• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

Red Cards

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Sports Talk
228 Posts 38 Posters 8.2k Views
Red Cards
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • nzzpN Offline
    nzzpN Offline
    nzzp
    replied to gt12 on last edited by
    #45

    @gt12 love it

    Starts getting gnarly with definitions though. Interested in your opinions on:

    Was the Sam Cane hit on that Irish bloke a red? What about Naholo going high on their winger?

    Ofa red card against Australia?

    gt12G 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • BonesB Offline
    BonesB Offline
    Bones
    replied to Chris B. on last edited by
    #46

    @Chris-B said in Red Cards:

    Most of them I think people start to do something, somehow get their timing compromised and end up looking like they're thugs - especially in slow mo.

    Or, they try to impose themselves with a hard, high hit and fuck it up, meaning they should have compromised the hard and not gone high...

    KiwiwombleK 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • KiwiwombleK Offline
    KiwiwombleK Offline
    Kiwiwomble
    replied to Bones on last edited by Kiwiwomble
    #47

    @Bones said in Red Cards:

    @Chris-B said in Red Cards:

    Most of them I think people start to do something, somehow get their timing compromised and end up looking like they're thugs - especially in slow mo.

    Or, they try to impose themselves with a hard, high hit and fuck it up, meaning they should have compromised the hard and not gone high...

    ...and then they read the fern and they see people nit picking between tackles and dominant tackles 😉

    in principle i agree though, i think the only way is to slow things, soften some impacts, accept more given and take, i'd like to see less subs tried and maybe

    BonesB 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • BonesB Offline
    BonesB Offline
    Bones
    replied to Kiwiwomble on last edited by
    #48

    @Kiwiwomble said in Red Cards:

    @Bones said in Red Cards:

    @Chris-B said in Red Cards:

    Most of them I think people start to do something, somehow get their timing compromised and end up looking like they're thugs - especially in slow mo.

    Or, they try to impose themselves with a hard, high hit and fuck it up, meaning they should have compromised the hard and not gone high...

    ...and then they read the fern and they see people nit picking between tackles and dominant tackles 😉

    Discuss

    ToddyT 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • ToddyT Offline
    ToddyT Offline
    Toddy
    replied to Bones on last edited by
    #49

    @Bones no way the Goonies get out without him

    1 Reply Last reply
    8
  • gt12G Offline
    gt12G Offline
    gt12
    replied to nzzp on last edited by gt12
    #50

    @nzzp said in Red Cards:

    @gt12 love it

    Starts getting gnarly with definitions though. Interested in your opinions on:

    Was the Sam Cane hit on that Irish bloke a red? What about Naholo going high on their winger?

    Ofa red card against Australia?

    I don’t think any of them were dirty, a don’t return sinbin for all of them, with bans for all as well (as required) would make the system conceptually consistent.

    My prerence is something which - even if the refs aren’t consistent - will be similarly consistent and doesn’t require advanced degrees in physics.

    If a player is getting sat out of games often enough, soon their value will drop dramatically.

    nzzpN 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • nzzpN Offline
    nzzpN Offline
    nzzp
    replied to gt12 on last edited by
    #51

    @gt12 cool, bit would you see that the same way if you were Irish?

    Basically you're saying proper filth gets the red, and it'll be 1 or 2 a season

    gt12G 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • gt12G Offline
    gt12G Offline
    gt12
    replied to nzzp on last edited by
    #52

    @nzzp said in Red Cards:

    @gt12 cool, bit would you see that the same way if you were Irish?

    Basically you're saying proper filth gets the red, and it'll be 1 or 2 a season

    Yep.

    Anything that could potentially see another play unable to keep going would also result in you not continuing.

    We’d still get (mostly) a 15 vs 15 game though.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • NTAN Offline
    NTAN Offline
    NTA
    wrote on last edited by NTA
    #53

    Wait he got less than 6 weeks? How the FUCK does he get a reduction from 6 weeks? I don't give a shit if he's "remorseful". Throw the book at him. Not like his record is clean.

    KirwanK 1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • chimoausC Offline
    chimoausC Offline
    chimoaus
    wrote on last edited by
    #54

    A simple way could just be if its cynical or dangerous its 10 minutes and replaced. There are 7 reserves so it shouldn't impact the side too much.

    boobooB 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • KirwanK Offline
    KirwanK Offline
    Kirwan
    replied to NTA on last edited by
    #55

    @NTA said in Red Cards:

    Wait he got less than 6 weeks? How the FUCK does he get a reduction from 6 weeks? I don't give a shit if he's "remorseful". Throw the book at him. Not like his record is clean.

    Farcical, I agree

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugby
    replied to gt12 on last edited by taniwharugby
    #56

    @gt12 I'm still not a fan of reducing a team to 14 (or less) for the balance of the game.

