• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

New Zealand v Bangladesh Test #2

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Sports Talk
cricket
353 Posts 34 Posters 8.6k Views
New Zealand v Bangladesh Test #2
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • CyclopsC Offline
    CyclopsC Offline
    Cyclops
    wrote on last edited by Cyclops
    #262

    I was sure someone had said Nicholls at 6 but can't find it now. He's got a decent number of not outs there too.

    Kyle Mills for the 10 and maybe Baz at 9?

    KiwiPieK 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • KiwiPieK Offline
    KiwiPieK Offline
    KiwiPie
    replied to Cyclops on last edited by
    #263

    @Cyclops said in New Zealand v Bangladesh Test #2:

    I was sure someone had said Nicholls at 6 but can't find it now. He's got a decent number of not outs there too.

    Kyle Mills for the 10 and maybe Baz at 9?

    All negative - not sure Nicholls has enough games at 6, Mills is 3rd at 10 (and also at 9) and I don't think Baz was ever that low was he?

    CyclopsC 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • CyclopsC Offline
    CyclopsC Offline
    Cyclops
    replied to KiwiPie on last edited by
    #264

    @KiwiPie said in New Zealand v Bangladesh Test #2:

    @Cyclops said in New Zealand v Bangladesh Test #2:

    I was sure someone had said Nicholls at 6 but can't find it now. He's got a decent number of not outs there too.

    Kyle Mills for the 10 and maybe Baz at 9?

    All negative - not sure Nicholls has enough games at 6, Mills is 3rd at 10 (and also at 9) and I don't think Baz was ever that low was he?

    Hadn't picked up that the qualifier had gone up to 20.

    Neesham at 6?

    KiwiPieK 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • KiwiPieK Offline
    KiwiPieK Offline
    KiwiPie
    replied to Cyclops on last edited by
    #265

    @Cyclops said in New Zealand v Bangladesh Test #2:

    @KiwiPie said in New Zealand v Bangladesh Test #2:

    @Cyclops said in New Zealand v Bangladesh Test #2:

    I was sure someone had said Nicholls at 6 but can't find it now. He's got a decent number of not outs there too.

    Kyle Mills for the 10 and maybe Baz at 9?

    All negative - not sure Nicholls has enough games at 6, Mills is 3rd at 10 (and also at 9) and I don't think Baz was ever that low was he?

    Hadn't picked up that the qualifier had gone up to 20.

    Neesham at 6?

    Another one taken - just 9 and 10 to be guessed. 9 is a left-handed bat, 10 is a right-handed bat. Both have opened the bowling at test level for NZ.

    mariner4lifeM 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • mariner4lifeM Online
    mariner4lifeM Online
    mariner4life
    replied to KiwiPie on last edited by
    #266

    @KiwiPie James Franklin?

    KiwiPieK 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • CyclopsC Offline
    CyclopsC Offline
    Cyclops
    wrote on last edited by
    #267

    What about Dion Nash at 10?

    KiwiPieK 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • KiwiPieK Offline
    KiwiPieK Offline
    KiwiPie
    replied to mariner4life on last edited by
    #268

    @mariner4life said in New Zealand v Bangladesh Test #2:

    @KiwiPie James Franklin?

    Yes for number 9.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • KiwiPieK Offline
    KiwiPieK Offline
    KiwiPie
    replied to Cyclops on last edited by
    #269

    @Cyclops said in New Zealand v Bangladesh Test #2:

    What about Dion Nash at 10?

    Not Nash - there is much love for this man on the Fern ...

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • dogmeatD Offline
    dogmeatD Offline
    dogmeat
    wrote on last edited by
    #270

    Gavin Larsen - I reckon you were trying t pull a fast one with the clue about opening the bowling

    KiwiPieK 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • KiwiPieK Offline
    KiwiPieK Offline
    KiwiPie
    replied to dogmeat on last edited by
    #271

    @dogmeat said in New Zealand v Bangladesh Test #2:

    Gavin Larsen - I reckon you were trying t pull a fast one with the clue about opening the bowling

    Ha - genuine love for the man we're after

    CyclopsC 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • CyclopsC Offline
    CyclopsC Offline
    Cyclops
    replied to KiwiPie on last edited by
    #272

    @KiwiPie said in New Zealand v Bangladesh Test #2:

    @dogmeat said in New Zealand v Bangladesh Test #2:

    Gavin Larsen - I reckon you were trying t pull a fast one with the clue about opening the bowling

    Ha - genuine love for the man we're after

    Bond?

    KiwiPieK 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • dogmeatD Offline
    dogmeatD Offline
    dogmeat
    wrote on last edited by
    #273

    Wags

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • KiwiPieK Offline
    KiwiPieK Offline
    KiwiPie
    replied to Cyclops on last edited by
    #274

    @Cyclops said in New Zealand v Bangladesh Test #2:

    @KiwiPie said in New Zealand v Bangladesh Test #2:

    @dogmeat said in New Zealand v Bangladesh Test #2:

    Gavin Larsen - I reckon you were trying t pull a fast one with the clue about opening the bowling

    Ha - genuine love for the man we're after

    Bond?

