Skip to content
  • Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

  • Tipping
  • Team Sheets
  • Highlights
  • Results
    • All Blacks

      Search every All Blacks Test. Filter results by year, opposition, location, venue, city and RWC stage

    • Super Rugby

      Search every Super Rugby since match 1996

    • NPC

      Search NPC results. Only first division matches from 1976-2005. All results from the 14 team competition (2006-present) are included

Judiciary Happenings

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Sports Talk
rwc
197 Posts 38 Posters 12.0k Views 2 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • NTAN NTA

    @Snowy said in Judiciary Happenings:

    Some high quality piss taking today on several threads.

    When we're bored, this happens...

    🤔

    Or the Politics thread gives the mods a migraine...

    ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT Crusader
    wrote on last edited by
    #164

    @NTA said in Judiciary Happenings:

    @Snowy said in Judiciary Happenings:

    Some high quality piss taking today on several threads.

    When we're bored, this happens...

    🤔

    Or the Politics thread gives the mods a migraine...

    There’s a politics thread?

    NTAN 1 Reply Last reply
    2
    • ACT CrusaderA ACT Crusader

      @NTA said in Judiciary Happenings:

      @Snowy said in Judiciary Happenings:

      Some high quality piss taking today on several threads.

      When we're bored, this happens...

      🤔

      Or the Politics thread gives the mods a migraine...

      There’s a politics thread?

      NTAN Offline
      NTAN Offline
      NTA
      wrote on last edited by
      #165

      @ACT-Crusader said in Judiciary Happenings:

      @NTA said in Judiciary Happenings:

      @Snowy said in Judiciary Happenings:

      Some high quality piss taking today on several threads.

      When we're bored, this happens...

      🤔

      Or the Politics thread gives the mods a migraine...

      There’s a politics thread?

      Subforum, maybe. You might have set it to "Ignore" as it was generally a bunch of old men getting shouty about bullshit.

      SnowyS 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • NTAN NTA

        @ACT-Crusader said in Judiciary Happenings:

        @NTA said in Judiciary Happenings:

        @Snowy said in Judiciary Happenings:

        Some high quality piss taking today on several threads.

        When we're bored, this happens...

        🤔

        Or the Politics thread gives the mods a migraine...

        There’s a politics thread?

        Subforum, maybe. You might have set it to "Ignore" as it was generally a bunch of old men getting shouty about bullshit.

        SnowyS Offline
        SnowyS Offline
        Snowy
        wrote on last edited by
        #166

        @NTA said in Judiciary Happenings:

        it was generally a bunch of old men getting shouty about bullshit.

        And some Polish chicks apparently.

        Out of interest how would you differentiate that from the rest of The Fern forums?

        NepiaN NTAN 2 Replies Last reply
        1
        • SnowyS Snowy

          @NTA said in Judiciary Happenings:

          it was generally a bunch of old men getting shouty about bullshit.

          And some Polish chicks apparently.

          Out of interest how would you differentiate that from the rest of The Fern forums?

          NepiaN Offline
          NepiaN Offline
          Nepia
          wrote on last edited by
          #167

          @Snowy said in Judiciary Happenings:

          @NTA said in Judiciary Happenings:

          it was generally a bunch of old men getting shouty about bullshit.

          And some Polish chicks apparently.

          Out of interest how would you differentiate that from the rest of The Fern forums?

          Wait what? Do tell.

          SnowyS 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • NepiaN Nepia

            @Snowy said in Judiciary Happenings:

            @NTA said in Judiciary Happenings:

            it was generally a bunch of old men getting shouty about bullshit.

            And some Polish chicks apparently.

            Out of interest how would you differentiate that from the rest of The Fern forums?

            Wait what? Do tell.

            SnowyS Offline
            SnowyS Offline
            Snowy
            wrote on last edited by
            #168

            @Nepia Was in another thread about the demographics of this place. There were a surprising number of posts by women (or posters who identify as such) and Poland was also quite high in the ratings of places that people post from. So in good Fern fashion I put 2 and 2 together and got 81 - most people that post here are Polish chicks.

            I'm actually Lena from Krakow which might explain it.

