The Cane vs Savea Debate
-
@Kirwan said in The Cane vs Savea Debate:
@KiwiMurph said in The Cane vs Savea Debate:
It's one of the issues I had with Hansen. He delayed bringing Mo'unga into the AB fray. Mounga won a Super title at 10 in 2017 - he should have been in the AB squad in 2017.
He got delayed because he had holes in his game, and BB had less.
ABs still need to pick their best players to win Tests.
Even in the semi we were hiding Mounga from his channel and it cost us dearly.
It’s up to the player to fix those issues and leapfrog the other player. BB had to fix his defence to start regularly why shouldn’t RM have had to?
Hopefully he has, as after BB and RM is a steep drop off.
I wasn't talking about instead of BB. I meant the AB squad at all - he wasn't including in the ABs at all in 2017 except for that ABs midweek game vs France XV where they included anyone they could find (heck Hansen even picked Akira for that game).
On the end of year tour 2017 they selected two 10s BB and Lima only despite Lima's form trending downwards throughout 2017 (including a really bad performance as 10 in the 3rd Bledisloe in Brisbane).
@KiwiMurph said in The Cane vs Savea Debate:
@Kirwan said in The Cane vs Savea Debate:
@KiwiMurph said in The Cane vs Savea Debate:
It's one of the issues I had with Hansen. He delayed bringing Mo'unga into the AB fray. Mounga won a Super title at 10 in 2017 - he should have been in the AB squad in 2017.
He got delayed because he had holes in his game, and BB had less.
ABs still need to pick their best players to win Tests.
Even in the semi we were hiding Mounga from his channel and it cost us dearly.
It’s up to the player to fix those issues and leapfrog the other player. BB had to fix his defence to start regularly why shouldn’t RM have had to?
Hopefully he has, as after BB and RM is a steep drop off.
I wasn't talking about instead of BB. I meant the AB squad at all - he wasn't including in the ABs at all in 2017 except for that ABs midweek game vs France XV where they included anyone they could find (heck Hansen even picked Akira for that game).
On the end of year tour 2017 they selected two 10s BB and Lima only despite Lima's form trending downwards throughout 2017 (including a really bad performance as 10 in the 3rd Bledisloe in Brisbane).
Ahh, Lima. Talk about starting from the manor born. Showed you can hit the ground running from the start, but he didn’t maintain it.
Shame he left so early too. Am sure if they knew he was going to leave they would punted on RM, but who knows!
-
@KiwiMurph said in The Cane vs Savea Debate:
It's one of the issues I had with Hansen. He delayed bringing Mo'unga into the AB fray. Mounga won a Super title at 10 in 2017 - he should have been in the AB squad in 2017.
He got delayed because he had holes in his game, and BB had less.
ABs still need to pick their best players to win Tests.
Even in the semi we were hiding Mounga from his channel and it cost us dearly.
It’s up to the player to fix those issues and leapfrog the other player. BB had to fix his defence to start regularly why shouldn’t RM have had to?
Hopefully he has, as after BB and RM is a steep drop off.
@Kirwan said in The Cane vs Savea Debate:
@KiwiMurph said in The Cane vs Savea Debate:
It's one of the issues I had with Hansen. He delayed bringing Mo'unga into the AB fray. Mounga won a Super title at 10 in 2017 - he should have been in the AB squad in 2017.
He got delayed because he had holes in his game, and BB had less.
ABs still need to pick their best players to win Tests.
Even in the semi we were hiding Mounga from his channel and it cost us dearly.
It’s up to the player to fix those issues and leapfrog the other player. BB had to fix his defence to start regularly why shouldn’t RM have had to?
Hopefully he has, as after BB and RM is a steep drop off.
Let's not forget that BB was the reigning World Rugby POTY at the time. It's not like we needed to find a new 10 at hat stage
-
@Nepia said in The Cane vs Savea Debate:
@shark said in The Cane vs Savea Debate:
It's always worked well for the All Blacks when we've looked to alter our team structure and move away from our strengths because of another team's strength. We're going to have to import some Afrikaans.
