• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

Australia v India

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Sports Talk
cricket
1.8k Posts 56 Posters 47.3k Views
Australia v India
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.
    wrote on last edited by
    #1213

    The way they're playing, you'd guess 320 was his target, unless it's just have a go lads and see how many we can get in a hurry.

    Nine down now.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • NTAN Offline
    NTAN Offline
    NTA
    replied to Chris B. on last edited by NTA
    #1214

    @Chris-B might be about to rain again so swing hard and declare in an over

    Chris B.C 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • KiwiMurphK Online
    KiwiMurphK Online
    KiwiMurph
    wrote on last edited by
    #1215

    huge difference in batting ability between India no. 11 and Hazelwood.

    MN5M 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • DonsteppaD Offline
    DonsteppaD Offline
    Donsteppa
    wrote on last edited by Donsteppa
    #1216

    Very un-Australian if the musings of aggressive declarations earlier today by the Fox commentators of leads less than 300 are anything to go by...

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • KiwiMurphK Online
    KiwiMurphK Online
    KiwiMurph
    wrote on last edited by
    #1217

    I think Australia have effectively taken one result out of the equation - they have about 100 more runs than the highest successful chase at the GABBA.

    ACT CrusaderA 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • MN5M Offline
    MN5M Offline
    MN5
    replied to KiwiMurph on last edited by
    #1218

    @KiwiMurph said in Australia v India:

    huge difference in batting ability between India no. 11 and Hazelwood.

    pfffft, even Chris Martin had a batting average of 12 at one stage......a barnstorming knock of 7 on debut ( this included a four ).....then a watchful 0 not out then a swashbuckling 5 not out ( complete with another four ).....after that it was nine innings in a row of no runs but admittedly a few of these were unbeaten.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • NTAN Offline
    NTAN Offline
    NTA
    wrote on last edited by
    #1219

    Radar check from the brains trust in the Aussie box

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.
    replied to NTA on last edited by
    #1220

    @NTA said in Australia v India:

    @Chris-B might be about to rain again so swing hard and declare in an over

    Isa seems to be saying 127 overs still left in the match - 322 ahead.

    India would need to go at fractionally more than 2.5 to get that.

    Only rain would stop a result.

    KiwiMurphK 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • KiwiMurphK Online
    KiwiMurphK Online
    KiwiMurph
    replied to Chris B. on last edited by
    #1221

    @Chris-B isn't that assuming full overs get bowled which almost never happens?

    Chris B.C 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT Crusader
    replied to KiwiMurph on last edited by
    #1222

    @KiwiMurph said in Australia v India:

    I think Australia have effectively taken one result out of the equation - they have about 100 more runs than the highest successful chase at the GABBA.

    I love how the commentators keep talking up India. Australia are so in the box seat it’s not funny.

    Chris B.C 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • NTAN Offline
    NTAN Offline
    NTA
    wrote on last edited by
    #1223

    Good bowling Siraj. A few of the more established Indian pace men might be looking over their shoulders, nervously.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • KiwiMurphK Online
    KiwiMurphK Online
    KiwiMurph
    wrote on last edited by
    #1224

    India have to be pleased with their second string bowling lineup all things considered - lost the toss and bowled Australia out twice.

    1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.
    replied to KiwiMurph on last edited by
    #1225

    @KiwiMurph said in Australia v India:

    @Chris-B isn't that assuming full overs get bowled which almost never happens?

    Dunno - but, India will easily have time to get these regardless if it doesn't rain and they're good enough. They went at 3 in the first innings.

    328 to get is it?

    ACT CrusaderA 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • KiapK Offline
    KiapK Offline
    Kiap
    wrote on last edited by
    #1226

    I'd reckon 25+90 ... 115 overs left (excl. rain)

    2.84 rpo is about the minimum rate, ... if they can last.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT Crusader
    replied to Chris B. on last edited by
    #1227

    @Chris-B said in Australia v India:

    @KiwiMurph said in Australia v India:

    @Chris-B isn't that assuming full overs get bowled which almost never happens?

    Dunno - but, India will easily have time to get these regardless if it doesn't rain and they're good enough. They went at 3 in the first innings.

    328 to get is it?

    They’re saying 25 overs left today and then all tomorrow. Sure there are overs to get them but I think the Aussie bowlers will cause India to have a mountain of dot balls

    Chris B.C 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.
    replied to ACT Crusader on last edited by
    #1228

    @ACT-Crusader said in Australia v India:

    @KiwiMurph said in Australia v India:

    I think Australia have effectively taken one result out of the equation - they have about 100 more runs than the highest successful chase at the GABBA.

    I love how the commentators keep talking up India. Australia are so in the box seat it’s not funny.

    https://www.espncricinfo.com/series/pak-tour-of-aus-2016-17-1000871/australia-vs-pakistan-1st-test-1000881/full-scorecard

    Chuck this scorecard in to make it interesting... ! 🙂

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.
    replied to ACT Crusader on last edited by
    #1229

    @ACT-Crusader Yeah!

    In all seriousness, hardly anyone ever makes these.

    But, there will be trembling if the Indians are 80/0 tonight!

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • KiwiMurphK Online
    KiwiMurphK Online
    KiwiMurph
    wrote on last edited by
    #1230

    They aren't going to get many overs in before the next rain.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • boobooB Offline
    boobooB Offline
    booboo
    replied to NTA on last edited by
    #1231

    @NTA said in Australia v India:

    @booboo missed your post as it was the bottom of the page.

    I don't think that band out west will come close enough

    I dunno. Check out the latest.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • nzzpN Offline
    nzzpN Offline
    nzzp
    wrote on last edited by
    #1232

    would be stoked if Gill could get a big score here. He looks a player.

    Feels like a jinx, but I'll go there anyway.

    ACT CrusaderA 1 Reply Last reply
    1

Australia v India
Sports Talk
cricket
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.