    Yay - now I can get some work done! Here's your full list

    Turner 49.87
    Guptill 45.42 (M Crowe, Latham, Astle - all below 40)
    Williamson 49.00 (Astle, Parore)
    Taylor 52.65 (M Crowe 48.69, Twose, Styris)
    Latham 33.69 (Elliott, C. Cairns)
    Neesham 39.71 (Coney 39.08, McMillan)
    Harris 31.32 (Oram 30.42, C. Cairns, Ronchi)
    Harris 39.92 (Santner 37.73, BMac, Oram)
    Franklin 23.58 (Larsen, Mills, L. Cairns)
    Bond 18.16 (Henry 17.83, Mills, Vettori, Southee)
    McClenaghan 55.00 (Bond 18.12, Morrison, Patel)

    dogmeatD Chris B.C 2 Replies Last reply
    2
  • PaekakboyzP Offline
    PaekakboyzP Offline
    Paekakboyz
    wrote on last edited by
    #275

    dammit. I thought mitch might be in there

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • dogmeatD Offline
    dogmeatD Offline
    dogmeat
    replied to KiwiPie on last edited by
    #276

    @KiwiPie HOLD THE FRONT PAGE "And of course it the same question as last time - except now it is for ODIs - 1-11 of the players with the highest batting average in that position - minimum 20 games in that position)".

    McClenaghan11th position 2013-2015 9 9 8 55 34* 55.00 98 56.12

    CyclopsC KiwiPieK 2 Replies Last reply
    0
  • CyclopsC Offline
    CyclopsC Offline
    Cyclops
    replied to dogmeat on last edited by
    #277

    @dogmeat said in New Zealand v Bangladesh Test #2:

    @KiwiPie HOLD THE FRONT PAGE "And of course it the same question as last time - except now it is for ODIs - 1-11 of the players with the highest batting average in that position - minimum 20 games in that position)".

    McClenaghan11th position 2013-2015 9 9 8 55 34* 55.00 98 56.12

    You should have quoted the bit where he said he counted matches where they didn't bat as if they had batted at their listed position.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • KiwiPieK Offline
    KiwiPieK Offline
    KiwiPie
    replied to dogmeat on last edited by KiwiPie
    #278

    @dogmeat said in New Zealand v Bangladesh Test #2:

    @KiwiPie HOLD THE FRONT PAGE "And of course it the same question as last time - except now it is for ODIs - 1-11 of the players with the highest batting average in that position - minimum 20 games in that position)".

    McClenaghan11th position 2013-2015 9 9 8 55 34* 55.00 98 56.12

    He's listed with 36 games at number 11 - not his fault he "DID NOT BAT" in most of them.

    • Please read the small print
    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • dogmeatD Offline
    dogmeatD Offline
    dogmeat
    wrote on last edited by
    #279

    As you were I see you have decided to assume that he would have maintained that average if he had batted in the 34 innings that he wasn't called on. Big bow but I guess that's gonna be the case for the lower orders.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • CyclopsC Offline
    CyclopsC Offline
    Cyclops
    wrote on last edited by
    #280

    That's really just the difference between matches and innings.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.
    replied to KiwiPie on last edited by
    #281

    @KiwiPie said in New Zealand v Bangladesh Test #2:

    @Cyclops said in New Zealand v Bangladesh Test #2:

    @KiwiPie said in New Zealand v Bangladesh Test #2:

    @dogmeat said in New Zealand v Bangladesh Test #2:

    Gavin Larsen - I reckon you were trying t pull a fast one with the clue about opening the bowling

    Ha - genuine love for the man we're after

    Bond?

    Yay - now I can get some work done! Here's your full list

    Turner 49.87
    Guptill 45.42 (M Crowe, Latham, Astle - all below 40)
    Williamson 49.00 (Astle, Parore)
    Taylor 52.65 (M Crowe 48.69, Twose, Styris)
    Latham 33.69 (Elliott, C. Cairns)
    Neesham 39.71 (Coney 39.08, McMillan)
    Harris 31.32 (Oram 30.42, C. Cairns, Ronchi)
    Harris 39.92 (Santner 37.73, BMac, Oram)
    Franklin 23.58 (Larsen, Mills, L. Cairns)
    Bond 18.16 (Henry 17.83, Mills, Vettori, Southee)
    McClenaghan 55.00 (Bond 18.12, Morrison, Patel)

    Raises some huge questions about who should bat in the top 6 at the coming CWC!

    Dust the pads off Glenn and we're sorted!

    MN5M 1 Reply Last reply
    1

New Zealand v Bangladesh Test #2
Sports Talk
cricket
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.