Odd for you to bring this up in this thread considering the benching of Cane last year was this exact scenario and England’s early run might have been stopped if we had his dominant tackling.
Less so the benching of Cane than the selection of Barrett at 6 in order to counter England's line-out strength. Maybe Cane was collateral damage in that scenario, but do you seriously think an openside flankers' somewhat fabled tackling ability was going to make the difference? Nooo.
@shark said in The Cane vs Savea Debate:
@Nepia said in The Cane vs Savea Debate:
@shark said in The Cane vs Savea Debate:
It's always worked well for the All Blacks when we've looked to alter our team structure and move away from our strengths because of another team's strength. We're going to have to import some Afrikaans.
Odd for you to bring this up in this thread considering the benching of Cane last year was this exact scenario and England’s early run might have been stopped if we had his dominant tackling.
Less so the benching of Cane than the selection of Barrett at 6 in order to counter England's line-out strength. Maybe Cane was collateral damage in that scenario, but do you seriously think an openside flankers' somewhat fabled tackling ability was going to make the difference? Nooo.
Lol this is joe post, right? You're seriously saying in a match where the opposition regularly gained metres and smashed us in the breakdown - which were significant contributors to the result - that having a better tackler on the field wouldn't have helped?
-
@Nepia said in The Cane vs Savea Debate:
@shark said in The Cane vs Savea Debate:
It's always worked well for the All Blacks when we've looked to alter our team structure and move away from our strengths because of another team's strength. We're going to have to import some Afrikaans.
Odd for you to bring this up in this thread considering the benching of Cane last year was this exact scenario and England’s early run might have been stopped if we had his dominant tackling.
Less so the benching of Cane than the selection of Barrett at 6 in order to counter England's line-out strength. Maybe Cane was collateral damage in that scenario, but do you seriously think an openside flankers' somewhat fabled tackling ability was going to make the difference? Nooo.
@shark said in The Cane vs Savea Debate:
@Nepia said in The Cane vs Savea Debate:
@shark said in The Cane vs Savea Debate:
It's always worked well for the All Blacks when we've looked to alter our team structure and move away from our strengths because of another team's strength. We're going to have to import some Afrikaans.
Odd for you to bring this up in this thread considering the benching of Cane last year was this exact scenario and England’s early run might have been stopped if we had his dominant tackling.
Less so the benching of Cane than the selection of Barrett at 6 in order to counter England's line-out strength. Maybe Cane was collateral damage in that scenario, but do you seriously think an openside flankers' somewhat fabled tackling ability was going to make the difference? Nooo.
Selection of Barrett over Cane is kinda the same thing.
Whilst I agree Cane's tackling ability has taken on mystical proportions I do think his presence in the SF would have made a difference.
-
@shark said in The Cane vs Savea Debate:
@Nepia said in The Cane vs Savea Debate:
@shark said in The Cane vs Savea Debate:
It's always worked well for the All Blacks when we've looked to alter our team structure and move away from our strengths because of another team's strength. We're going to have to import some Afrikaans.
Odd for you to bring this up in this thread considering the benching of Cane last year was this exact scenario and England’s early run might have been stopped if we had his dominant tackling.
Less so the benching of Cane than the selection of Barrett at 6 in order to counter England's line-out strength. Maybe Cane was collateral damage in that scenario, but do you seriously think an openside flankers' somewhat fabled tackling ability was going to make the difference? Nooo.
Selection of Barrett over Cane is kinda the same thing.
Whilst I agree Cane's tackling ability has taken on mystical proportions I do think his presence in the SF would have made a difference.
@booboo said in The Cane vs Savea Debate:
@shark said in The Cane vs Savea Debate:
@Nepia said in The Cane vs Savea Debate:
@shark said in The Cane vs Savea Debate:
It's always worked well for the All Blacks when we've looked to alter our team structure and move away from our strengths because of another team's strength. We're going to have to import some Afrikaans.
Odd for you to bring this up in this thread considering the benching of Cane last year was this exact scenario and England’s early run might have been stopped if we had his dominant tackling.
