Skip to content
  • Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

  • Tipping
  • Team Sheets
  • Highlights
  • Results
    • All Blacks

      Search every All Blacks Test. Filter results by year, opposition, location, venue, city and RWC stage

    • Super Rugby

      Search every Super Rugby since match 1996

    • NPC

      Search NPC results. Only first division matches from 1976-2005. All results from the 14 team competition (2006-present) are included

'Super Rugby' 2021

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Sports Talk
1.9k Posts 81 Posters 134.2k Views 5 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • M Machpants

    I think it is pretty bloody stupid going out an and antagonising potential partners, the NZR Board must be pretty far up their own arses. Not professional at all. Sure you have the results of a study, publish them, but to come out an say 'we might deign to let you in our comp' is just plain dumb. And now they've unleashed a shit storm, and the AR Board (who may well be as dumb) may cut of their nose to spite their face and tell NZR to fuck off, like the majority of their supporters and press have said.

    I'm pretty pissed by the whole thing, initially I thought it was just media bullshit, but it looks like NZR really beleive they can decide what Ozzie teams play rather than negotiate it.

    gt12G Offline
    gt12G Offline
    gt12
    wrote on last edited by
    #531

    @Machpants

    I agree with some of that, but equally the Force were considered to be too weak/not useful for Super rugby before, so for RA to bet the house on them being back in the competition now seems strange.

    Personally, I’m happy enough with a 5+5 although I think a better comp would be two separate competitions followed by a finals series for Australasian champion. That’s three main sponsors and two competitions each, sharing spoils of the TV deal of one between us.

    It’s also expandable and could easily include SA plus future partners.

    NZRU, you can send my check in the mail.

    NepiaN 1 Reply Last reply
    2
    • gt12G gt12

      @Machpants

      I agree with some of that, but equally the Force were considered to be too weak/not useful for Super rugby before, so for RA to bet the house on them being back in the competition now seems strange.

      Personally, I’m happy enough with a 5+5 although I think a better comp would be two separate competitions followed by a finals series for Australasian champion. That’s three main sponsors and two competitions each, sharing spoils of the TV deal of one between us.

      It’s also expandable and could easily include SA plus future partners.

      NZRU, you can send my check in the mail.

      NepiaN Offline
      NepiaN Offline
      Nepia
      wrote on last edited by
      #532

      @gt12 yeah, seems weird that the Force are now the hill to die on when they weren’t even in Super rugby at the start of the year.

      D 1 Reply Last reply
      2
      • NepiaN Nepia

        @gt12 yeah, seems weird that the Force are now the hill to die on when they weren’t even in Super rugby at the start of the year.

        D Offline
        D Offline
        Derpus
        wrote on last edited by Derpus
        #533
        This post is deleted!
        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • KirwanK Offline
          KirwanK Offline
          Kirwan
          wrote on last edited by
          #534

          This is starting to remind me of the good old days when the aussies stole the World Cup hosting because of the signage rules πŸ™‚

          Next Bledisloe is going to be great.

          J 1 Reply Last reply
          1
          • KirwanK Kirwan

            This is starting to remind me of the good old days when the aussies stole the World Cup hosting because of the signage rules πŸ™‚

            Next Bledisloe is going to be great.

            J Offline
            J Offline
            junior
            wrote on last edited by
            #535

            @Kirwan said in 'Super Rugby' 2021:

            This is starting to remind me of the good old days when the aussies stole the World Cup hosting because of the signage rules πŸ™‚

            Next Bledisloe is going to be great.

            I wonder how much of this is being drummed up as something it's not in order to concoct a narrative of discord and bring more interest to events on the field...?

            1 Reply Last reply
            1
            • D Offline
              D Offline
              Derpus
              wrote on last edited by
              #536

              Thing i dont really get is, if a couple of teams did decide to randomly abandon Australia and join the NZ comp - they wouldn't be any stronger than they are now? Sure NZ would have probably managed to destroy Australian rugby forever - but for what? Very confusing.

              S 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • D Derpus

                Thing i dont really get is, if a couple of teams did decide to randomly abandon Australia and join the NZ comp - they wouldn't be any stronger than they are now? Sure NZ would have probably managed to destroy Australian rugby forever - but for what? Very confusing.

                S Offline
                S Offline
                SidBarret
                wrote on last edited by
                #537

                @Derpus I read the IRB constitution a while back and there was a provision in there that states a national union needs to sanction all games within their jurisdiction so its not really possible for say the waratahs to rebel against the wishes of the RA.

