Skip to content
  • Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

  • Tipping
  • Team Sheets
  • Highlights
  • Results
    • All Blacks

      Search every All Blacks Test. Filter results by year, opposition, location, venue, city and RWC stage

    • Super Rugby

      Search every Super Rugby since match 1996

    • NPC

      Search NPC results. Only first division matches from 1976-2005. All results from the 14 team competition (2006-present) are included

'Super Rugby' 2021

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Sports Talk
1.9k Posts 81 Posters 169.5k Views 5 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • CrucialC Crucial

    @Rapido said in 'Super Rugby' 2021:

    @Crucial said in 'Super Rugby' 2021:

    @Rapido said in 'Super Rugby' 2021:

    @Crucial said in 'Super Rugby' 2021:

    @Rapido It looks like you are re-arranging the NPC in the North and sticking with Super in the south.

    We have things about right as it is with regard to high quality teams. If you want to add more you dilute the talent and then run into problems of how to dilute only the NI because to bring the Crusaders on par you'd have to ditch Ta$man from there and send them where?

    You can never quite win with our geography and populations but years of Super have shown us that the imabalances are through recruiting, not population.

    See my post above about NPC re-draw in north. For possible franshise border changes.

    It is still crazy IMO.
    You are still leaving two of the top provinces wedded while splitting and re-shaping everyone else.
    Splitting Ta$man and Canterbury wouldn't be an option either. Ta$man have built from being a feeder to the Saders. Take that away and they lose a lot of their attraction to players.

    What? Who is splitting Ta$man?

    It is your only option for not leaving the Crusaders untouched and strong while fucking up everyone else.

    RapidoR Offline
    RapidoR Offline
    Rapido
    wrote on last edited by Rapido
    #1235

    @Crucial said in 'Super Rugby' 2021:

    @Rapido said in 'Super Rugby' 2021:

    @Crucial said in 'Super Rugby' 2021:

    @Rapido said in 'Super Rugby' 2021:

    @Crucial said in 'Super Rugby' 2021:

    @Rapido It looks like you are re-arranging the NPC in the North and sticking with Super in the south.

    We have things about right as it is with regard to high quality teams. If you want to add more you dilute the talent and then run into problems of how to dilute only the NI because to bring the Crusaders on par you'd have to ditch Ta$man from there and send them where?

    You can never quite win with our geography and populations but years of Super have shown us that the imabalances are through recruiting, not population.

    See my post above about NPC re-draw in north. For possible franshise border changes.

    It is still crazy IMO.
    You are still leaving two of the top provinces wedded while splitting and re-shaping everyone else.
    Splitting Ta$man and Canterbury wouldn't be an option either. Ta$man have built from being a feeder to the Saders. Take that away and they lose a lot of their attraction to players.

    What? Who is splitting Ta$man?

    It is your only option for not leaving the Crusaders untouched and strong while fucking up everyone else.

    Ah. No, I mean the comp will not be even as long as the Crusaders hoover up every country boy with the Lincoln connection as well as retain so much talent with good coaches and adminstrators. Eventually someone in that organisation will fuck it up, or people like Robertson and Riach move on and their replacements aren't as good.

    It would be good (and quicker) if NZRU could force or draft players while re-establishing the comp. Like early S12, but ownership structures have changed, probably not likely.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • CrucialC Offline
      CrucialC Offline
      Crucial
      wrote on last edited by
      #1236

      We have discussed before how a draft wouldn't work in NZ.
      IMO we fucked up a lot of the parochial aspect of NZ rugby and the supporters bragging rights when we set up the franchises. It fucked up even more when the franchise based provinces became the route to pro rugby.
      Over time at least we stemmed that a little by the re-jig of NPC and franchises showing more willingness to appoint from 'lesser' unions and the franchises have been going long enough that they have attracted their own support levels.
      Re-setting all that again is crazy. I wouldn't want to become a Blues supporter. It has taken me decades to get my head around supporting a Waikato based team.