Less so the benching of Cane than the selection of Barrett at 6 in order to counter England's line-out strength. Maybe Cane was collateral damage in that scenario, but do you seriously think an openside flankers' somewhat fabled tackling ability was going to make the difference? Nooo.
Selection of Barrett over Cane is kinda the same thing
Whilst I agree Cane's tackling ability has taken on mystical proportions I do think his presence in the SF would have made a difference.
I don’t think it was. I think (and wrongly IMO) they focused on the lineout concerns first and it was just a straight call between Ardie and Cane. The Whitelock / Retallick / Barrett trio seemed in stone. Captain at 8.
Again I think they misread it but that’s from my armchair
-
@booboo said in The Cane vs Savea Debate:
@shark said in The Cane vs Savea Debate:
@Nepia said in The Cane vs Savea Debate:
@shark said in The Cane vs Savea Debate:
It's always worked well for the All Blacks when we've looked to alter our team structure and move away from our strengths because of another team's strength. We're going to have to import some Afrikaans.
Odd for you to bring this up in this thread considering the benching of Cane last year was this exact scenario and England’s early run might have been stopped if we had his dominant tackling.
Less so the benching of Cane than the selection of Barrett at 6 in order to counter England's line-out strength. Maybe Cane was collateral damage in that scenario, but do you seriously think an openside flankers' somewhat fabled tackling ability was going to make the difference? Nooo.
Selection of Barrett over Cane is kinda the same thing
Whilst I agree Cane's tackling ability has taken on mystical proportions I do think his presence in the SF would have made a difference.
I don’t think it was. I think (and wrongly IMO) they focused on the lineout concerns first and it was just a straight call between Ardie and Cane. The Whitelock / Retallick / Barrett trio seemed in stone. Captain at 8.
Again I think they misread it but that’s from my armchair
@ACT-Crusader said in The Cane vs Savea Debate:
@booboo said in The Cane vs Savea Debate:
@shark said in The Cane vs Savea Debate:
@Nepia said in The Cane vs Savea Debate:
@shark said in The Cane vs Savea Debate:
It's always worked well for the All Blacks when we've looked to alter our team structure and move away from our strengths because of another team's strength. We're going to have to import some Afrikaans.
Odd for you to bring this up in this thread considering the benching of Cane last year was this exact scenario and England’s early run might have been stopped if we had his dominant tackling.
Less so the benching of Cane than the selection of Barrett at 6 in order to counter England's line-out strength. Maybe Cane was collateral damage in that scenario, but do you seriously think an openside flankers' somewhat fabled tackling ability was going to make the difference? Nooo.
Selection of Barrett over Cane is kinda the same thing
Whilst I agree Cane's tackling ability has taken on mystical proportions I do think his presence in the SF would have made a difference.
I don’t think it was. I think (and wrongly IMO) they focused on the lineout concerns first and it was just a straight call between Ardie and Cane. The Whitelock / Retallick / Barrett trio seemed in stone. Captain at 8.
Again I think they misread it but that’s from my armchair
This is spot on, think I said the same in another post. The core of losing this game was Whitelock/Retallick/Read coming up empty. Ardie was probably our most consistent forward last year he was always going to win the head to head with Cane. Having Savea and Cane on the field at the same time was a pretty inspired decison and it had worked so well in the previous games, I just think Hansen outsmarted himself, but was not the losing of the game.
-
@booboo said in The Cane vs Savea Debate:
@shark said in The Cane vs Savea Debate:
@Nepia said in The Cane vs Savea Debate:
@shark said in The Cane vs Savea Debate:
It's always worked well for the All Blacks when we've looked to alter our team structure and move away from our strengths because of another team's strength. We're going to have to import some Afrikaans.
Odd for you to bring this up in this thread considering the benching of Cane last year was this exact scenario and England’s early run might have been stopped if we had his dominant tackling.
Less so the benching of Cane than the selection of Barrett at 6 in order to counter England's line-out strength. Maybe Cane was collateral damage in that scenario, but do you seriously think an openside flankers' somewhat fabled tackling ability was going to make the difference? Nooo.
