ vs Sri Lanka:

    @donsteppa said in Cricket - NZ vs Sri Lanka:

    @mn5 said in Cricket - NZ vs Sri Lanka:

    @mokey said in Cricket - NZ vs Sri Lanka:

    @virgil I'm sure I don't know what you mean...

    Twelve overs for the Lankans to face. I nominate Southee and Wagner full throttle since they did nothing with the bat.

    Fuck old mate Southee gets shit on here. He got six fucken wickets!!!!

    Says the man still merrily bagging Santner who has been out injured for nearly a year...!

    You mean the all rounder who's not actually that good at either discipline?

    So like many all rounders in NZ cricketing history, with a few notable exceptions?

    Neesham and Anderson haven't played in a while, perhaps they need a few passing swipes at? šŸ™‚

    The Neesh could get hundies though....

    With the ball as well as the bat...

    That is true.

    In any case Santner has no place in this team.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • G Offline
    G Offline
    Godder
    wrote on last edited by
    #168

    Southee to produce 6 of the best?

    boobooB 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • boobooB Offline
    boobooB Offline
    booboo
    replied to Godder on last edited by
    #169

    @godder said in Cricket - NZ vs Sri Lanka:

    Southee to produce 6 of the best?

    So scenario ...

    Southee ends up with 6 in both innings ... who gets MOTM, Timmah or Tommah?

    nzzpN 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • nzzpN Offline
    nzzpN Offline
    nzzp
    replied to booboo on last edited by nzzp
    #170

    @booboo said in Cricket - NZ vs Sri Lanka:

    @godder said in Cricket - NZ vs Sri Lanka:

    Southee to produce 6 of the best?

    So scenario ...

    Southee ends up with 6 in both innings ... who gets MOTM, Timmah or Tommah?

    Timmah. 12 wickets trumps any batting score (except freak outcomes). Much bigger contribution to the win.

    Edited to correct to Timmah!

    MN5M SnowyS 2 Replies Last reply
    0
  • MN5M Online
    MN5M Online
    MN5
    replied to nzzp on last edited by MN5
    #171

    @nzzp said in Cricket - NZ vs Sri Lanka:

    @booboo said in Cricket - NZ vs Sri Lanka:

    @godder said in Cricket - NZ vs Sri Lanka:

    Southee to produce 6 of the best?

    So scenario ...

    Southee ends up with 6 in both innings ... who gets MOTM, Timmah or Tommah?

    Timmah. 12 wickets trumps any batting score (except freak outcomes). Much bigger contribution to the win.

    Edited to correct to Timmah!

    He could get all 20 fucken wickets and the haters would still whinge about his batting even after cracking a fast paced but irresponsible 68 off 29 deliveries.....

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • SnowyS Offline
    SnowyS Offline
    Snowy
    replied to nzzp on last edited by
    #172

    @nzzp said in Cricket - NZ vs Sri Lanka:

    Timmah. 12 wickets trumps any batting score (except freak outcomes). Much bigger contribution to the win.

    Not disagreeing with you but that was something like the 6th highest score by a NZ batsman and the first time a Kiwi opener has carried his bat in NZ. Highest score by any opener in test history to get through an entire innings. Pretty impressive.

    I think 12 wickets would have been done a few times.

    MN5M nzzpN 2 Replies Last reply
    2
  • MN5M Online
    MN5M Online
    MN5
    replied to Snowy on last edited by
    #173

    @snowy said in Cricket - NZ vs Sri Lanka:

    @nzzp said in Cricket - NZ vs Sri Lanka:

    Timmah. 12 wickets trumps any batting score (except freak outcomes). Much bigger contribution to the win.

    Not disagreeing with you but that was something like the 6th highest score by a NZ batsman and the first time a Kiwi opener has carried his bat in NZ. Highest score by any opener in test history to get through an entire innings. Pretty impressive.

    I think 12 wickets would have been done a few times.

