Skip to content
  • Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

  • Tipping
  • Team Sheets
  • Highlights
  • Results
    • All Blacks

      Search every All Blacks Test. Filter results by year, opposition, location, venue, city and RWC stage

    • Super Rugby

      Search every Super Rugby since match 1996

    • NPC

      Search NPC results. Only first division matches from 1976-2005. All results from the 14 team competition (2006-present) are included

Super Rugby 2022

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Sports Talk
1.6k Posts 77 Posters 208.0k Views 4 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • BonesB Bones

    @kiwi_expat said in Super Rugby 2022:

    @tim said in Super Rugby 2022:

    @hooroo If your team stays healthy, I think you can roll them this year. Even without DMac.

    Just having a look through the squads and I think the Crusader's stocks are naturally being over-estimated on here again, for the past few seasons their squad hasn't looked amazing, but they've performed far greater than the sum of their parts under Scott Robertson's innovative coaching, and honestly, when you assess the positional strengths of each franchise the Crusaders depth/quality only really stands out at lock and back three.

    The Chiefs and Blues have the greatest talent and depth from positions 1-3, Blues, Chiefs (and Highlanders to lesser extent) each have envious depth in talented loosies which Crusaders are lacking, Highlanders/Blues/Chiefs packs all comfortably match theirs, the Chiefs have 5 standout locking options in their current squad, Highlanders tall timber, loosies and front-row all vastly underrated.

    Blues, Hurricanes, Chiefs, and Highlanders all have superior and more talented midfield options than Crusaders. Outside backs are perhaps the only department that could provide a genuine point of difference for Red & Blacks, but even then the back three is a great strength position across all the franchises right now, particularly amongst the Blues, Highlanders and Hurricanes. So nothing to scoff at either.

    I made an unsuccessful bid last super season for broken record. The NZ refs heavily favour the saders. Often it's just the little things, 50/50s going their way, "missed" calls, they get away with a lot more consecutive penalties minus a card it feels like as well. Be interested to see what side was most penalised.

    antipodeanA Offline
    antipodeanA Offline
    antipodean
    wrote on last edited by
    #375

    @bones said in Super Rugby 2022:

    @kiwi_expat said in Super Rugby 2022:

    @tim said in Super Rugby 2022:

    @hooroo If your team stays healthy, I think you can roll them this year. Even without DMac.

    Just having a look through the squads and I think the Crusader's stocks are naturally being over-estimated on here again, for the past few seasons their squad hasn't looked amazing, but they've performed far greater than the sum of their parts under Scott Robertson's innovative coaching, and honestly, when you assess the positional strengths of each franchise the Crusaders depth/quality only really stands out at lock and back three.

    The Chiefs and Blues have the greatest talent and depth from positions 1-3, Blues, Chiefs (and Highlanders to lesser extent) each have envious depth in talented loosies which Crusaders are lacking, Highlanders/Blues/Chiefs packs all comfortably match theirs, the Chiefs have 5 standout locking options in their current squad, Highlanders tall timber, loosies and front-row all vastly underrated.

    Blues, Hurricanes, Chiefs, and Highlanders all have superior and more talented midfield options than Crusaders. Outside backs are perhaps the only department that could provide a genuine point of difference for Red & Blacks, but even then the back three is a great strength position across all the franchises right now, particularly amongst the Blues, Highlanders and Hurricanes. So nothing to scoff at either.

    I made an unsuccessful bid last super season for broken record. The NZ refs heavily favour the saders. Often it's just the little things, 50/50s going their way, "missed" calls, they get away with a lot more consecutive penalties minus a card it feels like as well. Be interested to see what side was most penalised.

    Doesn't help when NZ referees make this type of appalling blunder.

    I hope that pre-season for these clowns addresses this sort of incompetence.

    YeetyaahY 1 Reply Last reply
    5
    • YeetyaahY Offline
      YeetyaahY Offline
      Yeetyaah
      wrote on last edited by
      #376

      https://www.superrugby.co.nz/news/new-zealands-super-rugby-pacific-franchises-have-an-extra-training-partner-this-year/

      The Blues have Brendon Pickerill running with them. There is one catch - he won't referee any Blues games this year.
      Around the rest of the country, Mike Fraser will be based with the Chiefs, Ben O'Keeffe with the Hurricanes, Paul Williams links up with the Crusaders and James Doleman will join the Highlanders. In every case, no referee will officiate their respective teams.