Selection of Barrett over Cane is kinda the same thing
Whilst I agree Cane's tackling ability has taken on mystical proportions I do think his presence in the SF would have made a difference.
I don’t think it was. I think (and wrongly IMO) they focused on the lineout concerns first and it was just a straight call between Ardie and Cane. The Whitelock / Retallick / Barrett trio seemed in stone. Captain at 8.
Again I think they misread it but that’s from my armchair
@ACT-Crusader said in The Cane vs Savea Debate:
they focused on the lineout concerns first
Yet did little to utilise the advantage of selecting an extra lock.
Appeared we were gonna target thier line-out, but didn't, were we being trying to be tricky?
-
@ACT-Crusader said in The Cane vs Savea Debate:
they focused on the lineout concerns first
Yet did little to utilise the advantage of selecting an extra lock.
Appeared we were gonna target thier line-out, but didn't, were we being trying to be tricky?
@taniwharugby said in The Cane vs Savea Debate:
@ACT-Crusader said in The Cane vs Savea Debate:
they focused on the lineout concerns first
Yet did little to utilise the advantage of selecting an extra lock.
Appeared we were gonna target thier line-out, but didn't, were we being trying to be tricky?
It’s basically all Scott Barrett’s fault for only providing height, he should have played a lot more like Savea AND Cane as well.
I put the blame solely on him.
-
@taniwharugby said in The Cane vs Savea Debate:
@ACT-Crusader said in The Cane vs Savea Debate:
they focused on the lineout concerns first
Yet did little to utilise the advantage of selecting an extra lock.
Appeared we were gonna target thier line-out, but didn't, were we being trying to be tricky?
It’s basically all Scott Barrett’s fault for only providing height, he should have played a lot more like Savea AND Cane as well.
I put the blame solely on him.
@MN5 said in The Cane vs Savea Debate:
@taniwharugby said in The Cane vs Savea Debate:
@ACT-Crusader said in The Cane vs Savea Debate:
they focused on the lineout concerns first
Yet did little to utilise the advantage of selecting an extra lock.
Appeared we were gonna target thier line-out, but didn't, were we being trying to be tricky?
It’s basically all Scott Barrett’s fault for only providing height, he should have played a lot more like Savea AND Cane as well.
I put the blame solely on him.
07 was his fault too
-
@MN5 said in The Cane vs Savea Debate:
@taniwharugby said in The Cane vs Savea Debate:
@ACT-Crusader said in The Cane vs Savea Debate:
they focused on the lineout concerns first
Yet did little to utilise the advantage of selecting an extra lock.
Appeared we were gonna target thier line-out, but didn't, were we being trying to be tricky?
It’s basically all Scott Barrett’s fault for only providing height, he should have played a lot more like Savea AND Cane as well.
I put the blame solely on him.
07 was his fault too
@Machpants said in The Cane vs Savea Debate:
@MN5 said in The Cane vs Savea Debate:
@taniwharugby said in The Cane vs Savea Debate:
@ACT-Crusader said in The Cane vs Savea Debate:
they focused on the lineout concerns first
Yet did little to utilise the advantage of selecting an extra lock.
Appeared we were gonna target thier line-out, but didn't, were we being trying to be tricky?
It’s basically all Scott Barrett’s fault for only providing height, he should have played a lot more like Savea AND Cane as well.
I put the blame solely on him.
07 was his fault too
no, that was Leon MacDonald's. So was 2003.
I haven't worked out which Crusader to pin '99 on, but '95 was Mehrts.
-
@Machpants said in The Cane vs Savea Debate:
@MN5 said in The Cane vs Savea Debate:
@taniwharugby said in The Cane vs Savea Debate:
@ACT-Crusader said in The Cane vs Savea Debate:
they focused on the lineout concerns first
Yet did little to utilise the advantage of selecting an extra lock.
Appeared we were gonna target thier line-out, but didn't, were we being trying to be tricky?
It’s basically all Scott Barrett’s fault for only providing height, he should have played a lot more like Savea AND Cane as well.
I put the blame solely on him.
