Skip to content
  • Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

  • Tipping
  • Team Sheets
  • Highlights
  • Results
    • All Blacks

      Search every All Blacks Test. Filter results by year, opposition, location, venue, city and RWC stage

    • Super Rugby

      Search every Super Rugby since match 1996

    • NPC

      Search NPC results. Only first division matches from 1976-2005. All results from the 14 team competition (2006-present) are included

All Blacks v Ireland - 2nd Test

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Rugby Matches
allblacksireland
2.1k Posts 108 Posters 229.1k Views 4 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • P pakman

    @Crazy-Horse said in All Blacks v Ireland - 2nd Test:

    @kev said in All Blacks v Ireland - 2nd Test:

    The worst part of this was we should have been down to 12 for needed to go to uncontested scrums. Clearly we need to name props to cover both sides to avoid this.

    I thought I read somewhere that teams had to nominate LH and TH injury replacements specifically - ie they can't nominate a player to cover both sides. Or am talking out of my arse again?

    I think you’re right. There was some controversy in Europe when props said they couldn’t play opposite side, and ‘tactical’ oldie scrums required. So must have one of each FR to cover that.

    But not sure there’s anything to stop a team volunteering a player who can play both sides.

    I seem to recall Ofa being nominated as LH but subbing for TH or vice versa.

    Crazy HorseC Offline
    Crazy HorseC Offline
    Crazy Horse
    wrote on last edited by Crazy Horse
    #1947

    @pakman said in All Blacks v Ireland - 2nd Test:

    @Crazy-Horse said in All Blacks v Ireland - 2nd Test:

    @kev said in All Blacks v Ireland - 2nd Test:

    The worst part of this was we should have been down to 12 for needed to go to uncontested scrums. Clearly we need to name props to cover both sides to avoid this.

    I thought I read somewhere that teams had to nominate LH and TH injury replacements specifically - ie they can't nominate a player to cover both sides. Or am talking out of my arse again?

    I think you’re right. There was some controversy in Europe when props said they couldn’t play opposite side, and ‘tactical’ oldie scrums required. So must have one of each FR to cover that.

    But not sure there’s anything to stop a team volunteering a player who can play both sides.

    I seem to recall Ofa being nominated as LH but subbing for TH or vice versa.

    This is what I found on the World Rugby website. I am still a little confused.

    Prior to the match, each team must advise the appropriate match official of their front-row players and possible front-row replacements and which position(s) in the front row they can play. Only these players may play in the front row when the scrum is contested and only in their designated position(s).
    A replacement front-row player may start the match in another position.

    P 1 Reply Last reply
    1
    • T Offline
      T Offline
      The Docter
      wrote on last edited by
      #1948

      When trying to rationalise the performance of the ABs over the weekend and since the new regime took over, simply put, wrong Head Coaching team and wrong Captain, the rest is a flow on effect from there.

      1 Reply Last reply
      1
      • mariner4lifeM mariner4life

        @antipodean said in All Blacks v Ireland - 2nd Test:

        @TheMojoman said in All Blacks v Ireland - 2nd Test:

        We’ll that was a strange game, hard to get any flow with the cards and with the Irish playing so well.

        I’m going to buck the trend here and say it’s far too early to panic. This AB team thrashed this same Irish team a week ago. You don’t go from being an excellent team to a poor one in one week.

        I think the scoreline last week flattered us.

        Hugely. We got rolled when Ireland got ball

        TheMojomanT Offline
        TheMojomanT Offline
        TheMojoman
        wrote on last edited by
        #1949

        @mariner4life said in All Blacks v Ireland - 2nd Test:

        @antipodean said in All Blacks v Ireland - 2nd Test:

        @TheMojoman said in All Blacks v Ireland - 2nd Test:

        We’ll that was a strange game, hard to get any flow with the cards and with the Irish playing so well.

