Interesting reads
-
Random 24 year old man spontaneously raises millions for charity , gets interviewed by local paper which digs up tweets from when he was 16 . Paper and journo gets massive blowback , journos identity is discovered, turns out he has said awful shit on twitter too and paper sacks him . Journo still doesn’t seem to understand what happened
-
@jegga said in Interesting reads:
Random 24 year old man spontaneously raises millions for charity , gets interviewed by local paper which digs up tweets from when he was 16 . Paper and journo gets massive blowback , journos identity is discovered, turns out he has said awful shit on twitter too and paper sacks him . Journo still doesn’t seem to understand what happened
This was definitely an interesting read but your description implied (or I misread it's intention) that the journalist was setting out to set him up ... when (and this is in his own words obviously) he was a writing a series of articles about him due to the charity work.
I can kind of understand why the journo doesn't understand what happened. The newspaper posted an editorial explaining the rationale for why 'they' were chosing to include the info about the tweets but were preempted by the guy himself. And the kid himself tweeted that he didn't have an issue with the reporter.
-
@Nepia said in Interesting reads:
@jegga said in Interesting reads:
Random 24 year old man spontaneously raises millions for charity , gets interviewed by local paper which digs up tweets from when he was 16 . Paper and journo gets massive blowback , journos identity is discovered, turns out he has said awful shit on twitter too and paper sacks him . Journo still doesn’t seem to understand what happened
This was definitely an interesting read but your description implied (or I misread it's intention) that the journalist was setting out to set him up ... when (and this is in his own words obviously) he was a writing a series of articles about him due to the charity work.
I can kind of understand why the journo doesn't understand what happened. The newspaper posted an editorial explaining the rationale for why 'they' were chosing to include the info about the tweets but were preempted by the guy himself. And the kid himself tweeted that he didn't have an issue with the reporter.
I don’t think I implied he was setting him up . He says in the first sentence he saw his job as to make sure his stories went viral so he included the tweets. He obviously never anticipated that it would massively backfire on him .
I followed the story when it first broke and the guy who raised the money is obviously a good sort so I guess having some understanding of what the journo is going through he wouldn’t wish it on anyone .
I thought it was an interesting story about social media and how what you say on it can come back to haunt you.
I don’t have much sympathy for the journo , he reminds me of Sarah Jeong he just didn’t have the high profile supporters she did .
-
@jegga said in Interesting reads:
@Nepia said in Interesting reads:
@jegga said in Interesting reads:
Random 24 year old man spontaneously raises millions for charity , gets interviewed by local paper which digs up tweets from when he was 16 . Paper and journo gets massive blowback , journos identity is discovered, turns out he has said awful shit on twitter too and paper sacks him . Journo still doesn’t seem to understand what happened
This was definitely an interesting read but your description implied (or I misread it's intention) that the journalist was setting out to set him up ... when (and this is in his own words obviously) he was a writing a series of articles about him due to the charity work.
I can kind of understand why the journo doesn't understand what happened. The newspaper posted an editorial explaining the rationale for why 'they' were chosing to include the info about the tweets but were preempted by the guy himself. And the kid himself tweeted that he didn't have an issue with the reporter.
I don’t think I implied he was setting him up . He says in the first sentence he saw his job as to make sure his stories went viral so he included the tweets. He obviously never anticipated that it would massively backfire on him .
I followed the story when it first broke and the guy who raised the money is obviously a good sort so I guess having some understanding of what the journo is going through he wouldn’t wish it on anyone .
I thought it was an interesting story about social media and how what you say on it can come back to haunt you.
I don’t have much sympathy for the journo , he reminds me of Sarah Jeong he just didn’t have the high profile supporters she did .
All good, must have just been my interpretation. I don't know who Jeong is but I guess we have to agree to disagree on the journo, he seemed pretty supportive of the guy to me - but I didn't follow it at the time, only just did some research after reading your link.
