All Blacks 2021
-
@Victor-Meldrew
I have read your posts on this thread and I do agree there are more things wrong with AB rugby than just Foster and you make some really valid points on that.What is your opinion on Foster as a coach do you rate him or not really?.
Genuine question being asked here.@chris said in All Blacks 2021:
@Victor-Meldrew
I have read your posts on this thread and I do agree there are more things wrong with AB rugby than just Foster and you make some really valid points on that.What is your opinion on Foster as a coach do you rate him or not really?.
Genuine question being asked here.Genuine answer: I don't know quite how I rate him at this stage. Bit of a curate’s egg. Apologies for the long post
Obviously looking in from 12,000 miles away, but I think he's inherited a mess (and obviously knew what he was getting into) and he can't influence everything in the AB camp - like lack of depth in certain positions, choice of assistant coaches. And where he can influence stuff, we don’t know how long it will take to turn things around. This year he's had to deal with some key players being unavailable which would make any coach's job difficult. But that’s his job.
Pluses:
-
Foster’s developed some good depth in the loose forwards and has managed the likes of Akira Ioane better than any other coach. Ditto Reiko where he's back to his best form at wing while developing his skills at 13
-
He seems happy to give off-the-wall ideas a try (bizarrely playing JB at wing) but equally recognises when things aren't working and nailed him in at 15 where he's developed as a world-class 15
-
Openness to trying new players like Sami T & Finlay Christie (and Brad Webber) and giving them plenty of game time has reaped some dividends.
-
Trying to be consistent in midfield and tried to build combinations. He's stopped mucking ALB about and given Havilli plenty of time to settle in. He's also given Reiko plenty of time at 13 to settle in without wrecking his confidence.
-
When the team actually does play well, they play bloody well - whoever the opponent is. Just not for long enough periods
-
He's prepared to front up and take the crap for his players when things don't go well (but see my comment on communications below)
Negatives:
-
If he has a new game plan or plans, I can't see it, or it isn't being executed well. Some of our tactics are poor/weird and/or poorly executed.
-
He sticks with some bizarre selections which don't make sense to me. Player loyalty is a good thing but can be carried too far and damage confidence. Think Bridge & Havilli.
-
The attitude of the team under pressure seems all over the place as is the on-field leadership. This isn't all up to him as it includes the senior players, but he needs to lead here. This sort of stuff can't be fixed overnight and there were glimpses of improvement - particularly against Oz - but they faded badly on the NH tour. That’s not good enough.
-
There's too many mistakes, ill-discipline, and lack of consistency on-field. That's down to him - and his Captain(s).
-
He doesn't communicate well in public. Which makes me wonder if he's not communicating well enough with the team overall. He's probably pretty good dealing on a one-to-one basis though (i.e. Akira).
Stick with him or a new coach? A new coach might make a short-term difference and paper over the cracks for a year or two, but the deeper problems still need to be fixed. I'm old enough to remember the crap time it was to be an AB supporter in the 70's -early 80's when we swapped one wonder-coach for another every two years
Perhaps Foster understands the problem well enough, but he, with his current coaching team aren’t capable of fixing them. Ideally, I'd like to see someone like Schmidt given more influence and a remit to understand the deeper issues & support Foster, along with someone like Tana or the GOAT to help with the team culture. TBF, we don't know how much input Foster has in this area.
And then if things don't improve this year, we have an experienced international coach who has worked with the team, understands the deeper issues who can take over and provide continuity
-
-
@chris said in All Blacks 2021:
@Victor-Meldrew
I have read your posts on this thread and I do agree there are more things wrong with AB rugby than just Foster and you make some really valid points on that.What is your opinion on Foster as a coach do you rate him or not really?.
Genuine question being asked here.Genuine answer: I don't know quite how I rate him at this stage. Bit of a curate’s egg. Apologies for the long post
Obviously looking in from 12,000 miles away, but I think he's inherited a mess (and obviously knew what he was getting into) and he can't influence everything in the AB camp - like lack of depth in certain positions, choice of assistant coaches. And where he can influence stuff, we don’t know how long it will take to turn things around. This year he's had to deal with some key players being unavailable which would make any coach's job difficult. But that’s his job.