07 was his fault too
no, that was Leon MacDonald's. So was 2003.
I haven't worked out which Crusader to pin '99 on, but '95 was Mehrts.
@mariner4life said in The Cane vs Savea Debate:
@Machpants said in The Cane vs Savea Debate:
@MN5 said in The Cane vs Savea Debate:
@taniwharugby said in The Cane vs Savea Debate:
@ACT-Crusader said in The Cane vs Savea Debate:
they focused on the lineout concerns first
Yet did little to utilise the advantage of selecting an extra lock.
Appeared we were gonna target thier line-out, but didn't, were we being trying to be tricky?
It’s basically all Scott Barrett’s fault for only providing height, he should have played a lot more like Savea AND Cane as well.
I put the blame solely on him.
07 was his fault too
no, that was Leon MacDonald's. So was 2003.
I haven't worked out which Crusader to pin '99 on, but '95 was Mehrts.
Perennial favourite Reuben Thorne was the starting blindside in the 1999 semi final.
-
@mariner4life said in The Cane vs Savea Debate:
@Machpants said in The Cane vs Savea Debate:
@MN5 said in The Cane vs Savea Debate:
@taniwharugby said in The Cane vs Savea Debate:
@ACT-Crusader said in The Cane vs Savea Debate:
they focused on the lineout concerns first
Yet did little to utilise the advantage of selecting an extra lock.
Appeared we were gonna target thier line-out, but didn't, were we being trying to be tricky?
It’s basically all Scott Barrett’s fault for only providing height, he should have played a lot more like Savea AND Cane as well.
I put the blame solely on him.
07 was his fault too
no, that was Leon MacDonald's. So was 2003.
I haven't worked out which Crusader to pin '99 on, but '95 was Mehrts.
Perennial favourite Reuben Thorne was the starting blindside in the 1999 semi final.
@Donsteppa said in The Cane vs Savea Debate:
@mariner4life said in The Cane vs Savea Debate:
@Machpants said in The Cane vs Savea Debate:
@MN5 said in The Cane vs Savea Debate:
@taniwharugby said in The Cane vs Savea Debate:
@ACT-Crusader said in The Cane vs Savea Debate:
they focused on the lineout concerns first
Yet did little to utilise the advantage of selecting an extra lock.
Appeared we were gonna target thier line-out, but didn't, were we being trying to be tricky?
It’s basically all Scott Barrett’s fault for only providing height, he should have played a lot more like Savea AND Cane as well.
I put the blame solely on him.
07 was his fault too
no, that was Leon MacDonald's. So was 2003.
I haven't worked out which Crusader to pin '99 on, but '95 was Mehrts.
Perennial favourite Reuben Thorne was the starting blindside in the 1999 semi final.
-
@Machpants said in The Cane vs Savea Debate:
@MN5 said in The Cane vs Savea Debate:
@taniwharugby said in The Cane vs Savea Debate:
@ACT-Crusader said in The Cane vs Savea Debate:
they focused on the lineout concerns first
Yet did little to utilise the advantage of selecting an extra lock.
Appeared we were gonna target thier line-out, but didn't, were we being trying to be tricky?
It’s basically all Scott Barrett’s fault for only providing height, he should have played a lot more like Savea AND Cane as well.
I put the blame solely on him.
07 was his fault too
no, that was Leon MacDonald's. So was 2003.
I haven't worked out which Crusader to pin '99 on, but '95 was Mehrts.
@mariner4life said in The Cane vs Savea Debate:
@Machpants said in The Cane vs Savea Debate:
@MN5 said in The Cane vs Savea Debate:
@taniwharugby said in The Cane vs Savea Debate:
@ACT-Crusader said in The Cane vs Savea Debate:
they focused on the lineout concerns first
Yet did little to utilise the advantage of selecting an extra lock.
Appeared we were gonna target thier line-out, but didn't, were we being trying to be tricky?
It’s basically all Scott Barrett’s fault for only providing height, he should have played a lot more like Savea AND Cane as well.
I put the blame solely on him.
