• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

Judiciary Happenings

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Sports Talk
rwc
197 Posts 38 Posters 11.1k Views
Judiciary Happenings
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT Crusader
    replied to NTA on last edited by
    #164

    @NTA said in Judiciary Happenings:

    @Snowy said in Judiciary Happenings:

    Some high quality piss taking today on several threads.

    When we're bored, this happens...

    🤔

    Or the Politics thread gives the mods a migraine...

    There’s a politics thread?

    NTAN 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • NTAN Offline
    NTAN Offline
    NTA
    replied to ACT Crusader on last edited by
    #165

    @ACT-Crusader said in Judiciary Happenings:

    @NTA said in Judiciary Happenings:

    @Snowy said in Judiciary Happenings:

    Some high quality piss taking today on several threads.

    When we're bored, this happens...

    🤔

    Or the Politics thread gives the mods a migraine...

    There’s a politics thread?

    Subforum, maybe. You might have set it to "Ignore" as it was generally a bunch of old men getting shouty about bullshit.

    SnowyS 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • SnowyS Offline
    SnowyS Offline
    Snowy
    replied to NTA on last edited by
    #166

    @NTA said in Judiciary Happenings:

    it was generally a bunch of old men getting shouty about bullshit.

    And some Polish chicks apparently.

    Out of interest how would you differentiate that from the rest of The Fern forums?

    NepiaN NTAN 2 Replies Last reply
    1
  • NepiaN Offline
    NepiaN Offline
    Nepia
    replied to Snowy on last edited by
    #167

    @Snowy said in Judiciary Happenings:

    @NTA said in Judiciary Happenings:

    it was generally a bunch of old men getting shouty about bullshit.

    And some Polish chicks apparently.

    Out of interest how would you differentiate that from the rest of The Fern forums?

    Wait what? Do tell.

    SnowyS 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • SnowyS Offline
    SnowyS Offline
    Snowy
    replied to Nepia on last edited by
    #168

    @Nepia Was in another thread about the demographics of this place. There were a surprising number of posts by women (or posters who identify as such) and Poland was also quite high in the ratings of places that people post from. So in good Fern fashion I put 2 and 2 together and got 81 - most people that post here are Polish chicks.

    I'm actually Lena from Krakow which might explain it.

    1 Reply Last reply
    5
  • KirwanK Offline
    KirwanK Offline
    Kirwan
    wrote on last edited by
    #169

    I was thinking about this the other day, I wonder if that’s an obscured location result from a VPN?

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • NTAN Offline
    NTAN Offline
    NTA
    replied to Snowy on last edited by
    #170

    @Snowy said in Judiciary Happenings:

    @NTA said in Judiciary Happenings:

    it was generally a bunch of old men getting shouty about bullshit.

    And some Polish chicks apparently.

    Out of interest how would you differentiate that from the rest of The Fern forums?

    Rugby isn't bullshit

    SnowyS 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • SnowyS Offline
    SnowyS Offline
    Snowy
    replied to NTA on last edited by
    #171

    @NTA said in Judiciary Happenings:

    Rugby isn't bullshit

    Agreed, but I could posit that most of what is said on here about rugby is.

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • TeWaioT Offline
    TeWaioT Offline
    TeWaio
    wrote on last edited by
    #172

    Can't wait for the Beast update on this thread....

    M Billy WebbB 2 Replies Last reply
    0
  • M Offline
    M Offline
    mooshld
    replied to TeWaio on last edited by
    #173

    @TeWaio Me as well, thought Barnes was a bit cheeky there. It deserved a TMO look, but I think he knew it could well be a red if it went to the TMO lottery. So went immediate yellow to avoid controversy.

    To be fair there were a few aerial challenges in that game that would have been straight yellow in super rugby as well.