Pluses:
-
Foster’s developed some good depth in the loose forwards and has managed the likes of Akira Ioane better than any other coach. Ditto Reiko where he's back to his best form at wing while developing his skills at 13
-
He seems happy to give off-the-wall ideas a try (bizarrely playing JB at wing) but equally recognises when things aren't working and nailed him in at 15 where he's developed as a world-class 15
-
Openness to trying new players like Sami T & Finlay Christie (and Brad Webber) and giving them plenty of game time has reaped some dividends.
-
Trying to be consistent in midfield and tried to build combinations. He's stopped mucking ALB about and given Havilli plenty of time to settle in. He's also given Reiko plenty of time at 13 to settle in without wrecking his confidence.
-
When the team actually does play well, they play bloody well - whoever the opponent is. Just not for long enough periods
-
He's prepared to front up and take the crap for his players when things don't go well (but see my comment on communications below)
Negatives:
-
If he has a new game plan or plans, I can't see it, or it isn't being executed well. Some of our tactics are poor/weird and/or poorly executed.
-
He sticks with some bizarre selections which don't make sense to me. Player loyalty is a good thing but can be carried too far and damage confidence. Think Bridge & Havilli.
-
The attitude of the team under pressure seems all over the place as is the on-field leadership. This isn't all up to him as it includes the senior players, but he needs to lead here. This sort of stuff can't be fixed overnight and there were glimpses of improvement - particularly against Oz - but they faded badly on the NH tour. That’s not good enough.
-
There's too many mistakes, ill-discipline, and lack of consistency on-field. That's down to him - and his Captain(s).
-
He doesn't communicate well in public. Which makes me wonder if he's not communicating well enough with the team overall. He's probably pretty good dealing on a one-to-one basis though (i.e. Akira).
Stick with him or a new coach? A new coach might make a short-term difference and paper over the cracks for a year or two, but the deeper problems still need to be fixed. I'm old enough to remember the crap time it was to be an AB supporter in the 70's -early 80's when we swapped one wonder-coach for another every two years
Perhaps Foster understands the problem well enough, but he, with his current coaching team aren’t capable of fixing them. Ideally, I'd like to see someone like Schmidt given more influence and a remit to understand the deeper issues & support Foster, along with someone like Tana or the GOAT to help with the team culture. TBF, we don't know how much input Foster has in this area.
And then if things don't improve this year, we have an experienced international coach who has worked with the team, understands the deeper issues who can take over and provide continuity
Thanks I appreciate the response and a very interesting well balanced one.
As you know I am not a Foster Fan really for all the negative reasons you outlined in your post.I would like him replaced.
But I take on board the other things you have said as they are good balanced points. -
-
@chris said in All Blacks 2021:
@Victor-Meldrew
I have read your posts on this thread and I do agree there are more things wrong with AB rugby than just Foster and you make some really valid points on that.What is your opinion on Foster as a coach do you rate him or not really?.
Genuine question being asked here.Genuine answer: I don't know quite how I rate him at this stage. Bit of a curate’s egg. Apologies for the long post
Obviously looking in from 12,000 miles away, but I think he's inherited a mess (and obviously knew what he was getting into) and he can't influence everything in the AB camp - like lack of depth in certain positions, choice of assistant coaches. And where he can influence stuff, we don’t know how long it will take to turn things around. This year he's had to deal with some key players being unavailable which would make any coach's job difficult. But that’s his job.
Pluses:
-
Foster’s developed some good depth in the loose forwards and has managed the likes of Akira Ioane better than any other coach. Ditto Reiko where he's back to his best form at wing while developing his skills at 13
-
He seems happy to give off-the-wall ideas a try (bizarrely playing JB at wing) but equally recognises when things aren't working and nailed him in at 15 where he's developed as a world-class 15
-
Openness to trying new players like Sami T & Finlay Christie (and Brad Webber) and giving them plenty of game time has reaped some dividends.
-
Trying to be consistent in midfield and tried to build combinations. He's stopped mucking ALB about and given Havilli plenty of time to settle in. He's also given Reiko plenty of time at 13 to settle in without wrecking his confidence.