07 was his fault too
no, that was Leon MacDonald's. So was 2003.
I haven't worked out which Crusader to pin '99 on, but '95 was Mehrts.
On the plus side our wins in 2015, 2011 and 1987 can be laid at the respective doors of Sam Whitelock, Richie McCaw and Craig Green.
-
@mariner4life said in The Cane vs Savea Debate:
@Machpants said in The Cane vs Savea Debate:
@MN5 said in The Cane vs Savea Debate:
@taniwharugby said in The Cane vs Savea Debate:
@ACT-Crusader said in The Cane vs Savea Debate:
they focused on the lineout concerns first
Yet did little to utilise the advantage of selecting an extra lock.
Appeared we were gonna target thier line-out, but didn't, were we being trying to be tricky?
It’s basically all Scott Barrett’s fault for only providing height, he should have played a lot more like Savea AND Cane as well.
I put the blame solely on him.
07 was his fault too
no, that was Leon MacDonald's. So was 2003.
I haven't worked out which Crusader to pin '99 on, but '95 was Mehrts.
On the plus side our wins in 2015, 2011 and 1987 can be laid at the respective doors of Sam Whitelock, Richie McCaw and Craig Green.
-
@mariner4life said in The Cane vs Savea Debate:
@Machpants said in The Cane vs Savea Debate:
@MN5 said in The Cane vs Savea Debate:
@taniwharugby said in The Cane vs Savea Debate:
@ACT-Crusader said in The Cane vs Savea Debate:
they focused on the lineout concerns first
Yet did little to utilise the advantage of selecting an extra lock.
Appeared we were gonna target thier line-out, but didn't, were we being trying to be tricky?
It’s basically all Scott Barrett’s fault for only providing height, he should have played a lot more like Savea AND Cane as well.
I put the blame solely on him.
07 was his fault too
no, that was Leon MacDonald's. So was 2003.
I haven't worked out which Crusader to pin '99 on, but '95 was Mehrts.
Perennial favourite Reuben Thorne was the starting blindside in the 1999 semi final.
@Donsteppa said in The Cane vs Savea Debate:
@mariner4life said in The Cane vs Savea Debate:
@Machpants said in The Cane vs Savea Debate:
@MN5 said in The Cane vs Savea Debate:
@taniwharugby said in The Cane vs Savea Debate:
@ACT-Crusader said in The Cane vs Savea Debate:
they focused on the lineout concerns first
Yet did little to utilise the advantage of selecting an extra lock.
Appeared we were gonna target thier line-out, but didn't, were we being trying to be tricky?
It’s basically all Scott Barrett’s fault for only providing height, he should have played a lot more like Savea AND Cane as well.
I put the blame solely on him.
07 was his fault too
no, that was Leon MacDonald's. So was 2003.
I haven't worked out which Crusader to pin '99 on, but '95 was Mehrts.
Perennial favourite Reuben Thorne was the starting blindside in the 1999 semi final.
Glad you pointed that out. I don't think anyone noticed
-
@Donsteppa said in The Cane vs Savea Debate:
@mariner4life said in The Cane vs Savea Debate:
@Machpants said in The Cane vs Savea Debate:
@MN5 said in The Cane vs Savea Debate:
@taniwharugby said in The Cane vs Savea Debate:
@ACT-Crusader said in The Cane vs Savea Debate:
they focused on the lineout concerns first
Yet did little to utilise the advantage of selecting an extra lock.
Appeared we were gonna target thier line-out, but didn't, were we being trying to be tricky?
It’s basically all Scott Barrett’s fault for only providing height, he should have played a lot more like Savea AND Cane as well.
I put the blame solely on him.
07 was his fault too
no, that was Leon MacDonald's. So was 2003.
I haven't worked out which Crusader to pin '99 on, but '95 was Mehrts.
Perennial favourite Reuben Thorne was the starting blindside in the 1999 semi final.
