• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

Black Caps v Pakistan

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Sports Talk
cricket
1.2k Posts 51 Posters 46.5k Views
Black Caps v Pakistan
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • RapidoR Offline
    RapidoR Offline
    Rapido
    replied to Bovidae on last edited by
    #753

    @Bovidae said in Black Caps v Pakistan:

    @Siam said in Black Caps v Pakistan:

    @LABCAT said in Black Caps v Pakistan:

    Peter Williams relaying a conversation with ICC chairman, ex NZC chairman, stating that we lose 100 grand for every test.
    T20 earns, but tests cost too much - 6 tests at home and we're in the hole more than half a million.

    Reality sucks !

    I think it is closer to a million per test NZC is losing, unless the test is against one of the big three.

    Just repeating Peter Williams on the radio today. He said 100k

    According to an article in The Telegraph written by a UK journo Tim Wigmore, that was in my local newspaper, NZC loses $830,000 per test if we aren't playing Aust, India or England. So what @LABCAT said.

    Pakistan has 43 players and coaches/support staff in NZ with the Shaheens (Pakistan A) also playing matches. The accommodation and travel costs must be significant.

    Good info.

    I'd still like to see the maths though.

    How do they work out the tv rights worth etc. Is that included in this figure? Or just the attendance etc. What about day-night tests etc.

    Actually seemed better test crowds than usual this year. Boxing Day at the Mount makes a big difference. Now got Mount, Chch and Wellington getting good crowds at good ovals. Hamilton still lets us down and must bleed plenty of cash . An oval at Auckland would be a game changer.

    BovidaeB 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • DamoD Offline
    DamoD Offline
    Damo
    wrote on last edited by
    #754

    Bat all day and potentially a session tomorrow. Bat big, bat once and then give ourselves 5 sessions to take 10 wickets. Try to score quickly as possible.

    In other words - score quickly without taking any risks.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • KiwiMurphK Offline
    KiwiMurphK Offline
    KiwiMurph
    wrote on last edited by
    #755

    Nicholls dropped again.

    G 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • boobooB Online
    boobooB Online
    booboo
    replied to Gunner on last edited by
    #756

    @Gunner said in Black Caps v Pakistan:

    @MN5 said in Black Caps v Pakistan:

    I reckon the plan early today has to be get Nicholls to his ton, get a lead and then accelerate a bit. Possibly getting way ahead of ourselves but a niggly declaration leaving Pakistan half an hour to bat would work wonders.

    Any other thoughts ?

    Just keep piling on the runs!

    What do we think is an acceptable total/lead from here, considering we're pretty much level pegging with 7 wickets in hand?

    450 minimum, lead of 150?

    Minimum

    Would like more

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • G Offline
    G Offline
    Gunner
    replied to KiwiMurph on last edited by
    #757

    @KiwiMurph said in Black Caps v Pakistan:

    Nicholls dropped again.

    He's leading a charmed life this summer.

    boobooB D 2 Replies Last reply
    1
  • boobooB Online
    boobooB Online
    booboo
    replied to Gunner on last edited by
    #758

    @Gunner said in Black Caps v Pakistan:

    @KiwiMurph said in Black Caps v Pakistan:

    Nicholls dropped again.

    He's leading a charmed life this summer.

    Dropped 7 times this summer apparently

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • D Offline
    D Offline
    delicatessen
    replied to Gunner on last edited by
    #759

    @Gunner said in Black Caps v Pakistan:

    @KiwiMurph said in Black Caps v Pakistan:

    Nicholls dropped again.

    He's leading a charmed life this summer.

    While it's great for the team, it's incredibly frustrating with Conway ready for a crack. Why should Nichols be judged by the poor performance of the opposition?

    MN5M 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • MN5M Offline
    MN5M Offline
    MN5
    replied to delicatessen on last edited by
    #760

    @delicatessen said in Black Caps v Pakistan:

    @Gunner said in Black Caps v Pakistan:

    @KiwiMurph said in Black Caps v Pakistan:

    Nicholls dropped again.

    He's leading a charmed life this summer.

    While it's great for the team, it's incredibly frustrating with Conway ready for a crack. Why should Nichols be judged by the poor performance of the opposition?

    If we have excellent players who can't get a look in then that's good for NZ cricket.

    Besides which as I posted earlier Rossco is having a slightly lean patch of late, Conway might get a shot there soon if he decides to retire ? ( he's 37 in March )

    D 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • MN5M Offline
    MN5M Offline
    MN5
    wrote on last edited by
    #761

    Fuck yeah Henry ! Shot son !!!!

