• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

NZ v Bangladesh Test #1

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Sports Talk
cricket
161 Posts 28 Posters 4.4k Views
NZ v Bangladesh Test #1
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • PaekakboyzP Offline
    PaekakboyzP Offline
    Paekakboyz
    replied to MN5 on last edited by
    #90

    @MN5 said in NZ v Bangladesh Test #1:

    @Siam said in NZ v Bangladesh Test #1:

    Thank you Todd, we'll call you if we need minimal legspin, no ability to tie down an end and a longer follow through than Boulty. You can keep the shirts and merch

    A black caps legspinner being a bit shit?

    There's a surprise.

    Fixed it for you 🙂

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • boobooB Offline
    boobooB Offline
    booboo
    replied to Crazy Horse on last edited by
    #91

    @Crazy-Horse said in NZ v Bangladesh Test #1:

    Can't find coverage on Fox today. Instead we get to watch the chicks play cricket in slow motion.

    Come on. You could have watched darts. Live.

    Fuck you Fox.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • boobooB Offline
    boobooB Offline
    booboo
    replied to booboo on last edited by
    #92

    @booboo said in NZ v Bangladesh Test #1:

    4 down in an impossible position to bat out 2 days, but playing on a road with two set batsmen who didn't look greatly challenged ...

    ...a bit too much like first test v Lankans ...

    Don't expect that to happen again though. (Fingers crossed.)

    Just saying ...

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • H Offline
    H Offline
    hydro11
    replied to Siam on last edited by
    #93

    @Siam said in NZ v Bangladesh Test #1:

    Thank you Todd, we'll call you if we need minimal legspin, no ability to tie down an end and a longer follow through than Boulty. You can keep the shirts and merch

    We shouldn't really expect a leggie to tie down an end. Probably a better pitch for Santner or Somerville. Somerville should probably come in for the Basin.

    SiamS 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • SiamS Offline
    SiamS Offline
    Siam
    replied to hydro11 on last edited by Siam
    #94

    @hydro11 who's expecting him to tie down an end?

    It's not unreasonable to expect him to at least trouble a batsman, perhaps bowl something from a different angle, perhaps get one above the eyes, perhaps do something useful in a search to get wickets?

    His toothless one dimensional bowling has nothing to do with the pitch

    H 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • H Offline
    H Offline
    hydro11
    replied to Siam on last edited by
    #95

    @Siam said in NZ v Bangladesh Test #1:

    @hydro11 who's expecting him to tie down an end?

    It's not unreasonable to expect him to at least trouble a batsman, perhaps bowl something from a different angle, perhaps get one above the eyes, perhaps do something useful in a search to get wickets?

    His toothless one dimensional bowling has nothing to do with the pitch

    Mehidy was dreadful and he is an international quality spinner though.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • G Offline
    G Offline
    Godder
    wrote on last edited by
    #96

    Apparently this is only the second time our top 3 have scored centuries.

    CyclopsC 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • CyclopsC Offline
    CyclopsC Offline
    Cyclops
    replied to Godder on last edited by
    #97

    @Godder said in NZ v Bangladesh Test #1:

    Apparently this is only the second time our top 3 have scored centuries.

    And 13th ever in test cricket.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • CyclopsC Offline
    CyclopsC Offline
    Cyclops
    wrote on last edited by
    #98

    New ball doing the job our spinners couldn't fortunately.

    Bangladesh are a better team than the first innings made them look, but probably not quite as good as the second innings so overall an average performance from our bowling attack. Need to roll the tail to get back ahead.

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • boobooB Offline
    boobooB Offline
    booboo
    wrote on last edited by
    #99

    So a win by an innings and 52 creating huuuge amounts of excitement ...

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • sharkS Offline
    sharkS Offline
    shark
    wrote on last edited by
    #100

    Williamson the first NZ batsman to 20 test centuries. To go with Taylor being the first to 20 ODI centuries earlier this summer. A few batting milestones being ticked off, and good to get a couple of names further up the all-time lists.

