TRC: The All Blacks against the Springboks (version 98)
-
@akan004 said in TRC: The All Blacks against the Springboks (version 98):
Listened to today's PC. The good news is they won't be taking SBW to Australia, the bad news is that Hansen thinks Frizell played well.
And I agree with him. He hoovered up line out ball in the first half and was more prominent in the 2nd. He defended well. It was a 7/10 from me compared to 3/10 from Fafita the week before.
Not convinced he’s the answer but he wasn’t hopeless.
@Billy-Tell said in TRC: The All Blacks against the Springboks (version 98):
@akan004 said in TRC: The All Blacks against the Springboks (version 98):
Listened to today's PC. The good news is they won't be taking SBW to Australia, the bad news is that Hansen thinks Frizell played well.
And I agree with him. He hoovered up line out ball in the first half and was more prominent in the 2nd. He defended well. It was a 7/10 from me compared to 3/10 from Fafita the week before.
Not convinced he’s the answer but he wasn’t hopeless.
6.5/10, IMO. He still doesn't know how to use his size and plays far too nice. I reckon we get far too caught up in "work rate" and "involvement" stats, in respect of which I'm assuming Frizell did quite well. However, we really need to measure his impact. (Adam Thomson was one guy who used to run around like a madman, joining rucks and making tackles willy-nilly, but more often had bugger all impact compared to Kaino who often had 50% less "involvement".)
-
@Stargazer said in TRC: The All Blacks against the Springboks (version 98):
@Kirwan I think BB would have struggled at 10 tonight.
At least in the first half.
-
@Snowy said in TRC: The All Blacks against the Springboks (version 98):
Nah. He is an AB fullback to me. He has been shifted to wing when it suits, but he is a full back.
Smith offers so much more at fullback. He’s ok on the wing, but I want him touching the ball more often and making more decisions
@Duluth said in TRC: The All Blacks against the Springboks (version 98):
@Snowy said in TRC: The All Blacks against the Springboks (version 98):
Nah. He is an AB fullback to me. He has been shifted to wing when it suits, but he is a full back.
Smith offers so much more at fullback. He’s ok on the wing, but I want him touching the ball more often and making more decisions
Want Bender in the team as wise heads are essential come knock out time. That said, Beaudy looked deadly at 15 and was my MOTM. Bender available at 14 OR 15 is for me a good arrow to have in the quiver.
-
@Duluth said in TRC: The All Blacks against the Springboks (version 98):
@Snowy said in TRC: The All Blacks against the Springboks (version 98):
Nah. He is an AB fullback to me. He has been shifted to wing when it suits, but he is a full back.
Smith offers so much more at fullback. He’s ok on the wing, but I want him touching the ball more often and making more decisions
Want Bender in the team as wise heads are essential come knock out time. That said, Beaudy looked deadly at 15 and was my MOTM. Bender available at 14 OR 15 is for me a good arrow to have in the quiver.
-
@Machpants said in TRC: The All Blacks against the Springboks (version 98):
@pakman how much was losing BBBR in that? I can't remember exactly
From memory Fifita was only LH lock in second poor scrum. But on hit Ofa's shoulders got bent to the right and once he was at 45 degrees who was behind him at lock probably didn't matter. Could have done with a good shove from his flanker, which by then was Papali'i.
-
@pakman he has been a project for a long time but can’t remember him dominating at scrum time ever. Maybe he trains well?
@kev said in TRC: The All Blacks against the Springboks (version 98):
@pakman he has been a project for a long time but can’t remember him dominating at scrum time ever. Maybe he trains well?
If it's Ofa we're talking about, I think he's good around the field and takes ball up well. Scrumtime OK at LH against run of the mill test THs and holds his own well against good LHs, so excellent utility for RWC. Not someone to start at LH against Boks/Poms/Paddies/Frogs.
And has WICKED reverse pass!
-
@Chris-B They have to persist with RM at 10, if only to give him the experience he'll need in case BB goes down with an injury.
@Stargazer said in TRC: The All Blacks against the Springboks (version 98):
They have to persist with RM at 10, if only to give him the experience he'll need in case BB goes down with an injury.
It's really Hansen's only option since DMac buggered his knee
-
@kev said in TRC: The All Blacks against the Springboks (version 98):
@pakman he has been a project for a long time but can’t remember him dominating at scrum time ever. Maybe he trains well?
If it's Ofa we're talking about, I think he's good around the field and takes ball up well. Scrumtime OK at LH against run of the mill test THs and holds his own well against good LHs, so excellent utility for RWC. Not someone to start at LH against Boks/Poms/Paddies/Frogs.
