Red cards
-
@Rembrandt said in Red cards:
Genuine question for those pro the yellow cards on the kiwi props as my rugby career ended before my balls dropped.
How does someone defend a try-line when an attacker is diving in leading with their head and you are camped on that line? (Or worse are a couple metres away and have to act fast)
Maybe I'm not understanding the concept of 'swinging arm' but I would have thought that if you didn't use your arm and instead braced with your bodyweight that that could be classified as a no-arms tackle.I tried to do a youtube search for great prop tries..but the highlights are all just overweight outside backs
Arms out in front of you. Take him onto your body, wrap man and ball and hold him up. Not so hard.
@Billy-Webb said in Red cards:
@Rembrandt said in Red cards:
Genuine question for those pro the yellow cards on the kiwi props as my rugby career ended before my balls dropped.
How does someone defend a try-line when an attacker is diving in leading with their head and you are camped on that line? (Or worse are a couple metres away and have to act fast)
Maybe I'm not understanding the concept of 'swinging arm' but I would have thought that if you didn't use your arm and instead braced with your bodyweight that that could be classified as a no-arms tackle.I tried to do a youtube search for great prop tries..but the highlights are all just overweight outside backs
Arms out in front of you. Take him onto your body, wrap man and ball and hold him up. Not so hard.
Allow attackers head to pass between your legs. Grab attacker around midriff and invert him until vertical. Fall backwards unto your buttucks.
This DDT manoeuvre has the double benefit of making no initial contact with the head (no card, yay) and also ought to shake the ball loose when said head hits the ground (counterattack opportunity!)
-
@Rembrandt said in Red cards:
Genuine question for those pro the yellow cards on the kiwi props as my rugby career ended before my balls dropped.
How does someone defend a try-line when an attacker is diving in leading with their head and you are camped on that line? (Or worse are a couple metres away and have to act fast)
Maybe I'm not understanding the concept of 'swinging arm' but I would have thought that if you didn't use your arm and instead braced with your bodyweight that that could be classified as a no-arms tackle.I tried to do a youtube search for great prop tries..but the highlights are all just overweight outside backs
Arms out in front of you. Take him onto your body, wrap man and ball and hold him up. Not so hard.
@Billy-Webb said in Red cards:
@Rembrandt said in Red cards:
Genuine question for those pro the yellow cards on the kiwi props as my rugby career ended before my balls dropped.
How does someone defend a try-line when an attacker is diving in leading with their head and you are camped on that line? (Or worse are a couple metres away and have to act fast)
Maybe I'm not understanding the concept of 'swinging arm' but I would have thought that if you didn't use your arm and instead braced with your bodyweight that that could be classified as a no-arms tackle.I tried to do a youtube search for great prop tries..but the highlights are all just overweight outside backs
Arms out in front of you. Take him onto your body, wrap man and ball and hold him up. Not so hard.
Except that the attacking player will always try to punch through the hole so will nearly always be to your left or right where using your arms to stop him is your only option.
-
@Billy-Webb said in Red cards:
@Rembrandt said in Red cards:
Genuine question for those pro the yellow cards on the kiwi props as my rugby career ended before my balls dropped.
How does someone defend a try-line when an attacker is diving in leading with their head and you are camped on that line? (Or worse are a couple metres away and have to act fast)
Maybe I'm not understanding the concept of 'swinging arm' but I would have thought that if you didn't use your arm and instead braced with your bodyweight that that could be classified as a no-arms tackle.I tried to do a youtube search for great prop tries..but the highlights are all just overweight outside backs
Arms out in front of you. Take him onto your body, wrap man and ball and hold him up. Not so hard.
Except that the attacking player will always try to punch through the hole so will nearly always be to your left or right where using your arms to stop him is your only option.
@No-Quarter said in Red cards:
@Billy-Webb said in Red cards:
@Rembrandt said in Red cards:
Genuine question for those pro the yellow cards on the kiwi props as my rugby career ended before my balls dropped.
How does someone defend a try-line when an attacker is diving in leading with their head and you are camped on that line? (Or worse are a couple metres away and have to act fast)
Maybe I'm not understanding the concept of 'swinging arm' but I would have thought that if you didn't use your arm and instead braced with your bodyweight that that could be classified as a no-arms tackle.I tried to do a youtube search for great prop tries..but the highlights are all just overweight outside backs
Arms out in front of you. Take him onto your body, wrap man and ball and hold him up. Not so hard.
Except that the attacking player will always try to punch through the hole so will nearly always be to your left or right where using your arms to stop him is your only option.
Fair enough. Provided you're not swinging your arm, then a normal arms and shoulder tackle.
Can't / don't want to comment on the head contact if the player has his head down in a bull-charge. I'm buggered if I know how that gets refereed. Judgment call by the ref? -
@mariner4life said in Red cards:
@MiketheSnow said in Red cards:
@mariner4life said in Red cards:
For the "just tackle lower" crowd, what exactly was Ofa T supposed to do differently?
Not lead with a swinging arm to the head.
Let the ball carrier continue his trajectory to the dirt, then jackal.
Bullshit Mike. You've played. In that spot you do the same thing.
Ah no.
Never got penalised for a late and/or high tackle. Or swinging arm.
Couple of instances in the France v Tonga match where the French players were happy for the Tongans to gain one, maybe two more metres going forward as they fell to the ground and then swooped in to try to steal the ball.
On the goal line you don't have the luxury of those metres but as explained on another thread better to not infringe, concede a try, but still be on the park than infringe and be binned.
