• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

Hillsborough

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Sports Talk
157 Posts 38 Posters 20.0k Views
Hillsborough
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugby
    wrote on last edited by
    #21

    <blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="hydro11" data-cid="576916" data-time="1462349450">
    <div>
    <p>I think the fans probably put reasonable faith in the authorities. I don't think anyone outside of the ground could have expected what transpired.</p>
    </div>
    </blockquote>
    <p> </p>
    <p>I doubt the cops involved expected it would turn out that way either, however reckless/negligent thier actions were.</p>

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • D Offline
    D Offline
    da_grubster
    wrote on last edited by
    #22

    Crucial, no one knew what was going on outside the stadium. <br><br>
    The negligence to open the gate was the main reason for the escalation of the problem. Fans were simply trying to get inside the stadium to watch a game of football. The only people who knew a dangerous crush was happening were the people being crushed<br><br>
    Probably best to leave this alone mate!

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • SiamS Offline
    SiamS Offline
    Siam
    wrote on last edited by
    #23

    <blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="jegga" data-cid="576906" data-time="1462347006">
    <div>
    <p> </p>
    <p> </p>
    <p>Is there any chance anyone in the police will actually be prosecuted ? Not just for their actions but the cover up that followed?</p>
    </div>
    </blockquote>
    <p> </p>
    <p>Jeg the author, referred to above, mentioned time and culture were no excuses for the BBC paedophiles, so expect that precedence to be highlighted in the upcoming trials</p>

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • TeWaioT Offline
    TeWaioT Offline
    TeWaio
    wrote on last edited by
    #24

    <blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="Catogrande" data-cid="576907" data-time="1462347064">
    <div>
    <p>Something not yet mentioned in any depth is <strong>the dreadful state of the stadia</strong> back in those days. for the most part the stadia had been built God knows how many years before and simply added to and re-furbed. No real investment into the infrastructure while all the time the use they were being put to was changing. Hillsborough was one of the FA's go to options for the FA Cup semi-finals. Why? Because it was big (capacity wise) and Sheffield Wednesday were unlikely to be in the frame. It was never chosen because it was fit for purpose.</p>
    </div>
    </blockquote>
    <p>
    I went to a boxing day game at Goodison Park a few years ago with my gf's Dad, a die hard Evertonian. I don't like crowds / cramped spaces at the best of times, and that place freaked me out. I think it is the one of the oldest stadia in the UK. Seriously like a rabbit warren with loads of bottlenecks. You can see how things could go seriously wrong, and that's with ticketed seating. Terraces + poorly managed crowd inflows.....makes me shudder to think about it.</p>

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • jeggaJ Offline
    jeggaJ Offline
    jegga
    wrote on last edited by
    #25

    <blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="Siam" data-cid="576921" data-time="1462351204">
    <div>
    <p>Jeg the author, referred to above, mentioned time and culture were no excuses for the BBC paedophiles, so expect that precedence to be highlighted in the upcoming trials</p>
    </div>
    </blockquote>
    <p> </p>
    <p>Excellent. </p>

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • SiamS Offline
    SiamS Offline
    Siam
    wrote on last edited by
    #26

    <blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="Catogrande" data-cid="576907" data-time="1462347064">
    <div>
    <p>Something not yet mentioned in any depth is the dreadful state of the stadia back in those days. for the most part the stadia had been built God knows how many years before and simply added to and re-furbed. No real investment into the infrastructure while all the time the use they were being put to was changing. Hillsborough was one of the FA's go to options for the FA Cup semi-finals. Why? Because it was big (capacity wise) and Sheffield Wednesday were unlikely to be in the frame. It was never chosen because it was fit for purpose.</p>
    </div>
    </blockquote>
    <p> </p>
    <p>true about stadia, civil evolution I guess</p>
    <p> </p>
    <p>Was it 2 other FA Cup Semis held there in the preceding years without incident?</p>
    <p> </p>
    <p>A major factor was removing the policeman Mole (his name) from the job he knew how to do explicitly - Senior Cops come out looking stink again</p>

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • canefanC Online
    canefanC Online
    canefan
    wrote on last edited by
    #27

    <blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="Siam" data-cid="576924" data-time="1462351606">
    <div>
    <p>true about stadia, civil evolution I guess</p>
    <p> </p>
    <p>Was it 2 other FA Cup Semis held there in the preceding years without incident?</p>
    <p> </p>
    <p>A major factor was removing the policeman Mole (his name) from the job he knew how to do explicitly - Senior Cops come out looking stink again</p>
    </div>
    </blockquote>
    <p>I watched the ESPN doco again last night, they mentioned a near tragedy in the Spurs Wolves semi 1981(sic).  You are right about the "stadium", it was built at the turn of the century (1900s) and was done up for the '66 WC.  It reminded me of a really old decrepit version of Athletic park</p>

