• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

Transgender debate, in sport, in general

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Off Topic
1.3k Posts 71 Posters 71.9k Views
Transgender debate, in sport, in general
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • nzzpN Offline
    nzzpN Offline
    nzzp
    replied to No Quarter on last edited by
    #466

    @No-Quarter said in Trans in sport / Laurel Hubbard:

    So they are banning biological males that transitioned after the age of 12. There should also be a law against children under the age of 12 (well 18 for that matter) from being allowed to medically transition as there's no way in hell they are mature enough to make a life altering decision like that.

    I suspect it's legal advice based on the science. If puberty is the difference, then kids who don't go through puberty can't be discriminated against.

    The 'open' category is the one I find weird. Can't see it progressing, feels like a last minute compromise somewhere.

    Brave move by FINA, but I think there will be strong and ongoing blowback on social media and media, and a whole lot of people who quietly support it.

    MiketheSnowM Victor MeldrewV Kid ChocolateK 3 Replies Last reply
    3
  • MiketheSnowM Offline
    MiketheSnowM Offline
    MiketheSnow
    replied to nzzp on last edited by
    #467

    @nzzp said in Trans in sport / Laurel Hubbard:

    @No-Quarter said in Trans in sport / Laurel Hubbard:

    So they are banning biological males that transitioned after the age of 12. There should also be a law against children under the age of 12 (well 18 for that matter) from being allowed to medically transition as there's no way in hell they are mature enough to make a life altering decision like that.

    I suspect it's legal advice based on the science. If puberty is the difference, then kids who don't go through puberty can't be discriminated against.

    The 'open' category is the one I find weird. Can't see it progressing, feels like a last minute compromise somewhere.

    Brave move by FINA, but I think there will be strong and ongoing blowback on social media and media, and a whole lot of people who quietly support it.

    Huge move

    Everyone else will follow suit

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • Victor MeldrewV Online
    Victor MeldrewV Online
    Victor Meldrew
    replied to nzzp on last edited by
    #468

    @nzzp said in Trans in sport / Laurel Hubbard:

    Brave move by FINA, but I think there will be strong and ongoing blowback on social media and media, and a whole lot of people who quietly support it.

    I think it shows some good thinking has gone on behind the scenes and they have come up with a reasonable and rational approach which is as fair as it can be to everyone.

    In the current climate, I think they should be applauded for that.

    nzzpN 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • nzzpN Offline
    nzzpN Offline
    nzzp
    replied to Victor Meldrew on last edited by
    #469

    @Victor-Meldrew said in Trans in sport / Laurel Hubbard:

    @nzzp said in Trans in sport / Laurel Hubbard:

    Brave move by FINA, but I think there will be strong and ongoing blowback on social media and media, and a whole lot of people who quietly support it.

    I think it shows some good thinking has gone on behind the scenes and they have come up with a reasonable and rational approach which is as fair as it can be to everyone.

    In the current climate, I think they should be applauded for that.

    also, I caught a bit of the discussion on it and apparently they presented a bunch of scientific evidence including that 14-15 year old boys post times that are faster than the elite women. So there's that.

    The issue for folk will be that you don't allow women who used to be men the ability to fully express themselves. And they are correct. If you don't you make a mockery of a protected class. Anyhoo, I'm sure there will be disagreement about this from a lot of people, but I expect ghe reasoning is strong given the incoming lawsuits

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • antipodeanA Offline
    antipodeanA Offline
    antipodean
    wrote on last edited by
    #470

    The solution is simple. An open category (men) and two protected categories; women and disabled.

    Because trans women aren't women, they still get to participate.

    The performance discrepancy is immense as given by these examples from 2017

    Screenshot_20220620-191433.png

    Screenshot_20220620-191501.png

    More at https://law.duke.edu/sports/sex-sport/comparative-athletic-performance/

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • HigginsH Offline
    HigginsH Offline
    Higgins
    wrote on last edited by
    #471

    The “former men but not any more open" category should open up a number of gold medal prospects for Lia Thomas who would be a certainty to win the following events
    50metres Open freestyle
    100metres Open reestyle
    200metres open freestyle
    400metres Open freesytle
    800metres Open freestyle
    1500metres Open freestyle
    100metres Open backstroke
    200metres Open backstroke
    100metres Open butterfly
    200metres Open butterfly
    100metres Open breaststroke
    200metres Open breaststroke
    200metres Open individual medley
    400metres Open individual medley
    1 metre springboard bellyflop
    3metre springboard bellyflop
    10metre tower bellyflop
    Open Individual synchronised swimming
    That looks like 18 individual golds at just the one Olympics, a record that will surely never be beaten, especially if she (it/they/them?) compete at multiple Games.
    Just a shame that one swimmer is not allowed to complete more than one leg in the multiple relay events or she could top over 20 gold medals in a single Olympics. Come to think of it Laurel Hubbard could pick up a swag of silvers is she decides to have a go.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • boobooB Offline
    boobooB Offline
    booboo
    wrote on last edited by booboo
    #472

    A number of comments:

    1. Well done FINA. Nearly got it right. The whole puberty thing still leaves it open. Don't know about you but in my lived experience growing up I really can't recall any prepubescent girl being more athletic that the boys in my classes at school.