      1 Reply Last reply
      2
      • YeetyaahY Offline
        YeetyaahY Offline
        Yeetyaah
        wrote on last edited by
        #377

        Pretty good incentive tbh. Blues are the big winners here as Pickerill won't be reffing them.

        1 Reply Last reply
        9
        • KiwiwombleK Offline
          KiwiwombleK Offline
          Kiwiwomble
          wrote on last edited by
          #378

          yeah, dont mind that

          1 Reply Last reply
          2
          • antipodeanA antipodean

            @bones said in Super Rugby 2022:

            @kiwi_expat said in Super Rugby 2022:

            @tim said in Super Rugby 2022:

            @hooroo If your team stays healthy, I think you can roll them this year. Even without DMac.

            Just having a look through the squads and I think the Crusader's stocks are naturally being over-estimated on here again, for the past few seasons their squad hasn't looked amazing, but they've performed far greater than the sum of their parts under Scott Robertson's innovative coaching, and honestly, when you assess the positional strengths of each franchise the Crusaders depth/quality only really stands out at lock and back three.

            The Chiefs and Blues have the greatest talent and depth from positions 1-3, Blues, Chiefs (and Highlanders to lesser extent) each have envious depth in talented loosies which Crusaders are lacking, Highlanders/Blues/Chiefs packs all comfortably match theirs, the Chiefs have 5 standout locking options in their current squad, Highlanders tall timber, loosies and front-row all vastly underrated.

            Blues, Hurricanes, Chiefs, and Highlanders all have superior and more talented midfield options than Crusaders. Outside backs are perhaps the only department that could provide a genuine point of difference for Red & Blacks, but even then the back three is a great strength position across all the franchises right now, particularly amongst the Blues, Highlanders and Hurricanes. So nothing to scoff at either.

            I made an unsuccessful bid last super season for broken record. The NZ refs heavily favour the saders. Often it's just the little things, 50/50s going their way, "missed" calls, they get away with a lot more consecutive penalties minus a card it feels like as well. Be interested to see what side was most penalised.

            Doesn't help when NZ referees make this type of appalling blunder.

            I hope that pre-season for these clowns addresses this sort of incompetence.

            YeetyaahY Offline
            YeetyaahY Offline
            Yeetyaah
            wrote on last edited by
            #379

            @antipodean Wait how the fuck was that a forward pass

            1 Reply Last reply
            1
            • kiwi_expatK kiwi_expat

              @tim said in Super Rugby 2022:

              @hooroo If your team stays healthy, I think you can roll them this year. Even without DMac.

              Just having a look through the squads and I think the Crusader's stocks are naturally being over-estimated on here again, for the past few seasons their squad hasn't looked amazing, but they've performed far greater than the sum of their parts under Scott Robertson's innovative coaching, and honestly, when you assess the positional strengths of each franchise the Crusaders depth/quality only really stands out at lock and back three.

              The Chiefs and Blues have the greatest talent and depth from positions 1-3, Blues, Chiefs (and Highlanders to lesser extent) each have envious depth in talented loosies which Crusaders are lacking, Highlanders/Blues/Chiefs packs all comfortably match theirs, the Chiefs have 5 standout locking options in their current squad, Highlanders tall timber, loosies and front-row all vastly underrated.

              Blues, Hurricanes, Chiefs, and Highlanders all have superior and more talented midfield options than Crusaders. Outside backs are perhaps the only department that could provide a genuine point of difference for Red & Blacks, but even then the back three is a great strength position across all the franchises right now, particularly amongst the Blues, Highlanders and Hurricanes. So nothing to scoff at either.

              mariner4lifeM Offline
              mariner4lifeM Offline
              mariner4life
              wrote on last edited by
              #380

              @kiwi_expat lol you have to be a troll account, surely.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • BovidaeB Offline
                BovidaeB Offline
                Bovidae
                wrote on last edited by
                #381

                Ben O’Keeffe is based in Auckland now so the Blues are lucky, while Williams and Fraser will still get to ref their "home" teams (Chiefs and Hurricanes, respectively).

                1 Reply Last reply
                3
                • kiwi_expatK kiwi_expat

                  @tim said in Super Rugby 2022:

                  @hooroo If your team stays healthy, I think you can roll them this year. Even without DMac.