-
When the team actually does play well, they play bloody well - whoever the opponent is. Just not for long enough periods
-
He's prepared to front up and take the crap for his players when things don't go well (but see my comment on communications below)
Negatives:
-
If he has a new game plan or plans, I can't see it, or it isn't being executed well. Some of our tactics are poor/weird and/or poorly executed.
-
He sticks with some bizarre selections which don't make sense to me. Player loyalty is a good thing but can be carried too far and damage confidence. Think Bridge & Havilli.
-
The attitude of the team under pressure seems all over the place as is the on-field leadership. This isn't all up to him as it includes the senior players, but he needs to lead here. This sort of stuff can't be fixed overnight and there were glimpses of improvement - particularly against Oz - but they faded badly on the NH tour. That’s not good enough.
-
There's too many mistakes, ill-discipline, and lack of consistency on-field. That's down to him - and his Captain(s).
-
He doesn't communicate well in public. Which makes me wonder if he's not communicating well enough with the team overall. He's probably pretty good dealing on a one-to-one basis though (i.e. Akira).
Stick with him or a new coach? A new coach might make a short-term difference and paper over the cracks for a year or two, but the deeper problems still need to be fixed. I'm old enough to remember the crap time it was to be an AB supporter in the 70's -early 80's when we swapped one wonder-coach for another every two years
Perhaps Foster understands the problem well enough, but he, with his current coaching team aren’t capable of fixing them. Ideally, I'd like to see someone like Schmidt given more influence and a remit to understand the deeper issues & support Foster, along with someone like Tana or the GOAT to help with the team culture. TBF, we don't know how much input Foster has in this area.
And then if things don't improve this year, we have an experienced international coach who has worked with the team, understands the deeper issues who can take over and provide continuity
@victor-meldrew said in All Blacks 2021:
-
He sticks with some bizarre selections which don't make sense to me. Player loyalty is a good thing but can be carried too far and damage confidence.
-
The attitude of the team under pressure seems all over the place as is the on-field leadership. This isn't all up to him as it includes the senior players, but he needs to lead here. This sort of stuff can't be fixed overnight and there were glimpses of improvement - particularly against Oz - but they faded badly on the NH tour. That’s not good enough.
-
There's too many mistakes, ill-discipline, and lack of consistency on-field. That's down to him - and his Captain(s).
-
He doesn't communicate well in public. Which makes me wonder if he's not communicating well enough with the team overall. He's probably pretty good dealing on a one-to-one basis though (i.e. Akira).
I'm glad that you have highlighted those 3 issues above.
Brendon McCullum (a man with relevant previous experience in a critical leadership role) voiced his views on the radio a few months back.
He reckoned that clearly Foster wants to be mates with his players, and doesn't have the ruthless streak to lay down the law or dump players who don't perform. And doesn't appear to have a coherent plan, or the ability to change things up when something isn't working.
In other words, not the right man to be Captain of the ship. Second mate is about his level. Foster simply isn't a natural leader.
A head coach needs to be an inspirational figure, a leader of men.. someone who's a big 'mover and shaker'.
Foster's personality is far too benign & mundane for a sheriff. If you think about all the great head coaching figures, they are all ruthless and decisive, no fluff involved. Eddie, Rassie, Razor, etc.. Crucially - their individual characters are stimulating, influential and engaging for players to stay driven, clear and motivated.
These high-profile head coaches have magnetic and charismatic personalities. Foster has all the charisma of dry paint. His interviews put me to sleep to be perfectly honest here... to contrast Henry, Eddie, Rassie, Razor etc.. are all extremely charming and engaging figures to listen to and interact with (for the players, media & fans alike). They each have magnetic personalities, are witty, sharp & intellectually minded. This is a critical point of difference that our current dry as dust, one dimensional head coach in Ian Foster severely lacks.
-
-
just stop
you are embarrassing yourself
-
@nostrildamus keeps his shoes on, innit
@bones said in All Blacks 2021:
@nostrildamus keeps his shoes on, innit
Good eye for detail, but devout Buddhist monks go barefoot (like Buddha).
