• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

New Zealand v Bangladesh Test #2

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Sports Talk
cricket
353 Posts 34 Posters 8.6k Views
New Zealand v Bangladesh Test #2
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • dogmeatD Offline
    dogmeatD Offline
    dogmeat
    wrote on last edited by
    #270

    Gavin Larsen - I reckon you were trying t pull a fast one with the clue about opening the bowling

    KiwiPieK 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • KiwiPieK Offline
    KiwiPieK Offline
    KiwiPie
    replied to dogmeat on last edited by
    #271

    @dogmeat said in New Zealand v Bangladesh Test #2:

    Gavin Larsen - I reckon you were trying t pull a fast one with the clue about opening the bowling

    Ha - genuine love for the man we're after

    CyclopsC 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • CyclopsC Offline
    CyclopsC Offline
    Cyclops
    replied to KiwiPie on last edited by
    #272

    @KiwiPie said in New Zealand v Bangladesh Test #2:

    @dogmeat said in New Zealand v Bangladesh Test #2:

    Gavin Larsen - I reckon you were trying t pull a fast one with the clue about opening the bowling

    Ha - genuine love for the man we're after

    Bond?

    KiwiPieK 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • dogmeatD Offline
    dogmeatD Offline
    dogmeat
    wrote on last edited by
    #273

    Wags

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • KiwiPieK Offline
    KiwiPieK Offline
    KiwiPie
    replied to Cyclops on last edited by
    #274

    @Cyclops said in New Zealand v Bangladesh Test #2:

    @KiwiPie said in New Zealand v Bangladesh Test #2:

    @dogmeat said in New Zealand v Bangladesh Test #2:

    Gavin Larsen - I reckon you were trying t pull a fast one with the clue about opening the bowling

    Ha - genuine love for the man we're after

    Bond?

    Yay - now I can get some work done! Here's your full list

    Turner 49.87
    Guptill 45.42 (M Crowe, Latham, Astle - all below 40)
    Williamson 49.00 (Astle, Parore)
    Taylor 52.65 (M Crowe 48.69, Twose, Styris)
    Latham 33.69 (Elliott, C. Cairns)
    Neesham 39.71 (Coney 39.08, McMillan)
    Harris 31.32 (Oram 30.42, C. Cairns, Ronchi)
    Harris 39.92 (Santner 37.73, BMac, Oram)
    Franklin 23.58 (Larsen, Mills, L. Cairns)
    Bond 18.16 (Henry 17.83, Mills, Vettori, Southee)
    McClenaghan 55.00 (Bond 18.12, Morrison, Patel)

    dogmeatD Chris B.C 2 Replies Last reply
    2
  • PaekakboyzP Offline
    PaekakboyzP Offline
    Paekakboyz
    wrote on last edited by
    #275

    dammit. I thought mitch might be in there

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • dogmeatD Offline
    dogmeatD Offline
    dogmeat
    replied to KiwiPie on last edited by
    #276

    @KiwiPie HOLD THE FRONT PAGE "And of course it the same question as last time - except now it is for ODIs - 1-11 of the players with the highest batting average in that position - minimum 20 games in that position)".

    McClenaghan11th position 2013-2015 9 9 8 55 34* 55.00 98 56.12

    CyclopsC KiwiPieK 2 Replies Last reply
    0
  • CyclopsC Offline
    CyclopsC Offline
    Cyclops
    replied to dogmeat on last edited by
    #277

    @dogmeat said in New Zealand v Bangladesh Test #2:

    @KiwiPie HOLD THE FRONT PAGE "And of course it the same question as last time - except now it is for ODIs - 1-11 of the players with the highest batting average in that position - minimum 20 games in that position)".

    McClenaghan11th position 2013-2015 9 9 8 55 34* 55.00 98 56.12

    You should have quoted the bit where he said he counted matches where they didn't bat as if they had batted at their listed position.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • KiwiPieK Offline
    KiwiPieK Offline
    KiwiPie
    replied to dogmeat on last edited by KiwiPie
    #278

    @dogmeat said in New Zealand v Bangladesh Test #2:

    @KiwiPie HOLD THE FRONT PAGE "And of course it the same question as last time - except now it is for ODIs - 1-11 of the players with the highest batting average in that position - minimum 20 games in that position)".

    McClenaghan11th position 2013-2015 9 9 8 55 34* 55.00 98 56.12

    He's listed with 36 games at number 11 - not his fault he "DID NOT BAT" in most of them.