-
@Nepia said in Interesting reads:
@jegga said in Interesting reads:
@Nepia said in Interesting reads:
@jegga said in Interesting reads:
Random 24 year old man spontaneously raises millions for charity , gets interviewed by local paper which digs up tweets from when he was 16 . Paper and journo gets massive blowback , journos identity is discovered, turns out he has said awful shit on twitter too and paper sacks him . Journo still doesn’t seem to understand what happened
This was definitely an interesting read but your description implied (or I misread it's intention) that the journalist was setting out to set him up ... when (and this is in his own words obviously) he was a writing a series of articles about him due to the charity work.
I can kind of understand why the journo doesn't understand what happened. The newspaper posted an editorial explaining the rationale for why 'they' were chosing to include the info about the tweets but were preempted by the guy himself. And the kid himself tweeted that he didn't have an issue with the reporter.
I don’t think I implied he was setting him up . He says in the first sentence he saw his job as to make sure his stories went viral so he included the tweets. He obviously never anticipated that it would massively backfire on him .
I followed the story when it first broke and the guy who raised the money is obviously a good sort so I guess having some understanding of what the journo is going through he wouldn’t wish it on anyone .
I thought it was an interesting story about social media and how what you say on it can come back to haunt you.
I don’t have much sympathy for the journo , he reminds me of Sarah Jeong he just didn’t have the high profile supporters she did .
All good, must have just been my interpretation. I don't know who Jeong is but I guess we have to agree to disagree on the journo, he seemed pretty supportive of the guy to me - but I didn't follow it at the time, only just did some research after reading your link.
It was around the same time as Trudeau’s penchant for black face earlier in his life so it was interesting to follow the two stories.
Struggling to give a shit about the journo . If the fundraiser hadn’t had the brains to front foot it on the advice of a pr firm it would have been much worse for him .
Sarah Jeong is a nyt writer who after she was hired was found to have tweeted all kinds of racist tweets and stuff like “ kill all men “ but people like Ezra Klein from Vox went bat for her despite all this and the fact she outed a gay Chinese tech writer who was previously anonymous. Eventually the nyt realised she was actually an awful person and moved her on. -
How to recognize AI snake oil:
-
@Tim Is it Nebraska that has really jumped into this? It was a key plank to English's plans for social welfare reform if Nats had been re-elected.
To give him some credit I think he was looking for more effective ways to target resources rather than aping a management fad. He was planning to mine existing DSW data to try and identify pointers to a bad adult outcome in young kids.
But yeah...nah
-
@dogmeat said in Interesting reads:
@Tim Is it Nebraska that has really jumped into this? It was a key plank to English's plans for social welfare reform if Nats had been re-elected.
To give him some credit I think he was looking for more effective ways to target resources rather than aping a management fad. He was planning to mine existing DSW data to try and identify pointers to a bad adult outcome in young kids.
But yeah...nah
Pittsburgh was really interested
David Farrar claimed it was behind falling teenage pregnancy rates but they had been trending downwards in the West since the 90s
-
Cryptocurrency scam:
-
@antipodean said in Interesting reads:
Cryptocurrency scam:
There's a podcast about this that I'm about to start listening to!
-
Good read that @antipodean thanks
-
200 page report about how Amnesty International got Oxfammed and destroyed its credibility.
-
@jegga a precis
Important to note that the paper was funded by Jewish Rights Watch, Collier is a self-avowed Zionist and he has criticised the UN and MI5 in the past for running anti-Jewish campaigns. Doesn't mean he's wrong about Amnesty though
-
@dogmeat said in Interesting reads:
@jegga a precis
Important to note that the paper was funded by Jewish Rights Watch, Collier is a self-avowed Zionist and he has criticised the UN and MI5 in the past for running anti-Jewish campaigns. Doesn't mean he's wrong about Amnesty though
He openly admits to being a zionist, the people he mentions have no place in Amnesty though. He even tries to give Amnesty an out by saying they should rotated out to other areas of the world where they might actually be able to do some good. Personally I think they have no place in Amnesty, the weird obsession with Israel and ignoring far worse countries or regimes from people like them won't do the organisation any favours.