-
@antipodean said in All Blacks 2021:
Option one is a path to mediocrity IMO. Everyone I speak to who isn't obviously brain damaged sees we're playing stupidly obvious patterns that don't make defenses make decisions. The same patterns we've been playing for ages.
Well he was chosen as a continuity coach. Maybe that's what they meant, same attack for another 4 years
@machpants said in All Blacks 2021:
@antipodean said in All Blacks 2021:
Option one is a path to mediocrity IMO. Everyone I speak to who isn't obviously brain damaged sees we're playing stupidly obvious patterns that don't make defenses make decisions. The same patterns we've been playing for ages.
Well he was chosen as a continuity coach. Maybe that's what they meant, same attack for another 4 years
Good point, it does seem a graceless but continual slide down from Hansen...
-
Thanks I appreciate the response and a very interesting well balanced one.
As you know I am not a Foster Fan really for all the negative reasons you outlined in your post.I would like him replaced.
But I take on board the other things you have said as they are good balanced points.@chris said in All Blacks 2021:
Thanks I appreciate the response and a very interesting well balanced one.
As you know I am not a Foster Fan really for all the negative reasons you outlined in your post.I would like him replaced.
But I take on board the other things you have said as they are good balanced points.One thing I might add is this: Has Super Rugby become too disconnected from Test level and doesn't provide the experience and exposure to pressure needed?
-
@chris said in All Blacks 2021:
Thanks I appreciate the response and a very interesting well balanced one.
As you know I am not a Foster Fan really for all the negative reasons you outlined in your post.I would like him replaced.
But I take on board the other things you have said as they are good balanced points.One thing I might add is this: Has Super Rugby become too disconnected from Test level and doesn't provide the experience and exposure to pressure needed?
@victor-meldrew said in All Blacks 2021:
@chris said in All Blacks 2021:
Thanks I appreciate the response and a very interesting well balanced one.
As you know I am not a Foster Fan really for all the negative reasons you outlined in your post.I would like him replaced.
But I take on board the other things you have said as they are good balanced points.One thing I might add is this: Has Super Rugby become too disconnected from Test level and doesn't provide the experience and exposure to pressure needed?
yes, yes, yes.
-
@victor-meldrew said in All Blacks 2021:
-
He sticks with some bizarre selections which don't make sense to me. Player loyalty is a good thing but can be carried too far and damage confidence.
-
The attitude of the team under pressure seems all over the place as is the on-field leadership. This isn't all up to him as it includes the senior players, but he needs to lead here. This sort of stuff can't be fixed overnight and there were glimpses of improvement - particularly against Oz - but they faded badly on the NH tour. That’s not good enough.
-
There's too many mistakes, ill-discipline, and lack of consistency on-field. That's down to him - and his Captain(s).
-
He doesn't communicate well in public. Which makes me wonder if he's not communicating well enough with the team overall. He's probably pretty good dealing on a one-to-one basis though (i.e. Akira).
I'm glad that you have highlighted those 3 issues above.
Brendon McCullum (a man with relevant previous experience in a critical leadership role) voiced his views on the radio a few months back.
He reckoned that clearly Foster wants to be mates with his players, and doesn't have the ruthless streak to lay down the law or dump players who don't perform. And doesn't appear to have a coherent plan, or the ability to change things up when something isn't working.
In other words, not the right man to be Captain of the ship. Second mate is about his level. Foster simply isn't a natural leader.
A head coach needs to be an inspirational figure, a leader of men.. someone who's a big 'mover and shaker'.
Foster's personality is far too benign & mundane for a sheriff. If you think about all the great head coaching figures, they are all ruthless and decisive, no fluff involved. Eddie, Rassie, Razor, etc.. Crucially - their individual characters are stimulating, influential and engaging for players to stay driven, clear and motivated.
These high-profile head coaches have magnetic and charismatic personalities. Foster has all the charisma of dry paint. His interviews put me to sleep to be perfectly honest here... to contrast Henry, Eddie, Rassie, Razor etc.. are all extremely charming and engaging figures to listen to and interact with (for the players, media & fans alike). They each have magnetic personalities, are witty, sharp & intellectually minded. This is a critical point of difference that our current dry as dust, one dimensional head coach in Ian Foster severely lacks.
