• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

Black Caps v Pakistan

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Sports Talk
cricket
1.2k Posts 51 Posters 46.0k Views
Black Caps v Pakistan
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • H Offline
    H Offline
    hydro11
    wrote on last edited by
    #311

    So great to see us not collapsing. We easily could have been out or under 350 after losing Nicholls and Williamson. Watling is so great to have at number 6.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • SnowyS Offline
    SnowyS Offline
    Snowy
    wrote on last edited by
    #312

    WRT to the spinner selection - I'm still struggling with this from Stead:

    *"The toughest squad selection was clearly around the spinner," said coach Gary Stead.

    "That basically came down to the balance of the side and with the four-strong pace attack going so nicely we wanted to have a spinning allrounder as an option for that No 7 position."*
    A guy that averages 25 (and scored 19 today) is a bowler (who is unlikely to take wickets in NZ).

    I think that we are living in the past a bit, our top order is so much stronger in NZ (mostly) and our pace bowlers so much fitter that giving them a rest with a spinner isn't really necessary either. So why not an attacking spinner that takes wickets (if one at all)?

    MN5M SynicBastS canefanC 3 Replies Last reply
    2
  • MN5M Offline
    MN5M Offline
    MN5
    replied to Snowy on last edited by
    #313

    @Snowy said in Black Caps v Pakistan:

    WRT to the spinner selection - I'm still struggling with this from Stead:

    *"The toughest squad selection was clearly around the spinner," said coach Gary Stead.

    "That basically came down to the balance of the side and with the four-strong pace attack going so nicely we wanted to have a spinning allrounder as an option for that No 7 position."*
    A guy that averages 25 (and scored 19 today) is a bowler (who is unlikely to take wickets in NZ).

    I think that we are living in the past a bit, our top order is so much stronger in NZ (mostly) and our pace bowlers so much fitter that giving them a rest with a spinner isn't really necessary either. So why not an attacking spinner that takes wickets (if one at all)?

    When is De Grandholme fit again ?

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • SynicBastS Offline
    SynicBastS Offline
    SynicBast
    replied to Snowy on last edited by
    #314

    @Snowy said in Black Caps v Pakistan:

    WRT to the spinner selection - I'm still struggling with this from Stead:

    I'm not. I'm really not convinced Stead is up to coaching this side. If anything I think he is a handbrake that Williamson is having to deal with for now. He was clueless in Aus and clueless when he went on holiday - he's not intellectually incisive enough to manage the team nor does he have the playing gravitas to persuade me either. Journeyman player - mediocre coach - the Santnav of Team management

    SnowyS 1 Reply Last reply
    7
  • MN5M Offline
    MN5M Offline
    MN5
    wrote on last edited by MN5
    #315

    Southee gives the haters more ammo with that innings.

    With regards to the spinner dilemma. KW isn't the worst in the world when he actually has a go but is captaincy and being the best player enough for him to have on his plate ?

    Watling's knack for scoring crucial runs when needed is obviously a big string to his bow but it's still almost a problem in how the side is selected around the 6/7 spots in the order. Do they go for another specialist batsman, shift Watling to 7 and hope that there are guys in the top order to roll the arm over occasionally ?

    boobooB 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • canefanC Offline
    canefanC Offline
    canefan
    replied to Snowy on last edited by
    #316

    @Snowy Mitch is a one day player, not a test player. Stead is a boob

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • boobooB Offline
    boobooB Offline
    booboo
    replied to MN5 on last edited by
    #317

    @MN5 said in Black Caps v Pakistan:

    Southee gives the haters more ammo with that innings.

    "Haters" = people with a different opinion to me.

    Expressing the opinion that he should try just a little harder at his batting ...

    transmission interrupted as Wags go... no he doesn't: no ball ... what a delivery though ...

    ... is hardly hating.

    It was a great ball from Yasir though and chance of getting a wicket regardless (non-bouncing yorker) was extremely high.

    MN5M 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • boobooB Offline
    boobooB Offline
    booboo
    wrote on last edited by
    #318

    Entertaining over from Shaheen.

    Reviewing last ball lbw.

    May be leg side.

    boobooB 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • boobooB Offline
    boobooB Offline
    booboo
    replied to booboo on last edited by
    #319

    @booboo said in Black Caps v Pakistan:

    Entertaining over from Shaheen.

