Skip to content
  • Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

  • Tipping
  • Team Sheets
  • Highlights
  • Results
    • All Blacks

      Search every All Blacks Test. Filter results by year, opposition, location, venue, city and RWC stage

    • Super Rugby

      Search every Super Rugby since match 1996

    • NPC

      Search NPC results. Only first division matches from 1976-2005. All results from the 14 team competition (2006-present) are included

Silver Lake buying a stake in the ABs?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Sports Talk
allblacks
593 Posts 66 Posters 35.9k Views 4 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • TimT Tim

    https://www.stuff.co.nz/sport/rugby/all-blacks/300287897/details-of-silver-lakes-buyin-of-new-zealand-rugby-revealed

    maxwellM Offline
    maxwellM Offline
    maxwell
    wrote on last edited by
    #153

    @tim I wonder if Commercial LP will be filled with agency suits external to NZR's existing commercial arm.

    Hoping its not a case of the left hand not knowing what the right is doing when its all put into motion.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
    • taniwharugbyT Offline
      taniwharugbyT Offline
      taniwharugby
      wrote on last edited by
      #154

      I thought this was more about the intellectual/marketing aspect as opposed to assets?

      • Clause B states NZR to transfer all commercial assets to Commercial LP.

      • Clause C states NZR sells a 12.5% stake in Commercial LP to Silver Lake.

      1 Reply Last reply
      1
      • BovidaeB Offline
        BovidaeB Offline
        Bovidae
        wrote on last edited by
        #155
        New Zealand Rugby's proposed deal with Silver Lake won't get the green light at Thursday's Annual General Meeting in Wellington.
        
        Newshub understands negotiations between NZR and the Players Association are at an impasse and the proposed $387.5 million deal won't get the sign off it needs at the AGM.  
        
        NZR has rejected two last ditch alternatives to the proposed Silver Lake deal from the Players Association.
        
        The governing body and the Players Association have been at loggerheads over the proposed deal for US firm Silver Lake to acquire a 12.5 percent stake in NZR worth $387.5m.
        
        Newshub understands two alternatives were put to NZR in their latest round of mediation talks, which concluded on Tuesday.
        
        One of those was debt raising - where NZR would essentially take out a loan they'd then pay back with interest - and the other, selling a five percent commercial stake in the company to a private investor.  
        
        But those would only raise around $90m and $150m respectively, significantly less than what's been tabled by Silver Lake, Newshub understands. 
        
        NZR has rejected both alternatives, both on the basis that they wouldn't be able raise enough capital and wouldn't benefit the game at grassroots level, which is at the core of NZR's deal with Silver Lake. 
        
        Mediation will continue with the Players Association following Thursday's AGM, as both parties search for common ground in this much maligned deal.
        
        RapidoR 1 Reply Last reply
        1
        • ChrisC Offline
          ChrisC Offline
          Chris
          wrote on last edited by Chris
          #156

          link text

          Interesting are the players being greedy,According to NZR.
          The national body's accused the country's leading players of demanding untenable payments at the expense of the community game.

          1 Reply Last reply
          1
          • BovidaeB Bovidae
            New Zealand Rugby's proposed deal with Silver Lake won't get the green light at Thursday's Annual General Meeting in Wellington.
            
            Newshub understands negotiations between NZR and the Players Association are at an impasse and the proposed $387.5 million deal won't get the sign off it needs at the AGM.  
            
            NZR has rejected two last ditch alternatives to the proposed Silver Lake deal from the Players Association.
            
            The governing body and the Players Association have been at loggerheads over the proposed deal for US firm Silver Lake to acquire a 12.5 percent stake in NZR worth $387.5m.
            
            Newshub understands two alternatives were put to NZR in their latest round of mediation talks, which concluded on Tuesday.
            
            One of those was debt raising - where NZR would essentially take out a loan they'd then pay back with interest - and the other, selling a five percent commercial stake in the company to a private investor.  
            
            But those would only raise around $90m and $150m respectively, significantly less than what's been tabled by Silver Lake, Newshub understands. 
            
            NZR has rejected both alternatives, both on the basis that they wouldn't be able raise enough capital and wouldn't benefit the game at grassroots level, which is at the core of NZR's deal with Silver Lake. 
            
            Mediation will continue with the Players Association following Thursday's AGM, as both parties search for common ground in this much maligned deal.
            
            RapidoR Offline
            RapidoR Offline
            Rapido
            wrote on last edited by Rapido
            #157

            @bovidae said in Silver Lake buying a stake in the ABs?:

            
            Newshub understands two alternatives were put to NZR in their latest round of mediation talks, which concluded on Tuesday.
            
            One of those was debt raising - where NZR would essentially take out a loan they'd then pay back with interest - and the other, selling a five percent commercial stake in the company to a private investor.  
            