      RapidoR KiwiwombleK 2 Replies Last reply
      0
      • CrucialC Crucial

        We have discussed before how a draft wouldn't work in NZ.
        IMO we fucked up a lot of the parochial aspect of NZ rugby and the supporters bragging rights when we set up the franchises. It fucked up even more when the franchise based provinces became the route to pro rugby.
        Over time at least we stemmed that a little by the re-jig of NPC and franchises showing more willingness to appoint from 'lesser' unions and the franchises have been going long enough that they have attracted their own support levels.
        Re-setting all that again is crazy. I wouldn't want to become a Blues supporter. It has taken me decades to get my head around supporting a Waikato based team.

        RapidoR Offline
        RapidoR Offline
        Rapido
        wrote on last edited by
        #1237

        @Crucial said in 'Super Rugby' 2021:

        a Blues supporter

        Who did you support in the Lomu and Vidiri Blues years? Genuinely curious.

        I know what you mean. About the original borders. But having expansion teams from other countries has bothered me way more than our internal border changes.

        CrucialC 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • CrucialC Crucial

          We have discussed before how a draft wouldn't work in NZ.
          IMO we fucked up a lot of the parochial aspect of NZ rugby and the supporters bragging rights when we set up the franchises. It fucked up even more when the franchise based provinces became the route to pro rugby.
          Over time at least we stemmed that a little by the re-jig of NPC and franchises showing more willingness to appoint from 'lesser' unions and the franchises have been going long enough that they have attracted their own support levels.
          Re-setting all that again is crazy. I wouldn't want to become a Blues supporter. It has taken me decades to get my head around supporting a Waikato based team.

          KiwiwombleK Offline
          KiwiwombleK Offline
          Kiwiwomble
          wrote on last edited by
          #1238

          @Crucial said in 'Super Rugby' 2021:

          We have discussed before how a draft wouldn't work in NZ.
          IMO we fucked up a lot of the parochial aspect of NZ rugby and the supporters bragging rights when we set up the franchises. It fucked up even more when the franchise based provinces became the route to pro rugby.
          Over time at least we stemmed that a little by the re-jig of NPC and franchises showing more willingness to appoint from 'lesser' unions and the franchises have been going long enough that they have attracted their own support levels.
          Re-setting all that again is crazy. I wouldn't want to become a Blues supporter. It has taken me decades to get my head around supporting a Waikato based team.

          agree with the first half of that....but you know there no rule saying you have to support the team covering your area

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • RapidoR Offline
            RapidoR Offline
            Rapido
            wrote on last edited by Rapido
            #1239

            Rough populations: (if split Auckland in 3, and re-jig the Auckland/Manukau border)

            North Auckland: 585,000
            Auckland: 682,000
            South Auckland: 563,000
            Chiefs: 806,000
            LNI: 580,00
            Hurricanes (Greater Wellington): 527,000
            Crusaders: 818,000
            Highlanders: 337,000

            (based on 2018 data)

            pukunuiP 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • RapidoR Offline
              RapidoR Offline
              Rapido
              wrote on last edited by Rapido
              #1240

              and my original proposal, splitting the Chiefs.

              North Auckland: 585,000
              Auckland: 1,245,000
              Greater Waikato: 482,000
              BOP + Gisborne: 374,000
              LNI: 580,00
              Greater Wellington: 527,000
              Crusaders: 818,000
              Highlanders: 337,000

              SnowyS 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • RapidoR Rapido

                and my original proposal, splitting the Chiefs.

                North Auckland: 585,000
                Auckland: 1,245,000
                Greater Waikato: 482,000
                BOP + Gisborne: 374,000
                LNI: 580,00
                Greater Wellington: 527,000
                Crusaders: 818,000
                Highlanders: 337,000

                SnowyS Offline
                SnowyS Offline
                Snowy
                wrote on last edited by
                #1241

                @Rapido Got something like registered player numbers to base that on?

                The demographics might change a bit if you include the over 70s women in the BOP region for example.

                taniwharugbyT 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • SnowyS Snowy

                  @Rapido Got something like registered player numbers to base that on?

                  The demographics might change a bit if you include the over 70s women in the BOP region for example.

                  taniwharugbyT Offline
                  taniwharugbyT Offline
                  taniwharugby
                  wrote on last edited by taniwharugby
                  #1242

                  @Snowy I thought that Delloitte State of the Nation report detailed player numbers?

                  It will be on this site somewhere I expect...🔭

                  SnowyS 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • taniwharugbyT taniwharugby

                    @Snowy I thought that Delloitte State of the Nation report detailed player numbers?