@kiwi_expat said in All Blacks 2021:
These high-profile head coaches have magnetic and charismatic personalities. Foster has all the charisma of dry paint.
Two words: Carwyn James.
-
-
@chris said in All Blacks 2021:
Thanks I appreciate the response and a very interesting well balanced one.
As you know I am not a Foster Fan really for all the negative reasons you outlined in your post.I would like him replaced.
But I take on board the other things you have said as they are good balanced points.One thing I might add is this: Has Super Rugby become too disconnected from Test level and doesn't provide the experience and exposure to pressure needed?
@victor-meldrew said in All Blacks 2021:
@chris said in All Blacks 2021:
Thanks I appreciate the response and a very interesting well balanced one.
As you know I am not a Foster Fan really for all the negative reasons you outlined in your post.I would like him replaced.
But I take on board the other things you have said as they are good balanced points.One thing I might add is this: Has Super Rugby become too disconnected from Test level and doesn't provide the experience and exposure to pressure needed?
Yes I think it has,No SA has had a dramatic impact on SR In my Opinion..
-
@victor-meldrew said in All Blacks 2021:
-
He sticks with some bizarre selections which don't make sense to me. Player loyalty is a good thing but can be carried too far and damage confidence.
-
The attitude of the team under pressure seems all over the place as is the on-field leadership. This isn't all up to him as it includes the senior players, but he needs to lead here. This sort of stuff can't be fixed overnight and there were glimpses of improvement - particularly against Oz - but they faded badly on the NH tour. That’s not good enough.
-
There's too many mistakes, ill-discipline, and lack of consistency on-field. That's down to him - and his Captain(s).
-
He doesn't communicate well in public. Which makes me wonder if he's not communicating well enough with the team overall. He's probably pretty good dealing on a one-to-one basis though (i.e. Akira).
I'm glad that you have highlighted those 3 issues above.
Brendon McCullum (a man with relevant previous experience in a critical leadership role) voiced his views on the radio a few months back.
He reckoned that clearly Foster wants to be mates with his players, and doesn't have the ruthless streak to lay down the law or dump players who don't perform. And doesn't appear to have a coherent plan, or the ability to change things up when something isn't working.
In other words, not the right man to be Captain of the ship. Second mate is about his level. Foster simply isn't a natural leader.
A head coach needs to be an inspirational figure, a leader of men.. someone who's a big 'mover and shaker'.
Foster's personality is far too benign & mundane for a sheriff. If you think about all the great head coaching figures, they are all ruthless and decisive, no fluff involved. Eddie, Rassie, Razor, etc.. Crucially - their individual characters are stimulating, influential and engaging for players to stay driven, clear and motivated.
These high-profile head coaches have magnetic and charismatic personalities. Foster has all the charisma of dry paint. His interviews put me to sleep to be perfectly honest here... to contrast Henry, Eddie, Rassie, Razor etc.. are all extremely charming and engaging figures to listen to and interact with (for the players, media & fans alike). They each have magnetic personalities, are witty, sharp & intellectually minded. This is a critical point of difference that our current dry as dust, one dimensional head coach in Ian Foster severely lacks.
@kiwi_expat said in All Blacks 2021:
Brendon McCullum (a man with relevant previous experience in a critical leadership role) voiced his views on the radio a few months back.
He reckoned that clearly Foster wants to be mates with his players, and doesn't have the ruthless streak to lay down the law or dump players who don't perform. And doesn't appear to have a coherent plan, or the ability to change things up when something isn't working.I would tend to agree this seems like an area of real weakness. If you look at his refusal to drop those that aren't showing form (Codie Taylor, George Bridge, TJP, Patrick Tuipulotu, Brayden Ennor etc) it's a worrying trend. He's picking the same players that were being picked in 2019 under Hansen with the odd exception (Akira, Will Jordan). And some of the newer players he does pick hardly ever get to play despite showing promise (Tupou Vaai, Sotutu etc).
-
-
@victor-meldrew said in All Blacks 2021:
@chris said in All Blacks 2021:
Thanks I appreciate the response and a very interesting well balanced one.
As you know I am not a Foster Fan really for all the negative reasons you outlined in your post.I would like him replaced.