    When Bryan Young got his double did they declare?

    rotatedR 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • nzzpN Offline
    nzzpN Offline
    nzzp
    replied to Snowy on last edited by
    #174

    @snowy said in Cricket - NZ vs Sri Lanka:

    @nzzp said in Cricket - NZ vs Sri Lanka:

    Timmah. 12 wickets trumps any batting score (except freak outcomes). Much bigger contribution to the win.

    Not disagreeing with you but that was something like the 6th highest score by a NZ batsman and the first time a Kiwi opener has carried his bat in NZ. Highest score by any opener in test history to get through an entire innings. Pretty impressive.

    I think 12 wickets would have been done a few times.

    12 in a match puts him second equal behind Hadlee. Done twice by Vettori (weirdly, I dont' remember him doing this and spinnig people out. Once in Aus in 2000, and again against the Bangles over there).

    So yeah, 12 in a match is amazingballs.

    List of New Zealand Test cricket records - Wikipedia

    List of New Zealand Test cricket records - Wikipedia
    MN5M 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • MN5M Online
    MN5M Online
    MN5
    replied to nzzp on last edited by MN5
    #175

    @nzzp said in Cricket - NZ vs Sri Lanka:

    @snowy said in Cricket - NZ vs Sri Lanka:

    @nzzp said in Cricket - NZ vs Sri Lanka:

    Timmah. 12 wickets trumps any batting score (except freak outcomes). Much bigger contribution to the win.

    Not disagreeing with you but that was something like the 6th highest score by a NZ batsman and the first time a Kiwi opener has carried his bat in NZ. Highest score by any opener in test history to get through an entire innings. Pretty impressive.

    I think 12 wickets would have been done a few times.

    12 in a match puts him second equal behind Hadlee. Done twice by Vettori (weirdly, I dont' remember him doing this and spinnig people out. Once in Aus in 2000, and again against the Bangles over there).

    So yeah, 12 in a match is amazingballs.

    List of New Zealand Test cricket records - Wikipedia

    List of New Zealand Test cricket records - Wikipedia

    If I remember rightly Alan Border got a 10 fer....

    But then again Jason Gillespie got a double ton....

    Cricket is a funny game ( say that in a Geoffrey Boycott accent for full effect )

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT Crusader
    wrote on last edited by
    #176

    I’d give MOTM to Timmy if he got another 6fer.

    The SL bowling attack really is poor. Their batting is better, albeit marginally.

    Well done to Latham. A huge effort in concentration and application.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • rotatedR Offline
    rotatedR Offline
    rotated
    replied to MN5 on last edited by
    #177

    @mn5 said in Cricket - NZ vs Sri Lanka:

    When Bryan Young got his double did they declare?

    At tea on the second day 7 down with Dipak also not out on 40 odd. Looking at the scorecard it looks to have rained most of the next day which was probably the consideration.

    Young, Sutcliffe, Kane and Fleming all had good chances at 300 but gave them up in the interests of the team. Sutcliffe was declared on only 2 down!!

    Does really show that unless you are batting second on a road after giving up ~600 there is almost has to be a degree of putting the individual first to get there.

    MN5M KiwiPieK DuluthD 3 Replies Last reply
    0
  • MN5M Online
    MN5M Online
    MN5
    replied to rotated on last edited by MN5
    #178

    @rotated said in Cricket - NZ vs Sri Lanka:

    @mn5 said in Cricket - NZ vs Sri Lanka:

    When Bryan Young got his double did they declare?

    At tea on the second day 7 down with Dipak also not out on 40 odd. Looking at the scorecard it looks to have rained most of the next day which was probably the consideration.

    Young, Sutcliffe, Kane and Fleming all had good chances at 300 but gave them up in the interests of the team. Sutcliffe was declared on only 2 down!!

    Does really show that unless you are batting second on a road after giving up ~600 there is almost has to be a degree of putting the individual first to get there.

    For all the shit Fleming got over his conversion rate he still cracked three double hundies.

    CyclopsC 1 Reply Last reply
    0

Cricket - NZ vs Sri Lanka
Sports Talk
cricket
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.