• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

Red Cards

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Sports Talk
228 Posts 38 Posters 8.2k Views
Red Cards
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • D Offline
    D Offline
    Dolamite
    wrote on last edited by
    #40

    How Aumua wasn’t red carded still baffles me, TMO reviewed it and said there was nothing in it even though Evans had a clear black eye

    chimoausC 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • chimoausC Offline
    chimoausC Offline
    chimoaus
    replied to Dolamite on last edited by
    #41

    @Dolamite said in Red Cards:

    How Aumua wasn’t red carded still baffles me, TMO reviewed it and said there was nothing in it even though Evans had a clear black eye

    I suspect the TMO only looked at it quickly and you can see on first review that it appears to have hit the chest and not the head. Perhaps he reviewed before seeing the black eye. The on-field ref missed it and asked and the TMO who said it was fine. I think the TMO's are under instruction to speed up the game and not to stop the game. I think this one just slipped through due to the angle of the replay.

    I agree that the guy had a black eye so should have been looked at again. You would have thought there was another angle available.

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.
    replied to Crazy Horse on last edited by
    #42

    @Crazy-Horse said in Red Cards:

    @Kirwan said in Red Cards:

    @taniwharugby said in Red Cards:

    @Kirwan it was 6...but got reduced to 4 cos.

    Not much of a disincentive is it. For that sort of clear thuggery, no reductions should be made. He had so much time to pull out of that.

    Was genuinely upsetting to watch Hodgman writhing on the ground after that.

    Not disagreeing with you about Barrett pulling out, but on a side note I wish they would also replay these things in 'real time' so we can get a better feel as to how much time players actually have.

    Less than people think I suspect.

    You'd have to be psychopathically stupid to be intentionally planting a shoulder into people's heads these days with camera replays all over the show.

    Most of them I think people start to do something, somehow get their timing compromised and end up looking like they're thugs - especially in slow mo.

    BonesB 1 Reply Last reply
    4
  • N Offline
    N Offline
    Nevorian
    replied to taniwharugby on last edited by
    #43

    @taniwharugby said in Red Cards:

    @Nepia the key for me, is that we have an even contest of 15 v 15 for as much of a match as possible, I dont want to see 15 v 13/14...even if it works in my teams favour.

    Do rugby players get fined for cards, they do in NRL dont they?

    Obviously in a comp like the NPC where some players earn $10k for thier season, so it needs to be relative.

    So maybe have a 10 or 20 minute sin bin but you can come back on however you will also be assessed by tribunal with possible suspension. Stick with outright off for the rest of the game and tribunal visit for outright bad behaviour ( stomping, eye contact, fighting etc)

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • gt12G Offline
    gt12G Offline
    gt12
    wrote on last edited by gt12
    #44

    YC for careless or cynical play: Sin bin and on report (fine/ban)
    OC for reckless or dangerous play: Sinbin and you can't return, and on report (fine/ban)
    RC for intentional filth: Off with no replacement (fine/ban)
    Report system for anything missed with bans lengthened by one match
    Penalties also lengthened across the board and fines used.

    Edit: Another idea would be, if people don't like an orange card, to have people not be able to return from the Sinbin. So, pretty much everything is either a penalty or YC, and after 10 minutes the team has the choice to replace players until they are out of replacements. Red cards are only for intentional filth.

    nzzpN taniwharugbyT 2 Replies Last reply
    5
  • nzzpN Offline
    nzzpN Offline
    nzzp
    replied to gt12 on last edited by
    #45

    @gt12 love it

    Starts getting gnarly with definitions though. Interested in your opinions on:

    Was the Sam Cane hit on that Irish bloke a red? What about Naholo going high on their winger?

    Ofa red card against Australia?

    gt12G 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • BonesB Offline
    BonesB Offline
    Bones
    replied to Chris B. on last edited by
    #46

    @Chris-B said in Red Cards:

    Most of them I think people start to do something, somehow get their timing compromised and end up looking like they're thugs - especially in slow mo.

    Or, they try to impose themselves with a hard, high hit and fuck it up, meaning they should have compromised the hard and not gone high...

    KiwiwombleK 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • KiwiwombleK Offline
    KiwiwombleK Offline
    Kiwiwomble
    replied to Bones on last edited by Kiwiwomble
    #47

    @Bones said in Red Cards:

    @Chris-B said in Red Cards:

    Most of them I think people start to do something, somehow get their timing compromised and end up looking like they're thugs - especially in slow mo.

    Or, they try to impose themselves with a hard, high hit and fuck it up, meaning they should have compromised the hard and not gone high...

    ...and then they read the fern and they see people nit picking between tackles and dominant tackles 😉

    in principle i agree though, i think the only way is to slow things, soften some impacts, accept more given and take, i'd like to see less subs tried and maybe

    BonesB 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • BonesB Offline
    BonesB Offline
    Bones
    replied to Kiwiwomble on last edited by
    #48

    @Kiwiwomble said in Red Cards:

    @Bones said in Red Cards:

    @Chris-B said in Red Cards:

    Most of them I think people start to do something, somehow get their timing compromised and end up looking like they're thugs - especially in slow mo.