                J 1 Reply Last reply
                1
                • S SidBarret

                  @Derpus I read the IRB constitution a while back and there was a provision in there that states a national union needs to sanction all games within their jurisdiction so its not really possible for say the waratahs to rebel against the wishes of the RA.

                  J Offline
                  J Offline
                  junior
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #538

                  @SidBarret said in 'Super Rugby' 2021:

                  @Derpus I read the IRB constitution a while back and there was a provision in there that states a national union needs to sanction all games within their jurisdiction so its not really possible for say the waratahs to rebel against the wishes of the RA.

                  What does jurisdiction mean, though? Are you talking about a geographical area or something else?

                  S 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • J junior

                    @SidBarret said in 'Super Rugby' 2021:

                    @Derpus I read the IRB constitution a while back and there was a provision in there that states a national union needs to sanction all games within their jurisdiction so its not really possible for say the waratahs to rebel against the wishes of the RA.

                    What does jurisdiction mean, though? Are you talking about a geographical area or something else?

                    S Offline
                    S Offline
                    SidBarret
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #539

                    @junior yeah that is what I meant in this case, ie RA would need to sanction any game played in Aus

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • sharkS Offline
                      sharkS Offline
                      shark
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #540

                      It's all becoming a little mundane. Just organise the 5+5 comp - no conferences and a four team finals series - and let performances on the field do the talking. When we end up with four Kiwi sides in the finals, the point will be proven. The Pacifika idea is cute, but highly likely to be unsustainable, so shelve it.

                      KirwanK D 2 Replies Last reply
                      3
                      • mofitzy_M Offline
                        mofitzy_M Offline
                        mofitzy_
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #541

                        Can see a Pasifika side based in Hawaii working. One day anyway.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        1
                        • sharkS shark

                          It's all becoming a little mundane. Just organise the 5+5 comp - no conferences and a four team finals series - and let performances on the field do the talking. When we end up with four Kiwi sides in the finals, the point will be proven. The Pacifika idea is cute, but highly likely to be unsustainable, so shelve it.

                          KirwanK Offline
                          KirwanK Offline
                          Kirwan
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #542

                          @shark said in 'Super Rugby' 2021:

                          It's all becoming a little mundane. Just organise the 5+5 comp - no conferences and a four team finals series - and let performances on the field do the talking. When we end up with four Kiwi sides in the finals, the point will be proven. The Pacifika idea is cute, but highly likely to be unsustainable, so shelve it.

                          This. No silly confirmed semi final spots for the much weaker Aussie conference, and for the PI team give a concrete date, eg 2022, to add that team, and maybe one from Japan to keep the teams even.

                          For weaker teams, like the Chiefs πŸ˜‰ , it will give them somebody to beat. (Getting in early)

                          M StargazerS 2 Replies Last reply
                          2
                          • KirwanK Kirwan

                            @shark said in 'Super Rugby' 2021:

                            It's all becoming a little mundane. Just organise the 5+5 comp - no conferences and a four team finals series - and let performances on the field do the talking. When we end up with four Kiwi sides in the finals, the point will be proven. The Pacifika idea is cute, but highly likely to be unsustainable, so shelve it.

                            This. No silly confirmed semi final spots for the much weaker Aussie conference, and for the PI team give a concrete date, eg 2022, to add that team, and maybe one from Japan to keep the teams even.

                            For weaker teams, like the Chiefs πŸ˜‰ , it will give them somebody to beat. (Getting in early)

                            M Offline
                            M Offline
                            Machpants
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #543

                            @Kirwan said in 'Super Rugby' 2021:

                            @shark said in 'Super Rugby' 2021:

                            It's all becoming a little mundane. Just organise the 5+5 comp - no conferences and a four team finals series - and let performances on the field do the talking. When we end up with four Kiwi sides in the finals, the point will be proven. The Pacifika idea is cute, but highly likely to be unsustainable, so shelve it.

                            This. No silly confirmed semi final spots for the much weaker Aussie conference, and for the PI team give a concrete date, eg 2022, to add that team, and maybe one from Japan to keep the teams even.