                  Just having a look through the squads and I think the Crusader's stocks are naturally being over-estimated on here again, for the past few seasons their squad hasn't looked amazing, but they've performed far greater than the sum of their parts under Scott Robertson's innovative coaching, and honestly, when you assess the positional strengths of each franchise the Crusaders depth/quality only really stands out at lock and back three.

                  The Chiefs and Blues have the greatest talent and depth from positions 1-3, Blues, Chiefs (and Highlanders to lesser extent) each have envious depth in talented loosies which Crusaders are lacking, Highlanders/Blues/Chiefs packs all comfortably match theirs, the Chiefs have 5 standout locking options in their current squad, Highlanders tall timber, loosies and front-row all vastly underrated.

                  Blues, Hurricanes, Chiefs, and Highlanders all have superior and more talented midfield options than Crusaders. Outside backs are perhaps the only department that could provide a genuine point of difference for Red & Blacks, but even then the back three is a great strength position across all the franchises right now, particularly amongst the Blues, Highlanders and Hurricanes. So nothing to scoff at either.

                  BonesB Offline
                  BonesB Offline
                  Bones
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #382

                  @kiwi_expat said in Super Rugby 2022:

                  Blues, Hurricanes, Chiefs, and Highlanders all have superior and more talented midfield options than Crusaders.

                  :face_with_tears_of_joy:

                  mariner4lifeM 1 Reply Last reply
                  5
                  • BonesB Bones

                    @kiwi_expat said in Super Rugby 2022:

                    Blues, Hurricanes, Chiefs, and Highlanders all have superior and more talented midfield options than Crusaders.

                    :face_with_tears_of_joy:

                    mariner4lifeM Offline
                    mariner4lifeM Offline
                    mariner4life
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #383

                    @bones said in Super Rugby 2022:

                    @kiwi_expat said in Super Rugby 2022:

                    Blues, Hurricanes, Chiefs, and Highlanders all have superior and more talented midfield options than Crusaders.

                    :face_with_tears_of_joy:

                    it's one of the better wind-ups in Fern history.

                    kiwi_expatK 1 Reply Last reply
                    2
                    • mariner4lifeM mariner4life

                      @bones said in Super Rugby 2022:

                      @kiwi_expat said in Super Rugby 2022:

                      Blues, Hurricanes, Chiefs, and Highlanders all have superior and more talented midfield options than Crusaders.

                      :face_with_tears_of_joy:

                      it's one of the better wind-ups in Fern history.

                      kiwi_expatK Offline
                      kiwi_expatK Offline
                      kiwi_expat
                      wrote on last edited by kiwi_expat
                      #384

                      I'm not sure if you're being serious here? they fit into Razor's system well enough but Ennor, Havili, Goodhue, McCleod, Punivai are all quite limited players. They are either far too lightweight, too passive and slow, or defensively poor.

                      The other franchises have considerably more talented, dynamic, faster & larger midfield options.

                      Chiefs: Anton Lienert-Brown (102kg), Alex Nankivell (98kg), Quinn Tupaea (102kg), Gideon Wrampling (101kg), Rameka Poihipi (105kg - has been the standout midfielder for Canterbury, Punivai & McCleod have been woeful).

                      Highlanders: Thomas Umaga-Jenson (107kg), Ngatungane Punivai (102kg), Scott Gregory (100kg), Fetuli Paea (98kg), Raymond Nu'u (98kg), Patelesio Tomkinson (96kg), Josh Timu.

                      Hurricanes: Jordie Barrett (102kg), Peter Umaga-Jensen (103kg), Billy Proctor (97kg), Bailyn Sullivan (98kg), Teihorangi Walden (96kg).

                      Blues: Reiko Ioane (103kg), Tanielu Te'ela (107kg), Roger Tuivasa-Sheck (98kg), Bryce Heem (103kg), Tamati Tua (98kg), Corey Evans (96kg).

                      KiwiwombleK African MonkeyA 2 Replies Last reply
                      1
                      • kiwi_expatK kiwi_expat

                        I'm not sure if you're being serious here? they fit into Razor's system well enough but Ennor, Havili, Goodhue, McCleod, Punivai are all quite limited players. They are either far too lightweight, too passive and slow, or defensively poor.