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • CatograndeC Offline
    CatograndeC Offline
    Catogrande
    wrote on last edited by
    #28

    <blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="Siam" data-cid="576924" data-time="1462351606">
    <div>
    <p>true about stadia, civil evolution I guess</p>
    <p> </p>
    <p><strong>Was it 2 other FA Cup Semis held there in the preceding years without incident</strong>?</p>
    <p> </p>
    <p>A major factor was removing the policeman Mole (his name) from the job he knew how to do explicitly - Senior Cops come out looking stink again</p>
    </div>
    </blockquote>
    <p>Yeah. As I said, it was one of the go-to stadia for the FA. Many times Hillsborough has been used without incident but... Over the years there have been a few examples of outdated stadia and disasters. Not always crowd related but a good indication of their fitness for purpose in the modern era. In 1985 there was the Heysel thing and also the Bradford City fire. Two different problems but the commonality was outdated infrastructure. In a similar vein the Ibrox disaster in 1971.</p>

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • CatograndeC Offline
    CatograndeC Offline
    Catogrande
    wrote on last edited by
    #29

    <blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="Siam" data-cid="576897" data-time="1462346072">
    <div>
    <p>Kelvin McKenzie would be proud of that explanation. The bad behaviour as them being there huh?</p>
    </div>
    </blockquote>
    <p> </p>
    <p>To Kelvin became a verb in Fleet Street at the time. "Have you been on holiday"? "Yes, two weeks Kelvin"</p>
    <p> </p>
    <p>Lying in the Sun.</p>

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • CatograndeC Offline
    CatograndeC Offline
    Catogrande
    wrote on last edited by
    #30

    <blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="canefan" data-cid="576936" data-time="1462353976">
    <div>
    <p>I watched the ESPN doco again last night, they mentioned a near tragedy in the Spurs Wolves semi 1981(sic).  You are right about the "stadium", it was built at the turn of the century (1900s) and was done up for the '66 WC.  It reminded me of a really old decrepit version of Athletic park</p>
    </div>
    </blockquote>
    <p> </p>
    <p>Yeah the initial semi-final was played at Hillsborough and in near identical circumstances the same issues arose. The Spurs fans were segregated down at the Leppings Lane end of the ground (The smaller end and also where the Liverpool supporters were sent. In both instances they were by far the larger number of supporters). For the Spurs supporters, complete disaster was averted by the police opening the terraces and allowing the fans to spill out onto pitch-side. Ironic that the policing saved the day this time but  8 years later totally fucked things up.</p>
    <p> </p>
    <p>Lessons learned.</p>
    <p> </p>
    <p>Not.</p>

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • SiamS Offline
    SiamS Offline
    Siam
    wrote on last edited by
    #31

    <p>Reminds me of something my commercial pilot trainer mate said when I asked the old "how safe is it to fly?" chestnut</p>
    <p> </p>
    <p>"It gets safer every time a plane crashes, it's a safety manual painted with blood" - sad but poignant</p>

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • canefanC Online
    canefanC Online
    canefan
    wrote on last edited by
    #32

    I wonder if Duckenfield,the officer in charge, will get charged now?

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • antipodeanA Online
    antipodeanA Online
    antipodean
    wrote on last edited by
    #33

    <blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="Crucial" data-cid="576912" data-time="1462347804"><p>Total rubbish.<br>The context of the first quote was talking about a legal level of blame. The second about the actions of some fans contributing to the situation.<br>Where have I blamed victims?</p></blockquote> <br>It's quite simple. You said the <em>'fans were not to blame'</em> and then apportioned blame by saying <em>'the fans contributed to what happened'</em>.<br><br>It's utterly wrong seeing as <strong>the fans have been completely exonerated</strong>. The FA are to blame for holding the match at an unsafe stadium, the police are at fault for their astonishing incompetence and subsequent cover-up and the ambulance service are to blame. Not the fans, not the victims.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • CatograndeC Offline
    CatograndeC Offline
    Catogrande
    wrote on last edited by
    #34