                            For weaker teams, like the Chiefs πŸ˜‰ , it will give them somebody to beat. (Getting in early)

                            Works for me, sad to not play Bok sides tho. Well when they are here, not so keen on them playing their games in the afternoon making it such as shit NZ time - too late to stay up, fkn early to get up 3am-5am, worst possible times

                            KirwanK 1 Reply Last reply
                            2
                            • M Machpants

                              @Kirwan said in 'Super Rugby' 2021:

                              @shark said in 'Super Rugby' 2021:

                              It's all becoming a little mundane. Just organise the 5+5 comp - no conferences and a four team finals series - and let performances on the field do the talking. When we end up with four Kiwi sides in the finals, the point will be proven. The Pacifika idea is cute, but highly likely to be unsustainable, so shelve it.

                              This. No silly confirmed semi final spots for the much weaker Aussie conference, and for the PI team give a concrete date, eg 2022, to add that team, and maybe one from Japan to keep the teams even.

                              For weaker teams, like the Chiefs πŸ˜‰ , it will give them somebody to beat. (Getting in early)

                              Works for me, sad to not play Bok sides tho. Well when they are here, not so keen on them playing their games in the afternoon making it such as shit NZ time - too late to stay up, fkn early to get up 3am-5am, worst possible times

                              KirwanK Offline
                              KirwanK Offline
                              Kirwan
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #544

                              @Machpants said in 'Super Rugby' 2021:

                              @Kirwan said in 'Super Rugby' 2021:

                              @shark said in 'Super Rugby' 2021:

                              It's all becoming a little mundane. Just organise the 5+5 comp - no conferences and a four team finals series - and let performances on the field do the talking. When we end up with four Kiwi sides in the finals, the point will be proven. The Pacifika idea is cute, but highly likely to be unsustainable, so shelve it.

                              This. No silly confirmed semi final spots for the much weaker Aussie conference, and for the PI team give a concrete date, eg 2022, to add that team, and maybe one from Japan to keep the teams even.

                              For weaker teams, like the Chiefs πŸ˜‰ , it will give them somebody to beat. (Getting in early)

                              Works for me, sad to not play Bok sides tho. Well when they are here, not so keen on them playing their games in the afternoon making it such as shit NZ time - too late to stay up, fkn early to get up 3am-5am, worst possible times

                              That's something else they can keep, earlier game times. Some afternoon rugby is much more kid friendly.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              4
                              • KiwiwombleK Offline
                                KiwiwombleK Offline
                                Kiwiwomble
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #545

                                how good have the sunday avo games been! have to say that was always one of the good things about football in the uk, down the pub/ground to watch avo game and you could still kick on after

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                1
                                • KirwanK Kirwan

                                  @shark said in 'Super Rugby' 2021:

                                  It's all becoming a little mundane. Just organise the 5+5 comp - no conferences and a four team finals series - and let performances on the field do the talking. When we end up with four Kiwi sides in the finals, the point will be proven. The Pacifika idea is cute, but highly likely to be unsustainable, so shelve it.

                                  This. No silly confirmed semi final spots for the much weaker Aussie conference, and for the PI team give a concrete date, eg 2022, to add that team, and maybe one from Japan to keep the teams even.

                                  For weaker teams, like the Chiefs πŸ˜‰ , it will give them somebody to beat. (Getting in early)

                                  StargazerS Offline
                                  StargazerS Offline
                                  Stargazer
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #546

                                  @Kirwan said in 'Super Rugby' 2021:

                                  @shark said in 'Super Rugby' 2021:

                                  It's all becoming a little mundane. Just organise the 5+5 comp - no conferences and a four team finals series - and let performances on the field do the talking. When we end up with four Kiwi sides in the finals, the point will be proven. The Pacifika idea is cute, but highly likely to be unsustainable, so shelve it.

                                  This. No silly confirmed semi final spots for the much weaker Aussie conference, and for the PI team give a concrete date, eg 2022, to add that team, and maybe one from Japan to keep the teams even.

                                  For weaker teams, like the Chiefs πŸ˜‰ , it will give them somebody to beat. (Getting in early)

                                  This is essential. One of the main criticisms of Super Rugby over the last few years - and something that was finally going to change, next year - was the automatic qualification for the finals of the highest ranked team in the Aussie conference and the highest ranked team of the SA conference, despite the teams in those conferences having an easier schedule by not having to play all NZ teams and still sometimes ending up on a lower competition points total than several other teams. The game schedule shouldn't favour teams based on the country they're based in.

                                  Btw, I'll also miss the games against teams like the Sharks, Stormers and Jaguares (and the pre-2019 Lions). I think we lose something by not playing SA teams. IMO, we're not going to gain anything by re-admitting the Force. I'm only for adding a PI team if it's based in the PIs and provides a pathway for players overthere. Obviously, no problem with propping up their squad with players now based in Europe (or not picked in NZ or Aus), but I assume the Europe based players will only say goodbye to their European wages if a sponsor of the PI team can pay good salaries or if they're at the end of their overseas' carreers.