    • Please read the small print
    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • dogmeatD Offline
    dogmeatD Offline
    dogmeat
    wrote on last edited by
    #279

    As you were I see you have decided to assume that he would have maintained that average if he had batted in the 34 innings that he wasn't called on. Big bow but I guess that's gonna be the case for the lower orders.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • CyclopsC Offline
    CyclopsC Offline
    Cyclops
    wrote on last edited by
    #280

    That's really just the difference between matches and innings.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.
    replied to KiwiPie on last edited by
    #281

    @KiwiPie said in New Zealand v Bangladesh Test #2:

    @Cyclops said in New Zealand v Bangladesh Test #2:

    @KiwiPie said in New Zealand v Bangladesh Test #2:

    @dogmeat said in New Zealand v Bangladesh Test #2:

    Gavin Larsen - I reckon you were trying t pull a fast one with the clue about opening the bowling

    Ha - genuine love for the man we're after

    Bond?

    Yay - now I can get some work done! Here's your full list

    Turner 49.87
    Guptill 45.42 (M Crowe, Latham, Astle - all below 40)
    Williamson 49.00 (Astle, Parore)
    Taylor 52.65 (M Crowe 48.69, Twose, Styris)
    Latham 33.69 (Elliott, C. Cairns)
    Neesham 39.71 (Coney 39.08, McMillan)
    Harris 31.32 (Oram 30.42, C. Cairns, Ronchi)
    Harris 39.92 (Santner 37.73, BMac, Oram)
    Franklin 23.58 (Larsen, Mills, L. Cairns)
    Bond 18.16 (Henry 17.83, Mills, Vettori, Southee)
    McClenaghan 55.00 (Bond 18.12, Morrison, Patel)

    Raises some huge questions about who should bat in the top 6 at the coming CWC!

    Dust the pads off Glenn and we're sorted!

    MN5M 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • MN5M Online
    MN5M Online
    MN5
    replied to Chris B. on last edited by
    #282

    @Chris-B said in New Zealand v Bangladesh Test #2:

    @KiwiPie said in New Zealand v Bangladesh Test #2:

    @Cyclops said in New Zealand v Bangladesh Test #2:

    @KiwiPie said in New Zealand v Bangladesh Test #2:

    @dogmeat said in New Zealand v Bangladesh Test #2:

    Gavin Larsen - I reckon you were trying t pull a fast one with the clue about opening the bowling

    Ha - genuine love for the man we're after

    Bond?

    Yay - now I can get some work done! Here's your full list

    Turner 49.87
    Guptill 45.42 (M Crowe, Latham, Astle - all below 40)
    Williamson 49.00 (Astle, Parore)
    Taylor 52.65 (M Crowe 48.69, Twose, Styris)
    Latham 33.69 (Elliott, C. Cairns)
    Neesham 39.71 (Coney 39.08, McMillan)
    Harris 31.32 (Oram 30.42, C. Cairns, Ronchi)
    Harris 39.92 (Santner 37.73, BMac, Oram)
    Franklin 23.58 (Larsen, Mills, L. Cairns)
    Bond 18.16 (Henry 17.83, Mills, Vettori, Southee)
    McClenaghan 55.00 (Bond 18.12, Morrison, Patel)

    Raises some huge questions about who should bat in the top 6 at the coming CWC!

    Dust the pads off Glenn and we're sorted!

    scoring rate would be far too slow....

    could be an urban myth but I'm fairly certain I read that Geoffrey Boycott batted for a not out to 'draw' one of the very early ODIs.....

    dogmeatD 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • dogmeatD Offline
    dogmeatD Offline
    dogmeat
    replied to MN5 on last edited by
    #283

    @MN5

    I think its more likely that you are thinking of India v England in the First CWC which is infamous for Sunny Gavaskar's turgid batting.

    Batting first England got about 350. Gavaskar opened for India and carried his bat through the innings (60 overs) for [can't quite remember] somewhere in the 30's.

    I can't really remember anything else about the match other than (obviously) India lost by truckloads.

    Multiple theories abound for Gavaskar's behaviour including gave up so protected his average, was having a dummy spit because he wasn't captain, didn't agree with India's bowling selection. Whatever is was a display of utter fluffybunnyishness.

