GOT - there will be spoilers
-
@Crucial That sounds logical, Snow might say the Throne has been bad since the beginning and causes nothing but bloodshed so he may destroy the throne and as you say each kingdom will rule itself. However the show is called the "Game" of thrones so perhaps someone has to win the game.
-
@chimoaus said in GOT - there will be spoilers:
@Crucial That sounds logical, Snow might say the Throne has been bad since the beginning and causes nothing but bloodshed so he may destroy the throne and as you say each kingdom will rule itself. However the show is called the "Game" of thrones so perhaps someone has to win the game.
I guess there's no rule that there has to be one ruler. The Northerners clearly don't want a Southern ruler anymore and the other regions probably couldn't give a fark either. Wonder if that's sustainable though. What kind of a power base would Bronn or Gendry have? And what's going on in Dorne? Talk about a waste of time.
-
-
@Rancid-Schnitzel said in GOT - there will be spoilers:
@chimoaus said in GOT - there will be spoilers:
@Crucial That sounds logical, Snow might say the Throne has been bad since the beginning and causes nothing but bloodshed so he may destroy the throne and as you say each kingdom will rule itself. However the show is called the "Game" of thrones so perhaps someone has to win the game.
I guess there's no rule that there has to be one ruler. The Northerners clearly don't want a Southern ruler anymore and the other regions probably couldn't give a fark either. Wonder if that's sustainable though. What kind of a power base would Bronn or Gendry have? And what's going on in Dorne? Talk about a waste of time.
Used to be 7 seperate Kingdoms until Aegon the Conqueror came over with his dragons and conquered Westeros 300 years earlier.
I suspect it will go back to seperate kingdoms again -
@Virgil said in GOT - there will be spoilers:
@Rancid-Schnitzel said in GOT - there will be spoilers:
@chimoaus said in GOT - there will be spoilers:
@Crucial That sounds logical, Snow might say the Throne has been bad since the beginning and causes nothing but bloodshed so he may destroy the throne and as you say each kingdom will rule itself. However the show is called the "Game" of thrones so perhaps someone has to win the game.
I guess there's no rule that there has to be one ruler. The Northerners clearly don't want a Southern ruler anymore and the other regions probably couldn't give a fark either. Wonder if that's sustainable though. What kind of a power base would Bronn or Gendry have? And what's going on in Dorne? Talk about a waste of time.
Used to be 7 seperate Kingdoms until Aegon the Conqueror came over with his dragons and conquered Westeros 300 years earlier.
I suspect it will go back to seperate kingdoms againYes, no S. The question is whether the kingdoms can survive as separate entities. The North, Vale and Riverlands seem ok (although I'm not sure what the status is without the Frey's), but there appear to be massive power vaccums everywhere else. You'd imagine there would be a massive disparity in wealth and resources.
-
Is that accurate? Have we talked about this in terms of Varys betraying Dany?
-
@Paekakboyz said in GOT - there will be spoilers:
Is that accurate? Have we talked about this in terms of Varys betraying Dany?
Yeah reckon he was tying to poison her.
Back in season 1 when Ned was investigating the death of Lord Arran (King Robs murderer Hand) and poison was talked about, Pycell said poison is the weapon of woman and Eunuchs
Then made the point that Varys is a Eunuch -
@Paekakboyz like Cercei I actually felt sorry for Varys at the end. Great writing and acting.
Never felt the least bit bad for Joffrey, Ramsay or Littlefinger though.
-
@MN5 that moment with Tyrion and Varys was really good to. The two characters that kept Tyrion in the game both die due to his actions in that last episode. Varys via BBQ, and it never felt like Jamie was going to make it once he was freed to get to KL. Although I did wonder if that was going to be the end of Tyrion too.
-
@MajorRage said in GOT - there will be spoilers:
Can’t believe that episode is getting panned. Straight into number 2 for me. Fucking fantastic.
Big ending for Arya coming up. The focus on her for the last few minutes must mean something. Kill the Dragon?
I reckon Aryas story is over as I think others have mentioned. Showing her was more for us to have someone to relate to as she was running from the destruction.
-
Yeah but how many times did she get just about killed and knocked unconscious? Tedious by the end, that sort of Hollywood stuff is amongst the reasons the ep is getting panned. It was an excellent idea to have her in there to show the suffering, but it went on too long with too many miraculous escapes.
-
@taniwharugby said in GOT - there will be spoilers:
I see there are 'fan theories' (which have all been arse thus far) claiming LIttle Finger is in fact still alive...if so, maybe he will sweep in the back door and claim the Throne...:smiling_face_with_open_mouth_closed_eyes:
Can't see how he could be - he died on the hall floor in front of everyone.
Unless Bran is going to have a Pamela Ewing moment, "Oh, it was all just a dream!"
-
@taniwharugby Still - that's a theory I'd bet heavily against. Usually need someone to resurrect them (which thinking about it - the Night King did). They should have had a half rotted Littlefinger waste a few Winterfell defenders, before being returned to dust!
-
@Chris-B I dont think for a moment he will come back...but hey, is amusing reading some of the wild theories.
Also, if too many 'theories' get out there, that are in fact spoilers, they may go for one of thier alternate endings...?
-
@taniwharugby I wondered whether it might be the Directors sneakily leaking a few wild theories like baby dragons turning up - to help throw people off the trail.