        I’m going to buck the trend here and say it’s far too early to panic. This AB team thrashed this same Irish team a week ago. You don’t go from being an excellent team to a poor one in one week.

        I think the scoreline last week flattered us.

        Hugely. We got rolled when Ireland got ball

        The fact we were down to 13-14 men for the majority of the game and the Irish only beat us by 11PTS is a lot more positive than getting blown out last week.

        I think the AB’s have much more upside playing at home and with the talent we have at hand. Unless there are more reds/yellows against us I reckon AB’s will win by 10.

        1 Reply Last reply
        3
        • S Offline
          S Offline
          Steven Harris
          wrote on last edited by
          #1950

          This is awesome , ABs front row totally exposed ..Foster out coached not for the first time

          https://twitter.com/brettruganalyst/status/1546240815143460865?s=21&t=mgnCkr5Kn77pHPIoS1Ceew

          S antipodeanA ACT CrusaderA 3 Replies Last reply
          5
          • S Steven Harris

            This is awesome , ABs front row totally exposed ..Foster out coached not for the first time

            https://twitter.com/brettruganalyst/status/1546240815143460865?s=21&t=mgnCkr5Kn77pHPIoS1Ceew

            S Offline
            S Offline
            stodders
            wrote on last edited by
            #1951

            @Steven-Harris said in All Blacks v Ireland - 2nd Test:

            This is awesome , ABs front row totally exposed ..Foster out coached not for the first time

            https://twitter.com/brettruganalyst/status/1546240815143460865?s=21&t=mgnCkr5Kn77pHPIoS1Ceew

            That is brutal to watch. It used to be NZ forwards with the soft hands and running lines to carve out metres in traffic and get on the front foot.

            S 1 Reply Last reply
            3
            • S stodders

              @Steven-Harris said in All Blacks v Ireland - 2nd Test:

              This is awesome , ABs front row totally exposed ..Foster out coached not for the first time

              https://twitter.com/brettruganalyst/status/1546240815143460865?s=21&t=mgnCkr5Kn77pHPIoS1Ceew

              That is brutal to watch. It used to be NZ forwards with the soft hands and running lines to carve out metres in traffic and get on the front foot.

              S Offline
              S Offline
              Steven Harris
              wrote on last edited by
              #1952

              @stodders what was worse , it kept happening time ,after time after time , makes you wonder what the brains trust were watching 🤦🏻

              S 1 Reply Last reply
              4
              • S Steven Harris

                @stodders what was worse , it kept happening time ,after time after time , makes you wonder what the brains trust were watching 🤦🏻

                S Offline
                S Offline
                stodders
                wrote on last edited by
                #1953

                @Steven-Harris said in All Blacks v Ireland - 2nd Test:

                @stodders what was worse , it kept happening time ,after time after time , makes you wonder what the brains trust were watching 🤦🏻

                That poster also has a video about NZ's attack structure, or lack of it. Lends itself to the theory that NZ have poor attacking patterns and are relying on individualism to break open organised defences. V poor coaching.

                TheMojomanT 1 Reply Last reply
                6
                • Crazy HorseC Crazy Horse

                  @pakman said in All Blacks v Ireland - 2nd Test:

                  @Crazy-Horse said in All Blacks v Ireland - 2nd Test:

                  @kev said in All Blacks v Ireland - 2nd Test:

                  The worst part of this was we should have been down to 12 for needed to go to uncontested scrums. Clearly we need to name props to cover both sides to avoid this.

                  I thought I read somewhere that teams had to nominate LH and TH injury replacements specifically - ie they can't nominate a player to cover both sides. Or am talking out of my arse again?

                  I think you’re right. There was some controversy in Europe when props said they couldn’t play opposite side, and ‘tactical’ oldie scrums required. So must have one of each FR to cover that.

                  But not sure there’s anything to stop a team volunteering a player who can play both sides.

                  I seem to recall Ofa being nominated as LH but subbing for TH or vice versa.

