• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

World Rugby Board elections

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Sports Talk
281 Posts 35 Posters 6.8k Views
World Rugby Board elections
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • J Offline
    J Offline
    junior
    replied to voodoo on last edited by
    #235

    @voodoo said in World Rugby Board elections:

    @Bones said in World Rugby Board elections:

    @voodoo said in World Rugby Board elections:

    @Bones said in World Rugby Board elections:

    @voodoo because "T2" nations get fucked over! Who in their right mind is going to return to Samoa at 24 when they can go to Ireland and spend 5 years qualifying for Ireland while earning hundreds of thousands of Euro?

    No no no!!!

    That is the status quo! That their players leave to play overseas, first at club level then often at international level - I'm just trying to find some avenue for T2 nations to field their best teams! Why is it detrimental to allow quality players to return and contribute to their homelands at some point?

    Well no - under status quo, player that goes to Ireland and looks to play for Samoa et al still has an avenue back. You want to change it so that player now has to move to Samoa, not play professional rugby and wait 5 years.

    @Bones said in World Rugby Board elections:

    @voodoo said in World Rugby Board elections:

    @Bones said in World Rugby Board elections:

    @voodoo because "T2" nations get fucked over! Who in their right mind is going to return to Samoa at 24 when they can go to Ireland and spend 5 years qualifying for Ireland while earning hundreds of thousands of Euro?

    No no no!!!

    That is the status quo! That their players leave to play overseas, first at club level then often at international level - I'm just trying to find some avenue for T2 nations to field their best teams! Why is it detrimental to allow quality players to return and contribute to their homelands at some point?

    Well no - under status quo, player that goes to Ireland and looks to play for Samoa et al still has an avenue back. You want to change it so that player now has to move to Samoa, not play professional rugby and wait 5 years.

    No, only if they represent Ireland then want to switch should they have to fulfill that residency requirement back in Samoa. Seems weird to allow someone to move from Samoa to Ireland to play club and test footy, then to stay in Ireland but play for Samoa???

    But in that case no one is going to switch back to Samoa are they? Because that would preclude them playing club or franchise footy and earning heaps of coin elsewhere

    voodooV 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • voodooV Offline
    voodooV Offline
    voodoo
    replied to Bones on last edited by voodoo
    #236

    @Bones said in World Rugby Board elections:

    @voodoo said in World Rugby Board elections:

    @Bones said in World Rugby Board elections:

    @voodoo sevens/olympics.

    But a guy who plays for the AB's/Ireland at test level can't play for Samoa/Tonga ever again

    Why?

    They can though.

    Isn't this the current rule ?

    When is a player ‘captured’ by a country?

    Captured is the term used when a player becomes tied to one country and can no longer represent another nation on the international stage. This happens when a player plays for one of three teams:

    The senior 15-a-side national representative team of a union. This is quite simple and basically means playing in a Test match, eg England v Ireland in the Six Nations.
    The next senior 15-a-side national representative team of a union. This is where it gets slightly complicated as each union may have a different idea of what to nominate as their second team. It could be an A team, like England Saxons, but it’s up to each union to decide which team they want to designate as their ‘next senior’ side. In the past some unions have nominated their U20 side, but since the start of 2018 they are no longer able to do that.
    The senior national representative sevens team of a union where the player is aged 20 or older or, if at an Olympics or Sevens World Cup, the player has reached the age of majority (18).

    StargazerS 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • voodooV Offline
    voodooV Offline
    voodoo
    replied to junior on last edited by
    #237

    @junior said in World Rugby Board elections:

    @voodoo said in World Rugby Board elections:

    @Bones said in World Rugby Board elections:

    @voodoo said in World Rugby Board elections:

    @Bones said in World Rugby Board elections:

    @voodoo because "T2" nations get fucked over! Who in their right mind is going to return to Samoa at 24 when they can go to Ireland and spend 5 years qualifying for Ireland while earning hundreds of thousands of Euro?

    No no no!!!

