RWC: Japan v Scotland (Pool A)
-
@Blackheart said in RWC: Japan v Scotland (Possible) (Pool A):
@akan004 Ok so that's the ruling...great...Come on Scotland..I nice win by 8 would do the trick.
Either Scotland or Japan in the quarter would be fine, preferably Japan for me.
@akan004 said in RWC: Japan v Scotland (Pool A):
@Blackheart said in RWC: Japan v Scotland (Possible) (Pool A):
@akan004 Ok so that's the ruling...great...Come on Scotland..I nice win by 8 would do the trick.
Either Scotland or Japan in the quarter would be fine, preferably Japan for me.
Just my 2 cents worth, bring on Ireland.
-
@akan004 said in RWC: Japan v Scotland (Pool A):
@Blackheart said in RWC: Japan v Scotland (Possible) (Pool A):
@akan004 Ok so that's the ruling...great...Come on Scotland..I nice win by 8 would do the trick.
Either Scotland or Japan in the quarter would be fine, preferably Japan for me.
Just my 2 cents worth, bring on Ireland.
@ACT-Crusader said in RWC: Japan v Scotland (Pool A):
@akan004 said in RWC: Japan v Scotland (Pool A):
@Blackheart said in RWC: Japan v Scotland (Possible) (Pool A):
@akan004 Ok so that's the ruling...great...Come on Scotland..I nice win by 8 would do the trick.
Either Scotland or Japan in the quarter would be fine, preferably Japan for me.
Just my 2 cents worth, bring on Ireland.
Took your time.
-
@canefan said in RWC: Japan v Scotland (Pool A):
@NTA said in RWC: Japan v Scotland (Possible) (Pool A):
@akan004 said in RWC: Japan v Scotland (Possible) (Pool A):
@Blackheart said in RWC: Japan v Scotland (Possible) (Pool A):
@akan004 neither team has beaten the ABs but I agree Japan would be a better choice...anything than those bloody Micks...they know how to beat us.
Yeah. Ireland will be very tough so best to avoid them. We should beat either Scotland or Japan comfortably enough.
That's pussy talk
I spent a lot of money to attend that game. As much as I'm confident we'd beat the paddies I would prefer not to chance it. Besides, a Japan/Scotland, England, SA path to the final would be more desirable
And now I'm confused as to whether you're a pussy or just chicken
@NTA said in RWC: Japan v Scotland (Pool A):
@canefan said in RWC: Japan v Scotland (Pool A):
@NTA said in RWC: Japan v Scotland (Possible) (Pool A):
@akan004 said in RWC: Japan v Scotland (Possible) (Pool A):
@Blackheart said in RWC: Japan v Scotland (Possible) (Pool A):
@akan004 neither team has beaten the ABs but I agree Japan would be a better choice...anything than those bloody Micks...they know how to beat us.
Yeah. Ireland will be very tough so best to avoid them. We should beat either Scotland or Japan comfortably enough.
That's pussy talk
I spent a lot of money to attend that game. As much as I'm confident we'd beat the paddies I would prefer not to chance it. Besides, a Japan/Scotland, England, SA path to the final would be more desirable
And now I'm confused as to whether you're a pussy or just chicken
I know that there's possibly a joke of some sort to be made here about being unable to differentiate between a pussy and a cock, but after passing on an earlier opportunity to caption the flooded tunnel footage from Japan's training session ("...so THAT's why that call it a pool game"). I no longer trust my judgment.
-
@Catogrande said in RWC: Japan v Scotland (Possible) (Pool A):
@Snowy @jegga I do wonder though that if it was say England or NZ that needed to play to qualify whether or not the outcome from World Rugby would have been different. I'd like to think not, but I'm not so sure. Now this is not a dig and either team, more taking a view on the commercial decision that World Rugby might have taken.
It would have been exactly the same.
Any NZ team that had been thrashed in a pool match before playing the unbeaten leader of the pool would be considered so useless that they got what they deserved. World Rugby would delight -- positively delight -- in stiffing us. Taking the ABs out early in any tournament would vastly increase the interest from the neutrals to each succeeding match, as everyone would think they could pull it off.
And England have no Aura, so it isn't an issue.
@Chester-Draws said in RWC: Japan v Scotland (Pool A):
@Catogrande said in RWC: Japan v Scotland (Possible) (Pool A):
@Snowy @jegga I do wonder though that if it was say England or NZ that needed to play to qualify whether or not the outcome from World Rugby would have been different. I'd like to think not, but I'm not so sure. Now this is not a dig and either team, more taking a view on the commercial decision that World Rugby might have taken.
It would have been exactly the same.
Any NZ team that had been thrashed in a pool match before playing the unbeaten leader of the pool would be considered so useless that they got what they deserved. World Rugby would delight -- positively with delight -- in stiffing us. Taking the ABs out early in any tournament would vastly increase the interest from the neutrals to each succeeding match, as everyone would think they could pull it off.
And England have no Aura, so it isn't an issue.
I guess you missed the bit saying it wasn’t a dig at either?
-
Carn the Japanese!!!
-
@chimoaus Good on him, a decent play by play caller.
-
My missus reckons the kiwi ref is the best looking ref at the wc
-
Crowd noise is unreal!