But I take on board the other things you have said as they are good balanced points.One thing I might add is this: Has Super Rugby become too disconnected from Test level and doesn't provide the experience and exposure to pressure needed?
Yes I think it has,No SA has had a dramatic impact on SR In my Opinion..
@chris said in All Blacks 2021:
@victor-meldrew said in All Blacks 2021:
@chris said in All Blacks 2021:
Thanks I appreciate the response and a very interesting well balanced one.
As you know I am not a Foster Fan really for all the negative reasons you outlined in your post.I would like him replaced.
But I take on board the other things you have said as they are good balanced points.One thing I might add is this: Has Super Rugby become too disconnected from Test level and doesn't provide the experience and exposure to pressure needed?
Yes I think it has,No SA has had a dramatic impact on SR In my Opinion..
it predated that. Since 2015 (and the ill fated and poxy Super 18) the quality has plummetted. Super 18 was 2016/17. The administrators were crappy then, and they are crappy now. Once you wreck the quality of a comp, you can't get it back easily at all.
Losing the SA teams will prove problematic for both of us in the medium term I suspect. You have to play the best to be the best -- and we all lose out without the games.
-
@kiwi_expat said in All Blacks 2021:
Brendon McCullum (a man with relevant previous experience in a critical leadership role) voiced his views on the radio a few months back.
He reckoned that clearly Foster wants to be mates with his players, and doesn't have the ruthless streak to lay down the law or dump players who don't perform. And doesn't appear to have a coherent plan, or the ability to change things up when something isn't working.I would tend to agree this seems like an area of real weakness. If you look at his refusal to drop those that aren't showing form (Codie Taylor, George Bridge, TJP, Patrick Tuipulotu, Brayden Ennor etc) it's a worrying trend. He's picking the same players that were being picked in 2019 under Hansen with the odd exception (Akira, Will Jordan). And some of the newer players he does pick hardly ever get to play despite showing promise (Tupou Vaai, Sotutu etc).
@kiwimurph said in All Blacks 2021:
And some of the newer players he does pick hardly ever get to play despite showing promise (Tupou Vaai, Sotutu etc).
TBF, I think Sotutu has been given plenty of game time and Vaia is probably being eased in. And he's given other new players plenty of time on the pitch as well.
-
@chris said in All Blacks 2021:
@victor-meldrew said in All Blacks 2021:
@chris said in All Blacks 2021:
Thanks I appreciate the response and a very interesting well balanced one.
As you know I am not a Foster Fan really for all the negative reasons you outlined in your post.I would like him replaced.
But I take on board the other things you have said as they are good balanced points.One thing I might add is this: Has Super Rugby become too disconnected from Test level and doesn't provide the experience and exposure to pressure needed?
Yes I think it has,No SA has had a dramatic impact on SR In my Opinion..
it predated that. Since 2015 (and the ill fated and poxy Super 18) the quality has plummetted. Super 18 was 2016/17. The administrators were crappy then, and they are crappy now. Once you wreck the quality of a comp, you can't get it back easily at all.
Losing the SA teams will prove problematic for both of us in the medium term I suspect. You have to play the best to be the best -- and we all lose out without the games.
@nzzp said in All Blacks 2021:
@chris said in All Blacks 2021:
@victor-meldrew said in All Blacks 2021:
@chris said in All Blacks 2021:
Thanks I appreciate the response and a very interesting well balanced one.
As you know I am not a Foster Fan really for all the negative reasons you outlined in your post.I would like him replaced.
But I take on board the other things you have said as they are good balanced points.One thing I might add is this: Has Super Rugby become too disconnected from Test level and doesn't provide the experience and exposure to pressure needed?
Yes I think it has,No SA has had a dramatic impact on SR In my Opinion..
it predated that. Since 2015 (and the ill fated and poxy Super 18) the quality has plummetted. Super 18 was 2016/17. The administrators were crappy then, and they are crappy now. Once you wreck the quality of a comp, you can't get it back easily at all.
Losing the SA teams will prove problematic for both of us in the medium term I suspect. You have to play the best to be the best -- and we all lose out without the games.
I agree. and as @chris said, the loss of SA last year or so has maybe compounded the problem.