            But those would only raise around $90m and $150m respectively, significantly less than what's been tabled by Silver Lake, Newshub understands. 
            
            NZR has rejected both alternatives, both on the basis that they wouldn't be able raise enough capital and wouldn't benefit the game at grassroots level, which is at the core of NZR's deal with Silver Lake. 
            
            
            

            Why are they going straight from, $90m in reserves, maybe close to eaten up by now after covid, straight to selling equity?

            Why not raise the $90m loan?

            Then see if in few years, then need to sell equity?

            NZRU have never been in debt , for 25 years , we are now just getting close to no reserves and we panic?

            This feels rushed, reactive, and I simply dont trust the acumen of these current numpties on the board.

            I'm hoping the players hold out.

            Make the provincial unions cut their cloth to fit.

            KiwiMurphK 1 Reply Last reply
            3
            • RapidoR Offline
              RapidoR Offline
              Rapido
              wrote on last edited by
              #158

              Although, $387m for 12.5% seems quite good, I admit, seeing as we have no established competitions to sell.

              1 Reply Last reply
              1
              • RapidoR Rapido

                @bovidae said in Silver Lake buying a stake in the ABs?:

                
                Newshub understands two alternatives were put to NZR in their latest round of mediation talks, which concluded on Tuesday.
                
                One of those was debt raising - where NZR would essentially take out a loan they'd then pay back with interest - and the other, selling a five percent commercial stake in the company to a private investor.  
                
                But those would only raise around $90m and $150m respectively, significantly less than what's been tabled by Silver Lake, Newshub understands. 
                
                NZR has rejected both alternatives, both on the basis that they wouldn't be able raise enough capital and wouldn't benefit the game at grassroots level, which is at the core of NZR's deal with Silver Lake. 
                
                
                

                Why are they going straight from, $90m in reserves, maybe close to eaten up by now after covid, straight to selling equity?

                Why not raise the $90m loan?

                Then see if in few years, then need to sell equity?

                NZRU have never been in debt , for 25 years , we are now just getting close to no reserves and we panic?

                This feels rushed, reactive, and I simply dont trust the acumen of these current numpties on the board.

                I'm hoping the players hold out.

                Make the provincial unions cut their cloth to fit.

                KiwiMurphK Online
                KiwiMurphK Online
                KiwiMurph
                wrote on last edited by
                #159

                @rapido I think it's about more than cash reserves. They want to put money into the grassroots and unions - they want to try and 'future proof' the game in NZ.

                For quite a few years now they've been either just keeping their head above water or posting operating losses. It's not a sustainable model currently.

                1 Reply Last reply
                2
                • RapidoR Offline
                  RapidoR Offline
                  Rapido
                  wrote on last edited by Rapido
                  #160

                  I dont like it.

                  I'd be much more comfortable if they were buying a stake in the TT SR comp. The efforts go into making a successful and sustainable professional comp.

                  For private equity, surely the low hanging fruit will just be even more whoring out of the AB brand in revenue sharing friendlies in non-NZ venues.

                  There are already too many tests, and the nz game is a hollowed out inverted pyramid.

                  As i say. It's the domestic / tasman professional comp that needs the attention. And with this being a deal independent of the ARU, I have doubts how this will work. Big doubts.

                  I'd rather they borrowed, get the Ta$man comp and the relationship with ARU healthy, get a common equity buyer for the 2 unions, if needed , once we have a comp to sell.

                  At the moment we are just selling the AB brand.

                  Too much rush and panic.

                  The other overseas comps are hurting as well, we have a few years up our sleeves if we borrow.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  2
                  • RapidoR Offline
                    RapidoR Offline
                    Rapido
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #161

                    Basically want a decision this momentous delayed until our administration have had a few years to prove they are competent.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    1
                    • BovidaeB Offline
                      BovidaeB Offline
                      Bovidae
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #162

                      It's up to the NZRPA now.

                      New Zealand Rugby’s provincial unions have voted unanimously in favour of a deal with private equity group Silver Lake.
                      
                      However, it can not pass completely without the sign-off from the New Zealand Rugby Players Association.
                      
                      The deal would see Silver Lake taking a 12.5 per cent stake in a newly created NZR entity called Commercial LP for $387.5 million.
                      
                      New Zealand Rugby board chair Brent Impey said it was “incredibly significant” for rugby but was unimpressed with the NZRPA’s stance.
                      
                      1 Reply Last reply
                      1
                      • D Offline
                        D Offline
                        Dolamite
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #163

                        NZRPA are in a weird spot, they’re supposed to be the “little guys” in this fight. But because the amateur game and grassroots have picked the deal they’ll essentially be going against “little guys”.

                        taniwharugbyT 1 Reply Last reply
                        2
                        • KiwiwombleK Offline
                          KiwiwombleK Offline
                          Kiwiwomble
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #164

                          have to say, im not too worried, NZ rugby hasn't really looked overly financially for a while and this might just be better than it going belly up.