            1 Reply Last reply
            5
            • KirwanK Offline
              KirwanK Offline
              Kirwan
              wrote on last edited by
              #169

              I was thinking about this the other day, I wonder if that’s an obscured location result from a VPN?

              1 Reply Last reply
              2
              • SnowyS Snowy

                @NTA said in Judiciary Happenings:

                it was generally a bunch of old men getting shouty about bullshit.

                And some Polish chicks apparently.

                Out of interest how would you differentiate that from the rest of The Fern forums?

                NTAN Offline
                NTAN Offline
                NTA
                wrote on last edited by
                #170

                @Snowy said in Judiciary Happenings:

                @NTA said in Judiciary Happenings:

                it was generally a bunch of old men getting shouty about bullshit.

                And some Polish chicks apparently.

                Out of interest how would you differentiate that from the rest of The Fern forums?

                Rugby isn't bullshit

                SnowyS 1 Reply Last reply
                1
                • NTAN NTA

                  @Snowy said in Judiciary Happenings:

                  @NTA said in Judiciary Happenings:

                  it was generally a bunch of old men getting shouty about bullshit.

                  And some Polish chicks apparently.

                  Out of interest how would you differentiate that from the rest of The Fern forums?

                  Rugby isn't bullshit

                  SnowyS Offline
                  SnowyS Offline
                  Snowy
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #171

                  @NTA said in Judiciary Happenings:

                  Rugby isn't bullshit

                  Agreed, but I could posit that most of what is said on here about rugby is.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  2
                  • TeWaioT Offline
                    TeWaioT Offline
                    TeWaio
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #172

                    Can't wait for the Beast update on this thread....

                    M Billy WebbB 2 Replies Last reply
                    0
                    • TeWaioT TeWaio

                      Can't wait for the Beast update on this thread....

                      M Offline
                      M Offline
                      mooshld
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #173

                      @TeWaio Me as well, thought Barnes was a bit cheeky there. It deserved a TMO look, but I think he knew it could well be a red if it went to the TMO lottery. So went immediate yellow to avoid controversy.

                      To be fair there were a few aerial challenges in that game that would have been straight yellow in super rugby as well.

                      PaekakboyzP 1 Reply Last reply
                      1
                      • M mooshld

                        @TeWaio Me as well, thought Barnes was a bit cheeky there. It deserved a TMO look, but I think he knew it could well be a red if it went to the TMO lottery. So went immediate yellow to avoid controversy.

                        To be fair there were a few aerial challenges in that game that would have been straight yellow in super rugby as well.

                        PaekakboyzP Offline
                        PaekakboyzP Offline
                        Paekakboyz
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #174

                        @mooshld that was as close to a red as a yellow can get imo. I think that's why Barnes jumped on the shoulder first contact and went yellow asap. I thought he handled other contact situations pretty well, compared to other refs that'd get card happy.

                        But soooo close to red, and who knows what might have happened!

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • TeWaioT TeWaio

                          Can't wait for the Beast update on this thread....

                          Billy WebbB Offline
                          Billy WebbB Offline
                          Billy Webb
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #175

                          @TeWaio said in Judiciary Happenings:

                          Can't wait for the Beast update on this thread....

                          Here's your update: no citing. The window (36 hours after conclusion of the match) has closed.

                          F 1 Reply Last reply
                          2
                          • Billy WebbB Billy Webb

                            @TeWaio said in Judiciary Happenings:

                            Can't wait for the Beast update on this thread....

                            Here's your update: no citing. The window (36 hours after conclusion of the match) has closed.

                            F Offline
                            F Offline
                            Frank
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #176

                            @Billy-Webb
                            But, but, but what are half the people on this site going to do if they can't argue with a citing despite virtually none of them ever actually having reffed and or read a law book??????????

                            Billy WebbB 1 Reply Last reply
                            2
                            • F Frank

                              @Billy-Webb
                              But, but, but what are half the people on this site going to do if they can't argue with a citing despite virtually none of them ever actually having reffed and or read a law book??????????