Too much focus on successful Super Rugby teams and not enough on the state of the game in NZ Rugby in general?
-
@bones said in All Blacks 2021:
@nostrildamus keeps his shoes on, innit
Good eye for detail, but devout Buddhist monks go barefoot (like Buddha).
@nostrildamus said in All Blacks 2021:
@bones said in All Blacks 2021:
@nostrildamus keeps his shoes on, innit
Good eye for detail, but devout Buddhist monks go barefoot (like Buddha).
My eye for detail also noted that I never said anything about a monk...
-
@chris said in All Blacks 2021:
@victor-meldrew said in All Blacks 2021:
@chris said in All Blacks 2021:
Thanks I appreciate the response and a very interesting well balanced one.
As you know I am not a Foster Fan really for all the negative reasons you outlined in your post.I would like him replaced.
But I take on board the other things you have said as they are good balanced points.One thing I might add is this: Has Super Rugby become too disconnected from Test level and doesn't provide the experience and exposure to pressure needed?
Yes I think it has,No SA has had a dramatic impact on SR In my Opinion..
it predated that. Since 2015 (and the ill fated and poxy Super 18) the quality has plummetted. Super 18 was 2016/17. The administrators were crappy then, and they are crappy now. Once you wreck the quality of a comp, you can't get it back easily at all.
Losing the SA teams will prove problematic for both of us in the medium term I suspect. You have to play the best to be the best -- and we all lose out without the games.
@nzzp said in All Blacks 2021:
Losing the SA teams will prove problematic for both of us in the medium term I suspect. You have to play the best to be the best -- and we all lose out without the games.
The best? Look at how poorly the SA franchises are performing in the URC & how many SR titles have they won since 2010?
People are quick to cite the Aussie sides getting belted every weekend when the Saffers had an even worse Super win-record & qualification record for the playoffs.
The South African record in SR was quite honestly abysmal. For a country that prides itself on it's rugby prowess, their franchises were terrible and what they achieved was embarrassing.
They hardly brought a lot of value to Super Rugby (except diversity) but cheating officials and corrupt administrators.
And pretty much everything Foster says re: the performance of the AB's in that article (regarding the current absence of SA teams) feels like he's saying nothing. Of course it's a negative to be playing less diverse opposition. It's not the first, second, or tenth thing I would even look at though.
And to a large extent... It's not really even true because Super matches against South African teams tended to have pretty similar amounts of running rugby to other games. If anything, a lot of the local derbies felt tighter and more physical.
The SA teams don't even add to the URC (look at their position in the current standings) but then they didn't to SR either.
The way the All Blacks have been beaten in the last ten years hasn’t changed. Everyone knows what to do and how to do it. Some teams can execute that game plan.
Our coaches have just got lazy and complacent relying on player talent to carry the lack of game plan & tactical nous. The rest is just making excuses.
-
@nzzp said in All Blacks 2021:
Losing the SA teams will prove problematic for both of us in the medium term I suspect. You have to play the best to be the best -- and we all lose out without the games.
The best? Look at how poorly the SA franchises are performing in the URC & how many SR titles have they won since 2010?
People are quick to cite the Aussie sides getting belted every weekend when the Saffers had an even worse Super win-record & qualification record for the playoffs.
The South African record in SR was quite honestly abysmal. For a country that prides itself on it's rugby prowess, their franchises were terrible and what they achieved was embarrassing.
They hardly brought a lot of value to Super Rugby (except diversity) but cheating officials and corrupt administrators.
And pretty much everything Foster says re: the performance of the AB's in that article (regarding the current absence of SA teams) feels like he's saying nothing. Of course it's a negative to be playing less diverse opposition. It's not the first, second, or tenth thing I would even look at though.
And to a large extent... It's not really even true because Super matches against South African teams tended to have pretty similar amounts of running rugby to other games. If anything, a lot of the local derbies felt tighter and more physical.
The SA teams don't even add to the URC (look at their position in the current standings) but then they didn't to SR either.
The way the All Blacks have been beaten in the last ten years hasn’t changed. Everyone knows what to do and how to do it. Some teams can execute that game plan.