    <p>I've taken the time to re-read the Grauniad article posted by Siam. It is undeniably a powerful piece and you can feel the outpouring of emotion throughout. The sense of a great injustice is undeniable too. But why did the journalist feel the need to put in that bit about the Freemasons?</p>
    <p> </p>
    <p>Quote "But what of the freemasons, those pantomime villains of the piece? In March 2015 David Duckenfield admitted what most of us had long suspected – he had been a freemason since the mid-70s. Remarkably, he was promoted to grand master of his lodge a year after Hillsborough.</p>
    <p>While the masons’ role in the cover-up remains unclear – if indeed they had one..." end quote.</p>
    <p> </p>
    <p>So, nothing to do with the 'masons then? Why bring it up?</p>

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • TeWaioT Offline
    TeWaioT Offline
    TeWaio
    wrote on last edited by
    #35

    <p>Margaret Aspinall CBE is an amazing woman. To lead that group in fighting for 27 years, and never giving up despite all the injustice along the way is just incredible. So many institutions / systems stacked against them for so long. To have such tenacity, after having lost a child in the tragedy. Beggars belief. </p>

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • SiamS Offline
    SiamS Offline
    Siam
    wrote on last edited by
    #36

    I was puzzled by that too Cato.<br><br>
    Perhaps a justification for the rise of Duckenfield and a further attack on the police hierarchy? Perhaps clinging to the thought that if Mole was on duty the senseless waste of lives, living and dead, would have been avoided, and it can be traced back to nepotistic promotions.<br><br>
    I don't know. I guess after 27 years of evidence appraisal even the most threadbare trace of causality gets explored.<br><br>
    I been thinking about the images and details in that article all day though. That lady that lost 2 daughters<br><br>
    Poor buggers. I hope this stuff this week helps them. I'm sure it does in some ways.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • SiamS Offline
    SiamS Offline
    Siam
    wrote on last edited by
    #37

    Didn't see your post TeWaio. Hear Hear!!

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • antipodeanA Online
    antipodeanA Online
    antipodean
    wrote on last edited by
    #38

    <blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="Siam" data-cid="576967" data-time="1462371583"><p>I was puzzled by that too Cato.<br><br>Perhaps a justification for the rise of Duckenfield and a further attack on the police hierarchy? Perhaps clinging to the thought that if Mole was on duty the senseless waste of lives, living and dead, would have been avoided, and it can be traced back to nepotistic promotions.</p></blockquote><br>That was my interpretation.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • CatograndeC Offline
    CatograndeC Offline
    Catogrande
    wrote on last edited by
    #39

    <blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="Siam" data-cid="576967" data-time="1462371583">
    <div>
    <p>I was puzzled by that too Cato.<br><br><strong>Perhaps a justification for the rise of Duckenfield and a further attack on the police hierarchy? Perhaps clinging to the thought that if Mole was on duty the senseless waste of lives, living and dead, would have been avoided, and it can be traced back to nepotistic promotions.<br><br>
    I don't know. I guess after 27 years of evidence appraisal even the most threadbare trace of causality gets explored.</strong><br><br>
    I been thinking about the images and details in that article all day though. That lady that lost 2 daughters<br><br>
    Poor buggers. I hope this stuff this week helps them. I'm sure it does in some ways.</p>
    </div>
    </blockquote>
    <p> I don't know. I would hope that is the case but it could also appear to be something of his own agenda. That would be a shame as it would degrade what is a great piece of journalism and in so many ways an incredible story of faith and tenacity in the face of overwhelming odds.</p>
    <p> </p>
    <p>The Duckenfield question is one that I would very much like to hear the answer to, but I fear this is unlikely. There may well be some form of financial compensation that South Yorkshire Police have to cough up but in reality that just comes out of the public purse one way or another, it doesn't really harm the South Yorkshire Police. The protagonists are now all in heir dotage, so any personal culpability is unlikely to get sanctioned but I would dearly love to see those accountable for the continuing cover up brought to book. After all it can be argued that the cover up was still going on until very recently.</p>

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • jeggaJ Offline
    jeggaJ Offline
    jegga
    wrote on last edited by
    #40

    <blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="TeWaio" data-cid="576966" data-time="1462371180">
    <div>
    <p>Margaret Aspinall CBE is an amazing woman. To lead that group in fighting for 27 years, and never giving up despite all the injustice along the way is just incredible. So many institutions / systems stacked against them for so long. To have such tenacity, after having lost a child in the tragedy. Beggars belief. </p>
    </div>
    </blockquote>
    <p> </p>
    <p>Agree, She reminds me of Lawrence Dallaglios mother who campaigned for the truth after her daughters death <a data-ipb='nomediaparse' href='http://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/i-lost-my-daughter-my-friend-1113754.html'>http://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/i-lost-my-daughter-my-friend-1113754.html</a></p>

    1 Reply Last reply
    0

Hillsborough
Sports Talk
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.