And has WICKED reverse pass!
Ofa T is a good all round player but at scrum time he got folded like a tent twice by Trevor Nyakane
I would worry big time for Ofa T against European scrums especially if he play LH prop
TBH only AB prop I'd have full confidence in going into RWC is Franks against European sides
-
Ofa T is a good all round player but at scrum time he got folded like a tent twice by Trevor Nyakane
I would worry big time for Ofa T against European scrums especially if he play LH prop
TBH only AB prop I'd have full confidence in going into RWC is Franks against European sides
@Jaguares4real said in TRC: The All Blacks against the Springboks (version 98):
Ofa T is a good all round player but at scrum time he got folded like a tent twice by Trevor Nyakane
I would worry big time for Ofa T against European scrums especially if he play LH prop
TBH only AB prop I'd have full confidence in going into RWC is Franks against European sides
That only happened after Brodie left the field. Before that the scrum went great, pushing them off their ball.
Fifita is not a lock.
-
@Rapido said in TRC: The All Blacks against the Springboks (version 98):
I though Moouga was good after shaky start.
Actually one of the few bright spots for me.
Dark spots are forward grunt lacking, tactics, some selections, and just getting old. Oh, and shit skills for entire first half .... and shit game management while such shit skills were putting us under pressure.
I thought our forwards looked much better after Angus and Ofa came on. The ability of those two with ball in hand (and in Ofa's case when he doesn't drop it) and in defence went a long way to us looking much more dynamic in attack in the 2nd half.
While Frizell went ok, better in the 2nd half, he still had minimal impact for such a unit.
Yes, he actually did quite a lot in that match (particularly in the 2nd half) but didn't do any of it with any real force. Maybe he's too nice a guy?
That said, I don't think selection issues does anything to deal with the real problem, which is dealing with the rush defence.
It appeared to me that we set-up our attack much differently to what we did last week against Argie, who also employ the rush D. Our runners seemd much more one-out, whereas against Argie, we ran in two-man pods and sent a lot of balls behind the decoy runners close to the ruck. (Someone posted a rugbypass article highlighting the new set-up in the Argie match - I wonder if they'll do something similar for this match.)
@junior said in TRC: The All Blacks against the Springboks (version 98):
@Rapido said in TRC: The All Blacks against the Springboks (version 98):
I though Moouga was good after shaky start.
Actually one of the few bright spots for me.
Dark spots are forward grunt lacking, tactics, some selections, and just getting old. Oh, and shit skills for entire first half .... and shit game management while such shit skills were putting us under pressure.
I thought our forwards looked much better after Angus and Ofa came on. The ability of those two with ball in hand (and in Ofa's case when he doesn't drop it) and in defence went a long way to us looking much more dynamic in attack in the 2nd half.
While Frizell went ok, better in the 2nd half, he still had minimal impact for such a unit.
Yes, he actually did quite a lot in that match (particularly in the 2nd half) but didn't do any of it with any real force. Maybe he's too nice a guy?
That said, I don't think selection issues does anything to deal with the real problem, which is dealing with the rush defence.
It appeared to me that we set-up our attack much differently to what we did last week against Argie, who also employ the rush D. Our runners seemd much more one-out, whereas against Argie, we ran in two-man pods and sent a lot of balls behind the decoy runners close to the ruck. (Someone posted a rugbypass article highlighting the new set-up in the Argie match - I wonder if they'll do something similar for this match.)
Sonny Bill’s attacking runs were very much one-out and that has been the case ever since he first started. It’s both a good and bad thing.
-
@junior said in TRC: The All Blacks against the Springboks (version 98):
@Rapido said in TRC: The All Blacks against the Springboks (version 98):
I though Moouga was good after shaky start.
Actually one of the few bright spots for me.
Dark spots are forward grunt lacking, tactics, some selections, and just getting old. Oh, and shit skills for entire first half .... and shit game management while such shit skills were putting us under pressure.
I thought our forwards looked much better after Angus and Ofa came on. The ability of those two with ball in hand (and in Ofa's case when he doesn't drop it) and in defence went a long way to us looking much more dynamic in attack in the 2nd half.
While Frizell went ok, better in the 2nd half, he still had minimal impact for such a unit.
Yes, he actually did quite a lot in that match (particularly in the 2nd half) but didn't do any of it with any real force. Maybe he's too nice a guy?
That said, I don't think selection issues does anything to deal with the real problem, which is dealing with the rush defence.
It appeared to me that we set-up our attack much differently to what we did last week against Argie, who also employ the rush D. Our runners seemd much more one-out, whereas against Argie, we ran in two-man pods and sent a lot of balls behind the decoy runners close to the ruck. (Someone posted a rugbypass article highlighting the new set-up in the Argie match - I wonder if they'll do something similar for this match.)