Glad you pointed that out. I don't think anyone noticed
@Crucial said in The Cane vs Savea Debate:
@Donsteppa said in The Cane vs Savea Debate:
@mariner4life said in The Cane vs Savea Debate:
@Machpants said in The Cane vs Savea Debate:
@MN5 said in The Cane vs Savea Debate:
@taniwharugby said in The Cane vs Savea Debate:
@ACT-Crusader said in The Cane vs Savea Debate:
they focused on the lineout concerns first
Yet did little to utilise the advantage of selecting an extra lock.
Appeared we were gonna target thier line-out, but didn't, were we being trying to be tricky?
It’s basically all Scott Barrett’s fault for only providing height, he should have played a lot more like Savea AND Cane as well.
I put the blame solely on him.
07 was his fault too
no, that was Leon MacDonald's. So was 2003.
I haven't worked out which Crusader to pin '99 on, but '95 was Mehrts.
Perennial favourite Reuben Thorne was the starting blindside in the 1999 semi final.
Glad you pointed that out. I don't think anyone noticed
I remember a Stephen Jones article after the match saying something to the effect of: 'afterwards we had to check the programme to see if the All Blacks had selected a blindside'
-
@ACT-Crusader said in The Cane vs Savea Debate:
@booboo said in The Cane vs Savea Debate:
@shark said in The Cane vs Savea Debate:
@Nepia said in The Cane vs Savea Debate:
@shark said in The Cane vs Savea Debate:
It's always worked well for the All Blacks when we've looked to alter our team structure and move away from our strengths because of another team's strength. We're going to have to import some Afrikaans.
Odd for you to bring this up in this thread considering the benching of Cane last year was this exact scenario and England’s early run might have been stopped if we had his dominant tackling.
Less so the benching of Cane than the selection of Barrett at 6 in order to counter England's line-out strength. Maybe Cane was collateral damage in that scenario, but do you seriously think an openside flankers' somewhat fabled tackling ability was going to make the difference? Nooo.
Selection of Barrett over Cane is kinda the same thing
Whilst I agree Cane's tackling ability has taken on mystical proportions I do think his presence in the SF would have made a difference.
I don’t think it was. I think (and wrongly IMO) they focused on the lineout concerns first and it was just a straight call between Ardie and Cane. The Whitelock / Retallick / Barrett trio seemed in stone. Captain at 8.
Again I think they misread it but that’s from my armchair
This is spot on, think I said the same in another post. The core of losing this game was Whitelock/Retallick/Read coming up empty. Ardie was probably our most consistent forward last year he was always going to win the head to head with Cane. Having Savea and Cane on the field at the same time was a pretty inspired decison and it had worked so well in the previous games, I just think Hansen outsmarted himself, but was not the losing of the game.
@DMX said in The Cane vs Savea Debate:
This is spot on, think I said the same in another post. The core of losing this game was Whitelock/Retallick/Read coming up empty. Ardie was probably our most consistent forward last year he was always going to win the head to head with Cane. Having Savea and Cane on the field at the same time was a pretty inspired decison and it had worked so well in the previous games, I just think Hansen outsmarted himself, but was not the losing of the game.
Cane pre-injury this isn't even a debate, but coming off the injury they were pretty close. Read however was absolutely past it and a liability and in a winner takes all scenario should have been the one to ride the pine. I can't think of an AB who went so off the boil for so long and was allowed to retain his spot (and I'm not having a go, I know a lot of it is injury related).
A two year long brain explosion from Hansen there - didn't have the mettle to kill his darlings and when he did it was at reactionary and the wrong ones.
-
@Machpants said in The Cane vs Savea Debate:
@MN5 said in The Cane vs Savea Debate:
@taniwharugby said in The Cane vs Savea Debate:
@ACT-Crusader said in The Cane vs Savea Debate:
they focused on the lineout concerns first
Yet did little to utilise the advantage of selecting an extra lock.
Appeared we were gonna target thier line-out, but didn't, were we being trying to be tricky?
It’s basically all Scott Barrett’s fault for only providing height, he should have played a lot more like Savea AND Cane as well.
I put the blame solely on him.
07 was his fault too
no, that was Leon MacDonald's. So was 2003.
I haven't worked out which Crusader to pin '99 on, but '95 was Mehrts.