                  This is what I found on the World Rugby website. I am still a little confused.

                  Prior to the match, each team must advise the appropriate match official of their front-row players and possible front-row replacements and which position(s) in the front row they can play. Only these players may play in the front row when the scrum is contested and only in their designated position(s).
                  A replacement front-row player may start the match in another position.

                  P Offline
                  P Offline
                  pakman
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #1954

                  @Crazy-Horse said in All Blacks v Ireland - 2nd Test:

                  @pakman said in All Blacks v Ireland - 2nd Test:

                  @Crazy-Horse said in All Blacks v Ireland - 2nd Test:

                  @kev said in All Blacks v Ireland - 2nd Test:

                  The worst part of this was we should have been down to 12 for needed to go to uncontested scrums. Clearly we need to name props to cover both sides to avoid this.

                  I thought I read somewhere that teams had to nominate LH and TH injury replacements specifically - ie they can't nominate a player to cover both sides. Or am talking out of my arse again?

                  I think you’re right. There was some controversy in Europe when props said they couldn’t play opposite side, and ‘tactical’ oldie scrums required. So must have one of each FR to cover that.

                  But not sure there’s anything to stop a team volunteering a player who can play both sides.

                  I seem to recall Ofa being nominated as LH but subbing for TH or vice versa.

                  This is what I found on the World Rugby website. I am still a little confused.

                  Prior to the match, each team must advise the appropriate match official of their front-row players and possible front-row replacements and which position(s) in the front row they can play. Only these players may play in the front row when the scrum is contested and only in their designated position(s).
                  A replacement front-row player may start the match in another position.

                  Sounds like we could have said that Bower could play LH and TH. in which case Ross on would have let normal scrums to continue.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  2
                  • S Steven Harris

                    This is awesome , ABs front row totally exposed ..Foster out coached not for the first time

                    https://twitter.com/brettruganalyst/status/1546240815143460865?s=21&t=mgnCkr5Kn77pHPIoS1Ceew

                    antipodeanA Offline
                    antipodeanA Offline
                    antipodean
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #1955

                    @Steven-Harris said in All Blacks v Ireland - 2nd Test:

                    This is awesome , ABs front row totally exposed ..Foster out coached not for the first time

                    https://twitter.com/brettruganalyst/status/1546240815143460865?s=21&t=mgnCkr5Kn77pHPIoS1Ceew

                    That's straight out Mcleod's job. Club level stuff.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    5
                    • Chris B.C Chris B.

                      @taniwharugby said in All Blacks v Ireland - 2nd Test:

                      @Chris-B you have to wonder if Fozzie is genuinely concerned with things, or if he is happy with how we are tracking, then add in NZR.

                      If we lose this weekend, the blow torch surely goes on full, and the other thing, if we lose again, playing poor rugby, will stadiums keep selling out, that will hit NZR, and also does brand damage when we play Aus and cant even sell a stadium out.

                      Is Wellington sold out yet?

                      I'm sure he's concerned, but he probably doesn't have the full set of tools to fix it. Someone pointed out that he's had a unique set of circumstances to deal with - with covid, etc (to which I'd add the advent of the crazy card game) - and that is true, but, I still think I've seen enough. The mediocrity in results correlates pretty strongly with what some of the Chiefs' supporters were warning about when he was appointed.

                      This coming weekend will be pretty interesting. Then we've got the retaining the Bledisloe hurdle, then the Jaapies at home hurdle and then EOYT.

                      Pretty sure the axe won't fall until after TRC and probably after the EOYT.

                      I'd actually bet against it falling at all, but really execution should only be stayed if NZR genuinely believe Fozzie is the best man for the job (or it's going to cost millions and millions to axe him).

                      nostrildamusN Offline
                      nostrildamusN Offline
                      nostrildamus
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #1956

                      @Chris-B said in All Blacks v Ireland - 2nd Test:

                      I'd actually bet against it falling at all, but really execution should only be stayed if NZR genuinely believe Fozzie is the best man for the job (or it's going to cost millions and millions to axe him).