    Williamson isn't yet 29. He could play another 8 years at the top and double his test tally and stats if he stays injury-free. They'd be phenomenal stats.

    1 Reply Last reply
    4
  • No QuarterN Offline
    No QuarterN Offline
    No Quarter
    wrote on last edited by
    #101

    NZ pitches being so bloody flat these days doesn't really help with the interest levels, especially against Bangladesh. Watching them score 400+ while losing comprehensively isn't exactly riveting cricket

    Still, Boult and Wags in the wickets. Raval gets the 100 monkey off his back. Kane and Tom continue to build on their impressive records. Not much to complain about there.

    MN5M 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • MN5M Offline
    MN5M Offline
    MN5
    replied to No Quarter on last edited by
    #102

    @No-Quarter said in NZ v Bangladesh Test #1:

    NZ pitches being so bloody flat these days doesn't really help with the interest levels, especially against Bangladesh. Watching them score 400+ while losing comprehensively isn't exactly riveting cricket

    Still, Boult and Wags in the wickets. Raval gets the 100 monkey off his back. Kane and Tom continue to build on their impressive records. Not much to complain about there.

    a test in which everyone did well except Rossco and Astle.

    Difference being one is a legend, the other has a point to prove.

    I'm nitpicking an innings victory, its great being a cricket fan these days.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • V Do not disturb
    V Do not disturb
    Virgil
    wrote on last edited by
    #103

    Interesting stat mentioned on the radio this morning, this test summer at home our pace attack have taken 52 Wickets. Spin bowlers 0 wickets.

    sharkS MN5M 2 Replies Last reply
    1
  • sharkS Offline
    sharkS Offline
    shark
    replied to Virgil on last edited by
    #104

    @Virgil said in NZ v Bangladesh Test #1:

    Interesting stat mentioned on the radio this morning, this test summer at home our pace attack have taken 52 Wickets. Spin bowlers 0 wickets.

    How many wickets taken by opposition spinners, as this would indicate where we're at in terms of test spinning talent level?

    V rotatedR 2 Replies Last reply
    0
  • V Do not disturb
    V Do not disturb
    Virgil
    replied to shark on last edited by
    #105

    @shark said in NZ v Bangladesh Test #1:

    @Virgil said in NZ v Bangladesh Test #1:

    Interesting stat mentioned on the radio this morning, this test summer at home our pace attack have taken 52 Wickets. Spin bowlers 0 wickets.

    How many wickets taken by opposition spinners, as this would indicate where we're at in terms of test spinning talent level?

    9 wickets
    6 across the 2 tests by Sri Lanka and 3 by the Bangles in this test.
    Should be pointed out across the 3 tests we have only had to bat 4 times...

    RapidoR 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • rotatedR Offline
    rotatedR Offline
    rotated
    replied to shark on last edited by
    #106

    @shark said in NZ v Bangladesh Test #1:

    How many wickets taken by opposition spinners

    Generous use of the word 'taken' here.

    How many opposition spinners happen to deliver the ball at the time a wicket occurred would be more accurate.

    1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • sharkS Offline
    sharkS Offline
    shark
    wrote on last edited by
    #107

    Are you saying on each of those nine occasions we gifted the wicket to the opposition?

    Chris B.C rotatedR 2 Replies Last reply
    0
  • MN5M Offline
    MN5M Offline
    MN5
    wrote on last edited by MN5
    #108

    so in summary can we say the Black Caps spinners are poor as ever but it's not like the opposition exactly have the next Warnie or Murali?

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.
    replied to shark on last edited by
    #109

    @shark Not quite - but, if you look at the figures of the specialist spinners in the opposition, they're not pretty e.g. Mehidy 2/246.

    The part timers have better figures e.g. Mahmadullah 1/3

    If you bowl enough balls you'll probably eventually get a wicket. I doubt our spinners have conceded 246 runs across the three tests.

    NZ pitches are a graveyard for any but the absolutely elite spinners - Warne, Murali class.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1

NZ v Bangladesh Test #1
Sports Talk
cricket
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.