    That is the status quo! That their players leave to play overseas, first at club level then often at international level - I'm just trying to find some avenue for T2 nations to field their best teams! Why is it detrimental to allow quality players to return and contribute to their homelands at some point?

    Well no - under status quo, player that goes to Ireland and looks to play for Samoa et al still has an avenue back. You want to change it so that player now has to move to Samoa, not play professional rugby and wait 5 years.

    @Bones said in World Rugby Board elections:

    @voodoo said in World Rugby Board elections:

    @Bones said in World Rugby Board elections:

    @voodoo because "T2" nations get fucked over! Who in their right mind is going to return to Samoa at 24 when they can go to Ireland and spend 5 years qualifying for Ireland while earning hundreds of thousands of Euro?

    No no no!!!

    That is the status quo! That their players leave to play overseas, first at club level then often at international level - I'm just trying to find some avenue for T2 nations to field their best teams! Why is it detrimental to allow quality players to return and contribute to their homelands at some point?

    Well no - under status quo, player that goes to Ireland and looks to play for Samoa et al still has an avenue back. You want to change it so that player now has to move to Samoa, not play professional rugby and wait 5 years.

    No, only if they represent Ireland then want to switch should they have to fulfill that residency requirement back in Samoa. Seems weird to allow someone to move from Samoa to Ireland to play club and test footy, then to stay in Ireland but play for Samoa???

    But in that case no one is going to switch back to Samoa are they? Because that would preclude them playing club or franchise footy and earning heaps of coin elsewhere

    Who knows? Maybe a 33yr who has played 10yrs of club footy in Europe and made heaps of cash wants to go and give back to his community and also represent his country of birth?

    The better question is why would we want to stop him if he did?

    J 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • StargazerS Offline
    StargazerS Offline
    Stargazer
    replied to voodoo on last edited by
    #238

    @voodoo I assume @Bones is referring to the Olympic 7s loophole. It's possible to play for another country, but it's not easy. For example, they must have a passport of the new country they wish to represent, participate in an "Olympic event" (defined by WR Schedule 2) and respect a stand-down period of 3 years.

    See particularly Regulations 8.7 and 8.12

    voodooV 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • mariner4lifeM Offline
    mariner4lifeM Offline
    mariner4life
    wrote on last edited by
    #239

    The only way to ever solve this is to make sure you get paid the same whether you play a test for Samoa or for England. Then you can choose to play for the country where you live, and who taught you to play rugby, or the country where your parents were born.

    RapidoR MajorRageM 2 Replies Last reply
    2
  • voodooV Offline
    voodooV Offline
    voodoo
    replied to Stargazer on last edited by
    #240

    @Stargazer said in World Rugby Board elections:

    @voodoo I assume @Bones is referring to the Olympic 7s loophole. It's possible to play for another country, but it's not easy. For example, they must have a passport of the new country they wish to represent, participate in an "Olympic event" (defined by WR Schedule 2) and respect a stand-down period of 3 years.

    See particularly Regulations 8.7 and 8.12

    Ahh, thanks. Pretty limited loophole though

    BonesB 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • RapidoR Offline
    RapidoR Offline
    Rapido
    replied to mariner4life on last edited by
    #241

    @mariner4life said in World Rugby Board elections:

    The only way to ever solve this is to make sure you get paid the same whether you play a test for Samoa or for England. Then you can choose to play for the country where you live, and who taught you to play rugby, or the country where your parents were born.

    And remove central funding by the unions of domestic contracts, and the conditions they put on it.
    Basically only France and the new MLS do this.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • BonesB Offline
    BonesB Offline
    Bones
    replied to voodoo on last edited by
    #242

    @voodoo said in World Rugby Board elections:

    @Stargazer said in World Rugby Board elections:

    @voodoo I assume @Bones is referring to the Olympic 7s loophole. It's possible to play for another country, but it's not easy. For example, they must have a passport of the new country they wish to represent, participate in an "Olympic event" (defined by WR Schedule 2) and respect a stand-down period of 3 years.