                    It will be on this site somewhere I expect...🔭

                    SnowyS Offline
                    SnowyS Offline
                    Snowy
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #1243

                    @taniwharugby Not sure that I would trust that.

                    We are all Polish women after all?

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • SnowyS Offline
                      SnowyS Offline
                      Snowy
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #1244

                      @taniwharugby Yep. https://www2.deloitte.com/content/dam/Deloitte/nz/Documents/consumer-business/nz-en-2019-state-of-the-unions-report.pdf

                      Also:

                      https://www.nzrugby.co.nz/assets/Insights-Tool-Guide.pdf

                      https://www.nzrugby.co.nz/assets/Insights-Tool-Guide.pdf

                      A bit more there and a link to the guide.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      1
                      • RapidoR Rapido

                        Rough populations: (if split Auckland in 3, and re-jig the Auckland/Manukau border)

                        North Auckland: 585,000
                        Auckland: 682,000
                        South Auckland: 563,000
                        Chiefs: 806,000
                        LNI: 580,00
                        Hurricanes (Greater Wellington): 527,000
                        Crusaders: 818,000
                        Highlanders: 337,000

                        (based on 2018 data)

                        pukunuiP Offline
                        pukunuiP Offline
                        pukunui
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #1245

                        @Rapido Got to admit. Yours is probably the worst proposal I have seen out of all of them.
                        It simultaneously kills the golden goose that is our 5 strong franchises, throws away the 20 years of history built on those “new” teams, creates new artificial teams with no existing united supporter base, dilutes the player quality in the comp overall, severely depletes the NI sides while keeping a team that has dominated 4 season in a row (and frankly much of the last 20 years) intact and will probably damage the npc by filling some of the gap between the current levels.

                        If we are going to destroy our Super sides then can them altogether and build a robust two tiered system with the existing npc and heartland sides. No crossover games but automatic promotion and relegation.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        9
                        • mofitzy_M mofitzy_

                          A Pasifika team only makes sense if they are based in Suva or Honolulu etc.

                          sparkyS Offline
                          sparkyS Offline
                          sparky
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #1246

                          @mofitzy_ said in 'Super Rugby' 2021:

                          A Pasifika team only makes sense if they are based in Suva or Honolulu etc.

                          Agree with this. People saying Auckland needs a Pasifika Super Franchise have forgotten about the Blues.

                          M 1 Reply Last reply
                          1
                          • sparkyS sparky

                            @mofitzy_ said in 'Super Rugby' 2021:

                            A Pasifika team only makes sense if they are based in Suva or Honolulu etc.

                            Agree with this. People saying Auckland needs a Pasifika Super Franchise have forgotten about the Blues.

                            M Offline
                            M Offline
                            Machpants
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #1247

                            @sparky said in 'Super Rugby' 2021:

                            @mofitzy_ said in 'Super Rugby' 2021:

                            A Pasifika team only makes sense if they are based in Suva or Honolulu etc.

                            Agree with this. People saying Auckland needs a Pasifika Super Franchise have forgotten about the Blues.

                            SnowyS 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • M Machpants

                              @sparky said in 'Super Rugby' 2021:

                              @mofitzy_ said in 'Super Rugby' 2021:

                              A Pasifika team only makes sense if they are based in Suva or Honolulu etc.

                              Agree with this. People saying Auckland needs a Pasifika Super Franchise have forgotten about the Blues.

                              SnowyS Offline
                              SnowyS Offline
                              Snowy
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #1248

                              @Machpants said in 'Super Rugby' 2021:

                              @sparky said in 'Super Rugby' 2021:

                              @mofitzy_ said in 'Super Rugby' 2021:

                              A Pasifika team only makes sense if they are based in Suva or Honolulu etc.

                              Agree with this. People saying Auckland needs a Pasifika Super Franchise have forgotten about the Blues.

                              What happened there? I got nothing.

                              M 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • SnowyS Snowy

                                @Machpants said in 'Super Rugby' 2021:

                                @sparky said in 'Super Rugby' 2021:

                                @mofitzy_ said in 'Super Rugby' 2021:

                                A Pasifika team only makes sense if they are based in Suva or Honolulu etc.

                                Agree with this. People saying Auckland needs a Pasifika Super Franchise have forgotten about the Blues.