                                  mariner4lifeM 1 Reply Last reply
                                  3
                                  • StargazerS Stargazer

                                    @Kirwan said in 'Super Rugby' 2021:

                                    @shark said in 'Super Rugby' 2021:

                                    It's all becoming a little mundane. Just organise the 5+5 comp - no conferences and a four team finals series - and let performances on the field do the talking. When we end up with four Kiwi sides in the finals, the point will be proven. The Pacifika idea is cute, but highly likely to be unsustainable, so shelve it.

                                    This. No silly confirmed semi final spots for the much weaker Aussie conference, and for the PI team give a concrete date, eg 2022, to add that team, and maybe one from Japan to keep the teams even.

                                    For weaker teams, like the Chiefs πŸ˜‰ , it will give them somebody to beat. (Getting in early)

                                    This is essential. One of the main criticisms of Super Rugby over the last few years - and something that was finally going to change, next year - was the automatic qualification for the finals of the highest ranked team in the Aussie conference and the highest ranked team of the SA conference, despite the teams in those conferences having an easier schedule by not having to play all NZ teams and still sometimes ending up on a lower competition points total than several other teams. The game schedule shouldn't favour teams based on the country they're based in.

                                    Btw, I'll also miss the games against teams like the Sharks, Stormers and Jaguares (and the pre-2019 Lions). I think we lose something by not playing SA teams. IMO, we're not going to gain anything by re-admitting the Force. I'm only for adding a PI team if it's based in the PIs and provides a pathway for players overthere. Obviously, no problem with propping up their squad with players now based in Europe (or not picked in NZ or Aus), but I assume the Europe based players will only say goodbye to their European wages if a sponsor of the PI team can pay good salaries or if they're at the end of their overseas' carreers.

                                    mariner4lifeM Offline
                                    mariner4lifeM Offline
                                    mariner4life
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #547

                                    @Stargazer playing the SA teams so regularly, and over there, was of real benefit to NZ rugby as a whole. I'll sort of miss them too.

                                    But then, in those early days, i was a night owl working in hospo, or out drinking piss until all hours, so i would watch a lot of games in the republic. These days? I'll not even watch a recording. Just the sports news highlights.

                                    I'm cool with 5+5, just get it done

                                    (i also highly doubt NZ will end up with 4 semi finalists).

                                    KiwiwombleK antipodeanA 2 Replies Last reply
                                    3
                                    • mariner4lifeM mariner4life

                                      @Stargazer playing the SA teams so regularly, and over there, was of real benefit to NZ rugby as a whole. I'll sort of miss them too.

                                      But then, in those early days, i was a night owl working in hospo, or out drinking piss until all hours, so i would watch a lot of games in the republic. These days? I'll not even watch a recording. Just the sports news highlights.

                                      I'm cool with 5+5, just get it done

                                      (i also highly doubt NZ will end up with 4 semi finalists).

                                      KiwiwombleK Offline
                                      KiwiwombleK Offline
                                      Kiwiwomble
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #548

                                      @mariner4life

                                      this ^ for me the practical side of watching outweighs seeing slightly higher quality

                                      lets not forget, NZ teams won the first 6 championships, so NZ did ok at building its own quality, its not like it took years for us to get up to speed

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • antipodeanA Offline
                                        antipodeanA Offline
                                        antipodean
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #549

                                        alt text

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        2
                                        • mariner4lifeM mariner4life

                                          @Stargazer playing the SA teams so regularly, and over there, was of real benefit to NZ rugby as a whole. I'll sort of miss them too.

                                          But then, in those early days, i was a night owl working in hospo, or out drinking piss until all hours, so i would watch a lot of games in the republic. These days? I'll not even watch a recording. Just the sports news highlights.

                                          I'm cool with 5+5, just get it done

                                          (i also highly doubt NZ will end up with 4 semi finalists).

                                          antipodeanA Offline
                                          antipodeanA Offline
                                          antipodean
                                          wrote on last edited by antipodean
                                          #550

                                          @mariner4life said in 'Super Rugby' 2021:

                                          (i also highly doubt NZ will end up with 4 semi finalists).

                                          Probs three, but definitely two home semis.

                                          Also this seems like a lot of angst for a one year competition.

                                          mariner4lifeM KiwiwombleK M 3 Replies Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Search
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Search