@mariner4life said in The Cane vs Savea Debate:
@Machpants said in The Cane vs Savea Debate:
@MN5 said in The Cane vs Savea Debate:
@taniwharugby said in The Cane vs Savea Debate:
@ACT-Crusader said in The Cane vs Savea Debate:
they focused on the lineout concerns first
Yet did little to utilise the advantage of selecting an extra lock.
Appeared we were gonna target thier line-out, but didn't, were we being trying to be tricky?
It’s basically all Scott Barrett’s fault for only providing height, he should have played a lot more like Savea AND Cane as well.
I put the blame solely on him.
07 was his fault too
no, that was Leon MacDonald's. So was 2003.
I haven't worked out which Crusader to pin '99 on, but '95 was Mehrts.
How long have you been on the Fern, and you're not blaming Deans?
-
@DMX said in The Cane vs Savea Debate:
This is spot on, think I said the same in another post. The core of losing this game was Whitelock/Retallick/Read coming up empty. Ardie was probably our most consistent forward last year he was always going to win the head to head with Cane. Having Savea and Cane on the field at the same time was a pretty inspired decison and it had worked so well in the previous games, I just think Hansen outsmarted himself, but was not the losing of the game.
Cane pre-injury this isn't even a debate, but coming off the injury they were pretty close. Read however was absolutely past it and a liability and in a winner takes all scenario should have been the one to ride the pine. I can't think of an AB who went so off the boil for so long and was allowed to retain his spot (and I'm not having a go, I know a lot of it is injury related).
A two year long brain explosion from Hansen there - didn't have the mettle to kill his darlings and when he did it was at reactionary and the wrong ones.
-
@Crucial said in The Cane vs Savea Debate:
@Donsteppa said in The Cane vs Savea Debate:
@mariner4life said in The Cane vs Savea Debate:
@Machpants said in The Cane vs Savea Debate:
@MN5 said in The Cane vs Savea Debate:
@taniwharugby said in The Cane vs Savea Debate:
@ACT-Crusader said in The Cane vs Savea Debate:
they focused on the lineout concerns first
Yet did little to utilise the advantage of selecting an extra lock.
Appeared we were gonna target thier line-out, but didn't, were we being trying to be tricky?
It’s basically all Scott Barrett’s fault for only providing height, he should have played a lot more like Savea AND Cane as well.
I put the blame solely on him.
07 was his fault too
no, that was Leon MacDonald's. So was 2003.
I haven't worked out which Crusader to pin '99 on, but '95 was Mehrts.
Perennial favourite Reuben Thorne was the starting blindside in the 1999 semi final.
Glad you pointed that out. I don't think anyone noticed
I remember a Stephen Jones article after the match saying something to the effect of: 'afterwards we had to check the programme to see if the All Blacks had selected a blindside'
@Donsteppa said in The Cane vs Savea Debate:
@Crucial said in The Cane vs Savea Debate:
@Donsteppa said in The Cane vs Savea Debate:
@mariner4life said in The Cane vs Savea Debate:
@Machpants said in The Cane vs Savea Debate:
@MN5 said in The Cane vs Savea Debate:
@taniwharugby said in The Cane vs Savea Debate:
@ACT-Crusader said in The Cane vs Savea Debate:
they focused on the lineout concerns first
Yet did little to utilise the advantage of selecting an extra lock.
Appeared we were gonna target thier line-out, but didn't, were we being trying to be tricky?
It’s basically all Scott Barrett’s fault for only providing height, he should have played a lot more like Savea AND Cane as well.
I put the blame solely on him.
07 was his fault too
no, that was Leon MacDonald's. So was 2003.
I haven't worked out which Crusader to pin '99 on, but '95 was Mehrts.
Perennial favourite Reuben Thorne was the starting blindside in the 1999 semi final.
Glad you pointed that out. I don't think anyone noticed
I remember a Stephen Jones article after the match saying something to the effect of: 'afterwards we had to check the programme to see if the All Blacks had selected a blindside'
That’s actually quite witty. Surely someone else wrote it ?
