• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

Australia v India

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Sports Talk
cricket
1.8k Posts 56 Posters 47.3k Views
Australia v India
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • NTAN Offline
    NTAN Offline
    NTA
    wrote on last edited by
    #1119

    Lol @ Ponting "the one thing that isn't moving: the stumps"

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • NTAN Offline
    NTAN Offline
    NTA
    wrote on last edited by
    #1120

    Hoff gets a Michelle

    SiamS 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • SiamS Offline
    SiamS Offline
    Siam
    wrote on last edited by
    #1121

    What are those 3 pink sticks sticking out of the ground for?🤔

    nzzpN 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • SiamS Offline
    SiamS Offline
    Siam
    replied to NTA on last edited by Siam
    #1122

    @NTA said in Australia v India:

    Hoff gets a Michelle

    Damn foxtel go app and it's delay!🙂

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • nzzpN Offline
    nzzpN Offline
    nzzp
    replied to Siam on last edited by
    #1123

    @Siam said in Australia v India:

    What are those 3 pink sticks sticking out of the ground for?🤔

    4 off 90 balls aimed at them after lunch. Amazing.

    Will played India

    A 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • A Offline
    A Offline
    African Monkey
    wrote on last edited by
    #1124

    Good change of pace there from Hazelwood.

    Interesting few overs coming up here for the Aussie batsmen. If India get a wicket or 2 before stumps, it could be the Aussies fighting to survive.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • DonsteppaD Offline
    DonsteppaD Offline
    Donsteppa
    wrote on last edited by
    #1125

    Funny listening to the Fox commentators getting frustrated over the last half hour that the three Indian #11's won't only swing wildly at the ball and immediately get out just to suit Australia's needs...

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • voodooV Offline
    voodooV Offline
    voodoo
    wrote on last edited by
    #1126

    Amazing effort to go from 5-161 to > double the score

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • A Offline
    A Offline
    African Monkey
    replied to nzzp on last edited by
    #1127

    @nzzp Yeah they got carried away with it especially towards the end. If anything, they probably were a bit too late using it on Thakur and Sundar as they had a bit of success with it eventually, but could have cleaned up the tail a bit quicker by aiming at the poles.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • SiamS Offline
    SiamS Offline
    Siam
    wrote on last edited by
    #1128

    I've still got Aus winning this game. Can't rationalise it but just a hunch due to test experience vs newbies.

    Intriguing stuff and a vital few overs tonight

    voodooV 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • barbarianB Offline
    barbarianB Offline
    barbarian
    wrote on last edited by
    #1129

    Lot of pressure on Warner here. Given the game situation, he gets a score and Aus have a fighting chance of a win. A quick ton might well win the game.

    ACT CrusaderA 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • voodooV Offline
    voodooV Offline
    voodoo
    replied to Siam on last edited by
    #1130

    @Siam said in Australia v India:

    I've still got Aus winning this game. Can't rationalise it but just a hunch due to test experience vs newbies.

    Intriguing stuff and a vital few overs tonight

    It's because they're Australian fucking cricketers. Annoying as fuck to man, but one of the pricks always delivers. Usually more.

    If they were shit, we wouldn't hate them so much

    SiamS 1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • SiamS Offline
    SiamS Offline
    Siam
    replied to voodoo on last edited by
    #1131

    @voodoo and they'd be called England 😄

    voodooV 1 Reply Last reply
    4
  • voodooV Offline
    voodooV Offline
    voodoo
    replied to Siam on last edited by
    #1132

    @Siam said in Australia v India:

    @voodoo and they'd be called England 😄

    That earned an audible chuckle

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • NTAN Offline
    NTAN Offline
    NTA
    wrote on last edited by NTA
    #1133

    It'll be a draw based on the forecast.

    As for the short stuff - the number of edges, near-edges, and gloved mis-timed shots it produced that just went over a fielder justified it IMHO.

    "Bowl at the stumps!" works unless the tailenders are just getting on the front foot, blocking or driving you, which they were.

    Sure, 4 balls out of 90 that would have hit the pegs was not great, but that is a small target area really, and batsmen get out playing something that might hit the stumps as well. These guys weren't good enough to edge it.

    Leaving Lyon on to bowl that many overs was the big mistake, instead of getting pressure on at both ends as soon as Starc found something approaching rhythm.

    boobooB 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT Crusader
    replied to barbarian on last edited by
    #1134

    @barbarian said in Australia v India:

    Lot of pressure on Warner here. Given the game situation, he gets a score and Aus have a fighting chance of a win. A quick ton might well win the game.

    Off to a Warner-like start, 20 off 22 with 3 boundaries.

    Play likely to be disrupted tomorrow and Tuesday due to weather puts the batting team in the box seat on dictating this how this match will pan out.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • boobooB Offline
    boobooB Offline
    booboo
    replied to MN5 on last edited by
    #1135

    @MN5 said in Australia v India:

    @NTA said in Australia v India:

    Given these guys are untroubled at the moment, I'm thinking we're headed for a draw with 2 days of mostly wet weather predicted.

    Paine can't declare early in case it blows over, and he can't settle for anything under 300 runs as a lead.

    Looks like that despite the weather to be honest. A risky declaration looks the only way to make a game of it.

    Still the case.

    Aus need to win so how long do they need to get 10 wickets?

    Probably an opportunity for Davey to bash himself into form.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • boobooB Offline
    boobooB Offline
    booboo
    replied to MN5 on last edited by
    #1136

    @MN5 said in Australia v India:

    @Siam said in Australia v India:

    @ACT-Crusader said in Australia v India:

    Paine drops another one

    Yeeesh, the easiest of his drops too!

    India are going at a very old fashioned run rate too. What exactly is their game plan here ?

    Don't lose

    MN5M 1 Reply Last reply
    7
  • boobooB Offline
    boobooB Offline
    booboo
    replied to NTA on last edited by
    #1137

    @NTA said in Australia v India:

    It'll be a draw based on the forecast.

    http://www.bom.gov.au/jsp/watl/rainfall/pme.jsp?ref=ftr

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • barbarianB Offline
    barbarianB Offline
    barbarian
    wrote on last edited by
    #1138

    If they get lucky, they might only lose an hour or two today and dodge the showers tomorrow.

    It will be interesting to see how hard they push for the win. Do they give India a chaseable target and risk losing the series? It may depend on how the pitch plays today. If it's a flat track then they might not be as bold.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1

Australia v India
Sports Talk
cricket
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.