    See particularly Regulations 8.7 and 8.12

    Ahh, thanks. Pretty limited loophole though

    Hah, as opposed to giving up rugby altogether?

    voodooV 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • voodooV Offline
    voodooV Offline
    voodoo
    replied to Bones on last edited by
    #243

    @Bones said in World Rugby Board elections:

    @voodoo said in World Rugby Board elections:

    @Stargazer said in World Rugby Board elections:

    @voodoo I assume @Bones is referring to the Olympic 7s loophole. It's possible to play for another country, but it's not easy. For example, they must have a passport of the new country they wish to represent, participate in an "Olympic event" (defined by WR Schedule 2) and respect a stand-down period of 3 years.

    See particularly Regulations 8.7 and 8.12

    Ahh, thanks. Pretty limited loophole though

    Hah, as opposed to giving up rugby altogether?

    Well its something, sure , but now you're planning your retirement carefully around a 4yr cycle, obvs not as easy.

    I just don't get what problem we are solving for by banning these guys from going home and representing another country that they choose to make home.

    BonesB 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • BonesB Offline
    BonesB Offline
    Bones
    replied to voodoo on last edited by
    #244

    @voodoo look, your proposal is fine, it would be entirely unused by any "T2" nation. Around about zero PIs are going to "head home" and end up representing another country years later after playing amateur club rugby in the islands. It's pointless in that regard.

    So basically all it becomes is another tool to entice young project players to richer nations. One which fits perfectly with club greed to entice a player to turn their back on their T2 country in the hope they might get more money in 5 years.

    voodooV 2 Replies Last reply
    2
  • voodooV Offline
    voodooV Offline
    voodoo
    replied to Bones on last edited by voodoo
    #245

    @Bones said in World Rugby Board elections:

    @voodoo look, your proposal is fine, it would be entirely unused by any "T2" nation. Around about zero PIs are going to "head home" and end up representing another country years later after playing amateur club rugby in the islands. It's pointless in that regard.

    So basically all it becomes is another tool to entice young project players to richer nations. One which fits perfectly with club greed to entice a player to turn their back on their T2 country in the hope they might get more money in 5 years.

    That's BS, there are plenty enough incentives to get young PI kids out at the moment, this wouldn't do a damn thing to increase the flow

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • voodooV Offline
    voodooV Offline
    voodoo
    replied to Bones on last edited by
    #246

    @Bones said in World Rugby Board elections:

    @voodoo look, your proposal is fine, it would be entirely unused by any "T2" nation. Around about zero PIs are going to "head home" and end up representing another country years later after playing amateur club rugby in the islands. It's pointless in that regard.

    So basically all it becomes is another tool to entice young project players to richer nations. One which fits perfectly with club greed to entice a player to turn their back on their T2 country in the hope they might get more money in 5 years.

    And look, to be clear, I don't have a proposal. I don't have a set of guidelines that I'd like to see in place.

    But I genuinely don't understand why we should stop someone playing for a 2nd country if they choose to make that country their home.

    I really don't get it

    antipodeanA mariner4lifeM BonesB 3 Replies Last reply
    0
  • antipodeanA Offline
    antipodeanA Offline
    antipodean
    replied to voodoo on last edited by
    #247

    @voodoo said in World Rugby Board elections:

    @Bones said in World Rugby Board elections:

    @voodoo look, your proposal is fine, it would be entirely unused by any "T2" nation. Around about zero PIs are going to "head home" and end up representing another country years later after playing amateur club rugby in the islands. It's pointless in that regard.

    So basically all it becomes is another tool to entice young project players to richer nations. One which fits perfectly with club greed to entice a player to turn their back on their T2 country in the hope they might get more money in 5 years.

    And look, to be clear, I don't have a proposal. I don't have a set of guidelines that I'd like to see in place.

    But I genuinely don't understand why we should stop someone playing for a 2nd country if they choose to make that country their home.