    Clive Lloyd was accused of deliberately dropping Boycott in the 79 Final but always denied it. Boycott could be a selfish prick but I don't actually remember him being that bad (for his era) in ODI's. He scored painfully slowly but it was a time of no fielding restrictions and even guys like Kallicharan scored at a snails pace by today's standards. Once the game changed with guys like Richards and Botham Boycott was dropped from the England ODI squad. I don't think he deliberately batted slowly he just prized his wicket and was so risk averse and this was so ingrained that he wouldn't/couldn't hit out even when well on top if he thought it might risk getting out.

    MN5M Chris B.C KiwiPieK 3 Replies Last reply
    3
  • MN5M Online
    MN5M Online
    MN5
    replied to dogmeat on last edited by
    #284

    @dogmeat said in New Zealand v Bangladesh Test #2:

    @MN5

    I think its more likely that you are thinking of India v England in the First CWC which is infamous for Sunny Gavaskar's turgid batting.

    Batting first England got about 350. Gavaskar opened for India and carried his bat through the innings (60 overs) for [can't quite remember] somewhere in the 30's.

    I can't really remember anything else about the match other than (obviously) India lost by truckloads.

    Multiple theories abound for Gavaskar's behaviour including gave up so protected his average, was having a dummy spit because he wasn't captain, didn't agree with India's bowling selection. Whatever is was a display of utter fluffybunnyishness.

    Clive Lloyd was accused of deliberately dropping Boycott in the 79 Final but always denied it. Boycott could be a selfish prick but I don't actually remember him being that bad (for his era) in ODI's. He scored painfully slowly but it was a time of no fielding restrictions and even guys like Kallicharan scored at a snails pace by today's standards. Once the game changed with guys like Richards and Botham Boycott was dropped from the England ODI squad. I don't think he deliberately batted slowly he just prized his wicket and was so risk averse and this was so ingrained that he wouldn't/couldn't hit out even when well on top if he thought it might risk getting out.

    I do love good cricket yarns like that !

    teammates did deliberately go in and run Boycott out when he was scoring too slowly though. Have heard that from a few sources.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.
    replied to dogmeat on last edited by
    #285

    @dogmeat The Sky team had that scorecard up when Sunny was commentating here few weeks ago and were asking him about it. He reckoned he just couldn't get going and nor could any of the other Indians. A few other possible explanations...

    http://www.espncricinfo.com/story/_/id/22472643/sunil-gavaskar-indian-world-cup-go-slow

    MN5 - Botham reckons he purposely ran Geoffrey out - possibly against us.

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • dogmeatD Offline
    dogmeatD Offline
    dogmeat
    wrote on last edited by
    #286

    @MN5 Boycotts most infamous run out was this. Him scampering a suicidal single to get off strike when facing Thommo

    TBF to Boycott he did go on to a century which was critical to winning the Test and later the Ashes but Arkle and his many fans were distraught

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • KiwiPieK Offline
    KiwiPieK Offline
    KiwiPie
    replied to dogmeat on last edited by
    #287

    @dogmeat said in New Zealand v Bangladesh Test #2:

    @MN5

    I think its more likely that you are thinking of India v England in the First CWC which is infamous for Sunny Gavaskar's turgid batting.

    Batting first England got about 350. Gavaskar opened for India and carried his bat through the innings (60 overs) for [can't quite remember] somewhere in the 30's.

    I can't really remember anything else about the match other than (obviously) India lost by truckloads.

    Multiple theories abound for Gavaskar's behaviour including gave up so protected his average, was having a dummy spit because he wasn't captain, didn't agree with India's bowling selection. Whatever is was a display of utter fluffybunnyishness.

    Clive Lloyd was accused of deliberately dropping Boycott in the 79 Final but always denied it. Boycott could be a selfish prick but I don't actually remember him being that bad (for his era) in ODI's. He scored painfully slowly but it was a time of no fielding restrictions and even guys like Kallicharan scored at a snails pace by today's standards. Once the game changed with guys like Richards and Botham Boycott was dropped from the England ODI squad. I don't think he deliberately batted slowly he just prized his wicket and was so risk averse and this was so ingrained that he wouldn't/couldn't hit out even when well on top if he thought it might risk getting out.

    I remember the 79 final well. A very good score for the Windies (by today's standards and totally due to Sir Viv and the legendary Collis King) and Boycott and Brearley opening for England just accumulated and had a big partnership but at 3 an over. Left the talent of Randall, Gooch, Gower and Botham way too much to do in the final 20 overs (150 or so from memory in a 60 over game). I can believe the Windies happy to keep both openers in to be honest.