                        The other franchises have considerably more talented, dynamic, faster & larger midfield options.

                        Chiefs: Anton Lienert-Brown (102kg), Alex Nankivell (98kg), Quinn Tupaea (102kg), Gideon Wrampling (101kg), Rameka Poihipi (105kg - has been the standout midfielder for Canterbury, Punivai & McCleod have been woeful).

                        Highlanders: Thomas Umaga-Jenson (107kg), Ngatungane Punivai (102kg), Scott Gregory (100kg), Fetuli Paea (98kg), Raymond Nu'u (98kg), Patelesio Tomkinson (96kg), Josh Timu.

                        Hurricanes: Jordie Barrett (102kg), Peter Umaga-Jensen (103kg), Billy Proctor (97kg), Bailyn Sullivan (98kg), Teihorangi Walden (96kg).

                        Blues: Reiko Ioane (103kg), Tanielu Te'ela (107kg), Roger Tuivasa-Sheck (98kg), Bryce Heem (103kg), Tamati Tua (98kg), Corey Evans (96kg).

                        KiwiwombleK Offline
                        KiwiwombleK Offline
                        Kiwiwomble
                        wrote on last edited by Kiwiwomble
                        #385

                        @kiwi_expat surely you could acknowledge 3 of the 5 lightweight/pass/slow midfielders the saders have are All Blacks.....and so this opinion might be not a universal fact

                        surely you cant be surprised

                        kiwi_expatK 1 Reply Last reply
                        4
                        • mariner4lifeM Offline
                          mariner4lifeM Offline
                          mariner4life
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #386

                          okay, we are getting somewhere

                          Foster isn't the problem, picking too many shit Crusaders is the problem. Limited, light slow Crusaders

                          That all played tests this year, but weren't the reason we lost.

                          alt text

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          4
                          • KiwiwombleK Kiwiwomble

                            @kiwi_expat surely you could acknowledge 3 of the 5 lightweight/pass/slow midfielders the saders have are All Blacks.....and so this opinion might be not a universal fact

                            surely you cant be surprised

                            kiwi_expatK Offline
                            kiwi_expatK Offline
                            kiwi_expat
                            wrote on last edited by kiwi_expat
                            #387

                            @kiwiwomble - It's Foster trying to put square pegs in round holes under Foster's vastly inferior system.

                            https://www.rugbypass.com/news/all-blacks-side-full-of-character-could-use-some-more-talent-in-search-of-new-identity/

                            This article from Ben Smith basically summarizes what I've long argued previously.

                            Razor's innovative and resourceful systems & structures get the most out of relatively limited players - Foster then takes those same limited players and substitutes them directly into his (much less effective...) systems and people wonder why it doesn't exactly work out seamlessly.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            1
                            • kiwi_expatK kiwi_expat

                              I'm not sure if you're being serious here? they fit into Razor's system well enough but Ennor, Havili, Goodhue, McCleod, Punivai are all quite limited players. They are either far too lightweight, too passive and slow, or defensively poor.

                              The other franchises have considerably more talented, dynamic, faster & larger midfield options.

                              Chiefs: Anton Lienert-Brown (102kg), Alex Nankivell (98kg), Quinn Tupaea (102kg), Gideon Wrampling (101kg), Rameka Poihipi (105kg - has been the standout midfielder for Canterbury, Punivai & McCleod have been woeful).

                              Highlanders: Thomas Umaga-Jenson (107kg), Ngatungane Punivai (102kg), Scott Gregory (100kg), Fetuli Paea (98kg), Raymond Nu'u (98kg), Patelesio Tomkinson (96kg), Josh Timu.

                              Hurricanes: Jordie Barrett (102kg), Peter Umaga-Jensen (103kg), Billy Proctor (97kg), Bailyn Sullivan (98kg), Teihorangi Walden (96kg).

                              Blues: Reiko Ioane (103kg), Tanielu Te'ela (107kg), Roger Tuivasa-Sheck (98kg), Bryce Heem (103kg), Tamati Tua (98kg), Corey Evans (96kg).

                              African MonkeyA Online
                              African MonkeyA Online
                              African Monkey
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #388

                              @kiwi_expat Really? 3 All Black midfielders in the squad and somehow they have the least talented midfield in the comp? You didn't include Leicester Fainga'nuku either who probably should have been capped by now at the very least (he's certainly good enough).