    Filth, you are gone but still replaced, why is the rest of your team punished cos you a dirty fluffybunny? Why are fans punished cos you a dirty fluffybunny?

    The accidental ones are tougher, Barrett for example, huge bone head thuggish move, but no way did he go out to hurt/injure someone, but he has, so he needs to go too and not return, I'd be keen on an orange card being 10 mins, but automatic 2 week ban to go with your judiciary visit, more time off and a fine.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • antipodeanA Offline
    antipodeanA Offline
    antipodean
    wrote on last edited by
    #57

    I'm convinced that rugby needs a cultural change so that cards for head contact are replaced with a citation system and longer suspensions.

    Victor MeldrewV 1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • Victor MeldrewV Offline
    Victor MeldrewV Offline
    Victor Meldrew
    replied to antipodean on last edited by Victor Meldrew
    #58

    @antipodean said in Red Cards:

    I'm convinced that rugby needs a cultural change so that cards for head contact are replaced with a citation system and longer suspensions.

    I tend to agree. Think there needs to be a distinction between deliberate dangerous play, like kneeing someone in the neck, and what is essentially poor tacking technique.

    If on-field sanction is needed, perhaps a YC and citation/suspension system where things can be looked at away from the baying crowd?

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • MajorRageM Offline
    MajorRageM Offline
    MajorRage
    wrote on last edited by MajorRage
    #59

    I'm not sure the real issue is being addressed.

    If it was being addressed properly, then the numbers should be going down. They aren't. They are sky rocketing.

    First step in resolving a problem, is really understanding what the problem is. I'm not sure that's being done here.

    BonesB 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • BonesB Offline
    BonesB Offline
    Bones
    replied to MajorRage on last edited by
    #60

    @MajorRage said in Red Cards:

    I'm not sure the real issue is being addressed.

    If it was being addressed properly, then the numbers should be going down. They aren't. They are sky rocketing.

    First step in resolving a problem, is really understanding what the problem is. I'm not sure that's being done here.

    You could look at it another way in that it's well and truly recognised now by officials, but not being addressed by coaches and players, hence the sky rockets in flight.

    No afternoon delight.

    MajorRageM 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • MajorRageM Offline
    MajorRageM Offline
    MajorRage
    replied to Bones on last edited by
    #61

    @Bones said in Red Cards:

    @MajorRage said in Red Cards:

    I'm not sure the real issue is being addressed.

    If it was being addressed properly, then the numbers should be going down. They aren't. They are sky rocketing.

    First step in resolving a problem, is really understanding what the problem is. I'm not sure that's being done here.

    You could look at it another way in that it's well and truly recognised now by officials, but not being addressed by coaches and players, hence the sky rockets in flight.

    No afternoon delight.

    Yeah, very true. However perhaps a certain number of head knocks are just part of how the game is played & there really is nothing you can do about them other than punish those that find themselves being the perpetrator.

    People aren't perfect and never have been. Modern game you need to tackle around the chest to stop plays. As long as this remains the key way to clear people out / collide, then head knocks are always going to happen. If everybody did everything perfectly runners would never get injured, tennis players would never do an unforced error, cricketers would never drop catches.

    It's just not reality.

    BonesB 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • BonesB Offline
    BonesB Offline
    Bones
    replied to MajorRage on last edited by
    #62

    @MajorRage said in Red Cards:

    Modern game you need to tackle around the chest to stop plays.

    That's not necessarily true though and it's this attitude that needs to be addressed I reckon, it's simply just not ok to do something dangerous/careless/reckless to stop play - if you can't do it safely, then don't do it. Then the game opens up and/or teams find other ways to safely get around foul play.

    MajorRageM 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • MajorRageM Offline
    MajorRageM Offline
    MajorRage
    replied to Bones on last edited by
    #63

    @Bones said in Red Cards:

    @MajorRage said in Red Cards:

    Modern game you need to tackle around the chest to stop plays.

    That's not necessarily true though and it's this attitude that needs to be addressed I reckon, it's simply just not ok to do something dangerous/careless/reckless to stop play - if you can't do it safely, then don't do it. Then the game opens up and/or teams find other ways to safely get around foul play.

    It's true if you tack on the word effectively to it.

    I'm not condoning people shoulder charging to head/neck. Far from it. But the way the game is being played at the moment, it IS going to happen. Either we are happy with a huge increase in the cards, or we aren't. The number of cards is only going to go up, unless the real problem is addressed.

    BonesB 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • BonesB Offline
    BonesB Offline
    Bones
    replied to MajorRage on last edited by
    #64

    @MajorRage said in Red Cards:

    unless the real problem is addressed

    Which is the players and coaches not taking responsibility and effectively training on technique to be safer. And the casual fans moaning that there's nothing the players can do about it....

    MajorRageM 1 Reply Last reply
    1

Red Cards
Sports Talk
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.