Our coaches have just got lazy and complacent relying on player talent to carry the lack of game plan & tactical nous. The rest is just making excuses.
@kiwi_expat said in All Blacks 2021:
They hardly brought a lot of value to Super Rugby (except diversity) besides cheating officials and corrupt administrators.
I don't agree. They brought huge physicality to the game, and a different style of play for people and teams to adapt to. They forced us to learn how to travel long distances and play well. They made us develop different game plans to win at altitude.
So I understand your point - but I really enjoyed having them in the comp, and will miss them.
-
@nzzp said in All Blacks 2021:
Losing the SA teams will prove problematic for both of us in the medium term I suspect. You have to play the best to be the best -- and we all lose out without the games.
The best? Look at how poorly the SA franchises are performing in the URC & how many SR titles have they won since 2010?
People are quick to cite the Aussie sides getting belted every weekend when the Saffers had an even worse Super win-record & qualification record for the playoffs.
The South African record in SR was quite honestly abysmal. For a country that prides itself on it's rugby prowess, their franchises were terrible and what they achieved was embarrassing.
They hardly brought a lot of value to Super Rugby (except diversity) but cheating officials and corrupt administrators.
And pretty much everything Foster says re: the performance of the AB's in that article (regarding the current absence of SA teams) feels like he's saying nothing. Of course it's a negative to be playing less diverse opposition. It's not the first, second, or tenth thing I would even look at though.
And to a large extent... It's not really even true because Super matches against South African teams tended to have pretty similar amounts of running rugby to other games. If anything, a lot of the local derbies felt tighter and more physical.
The SA teams don't even add to the URC (look at their position in the current standings) but then they didn't to SR either.
The way the All Blacks have been beaten in the last ten years hasn’t changed. Everyone knows what to do and how to do it. Some teams can execute that game plan.
Our coaches have just got lazy and complacent relying on player talent to carry the lack of game plan & tactical nous. The rest is just making excuses.
@kiwi_expat said in All Blacks 2021:
The South African record in SR was quite honestly abysmal. For a country that prides itself on it's rugby prowess, their franchises were terrible and what they achieved was embarrassing.
I agree. Yet they have won as many RWC's as us
You make a strong argument that any connection between coaching success at Super Rugby and Test level is tenuous at best.
-
@kiwi_expat said in All Blacks 2021:
They hardly brought a lot of value to Super Rugby (except diversity) besides cheating officials and corrupt administrators.
I don't agree. They brought huge physicality to the game, and a different style of play for people and teams to adapt to. They forced us to learn how to travel long distances and play well. They made us develop different game plans to win at altitude.
So I understand your point - but I really enjoyed having them in the comp, and will miss them.
@nzzp said in All Blacks 2021:
@kiwi_expat said in All Blacks 2021:
They hardly brought a lot of value to Super Rugby (except diversity) besides cheating officials and corrupt administrators.
I don't agree. They brought huge physicality to the game, and a different style of play for people and teams to adapt to. They forced us to learn how to travel long distances and play well. They made us develop different game plans to win at altitude.
So I understand your point - but I really enjoyed having them in the comp, and will miss them.
That this needs pointing out is testament to some of the recent shit being posted on here (and separate from the fact that they would have been very strong if we had stayed with the original Super 12).
Don't get me wrong, I've been loving it, because January is a bit boring and it has kept me coming back.
-
@kiwi_expat said in All Blacks 2021:
They hardly brought a lot of value to Super Rugby (except diversity) besides cheating officials and corrupt administrators.
I don't agree. They brought huge physicality to the game, and a different style of play for people and teams to adapt to. They forced us to learn how to travel long distances and play well. They made us develop different game plans to win at altitude.
So I understand your point - but I really enjoyed having them in the comp, and will miss them.
@nzzp said in All Blacks 2021:
@kiwi_expat said in All Blacks 2021:
They hardly brought a lot of value to Super Rugby (except diversity) besides cheating officials and corrupt administrators.
I don't agree. They brought huge physicality to the game, and a different style of play for people and teams to adapt to. They forced us to learn how to travel long distances and play well. They made us develop different game plans to win at altitude.
That appears to be something we learnt easily. We dominated them in SR.