    Or, they try to impose themselves with a hard, high hit and fuck it up, meaning they should have compromised the hard and not gone high...

    ...and then they read the fern and they see people nit picking between tackles and dominant tackles 😉

    Discuss

    ToddyT 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • ToddyT Offline
    ToddyT Offline
    Toddy
    replied to Bones on last edited by
    #49

    @Bones no way the Goonies get out without him

    1 Reply Last reply
    8
  • gt12G Offline
    gt12G Offline
    gt12
    replied to nzzp on last edited by gt12
    #50

    @nzzp said in Red Cards:

    @gt12 love it

    Starts getting gnarly with definitions though. Interested in your opinions on:

    Was the Sam Cane hit on that Irish bloke a red? What about Naholo going high on their winger?

    Ofa red card against Australia?

    I don’t think any of them were dirty, a don’t return sinbin for all of them, with bans for all as well (as required) would make the system conceptually consistent.

    My prerence is something which - even if the refs aren’t consistent - will be similarly consistent and doesn’t require advanced degrees in physics.

    If a player is getting sat out of games often enough, soon their value will drop dramatically.

    nzzpN 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • nzzpN Offline
    nzzpN Offline
    nzzp
    replied to gt12 on last edited by
    #51

    @gt12 cool, bit would you see that the same way if you were Irish?

    Basically you're saying proper filth gets the red, and it'll be 1 or 2 a season

    gt12G 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • gt12G Offline
    gt12G Offline
    gt12
    replied to nzzp on last edited by
    #52

    @nzzp said in Red Cards:

    @gt12 cool, bit would you see that the same way if you were Irish?

    Basically you're saying proper filth gets the red, and it'll be 1 or 2 a season

    Yep.

    Anything that could potentially see another play unable to keep going would also result in you not continuing.

    We’d still get (mostly) a 15 vs 15 game though.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • NTAN Offline
    NTAN Offline
    NTA
    wrote on last edited by NTA
    #53

    Wait he got less than 6 weeks? How the FUCK does he get a reduction from 6 weeks? I don't give a shit if he's "remorseful". Throw the book at him. Not like his record is clean.

    KirwanK 1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • chimoausC Offline
    chimoausC Offline
    chimoaus
    wrote on last edited by
    #54

    A simple way could just be if its cynical or dangerous its 10 minutes and replaced. There are 7 reserves so it shouldn't impact the side too much.

    boobooB 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • KirwanK Offline
    KirwanK Offline
    Kirwan
    replied to NTA on last edited by
    #55

    @NTA said in Red Cards:

    Wait he got less than 6 weeks? How the FUCK does he get a reduction from 6 weeks? I don't give a shit if he's "remorseful". Throw the book at him. Not like his record is clean.

    Farcical, I agree

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugby
    replied to gt12 on last edited by taniwharugby
    #56

    @gt12 I'm still not a fan of reducing a team to 14 (or less) for the balance of the game.

    Filth, you are gone but still replaced, why is the rest of your team punished cos you a dirty fluffybunny? Why are fans punished cos you a dirty fluffybunny?

    The accidental ones are tougher, Barrett for example, huge bone head thuggish move, but no way did he go out to hurt/injure someone, but he has, so he needs to go too and not return, I'd be keen on an orange card being 10 mins, but automatic 2 week ban to go with your judiciary visit, more time off and a fine.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • antipodeanA Offline
    antipodeanA Offline
    antipodean
    wrote on last edited by
    #57

    I'm convinced that rugby needs a cultural change so that cards for head contact are replaced with a citation system and longer suspensions.

    Victor MeldrewV 1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • Victor MeldrewV Online
    Victor MeldrewV Online
    Victor Meldrew
    replied to antipodean on last edited by Victor Meldrew
    #58

    @antipodean said in Red Cards:

    I'm convinced that rugby needs a cultural change so that cards for head contact are replaced with a citation system and longer suspensions.

    I tend to agree. Think there needs to be a distinction between deliberate dangerous play, like kneeing someone in the neck, and what is essentially poor tacking technique.

    If on-field sanction is needed, perhaps a YC and citation/suspension system where things can be looked at away from the baying crowd?

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • MajorRageM Offline
    MajorRageM Offline
    MajorRage
    wrote on last edited by MajorRage
    #59

    I'm not sure the real issue is being addressed.

    If it was being addressed properly, then the numbers should be going down. They aren't. They are sky rocketing.

    First step in resolving a problem, is really understanding what the problem is. I'm not sure that's being done here.

    BonesB 1 Reply Last reply
    1

Red Cards
Sports Talk
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.