    How long is it their home for? The year RWC squads are announced?

    voodooV 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • mariner4lifeM Offline
    mariner4lifeM Offline
    mariner4life
    replied to voodoo on last edited by
    #248

    @voodoo said in World Rugby Board elections:

    they choose to make that country their home.

    why do you keep saying this. Approximately zero players will head back and actually live in the islands.

    voodooV 1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • BonesB Offline
    BonesB Offline
    Bones
    replied to voodoo on last edited by
    #249

    @voodoo said in World Rugby Board elections:

    @Bones said in World Rugby Board elections:

    @voodoo look, your proposal is fine, it would be entirely unused by any "T2" nation. Around about zero PIs are going to "head home" and end up representing another country years later after playing amateur club rugby in the islands. It's pointless in that regard.

    So basically all it becomes is another tool to entice young project players to richer nations. One which fits perfectly with club greed to entice a player to turn their back on their T2 country in the hope they might get more money in 5 years.

    And look, to be clear, I don't have a proposal. I don't have a set of guidelines that I'd like to see in place.

    But I genuinely don't understand why we should stop someone playing for a 2nd country if they choose to make that country their home.

    I really don't get it

    I'm gobsmacked you think project players are a good idea, but there you go.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • voodooV Offline
    voodooV Offline
    voodoo
    replied to antipodean on last edited by
    #250

    @antipodean said in World Rugby Board elections:

    @voodoo said in World Rugby Board elections:

    @Bones said in World Rugby Board elections:

    @voodoo look, your proposal is fine, it would be entirely unused by any "T2" nation. Around about zero PIs are going to "head home" and end up representing another country years later after playing amateur club rugby in the islands. It's pointless in that regard.

    So basically all it becomes is another tool to entice young project players to richer nations. One which fits perfectly with club greed to entice a player to turn their back on their T2 country in the hope they might get more money in 5 years.

    And look, to be clear, I don't have a proposal. I don't have a set of guidelines that I'd like to see in place.

    But I genuinely don't understand why we should stop someone playing for a 2nd country if they choose to make that country their home.

    How long is it their home for? The year RWC squads are announced?

    Again, I don't have a proposal for you clearly it should be meaningful though. If I played 2 tests for NZ, then marry a Scot and live there for the rest of my life, it feels right that I should have the option to represent them at footy outside the Olympics

    antipodeanA 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • voodooV Offline
    voodooV Offline
    voodoo
    replied to mariner4life on last edited by
    #251

    @mariner4life said in World Rugby Board elections:

    @voodoo said in World Rugby Board elections:

    they choose to make that country their home.

    why do you keep saying this. Approximately zero players will head back and actually live in the islands.

    Then why have a rule stopping them? What are you worried about?

    BonesB 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • BonesB Offline
    BonesB Offline
    Bones
    replied to voodoo on last edited by
    #252

    @voodoo said in World Rugby Board elections:

    @mariner4life said in World Rugby Board elections:

    @voodoo said in World Rugby Board elections:

    they choose to make that country their home.

    why do you keep saying this. Approximately zero players will head back and actually live in the islands.

    Then why have a rule stopping them? What are you worried about?

    The fucken players going the other way! For money!

    mariner4lifeM 1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • mariner4lifeM Offline
    mariner4lifeM Offline
    mariner4life
    replied to Bones on last edited by
    #253

    @Bones said in World Rugby Board elections:

    @voodoo said in World Rugby Board elections:

    @mariner4life said in World Rugby Board elections:

    @voodoo said in World Rugby Board elections:

    they choose to make that country their home.

    why do you keep saying this. Approximately zero players will head back and actually live in the islands.

    Then why have a rule stopping them? What are you worried about?

    The fucken players going the other way! For money!

    absolutely this.

    Exporters of talent losing players for their prime years because they are getting a bigger pay day elsewhere, knowing they can go the other way no worries later on. when they are old, and finished.

    BonesB 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • voodooV Offline
    voodooV Offline
    voodoo
    wrote on last edited by
    #254

    Look, as I said yesterday, I did this a month ago eith someone here, I really don't have the energy to do it again.

    BonesB 1 Reply Last reply
    0

World Rugby Board elections
Sports Talk
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.