    Reviewing last ball lbw.

    May be leg side.

    Way down leg

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • G Offline
    G Offline
    Godder
    wrote on last edited by
    #320

    As far as I can tell, Santner's job is to bowl 5-10 overs with the old ball, bat better than the other options as spinners, and be injury cover.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • boobooB Offline
    boobooB Offline
    booboo
    wrote on last edited by
    #321

    Ouchy foot for Wags. Could be a worry being his front foot for bowling.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • MN5M Offline
    MN5M Offline
    MN5
    replied to booboo on last edited by
    #322

    @booboo said in Black Caps v Pakistan:

    @MN5 said in Black Caps v Pakistan:

    Southee gives the haters more ammo with that innings.

    "Haters" = people with a different opinion to me.

    Expressing the opinion that he should try just a little harder at his batting ...

    transmission interrupted as Wags go... no he doesn't: no ball ... what a delivery though ...

    ... is hardly hating.

    It was a great ball from Yasir though and chance of getting a wicket regardless (non-bouncing yorker) was extremely high.

    He just get's a lot of grief for it that's all. He still has the talent to play the odd decent innings which is all that's needed sometimes.

    boobooB 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • boobooB Offline
    boobooB Offline
    booboo
    replied to MN5 on last edited by
    #323

    @MN5 said in Black Caps v Pakistan:

    @booboo said in Black Caps v Pakistan:

    @MN5 said in Black Caps v Pakistan:

    Southee gives the haters more ammo with that innings.

    "Haters" = people with a different opinion to me.

    Expressing the opinion that he should try just a little harder at his batting ...

    transmission interrupted as Wags go... no he doesn't: no ball ... what a delivery though ...

    ... is hardly hating.

    It was a great ball from Yasir though and chance of getting a wicket regardless (non-bouncing yorker) was extremely high.

    He just get's a lot of grief for it that's all. He still has the talent to play the odd decent innings which is all that's needed sometimes.

    He has (and had) the talent to play a lot of decent innings.

    As I say though, you can't blame home for getting out to that.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • SynicBastS Offline
    SynicBastS Offline
    SynicBast
    wrote on last edited by
    #324

    I really really don't want Watling to retire

    1 Reply Last reply
    6
  • RapidoR Offline
    RapidoR Offline
    Rapido
    replied to SynicBast on last edited by
    #325

    @SynicBast said in Black Caps v Pakistan:

    One of the problems that developped in the test team is that I don't think either Kane or McCullum had enough faith in any of the spinners to bowl them enough TBH. In McCullum's case, I don't believe he rated any spinner anyway so whoever got selected was on a hiding to nothing. This was exacerabted by the selection of the likes of santner and craig who arre basically seen - as vettori-lites. And let's be honest here, when was the last time Vettori ran through a test side - if my memory serves me well, it was before his batting became essential to make up for an extremely deficient top order

    Disagree with this for Mccullum, agree for Kane.

    Baz captaincy of spinners, Craig successfully, Sodhi unsuccessfully, was very positive.

    Kane, not so much, unless he trusts them not to leak runs. His treatment of T Astle reminded Fleming 's captaincy of Wiseman.

    M 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • gt12G Offline
    gt12G Offline
    gt12
    wrote on last edited by
    #326

    That bowler is throwing it.

    SynicBastS 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • SynicBastS Offline
    SynicBastS Offline
    SynicBast
    replied to gt12 on last edited by
    #327

    @gt12 said in Black Caps v Pakistan:

    That bowler is throwing it.

    Afridi?

    gt12G 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • gt12G Offline
    gt12G Offline
    gt12
    replied to SynicBast on last edited by
    #328

    @SynicBast

    The one who just got Watling.

    SynicBastS 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • SynicBastS Offline
    SynicBastS Offline
    SynicBast
    replied to gt12 on last edited by
    #329

    @gt12 said in Black Caps v Pakistan:

    @SynicBast

    The one who just got Watling.

    Yup Afridi - I do not like his arm action when it comes to the short or effort ball - it looks distinctly suss

    gt12G 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • M Offline
    M Offline
    mikey07
    replied to Rapido on last edited by
    #330

    @Rapido That’s why I like Ajaz Patel he’s more of ab attacking spinner

    RapidoR 1 Reply Last reply
    1

Black Caps v Pakistan
Sports Talk
cricket
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.