@MiketheSnow said in Red cards:
@mariner4life said in Red cards:
@MiketheSnow said in Red cards:
@mariner4life said in Red cards:
For the "just tackle lower" crowd, what exactly was Ofa T supposed to do differently?
Not lead with a swinging arm to the head.
Let the ball carrier continue his trajectory to the dirt, then jackal.
Bullshit Mike. You've played. In that spot you do the same thing.
Ah no.
Never got penalised for a late and/or high tackle. Or swinging arm.
Couple of instances in the France v Tonga match where the French players were happy for the Tongans to gain one, maybe two more metres going forward as they fell to the ground and then swooped in to try to steal the ball.
On the goal line you don't have the luxury of those metres but as explained on another thread better to not infringe, concede a try, but still be on the park than infringe and be binned.
In the case of Ofa though the Namib player wasn’t falling. He went low and drove into Ofa. At the time he committed to the tackle Ofa had no way of knowing the ball carrier was going to fall, only that he was driving forwards.
-
So if a team is unable to stop a driving maul legally and it's about to score, they should be allowed to collapse it right?
If you can't win a lineout legally, you should be able to drag down the jumper or take out the lifter. It's not fair otherwise.
-
So if a team is unable to stop a driving maul legally and it's about to score, they should be allowed to collapse it right?
If you can't win a lineout legally, you should be able to drag down the jumper or take out the lifter. It's not fair otherwise.
-
So if a team is unable to stop a driving maul legally and it's about to score, they should be allowed to collapse it right?
If you can't win a lineout legally, you should be able to drag down the jumper or take out the lifter. It's not fair otherwise.
-
@Bones they did try changing the rules a few years back didnt they (re mauls)
-
@taniwharugby said in Red cards:
@Bones they did try changing the rules a few years back didnt they (re mauls)
No idea. I'm hardly going to go searching out any facts.
@taniwharugby said in Red cards:
@Bones they did try changing the rules a few years back didnt they (re mauls)
No idea. I'm hardly going to go searching out any facts.
That right there is the level of dedication we should all be striving for. All you younger fellas watch and learn from a pro.
-
@taniwharugby said in Red cards:
@Bones they did try changing the rules a few years back didnt they (re mauls)
No idea. I'm hardly going to go searching out any facts.
That right there is the level of dedication we should all be striving for. All you younger fellas watch and learn from a pro.
@taniwharugby said in Red cards:
@Bones they did try changing the rules a few years back didnt they (re mauls)
No idea. I'm hardly going to go searching out any facts.
That right there is the level of dedication we should all be striving for. All you younger fellas watch and learn from a pro.
Steady on old man! The implication I'm no longer younger is deeply offensive.
-
@taniwharugby said in Red cards:
@Bones they did try changing the rules a few years back didnt they (re mauls)
No idea. I'm hardly going to go searching out any facts.
That right there is the level of dedication we should all be striving for. All you younger fellas watch and learn from a pro.
Steady on old man! The implication I'm no longer younger is deeply offensive.
@taniwharugby said in Red cards:
@Bones they did try changing the rules a few years back didnt they (re mauls)
No idea. I'm hardly going to go searching out any facts.
That right there is the level of dedication we should all be striving for. All you younger fellas watch and learn from a pro.
Steady on old man! The implication I'm no longer younger is deeply offensive.
I’d apologise but I suspect you’d lose interest part way through.
-
@taniwharugby said in Red cards:
@Bones they did try changing the rules a few years back didnt they (re mauls)
No idea. I'm hardly going to go searching out any facts.
That right there is the level of dedication we should all be striving for. All you younger fellas watch and learn from a pro.
Steady on old man! The implication I'm no longer younger is deeply offensive.
@taniwharugby said in Red cards:
@Bones they did try changing the rules a few years back didnt they (re mauls)
No idea. I'm hardly going to go searching out any facts.
That right there is the level of dedication we should all be striving for. All you younger fellas watch and learn from a pro.
Steady on old man! The implication I'm no longer younger is
deeply offensive.completely true. -
@taniwharugby said in Red cards:
@Bones they did try changing the rules a few years back didnt they (re mauls)
No idea. I'm hardly going to go searching out any facts.
That right there is the level of dedication we should all be striving for. All you younger fellas watch and learn from a pro.
Steady on old man! The implication I'm no longer younger is
deeply offensive.completely true.@Catogrande said in Red cards:
@taniwharugby said in Red cards:
@Bones they did try changing the rules a few years back didnt they (re mauls)
No idea. I'm hardly going to go searching out any facts.
That right there is the level of dedication we should all be striving for. All you younger fellas watch and learn from a pro.
Steady on old man! The implication I'm no longer younger is
deeply offensive.completely true.40 is the new GFY.
-
@Catogrande said in Red cards:
@taniwharugby said in Red cards:
@Bones they did try changing the rules a few years back didnt they (re mauls)
No idea. I'm hardly going to go searching out any facts.
That right there is the level of dedication we should all be striving for. All you younger fellas watch and learn from a pro.
Steady on old man! The implication I'm no longer younger is
deeply offensive.completely true.40 is the new GFY.
@Bones I'm surprised you remember.
-
I just happened to see highlights of that argie fella hitting Farrell. Did he get the red for a shoulder charge? Because his arms never even made contact with Farrell
@canefan Yeah, straight shoulder to the head.
-
Easy RC decision for the Cannuck’s shoulder to the head clean out.
-
Should we rename the thread title to
“When you want to rant about Skeen”
-
Said in a small-balled whine
"Ah, gerome, I just need to show you vision of this thing that happened right in front of you 5 minutes ago, but I found with 40 cameras and super slow mo.
Let's watch it for 3 minutes
I recommend a public hanging"