    2. WRT to the transitioning prior to 12. The major draw back. We all assume that this could never happen but there are enough evil people in the world who are busily paving the road to hell who would perpetrate this on children.

    3. The ABC's coverage is all about how "diversity experts", or 'Hannah' Mouncey, or some trans activist is declaring it discriminatory, or how it's not a big deal because it's only US collegiate sport and trans aren't dominating the Olympics etc. Quite sickening really. Report the facts please.

    4. UCI did the opposite on the weekend and essentially said everyone should have an opportunity, just not necessarily an equal opportunity.

    Anyway, a step in the right direction. Well done FINA for as far as it goes.

    WRT to the 'open' category (ie, the not female). Everyone sensible would agree with that, but the Trans activists are so convinced that TWAW that they must be treated as women. Anything short is bigotry. Will never happen. So just set the definition of women (get a biologist in), and if you don't make the cut you're a bloke.

    MiketheSnowM voodooV ACT CrusaderA 3 Replies Last reply
    2
  • Kid ChocolateK Offline
    Kid ChocolateK Offline
    Kid Chocolate
    replied to nzzp on last edited by Kid Chocolate
    #473

    @nzzp said in Trans in sport / Laurel Hubbard:

    The 'open' category is the one I find weird. Can't see it progressing, feels like a last minute compromise somewhere.

    Centuries-old common sense, the way horse racing has been doing it since before there was modern sports. Derbies are restricted to 3yos; Oaks are restricted to 3yo fillies, there are races where geldings are restricted, etc., there’s even races restricted to Greys-Only (hello Polly!) and then there’s the really big “Open” championships where it’s Game-On! if you think you’re good enough, best-against-best, which is where we get our Sunlines, Makybe Divas, Winx’s and Veery Elleegants. So Lia is now restricted from competing with the fillies and mares, he’s now (rightly) going to have to compete against the colts and horses in restricted class — and if he rates himself and chances his arm, s/he’ll compete in Open events.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • MiketheSnowM Offline
    MiketheSnowM Offline
    MiketheSnow
    replied to booboo on last edited by
    #474

    @booboo said in Trans in sport / Laurel Hubbard:

    A number of comments:

    1. Well done FINA. Nearly got it right. The whole puberty thing still leaves it open. Don't know about you but in my lived experience growing up I really can't recall any prepubescent girl being more athletic that the boys in my classes at school.

    2. WRT to the transitioning prior to 12. The major draw back. We all assume that this could never happen but there are enough evil people in the world who are busily paving the road to hell who would perpetrate this on children.

    3. The ABC's coverage is all about how "diversity experts", or 'Hannah' Mouncey, or some trans activist is declaring it discriminatory, or how it's not a big deal because it's only US collegiate sport and trans aren't dominating the Olympics etc. Quite sickening really. Report the facts please.

    4. UCI did the opposite on the weekend and essentially said everyone should have an opportunity, just not necessarily an equal opportunity.

    Anyway, a step in the right direction. Well done FINA for as far as it goes.

    WRT to the 'open' category (ie, the not female). Everyone sensible would agree with that, but the Trans activists are so convinced that TWAW that they must be treated as women. Anything short is bigotry. Will never happen. So just set the definition of women (get a biologist in), and if you don't make the cut you're a bloke.

    Surely if you make the cut you're a bird

    I'll get my coat

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • Kid ChocolateK Offline
    Kid ChocolateK Offline
    Kid Chocolate
    wrote on last edited by Kid Chocolate
    #475

    This repellent woke showboat was a member of a world championship womens team that got clobbered by a boys high school team, yet fails to see the clear and unambiguous meaning behind that clobbering. Clueless radicalism.