                          it didn't have to be this way though, if NZR had concentrated on super rugby and the NPC rather than making the All Blacks the sole focus, then those competitions and those clubs/franchises could be used to sell equity...and keep the black jersey as this privileged pinnacle of the game....but the world sees the AB's as the only thing worth any money

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          1
                          • StargazerS Offline
                            StargazerS Offline
                            Stargazer
                            wrote on last edited by Stargazer
                            #165

                            https://twitter.com/NZRugby/status/1387558835649351680

                            About Mark Hutton: https://www.businessnews.com.au/Person/Mark-R-Hutton


                            https://twitter.com/NZRugby/status/1387552056370634752


                            Bio Ajit Balasingham
                            https://www.ajit.nz/about/

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            1
                            • D Dolamite

                              NZRPA are in a weird spot, they’re supposed to be the “little guys” in this fight. But because the amateur game and grassroots have picked the deal they’ll essentially be going against “little guys”.

                              taniwharugbyT Offline
                              taniwharugbyT Offline
                              taniwharugby
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #166

                              @dolamite yeah is odd how the Unions are all for it, whihc will help grass roots, yet the RPA, which I assume covers players from AB down to Heartland?

                              So there is a disconnect between players and Unions as well, or, is it a few 'high profile' players who are against?

                              Initial deal I thought sounded great with 15% for a stake in some imaginary branding worth billions, but the release yesterday said NZR would transfer whatever assets it had into this new company, for which Silver Lake get 15% of, that is less ideal.

                              BovidaeB 1 Reply Last reply
                              1
                              • KiwiwombleK Offline
                                KiwiwombleK Offline
                                Kiwiwomble
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #167

                                what physical assets does NZR have? its not like they own a stadium or anything, im sure there is stuff but struggling to think of something substantial

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                1
                                • taniwharugbyT taniwharugby

                                  @dolamite yeah is odd how the Unions are all for it, whihc will help grass roots, yet the RPA, which I assume covers players from AB down to Heartland?

                                  So there is a disconnect between players and Unions as well, or, is it a few 'high profile' players who are against?

                                  Initial deal I thought sounded great with 15% for a stake in some imaginary branding worth billions, but the release yesterday said NZR would transfer whatever assets it had into this new company, for which Silver Lake get 15% of, that is less ideal.

                                  BovidaeB Offline
                                  BovidaeB Offline
                                  Bovidae
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #168

                                  @taniwharugby Watch the video in this article. It's all about the % of NZR's money in the player payment pool.

                                  https://www.newshub.co.nz/home/sport/2021/04/silver-lake-stalemate-nz-rugby-players-association-at-impasse-over-us-investment.html

                                  taniwharugbyT 1 Reply Last reply
                                  1
                                  • BovidaeB Bovidae

                                    @taniwharugby Watch the video in this article. It's all about the % of NZR's money in the player payment pool.

                                    https://www.newshub.co.nz/home/sport/2021/04/silver-lake-stalemate-nz-rugby-players-association-at-impasse-over-us-investment.html

                                    taniwharugbyT Offline
                                    taniwharugbyT Offline
                                    taniwharugby
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #169

                                    @bovidae cant you just summarise it for us, thats the TSF way 🙂

                                    @Kiwiwomble I did wonder that, but like the Unions many do have assets.

                                    KiwiwombleK 1 Reply Last reply
                                    1
                                    • taniwharugbyT taniwharugby

                                      @bovidae cant you just summarise it for us, thats the TSF way 🙂

                                      @Kiwiwomble I did wonder that, but like the Unions many do have assets.

                                      KiwiwombleK Offline
                                      KiwiwombleK Offline
                                      Kiwiwomble
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #170

                                      @taniwharugby how much can a scrum machine, a bag of balls and some pads be worth?

                                      JCJ 1 Reply Last reply
                                      1
                                      • KiwiwombleK Kiwiwomble

                                        @taniwharugby how much can a scrum machine, a bag of balls and some pads be worth?

                                        JCJ Offline
                                        JCJ Offline
                                        JC
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #171

                                        @kiwiwomble Well if a pair of trainers sells for millions just because Kanye West wore them, I'd expect a ball touched by the hand of Richie McCaw to go for a billion at least.

                                        KiwiwombleK P 2 Replies Last reply
                                        6
                                        • JCJ JC

                                          @kiwiwomble Well if a pair of trainers sells for millions just because Kanye West wore them, I'd expect a ball touched by the hand of Richie McCaw to go for a billion at least.

                                          KiwiwombleK Offline
                                          KiwiwombleK Offline
                                          Kiwiwomble
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #172

                                          @jc maybe we should look into that instead of silverlake 😉

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          1
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Search
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Search