    PaekakboyzP 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • PaekakboyzP Offline
    PaekakboyzP Offline
    Paekakboyz
    replied to mooshld on last edited by
    #174

    @mooshld that was as close to a red as a yellow can get imo. I think that's why Barnes jumped on the shoulder first contact and went yellow asap. I thought he handled other contact situations pretty well, compared to other refs that'd get card happy.

    But soooo close to red, and who knows what might have happened!

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Billy WebbB Offline
    Billy WebbB Offline
    Billy Webb
    replied to TeWaio on last edited by
    #175

    @TeWaio said in Judiciary Happenings:

    Can't wait for the Beast update on this thread....

    Here's your update: no citing. The window (36 hours after conclusion of the match) has closed.

    F 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • F Offline
    F Offline
    Frank
    replied to Billy Webb on last edited by
    #176

    @Billy-Webb
    But, but, but what are half the people on this site going to do if they can't argue with a citing despite virtually none of them ever actually having reffed and or read a law book??????????

    Billy WebbB 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • Billy WebbB Offline
    Billy WebbB Offline
    Billy Webb
    replied to Frank on last edited by
    #177

    @Frank hahaha. True. But then again, lack of knowledge has hardly ever stopped any of us from adding our 2c 😉

    CatograndeC 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • CatograndeC Offline
    CatograndeC Offline
    Catogrande
    replied to Billy Webb on last edited by
    #178

    @Billy-Webb said in Judiciary Happenings:

    @Frank hahaha. True. But then again, lack of knowledge has hardly ever stopped any of us from adding our 2c to that lack of knowledge 😉

    Fixed

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • C Offline
    C Offline
    cgrant
    wrote on last edited by
    #179

    Maybe a bit out of thread but Jaco Peyper was not considered for the semi-finals because of his controversial photo with Welsh Fans.

    Billy WebbB 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Billy WebbB Offline
    Billy WebbB Offline
    Billy Webb
    replied to cgrant on last edited by
    #180

    @cgrant said in Judiciary Happenings:

    Maybe a bit out of thread but Jaco Peyper was not considered for the semi-finals because of his controversial photo with Welsh Fans.

    and absolutely the right call imo.
    Stupid thing for him to have done and World Rugby needed to be seen to act.
    Just hope for his sake it doesn't permanently harm his career.

    NTAN SnowyS 2 Replies Last reply
    1
  • NTAN Offline
    NTAN Offline
    NTA
    replied to Billy Webb on last edited by NTA
    #181

    @Billy-Webb said in Judiciary Happenings:

    Just hope for his sake it doesn't permanently harm his career.

    If his style of refereeing hasn't harmed his career to date, one photo surely won't.

    voodooV 1 Reply Last reply
    7
  • voodooV Offline
    voodooV Offline
    voodoo
    replied to NTA on last edited by
    #182

    @NTA said in Judiciary Happenings:

    @Billy-Webb said in Judiciary Happenings:

    Just hope for his sake it doesn't permanently harm his career.

    If his style of refereeing hasn't harmed his career to date, one photo surely won't.

    Interestingly, some friends recently (pre-RWC but this year) spent some time with Steve Tew and colleagues, and their view was that they'd happily ditch neutral refs if they could have Peyper for every game. Really rated him.

    NTAN 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • NTAN Offline
    NTAN Offline
    NTA
    replied to voodoo on last edited by
    #183

    @voodoo said in Judiciary Happenings:

    @NTA said in Judiciary Happenings:

    @Billy-Webb said in Judiciary Happenings:

    Just hope for his sake it doesn't permanently harm his career.

    If his style of refereeing hasn't harmed his career to date, one photo surely won't.

    Interestingly, some friends recently (pre-RWC but this year) spent some time with Steve Tew and colleagues, and their view was that they'd happily ditch neutral refs if they could have Peyper for every game. Really rated him.

    Because he lets a lot of things go, probably. Suits the AB ability to allow ball down when the ruck is messy

    voodooV 1 Reply Last reply
    0

Judiciary Happenings
Sports Talk
rwc
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.