                              Come on, I know you're trying to prop up your pro Razor agenda (and you make some decent points along the way), but come on, this is a poor argument.

                              KiwiwombleK kiwi_expatK 2 Replies Last reply
                              9
                              • mariner4lifeM Offline
                                mariner4lifeM Offline
                                mariner4life
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #389

                                alt text

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                1
                                • African MonkeyA African Monkey

                                  @kiwi_expat Really? 3 All Black midfielders in the squad and somehow they have the least talented midfield in the comp? You didn't include Leicester Fainga'nuku either who probably should have been capped by now at the very least (he's certainly good enough).

                                  Come on, I know you're trying to prop up your pro Razor agenda (and you make some decent points along the way), but come on, this is a poor argument.

                                  KiwiwombleK Offline
                                  KiwiwombleK Offline
                                  Kiwiwomble
                                  wrote on last edited by Kiwiwomble
                                  #390

                                  @african-monkey thats a bloody good point

                                  and also doesn't address things like of the Highlanders world beating midfield....two had season ending injuries, two other looks passable at NPC level and the other two have been used much more on the wing at super level and sio will kill someone of get carded....and that probably the only fact in this thread

                                  i actually agree that maybe they can look better than they are because of how razor had the team playing....but im not going as far as saying its a fact theyre shit

                                  kiwi_expatK 1 Reply Last reply
                                  1
                                  • KiwiwombleK Kiwiwomble

                                    @african-monkey thats a bloody good point

                                    and also doesn't address things like of the Highlanders world beating midfield....two had season ending injuries, two other looks passable at NPC level and the other two have been used much more on the wing at super level and sio will kill someone of get carded....and that probably the only fact in this thread

                                    i actually agree that maybe they can look better than they are because of how razor had the team playing....but im not going as far as saying its a fact theyre shit

                                    kiwi_expatK Offline
                                    kiwi_expatK Offline
                                    kiwi_expat
                                    wrote on last edited by kiwi_expat
                                    #391

                                    @kiwiwomble said in Super Rugby 2022:

                                    i actually agree that maybe they can look better than they are because of how razor had the team playing....but im not going as far as saying its a fact theyre shit

                                    Maybe? It's quite obvious the team appears far greater than the sum of their parts when they're performing at their best.

                                    I remember a while back Squidge did an analysis of different club side's structures/systems & overall team cohesion. The Crusaders metrics were literally off the charts under Robertson and additionally exceeded the best results from other sporting codes as well.

                                    KiwiwombleK 1 Reply Last reply
                                    1
                                    • kiwi_expatK kiwi_expat

                                      @kiwiwomble said in Super Rugby 2022:

                                      i actually agree that maybe they can look better than they are because of how razor had the team playing....but im not going as far as saying its a fact theyre shit

                                      Maybe? It's quite obvious the team appears far greater than the sum of their parts when they're performing at their best.

                                      I remember a while back Squidge did an analysis of different club side's structures/systems & overall team cohesion. The Crusaders metrics were literally off the charts under Robertson and additionally exceeded the best results from other sporting codes as well.

                                      KiwiwombleK Offline
                                      KiwiwombleK Offline
                                      Kiwiwomble
                                      wrote on last edited by Kiwiwomble
                                      #392

                                      @kiwi_expat it might also be the other way around too, fozzies game plan making them look worse than they are

                                      almost certainly a bit of both

                                      kiwi_expatK 1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • ChrisC Offline
                                        ChrisC Offline
                                        Chris
                                        wrote on last edited by Chris
                                        #393

                                        Crusaders MF options are not that small
                                        Goodhue 187 cm 105 kg
                                        McLeod. 197 cm 101 kg
                                        Punivai. 189 cm 100kg
                                        Ennor 187 cm 95 kg
                                        Havilli 188 cm. 90 kg being the smallest.

                                        Compare pretty well, then if Leicester Fainga'anuku is classed as a potential centre were he played a bit for the Crusaders last season he is a big unit at 188cm 109 kg

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        1
                                        • kiwi_expatK Offline
                                          kiwi_expatK Offline
                                          kiwi_expat
                                          wrote on last edited by kiwi_expat
                                          #394

                                          Goodhue is 100kg, look on their website. McLeod 99kg, Ennor 94kg.

                                          ChrisC 2 Replies Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Search
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Search