Sonny Bill’s attacking runs were very much one-out and that has been the case ever since he first started. It’s both a good and bad thing.
@ACT-Crusader said in TRC: The All Blacks against the Springboks (version 98):
@junior said in TRC: The All Blacks against the Springboks (version 98):
@Rapido said in TRC: The All Blacks against the Springboks (version 98):
I though Moouga was good after shaky start.
Actually one of the few bright spots for me.
Dark spots are forward grunt lacking, tactics, some selections, and just getting old. Oh, and shit skills for entire first half .... and shit game management while such shit skills were putting us under pressure.
I thought our forwards looked much better after Angus and Ofa came on. The ability of those two with ball in hand (and in Ofa's case when he doesn't drop it) and in defence went a long way to us looking much more dynamic in attack in the 2nd half.
While Frizell went ok, better in the 2nd half, he still had minimal impact for such a unit.
Yes, he actually did quite a lot in that match (particularly in the 2nd half) but didn't do any of it with any real force. Maybe he's too nice a guy?
That said, I don't think selection issues does anything to deal with the real problem, which is dealing with the rush defence.
It appeared to me that we set-up our attack much differently to what we did last week against Argie, who also employ the rush D. Our runners seemd much more one-out, whereas against Argie, we ran in two-man pods and sent a lot of balls behind the decoy runners close to the ruck. (Someone posted a rugbypass article highlighting the new set-up in the Argie match - I wonder if they'll do something similar for this match.)
Sonny Bill’s attacking runs were very much one-out and that has been the case ever since he first started. It’s both a good and bad thing.
I don't care how good a ball-runner he is - or ever was - it's not a good strategy to send a guy up one-out and straight into 2-3 big Bok loose forwards. He's only ever going to go backwards. Even Ma'a would really battle in that role. Additionally, the offloading game only works if there are supporting player there to receive the offload. In either case, the way they used SBW on Saturday made very little sense to me.
-
@ACT-Crusader said in TRC: The All Blacks against the Springboks (version 98):
@junior said in TRC: The All Blacks against the Springboks (version 98):
@Rapido said in TRC: The All Blacks against the Springboks (version 98):
I though Moouga was good after shaky start.
Actually one of the few bright spots for me.
Dark spots are forward grunt lacking, tactics, some selections, and just getting old. Oh, and shit skills for entire first half .... and shit game management while such shit skills were putting us under pressure.
I thought our forwards looked much better after Angus and Ofa came on. The ability of those two with ball in hand (and in Ofa's case when he doesn't drop it) and in defence went a long way to us looking much more dynamic in attack in the 2nd half.
While Frizell went ok, better in the 2nd half, he still had minimal impact for such a unit.
Yes, he actually did quite a lot in that match (particularly in the 2nd half) but didn't do any of it with any real force. Maybe he's too nice a guy?
That said, I don't think selection issues does anything to deal with the real problem, which is dealing with the rush defence.
It appeared to me that we set-up our attack much differently to what we did last week against Argie, who also employ the rush D. Our runners seemd much more one-out, whereas against Argie, we ran in two-man pods and sent a lot of balls behind the decoy runners close to the ruck. (Someone posted a rugbypass article highlighting the new set-up in the Argie match - I wonder if they'll do something similar for this match.)
Sonny Bill’s attacking runs were very much one-out and that has been the case ever since he first started. It’s both a good and bad thing.
I don't care how good a ball-runner he is - or ever was - it's not a good strategy to send a guy up one-out and straight into 2-3 big Bok loose forwards. He's only ever going to go backwards. Even Ma'a would really battle in that role. Additionally, the offloading game only works if there are supporting player there to receive the offload. In either case, the way they used SBW on Saturday made very little sense to me.
@junior agree. Saturday was poor. In the past he’s at least been able to run angles when he ran, whereas he was just doing hit ups into massive traffic.
I still think Crotty-ALB gives us the best balance.
-
@ACT-Crusader said in TRC: The All Blacks against the Springboks (version 98):
@junior said in TRC: The All Blacks against the Springboks (version 98):
@Rapido said in TRC: The All Blacks against the Springboks (version 98):
I though Moouga was good after shaky start.
Actually one of the few bright spots for me.
Dark spots are forward grunt lacking, tactics, some selections, and just getting old. Oh, and shit skills for entire first half .... and shit game management while such shit skills were putting us under pressure.