    Madeline Leesman  /  Jun 20, 2022  /  Tipsheet

    Megan Rapinoe: Banning Transgender Athletes from Women's Sports Is 'Disgusting'

    Megan Rapinoe: Banning Transgender Athletes from Women's Sports Is 'Disgusting'

    In an interview this week, U.S. women’s soccer player Megan Rapinoe called bans on transgender

    “Show me the evidence that trans women are dominating in every sport, are winning every title. I’m sorry, it’s just not happening,” she insists.

    alt text

    antipodeanA Kid ChocolateK 2 Replies Last reply
    0
  • antipodeanA Offline
    antipodeanA Offline
    antipodean
    replied to Kid Chocolate on last edited by
    #476

    @Kid-Chocolate There'd be thousands of 15 year old boys in America better at soccer than her. They should all identify and get selected to shut her up.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • voodooV Offline
    voodooV Offline
    voodoo
    replied to booboo on last edited by
    #477

    @booboo said in Trans in sport / Laurel Hubbard:

    A number of comments:

    1. Well done FINA. Nearly got it right. The whole puberty thing still leaves it open. Don't know about you but in my lived experience growing up I really can't recall any prepubescent girl being more athletic that the boys in my classes at school.

    My daughter raced in the NSW State Cross Country last weekend - she is 12, the race was for 12/13yrs so racing up a year. Also racing up a year was a 12yr old girl called Eliza Lawton who won with a time of 10:03 on a hilly 3km grass circuit.

    Her time was also fast enough to win the equivalent 12/13 boys race (by 1s but still) - racing up a year!!!

    Insane - remember that name, if she stays healthy she'll be an Olympian for sure

    ACT CrusaderA 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT Crusader
    replied to voodoo on last edited by
    #478

    @voodoo wonder if she is related to the Lawton family that produced several Wallabies over different generations?

    This is a rugby site, so thought I’d ask 😉

    voodooV 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • voodooV Offline
    voodooV Offline
    voodoo
    replied to ACT Crusader on last edited by
    #479

    @ACT-Crusader said in Trans in sport / Laurel Hubbard:

    @voodoo wonder if she is related to the Lawton family that produced several Wallabies over different generations?

    This is a rugby site, so thought I’d ask 😉

    Dunno, think her Father was a national-level runner though

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • antipodeanA Offline
    antipodeanA Offline
    antipodean
    wrote on last edited by
    #480

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT Crusader
    replied to booboo on last edited by
    #481

    @booboo on point 1, when I was in grade 5, I tried out for the school Aussie rules team. There were about 80 boys from across grade 5 and 6 that tried out. Only me and one other grade 5 boy made the team and the rest were grade 6 kids. A few of us convinced one of our friends, a grade 6 girl, to try out too.

    She would play footy at lunch time with and knew how to play.

    She was tall and slim and could jump higher than the rest of us. She was fast too. She made the team as our ruck.

    This wasn’t a case of making up the numbers or some crusade by a teacher. This was 35 years ago and sure there were no girls teams for footy, but she could play and her athleticism was too good to pass over.

    She wore headgear and a mouth guard like a couple of the boys in the team.

    She was easily in the top 3 best players for us.

    boobooB 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • boobooB Offline
    boobooB Offline
    booboo
    replied to ACT Crusader on last edited by
    #482

    @ACT-Crusader @voodoo there's 2

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • Kid ChocolateK Offline
    Kid ChocolateK Offline
    Kid Chocolate
    replied to Kid Chocolate on last edited by Kid Chocolate
    #483
    Madeline Leesman  /  Jun 20, 2022  /  Tipsheet

    Megan Rapinoe: Banning Transgender Athletes from Women's Sports Is 'Disgusting'

    Megan Rapinoe: Banning Transgender Athletes from Women's Sports Is 'Disgusting'

    In an interview this week, U.S. women’s soccer player Megan Rapinoe called bans on transgender

    Rapinoe’s recent activist logic:

    1. Demands equal pay for “women” athletes.

    2. Insists that sheilas with testicles qualify as “women.”

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • Kid ChocolateK Offline
    Kid ChocolateK Offline
    Kid Chocolate
    wrote on last edited by Kid Chocolate
    #484

    What a difference a day makes.

    Pt 1: Sunday, June 19

    alt text

    Pt 2: Monday, June 20

    Simon Evans  /  Jun 20, 2022  /  Sports

    FIFA, World Athletics review transgender rules after swimming's change

    FIFA, World Athletics review transgender rules after swimming's change

    World soccer's governing body FIFA and World Athletics said on Monday that they are reviewing their transgender eligibility policies after swimming passed new rules that restrict transgender participation in women's events.

    Thank god somebody at FINA had a spine and common sense. FINA leads, FIFA follows.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • Kid ChocolateK Offline
    Kid ChocolateK Offline
    Kid Chocolate
    wrote on last edited by Kid Chocolate
    #485
    This post is deleted!
    1 Reply Last reply
    0

Transgender debate, in sport, in general
Off Topic
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.