    Collis King kept playing club cricket in Wales where his hitting on the tiny village grounds was the stuff of legends and he's still listed on Wiki as playing for Dunnington CC at the age of 67. And of course recently he was deported ... https://www.telegraph.co.uk/cricket/2018/07/16/treated-like-criminal-britain-turned-back-west-indies-great/

    dogmeatD MN5M 2 Replies Last reply
    2
  • dogmeatD Offline
    dogmeatD Offline
    dogmeat
    replied to KiwiPie on last edited by
    #288

    @KiwiPie Yeah Brearley was just as slow as Boycs without the (batting) talent.

    I didn't know that about Collis King.

    Same thing happened to me decades ago. I got married to a Pom and was told by Home Office that I had to wait 12 months and then apply for a spousal Visa. So I did nothing but about 18 months later decided to have a weekend in Paris (in the days when this was a major undertaking and very expensive).

    Took a day off work to go down to Croydon and join the queues from the sub-continent, west Africa and Windies. Eventually got to the counter and explained what I wanted. They took my passport and called security and locked me in a room for 5 hours. It turned out I should have applied within twelve months.

    Upshot was I was released but they led my passport. Missus and I had to go back to Croydon and be interviewed separately by two (seemed like) 18 year olds. Asked questions like "What brand of toothpaste do you have in your bathroom and what did you have for dinner last Tuesday......

    In the end I told them they were working under a misguided impression that ours was a marriage of convenience, but what made them think it was so convenient to live in their godforsaken fucking country. They left me to stew meanwhile told my wife they would approve the Visa but that I had not treated the process with the seriousness it deserves. Never did get to Paris.

    Turns out said Visa's are a bit of a crock anyway. Eventually came back to NZ to see if we wanted to move permanently. After 16 months we return to London. I hand over my passport open at the Visa that said given lifetime residence and was told that I was lucky as it expires after 18 months. So good luck Collis old son - you're going to fucking need it.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • MN5M Online
    MN5M Online
    MN5
    replied to KiwiPie on last edited by
    #289

    @KiwiPie said in New Zealand v Bangladesh Test #2:

    @dogmeat said in New Zealand v Bangladesh Test #2:

    @MN5

    I think its more likely that you are thinking of India v England in the First CWC which is infamous for Sunny Gavaskar's turgid batting.

    Batting first England got about 350. Gavaskar opened for India and carried his bat through the innings (60 overs) for [can't quite remember] somewhere in the 30's.

    I can't really remember anything else about the match other than (obviously) India lost by truckloads.

    Multiple theories abound for Gavaskar's behaviour including gave up so protected his average, was having a dummy spit because he wasn't captain, didn't agree with India's bowling selection. Whatever is was a display of utter fluffybunnyishness.

    Clive Lloyd was accused of deliberately dropping Boycott in the 79 Final but always denied it. Boycott could be a selfish prick but I don't actually remember him being that bad (for his era) in ODI's. He scored painfully slowly but it was a time of no fielding restrictions and even guys like Kallicharan scored at a snails pace by today's standards. Once the game changed with guys like Richards and Botham Boycott was dropped from the England ODI squad. I don't think he deliberately batted slowly he just prized his wicket and was so risk averse and this was so ingrained that he wouldn't/couldn't hit out even when well on top if he thought it might risk getting out.

    I remember the 79 final well. A very good score for the Windies (by today's standards and totally due to Sir Viv and the legendary Collis King) and Boycott and Brearley opening for England just accumulated and had a big partnership but at 3 an over. Left the talent of Randall, Gooch, Gower and Botham way too much to do in the final 20 overs (150 or so from memory in a 60 over game). I can believe the Windies happy to keep both openers in to be honest.

    Collis King kept playing club cricket in Wales where his hitting on the tiny village grounds was the stuff of legends and he's still listed on Wiki as playing for Dunnington CC at the age of 67. And of course recently he was deported ... https://www.telegraph.co.uk/cricket/2018/07/16/treated-like-criminal-britain-turned-back-west-indies-great/

    we bemoan some average cricketers who've played for us but have a Google of Mike Brearleys record. He must have been THE best captain on earth to be as revered as he is.

    dogmeatD 1 Reply Last reply
    0

New Zealand v Bangladesh Test #2
Sports Talk
cricket
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.