I thought our forwards looked much better after Angus and Ofa came on. The ability of those two with ball in hand (and in Ofa's case when he doesn't drop it) and in defence went a long way to us looking much more dynamic in attack in the 2nd half.
While Frizell went ok, better in the 2nd half, he still had minimal impact for such a unit.
Yes, he actually did quite a lot in that match (particularly in the 2nd half) but didn't do any of it with any real force. Maybe he's too nice a guy?
That said, I don't think selection issues does anything to deal with the real problem, which is dealing with the rush defence.
It appeared to me that we set-up our attack much differently to what we did last week against Argie, who also employ the rush D. Our runners seemd much more one-out, whereas against Argie, we ran in two-man pods and sent a lot of balls behind the decoy runners close to the ruck. (Someone posted a rugbypass article highlighting the new set-up in the Argie match - I wonder if they'll do something similar for this match.)
Sonny Bill’s attacking runs were very much one-out and that has been the case ever since he first started. It’s both a good and bad thing.
I don't care how good a ball-runner he is - or ever was - it's not a good strategy to send a guy up one-out and straight into 2-3 big Bok loose forwards. He's only ever going to go backwards. Even Ma'a would really battle in that role. Additionally, the offloading game only works if there are supporting player there to receive the offload. In either case, the way they used SBW on Saturday made very little sense to me.
SBW was ineffective last night
He had 11 runs for 14m with no defenders beaten, no clean breaks and no offloads
When he carried it up he was handled with ease
Pollard along with Farrell is one of the physical fly half in the game & tackle ferociously -
Ofa T is a good all round player but at scrum time he got folded like a tent twice by Trevor Nyakane
I would worry big time for Ofa T against European scrums especially if he play LH prop
TBH only AB prop I'd have full confidence in going into RWC is Franks against European sides
@Jaguares4real said in TRC: The All Blacks against the Springboks (version 98):
Ofa T is a good all round player but at scrum time he got folded like a tent twice by Trevor Nyakane
I would worry big time for Ofa T against European scrums especially if he play LH prop
TBH only AB prop I'd have full confidence in going into RWC is Franks against European sides
I think we agree about Ofa at LH. Nyakane seems VERY effective against taller LHs.
Moody and Franks have been solid as against all comers in past few years. Moody has airlifted Puma LHs and only one I recall him having problems with was Antonio. Karl T and Nepo are also first rate, albeit with the occasional wobble.
Nepo and Franks don't have a second gear, which limits them around park.
After yesterday, for me Karl and Joe are locks at LH. Ofa best utility. Two of Franks/Nepo/Angus for TH. Angus is OK at TH but has much more around the park than other two, so will come down to what TWM are looking for.
-
@Jaguares4real said in TRC: The All Blacks against the Springboks (version 98):
Ofa T is a good all round player but at scrum time he got folded like a tent twice by Trevor Nyakane
I would worry big time for Ofa T against European scrums especially if he play LH prop
TBH only AB prop I'd have full confidence in going into RWC is Franks against European sides
I think we agree about Ofa at LH. Nyakane seems VERY effective against taller LHs.
Moody and Franks have been solid as against all comers in past few years. Moody has airlifted Puma LHs and only one I recall him having problems with was Antonio. Karl T and Nepo are also first rate, albeit with the occasional wobble.
Nepo and Franks don't have a second gear, which limits them around park.
After yesterday, for me Karl and Joe are locks at LH. Ofa best utility. Two of Franks/Nepo/Angus for TH. Angus is OK at TH but has much more around the park than other two, so will come down to what TWM are looking for.
I wouldn't take too much stock into crushing Pumas props with the exception of Chip Figallo These are not the Pumas who crushed all other opposing props in recent times
Moody and Franks are fine Beyond that there're ????
Karl being match fit and handling Irish/Eng props
Nepo being the same guy againI highly rate Ta'avao and Moli seems a good talent
TBH I'd take 6 props to RWC 2019 - Franks Moody Moli Ta'avo Ofa T Big Karl
-
@Jaguares4real said in TRC: The All Blacks against the Springboks (version 98):
Clearout was fine
First time I've seen the vision.
You have an interesting idea about what constitutes "fine". Cleanout was the very definition of illegal.
-
@Machpants said in TRC: The All Blacks against the Springboks (version 98):
@pakman how much was losing BBBR in that? I can't remember exactly
From memory Fifita was only LH lock in second poor scrum. But on hit Ofa's shoulders got bent to the right and once he was at 45 degrees who was behind him at lock probably didn't matter. Could have done with a good shove from his flanker, which by then was Papali'i.