                              Billy WebbB Offline
                              Billy WebbB Offline
                              Billy Webb
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #177

                              @Frank hahaha. True. But then again, lack of knowledge has hardly ever stopped any of us from adding our 2c 😉

                              CatograndeC 1 Reply Last reply
                              1
                              • Billy WebbB Billy Webb

                                @Frank hahaha. True. But then again, lack of knowledge has hardly ever stopped any of us from adding our 2c 😉

                                CatograndeC Offline
                                CatograndeC Offline
                                Catogrande
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #178

                                @Billy-Webb said in Judiciary Happenings:

                                @Frank hahaha. True. But then again, lack of knowledge has hardly ever stopped any of us from adding our 2c to that lack of knowledge 😉

                                Fixed

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                1
                                • C Offline
                                  C Offline
                                  cgrant
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #179

                                  Maybe a bit out of thread but Jaco Peyper was not considered for the semi-finals because of his controversial photo with Welsh Fans.

                                  Billy WebbB 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • C cgrant

                                    Maybe a bit out of thread but Jaco Peyper was not considered for the semi-finals because of his controversial photo with Welsh Fans.

                                    Billy WebbB Offline
                                    Billy WebbB Offline
                                    Billy Webb
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #180

                                    @cgrant said in Judiciary Happenings:

                                    Maybe a bit out of thread but Jaco Peyper was not considered for the semi-finals because of his controversial photo with Welsh Fans.

                                    and absolutely the right call imo.
                                    Stupid thing for him to have done and World Rugby needed to be seen to act.
                                    Just hope for his sake it doesn't permanently harm his career.

                                    NTAN SnowyS 2 Replies Last reply
                                    1
                                    • Billy WebbB Billy Webb

                                      @cgrant said in Judiciary Happenings:

                                      Maybe a bit out of thread but Jaco Peyper was not considered for the semi-finals because of his controversial photo with Welsh Fans.

                                      and absolutely the right call imo.
                                      Stupid thing for him to have done and World Rugby needed to be seen to act.
                                      Just hope for his sake it doesn't permanently harm his career.

                                      NTAN Offline
                                      NTAN Offline
                                      NTA
                                      wrote on last edited by NTA
                                      #181

                                      @Billy-Webb said in Judiciary Happenings:

                                      Just hope for his sake it doesn't permanently harm his career.

                                      If his style of refereeing hasn't harmed his career to date, one photo surely won't.

                                      voodooV 1 Reply Last reply
                                      7
                                      • NTAN NTA

                                        @Billy-Webb said in Judiciary Happenings:

                                        Just hope for his sake it doesn't permanently harm his career.

                                        If his style of refereeing hasn't harmed his career to date, one photo surely won't.

                                        voodooV Online
                                        voodooV Online
                                        voodoo
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #182

                                        @NTA said in Judiciary Happenings:

                                        @Billy-Webb said in Judiciary Happenings:

                                        Just hope for his sake it doesn't permanently harm his career.

                                        If his style of refereeing hasn't harmed his career to date, one photo surely won't.

                                        Interestingly, some friends recently (pre-RWC but this year) spent some time with Steve Tew and colleagues, and their view was that they'd happily ditch neutral refs if they could have Peyper for every game. Really rated him.

                                        NTAN 1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • voodooV voodoo

                                          @NTA said in Judiciary Happenings:

                                          @Billy-Webb said in Judiciary Happenings:

                                          Just hope for his sake it doesn't permanently harm his career.

                                          If his style of refereeing hasn't harmed his career to date, one photo surely won't.

                                          Interestingly, some friends recently (pre-RWC but this year) spent some time with Steve Tew and colleagues, and their view was that they'd happily ditch neutral refs if they could have Peyper for every game. Really rated him.

                                          NTAN Offline
                                          NTAN Offline
                                          NTA
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #183

                                          @voodoo said in Judiciary Happenings:

                                          @NTA said in Judiciary Happenings:

                                          @Billy-Webb said in Judiciary Happenings:

                                          Just hope for his sake it doesn't permanently harm his career.

                                          If his style of refereeing hasn't harmed his career to date, one photo surely won't.

                                          Interestingly, some friends recently (pre-RWC but this year) spent some time with Steve Tew and colleagues, and their view was that they'd happily ditch neutral refs if they could have Peyper for every game. Really rated him.

                                          Because he lets a lot of things go, probably. Suits the AB ability to allow ball down when the ruck is messy

                                          voodooV 1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Search
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Search