                                What happened there? I got nothing.

                                M Offline
                                M Offline
                                Machpants
                                wrote on last edited by Machpants
                                #1249

                                @Snowy QFT

                                Quoted For Truth

                                nah I just fucked up, don't even know what I was typing in there when I got interupted

                                antipodeanA 1 Reply Last reply
                                3
                                • RapidoR Rapido

                                  @Crucial said in 'Super Rugby' 2021:

                                  a Blues supporter

                                  Who did you support in the Lomu and Vidiri Blues years? Genuinely curious.

                                  I know what you mean. About the original borders. But having expansion teams from other countries has bothered me way more than our internal border changes.

                                  CrucialC Offline
                                  CrucialC Offline
                                  Crucial
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #1250

                                  @Rapido said in 'Super Rugby' 2021:

                                  @Crucial said in 'Super Rugby' 2021:

                                  a Blues supporter

                                  Who did you support in the Lomu and Vidiri Blues years? Genuinely curious.

                                  I'm not sure how many times I have explained this. Usually it is after the usual derision for changing allegiance.

                                  When Super first started I only took a passing interest. It was a gimmick based in the big towns.
                                  You are correct that, in theory I should have been a Blues supporter and while I watched them to see those two players the underlying feeling was that the AUCKLAND Blues didn't give a rats about genuinely selecting from Counties. Players were overlooked in favour of average Aucklanders. I felt very little connection. I viewed these new teams as just companies. They didn't warrant my support just by being.
                                  A little later I was living in Wellington with a young son keen on going to matches with his mates. He was playing for a local club and getting all the promotional stuff. When you have Jonah, Cully and Tana all playing it was pretty hard to not go to games and therefore I 'followed' the Canes more than being a supporter but over the years they were the team I cheered for.
                                  That all changed when the Hammatuer decided he could change the whole culture of the team and along with it the exciting style that was fun to watch. I got sick of that clown quite quickly. It coincided with the change to the NPC and the way players were being selected. CM players finally had a proper pathway and I got to watch many of them play at the next level in the Chiefs. Chiefs have my support because generally they select and develop more CM players than other franchises.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  4
                                  • M Machpants

                                    @Snowy QFT

                                    Quoted For Truth

                                    nah I just fucked up, don't even know what I was typing in there when I got interupted

                                    antipodeanA Offline
                                    antipodeanA Offline
                                    antipodean
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #1251

                                    @Machpants said in 'Super Rugby' 2021:

                                    @Snowy QFT

                                    Quoted For Truth

                                    nah I just fucked up, don't even know what I was typing in there when I got interupted

                                    Still in the top 50% of posts

                                    SnowyS 1 Reply Last reply
                                    3
                                    • antipodeanA antipodean

                                      @Machpants said in 'Super Rugby' 2021:

                                      @Snowy QFT

                                      Quoted For Truth

                                      nah I just fucked up, don't even know what I was typing in there when I got interupted

                                      Still in the top 50% of posts

                                      SnowyS Offline
                                      SnowyS Offline
                                      Snowy
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #1252

                                      @antipodean said in 'Super Rugby' 2021:

                                      @Machpants said in 'Super Rugby' 2021:

                                      @Snowy QFT

                                      Quoted For Truth

                                      nah I just fucked up, don't even know what I was typing in there when I got interupted

                                      Still in the top 50% of posts

                                      Harsh.

                                      @Machpants said in 'Super Rugby' 2021:

                                      nah I just fucked up, don't even know what I was typing in there

                                      That is one of the greatest posts . Top 3%.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • M Offline
                                        M Offline
                                        mikey07
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #1253

                                        I struggle to see how the Force can be included they were the whipping boys for the Aussie teams how are they going to go having to come over and play in NZ

                                        antipodeanA 1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • M mikey07

                                          I struggle to see how the Force can be included they were the whipping boys for the Aussie teams how are they going to go having to come over and play in NZ

                                          antipodeanA Offline
                                          antipodeanA Offline
                                          antipodean
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #1254

                                          @mikey07 said in 'Super Rugby' 2021:

                                          I struggle to see how the Force can be included they were the whipping boys for the Aussie teams how are they going to go having to come over and play in NZ

                                          That's easy to answer: "Something, something, Twiggy, 20 year plan."

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          1
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Search
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Search