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • D Offline
    D Offline
    delicatessen
    replied to MN5 on last edited by
    #762

    @MN5 said in Black Caps v Pakistan:

    @delicatessen said in Black Caps v Pakistan:

    @Gunner said in Black Caps v Pakistan:

    @KiwiMurph said in Black Caps v Pakistan:

    Nicholls dropped again.

    He's leading a charmed life this summer.

    While it's great for the team, it's incredibly frustrating with Conway ready for a crack. Why should Nichols be judged by the poor performance of the opposition?

    If we have excellent players who can't get a look in then that's good for NZ cricket.

    Besides which as I posted earlier Rossco is having a slightly lean patch of late, Conway might get a shot there soon if he decides to retire ? ( he's 37 in March )

    It's not through Nichols' ability that he can't get a look in. It's through Pakistans ineptitude.

    Rossco is not looking like he's trying to play test cricket at the minute. Almost like he's been asked to play a more attacking role? Either way he's not shelving his dangerous shots at all, which worked for that quick 70 the other day but looks a bit out of place after two quick wickets.

    Either way, they shouldn't drop Rossco before Nichols if Nichols has given more chances early in his innings than Taylor has. No idea if that's the case tbf.

    MN5M No QuarterN 2 Replies Last reply
    0
  • G Offline
    G Offline
    Gunner
    wrote on last edited by
    #763

    250 partnership up, interestingly only 221 of those are off the bat. That is a lot of extras.

    HoorooH boobooB 2 Replies Last reply
    0
  • HoorooH Offline
    HoorooH Offline
    Hooroo
    replied to Gunner on last edited by
    #764

    @Gunner said in Black Caps v Pakistan:

    250 partnership up, interestingly only 221 of those are off the bat. That is a lot of extras.

    A few byes down leg side for four where the ball has kept swinging away from the keeper

    G 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • D Offline
    D Offline
    delicatessen
    wrote on last edited by
    #765

    Nichols teeing off

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • G Offline
    G Offline
    Gunner
    replied to Hooroo on last edited by
    #766

    @Hooroo said in Black Caps v Pakistan:

    @Gunner said in Black Caps v Pakistan:

    250 partnership up, interestingly only 221 of those are off the bat. That is a lot of extras.

    A few byes down leg side for four where the ball has kept swinging away from the keeper

    b 10, lb 7, nb 10, w 7

    boobooB 2 Replies Last reply
    0
  • boobooB Online
    boobooB Online
    booboo
    replied to Gunner on last edited by
    #767

    @Gunner @Hooroo two consecutive 4 byes down leg of Shaheen (followed by Kane piercing the legslip cordon... ). All similar balls.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • boobooB Online
    boobooB Online
    booboo
    replied to Gunner on last edited by
    #768

    @Gunner said in Black Caps v Pakistan:

    @Hooroo said in Black Caps v Pakistan:

    @Gunner said in Black Caps v Pakistan:

    250 partnership up, interestingly only 221 of those are off the bat. That is a lot of extras.

    A few byes down leg side for four where the ball has kept swinging away from the keeper

    b 10, lb 7, nb 10, w 7

    That's terrible

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • G Offline
    G Offline
    Gunner
    wrote on last edited by
    #769

    After a very cautious opening 5 or 6 overs, the runs are flowing again.

    Touch wood, but it could be a very long day chasing leather for the pakistanis

    HoorooH 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • HoorooH Offline
    HoorooH Offline
    Hooroo
    replied to Gunner on last edited by
    #770

    @Gunner said in Black Caps v Pakistan:

    After a very cautious opening 5 or 6 overs, the runs are flowing again.

    Touch wood, but it could be a very long day chasing leather for the pakistanis

    Setting up for the perfect jinx, I see.

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • G Offline
    G Offline
    Godder
    wrote on last edited by
    #771

    I'm a bit late but in addition to Nicholls' century, the 250 partnership is up, and Kane passed 7,000 test runs.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • boobooB Online
    boobooB Online
    booboo
    replied to Gunner on last edited by booboo
    #772

    @Gunner said in Black Caps v Pakistan:

    @Hooroo said in Black Caps v Pakistan:

    @Gunner said in Black Caps v Pakistan:

    250 partnership up, interestingly only 221 of those are off the bat. That is a lot of extras.

    A few byes down leg side for four where the ball has kept swinging away from the keeper

    b 10, lb 7, nb 10, w 7

    +2

    Keeper having a mare

    HoorooH 1 Reply Last reply
    0

Black Caps v Pakistan
Sports Talk
cricket
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.