@pakman said in TRC: The All Blacks against the Springboks (version 98):
@Machpants said in TRC: The All Blacks against the Springboks (version 98):
@pakman how much was losing BBBR in that? I can't remember exactly
From memory Fifita was only LH lock in second poor scrum. But on hit Ofa's shoulders got bent to the right and once he was at 45 degrees who was behind him at lock probably didn't matter. Could have done with a good shove from his flanker, which by then was Papali'i.
BBBR is the TH lock when he plays and I would have expected Whitelock to switch sides once Brodie was replaced by Fifita.
After yesterday, for me Karl and Joe are locks at LH. Ofa best utility. Two of Franks/Nepo/Angus for TH. Angus is OK at TH but has much more around the park than other two, so will come down to what TWM are looking for.
You really want something different from your reserve props so Ta'avao is a more sensible option than Laulala. The fact Angus was picked ahead of Nepo might suggest the coaches are thinking the same. Selection for the Perth test might provide some clarity on their pecking order. Karl needs to play to force his case because you can't pick him on June 2018 form. His EOYT form was very average.
-
@booboo whoever posted that and wrote the tweet is really naff. So the clean out is fine cause Retallick was in on the side. So the cleanout which came from even further from the side was legal???
@Rebound said in TRC: The All Blacks against the Springboks (version 98):
@booboo whoever posted that and wrote the tweet is really naff. So the clean out is fine cause Retallick was in on the side. So the cleanout which came from even further from the side was legal???
He's a South African.
-
@ACT-Crusader said in TRC: The All Blacks against the Springboks (version 98):
@junior said in TRC: The All Blacks against the Springboks (version 98):
@Rapido said in TRC: The All Blacks against the Springboks (version 98):
I though Moouga was good after shaky start.
Actually one of the few bright spots for me.
Dark spots are forward grunt lacking, tactics, some selections, and just getting old. Oh, and shit skills for entire first half .... and shit game management while such shit skills were putting us under pressure.
I thought our forwards looked much better after Angus and Ofa came on. The ability of those two with ball in hand (and in Ofa's case when he doesn't drop it) and in defence went a long way to us looking much more dynamic in attack in the 2nd half.
While Frizell went ok, better in the 2nd half, he still had minimal impact for such a unit.
Yes, he actually did quite a lot in that match (particularly in the 2nd half) but didn't do any of it with any real force. Maybe he's too nice a guy?
That said, I don't think selection issues does anything to deal with the real problem, which is dealing with the rush defence.
It appeared to me that we set-up our attack much differently to what we did last week against Argie, who also employ the rush D. Our runners seemd much more one-out, whereas against Argie, we ran in two-man pods and sent a lot of balls behind the decoy runners close to the ruck. (Someone posted a rugbypass article highlighting the new set-up in the Argie match - I wonder if they'll do something similar for this match.)
Sonny Bill’s attacking runs were very much one-out and that has been the case ever since he first started. It’s both a good and bad thing.
I don't care how good a ball-runner he is - or ever was - it's not a good strategy to send a guy up one-out and straight into 2-3 big Bok loose forwards. He's only ever going to go backwards. Even Ma'a would really battle in that role. Additionally, the offloading game only works if there are supporting player there to receive the offload. In either case, the way they used SBW on Saturday made very little sense to me.
-
@pakman said in TRC: The All Blacks against the Springboks (version 98):
@Machpants said in TRC: The All Blacks against the Springboks (version 98):
@pakman how much was losing BBBR in that? I can't remember exactly
From memory Fifita was only LH lock in second poor scrum. But on hit Ofa's shoulders got bent to the right and once he was at 45 degrees who was behind him at lock probably didn't matter. Could have done with a good shove from his flanker, which by then was Papali'i.
BBBR is the TH lock when he plays and I would have expected Whitelock to switch sides once Brodie was replaced by Fifita.
After yesterday, for me Karl and Joe are locks at LH. Ofa best utility. Two of Franks/Nepo/Angus for TH. Angus is OK at TH but has much more around the park than other two, so will come down to what TWM are looking for.
You really want something different from your reserve props so Ta'avao is a more sensible option than Laulala. The fact Angus was picked ahead of Nepo might suggest the coaches are thinking the same. Selection for the Perth test might provide some clarity on their pecking order. Karl needs to play to force his case because you can't pick him on June 2018 form. His EOYT form was very average.
You really want something different from your reserve props so Ta'avao is a more sensible option than Laulala. The fact Angus was picked ahead of Nepo might suggest the coaches are thinking the same. Selection for the Perth test might provide some clarity on their pecking order. Karl needs to play to force his case because you can't pick him on June 2018 form. His EOYT form was very average.
Karl T nees a run?! Seems TWM leaning towards Ta'avao...