                      Then they are crap at writing contracts.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • Chris B.C Chris B.

                        @mariner4life We fucked ourselves with a stupid selection process that meant all the potential assistants had to take sides before the Head Coach was appointed.

                        @Frank - plenty of chance, but I think it would be a dumb move.

                        Joe quit coaching because he was burned out and he will have used all his best ideas already with Ireland. Meanwhile we've got a younger guy jumping out of his skin for the job, who has made it pretty clear he's been preparing for the job for about the last five years.

                        nostrildamusN Offline
                        nostrildamusN Offline
                        nostrildamus
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #1957

                        @Chris-B said in All Blacks v Ireland - 2nd Test:

                        @mariner4life We fucked ourselves with a stupid selection process that meant all the potential assistants had to take sides before the Head Coach was appointed.

                        @Frank - plenty of chance, but I think it would be a dumb move.

                        Joe quit coaching because he was burned out and he will have used all his best ideas already with Ireland. Meanwhile we've got a younger guy jumping out of his skin for the job, who has made it pretty clear he's been preparing for the job for about the last five years.

                        I thought Joe had a family member that needed looking after?

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        2
                        • S Steven Harris

                          This is awesome , ABs front row totally exposed ..Foster out coached not for the first time

                          https://twitter.com/brettruganalyst/status/1546240815143460865?s=21&t=mgnCkr5Kn77pHPIoS1Ceew

                          ACT CrusaderA Offline
                          ACT CrusaderA Offline
                          ACT Crusader
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #1958

                          @Steven-Harris said in All Blacks v Ireland - 2nd Test:

                          This is awesome , ABs front row totally exposed ..Foster out coached not for the first time

                          https://twitter.com/brettruganalyst/status/1546240815143460865?s=21&t=mgnCkr5Kn77pHPIoS1Ceew

                          And here I was thinking the powder was well and truly dry seeing our tighties get exposed over and over.

                          Bring back Owen Franks.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          3
                          • mariner4lifeM Offline
                            mariner4lifeM Offline
                            mariner4life
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #1959

                            That vision is damning

                            How easily do they isolate a front rower?

                            Notice our shape is not too much different but everyone is flatter. Meaning less options, less time, and often a less effective clean. And Ireland have the one out the back for the 2nd option (which we did a bit on Saturday as well).

                            Damning of individuals and their so called structure.

                            I think part of this is why we are more prone to reds. We are trying for individuals to stop momentum, rather than multiple players. Thus we need a bigger hit. Which increases our risk profile.

                            No QuarterN 1 Reply Last reply
                            6
                            • number9N number9

                              Has Foster said anything about why he replaced an in form Ardie? And not replaced Dalton? In my opinion this was another one of his brain explosions. Has he been questioned? He may have been but I missed it.

                              ARHSA Offline
                              ARHSA Offline
                              ARHS
                              wrote on last edited by ARHS
                              #1960

                              @number9 said in All Blacks v Ireland - 2nd Test:

                              Has Foster said anything about why he replaced an in form Ardie? And not replaced Dalton? In my opinion this was another one of his brain explosions. Has he been questioned? He may have been but I missed it.

                              It's the rule-book. AB's had it right and argued it. The officials got it wrong. How on earth is that a brain explosion?

                              BonesB number9N 2 Replies Last reply
                              0
                              • ARHSA ARHS

                                @number9 said in All Blacks v Ireland - 2nd Test:

                                Has Foster said anything about why he replaced an in form Ardie? And not replaced Dalton? In my opinion this was another one of his brain explosions. Has he been questioned? He may have been but I missed it.

                                It's the rule-book. AB's had it right and argued it. The officials got it wrong. How on earth is that a brain explosion?

                                BonesB Offline
                                BonesB Offline
                                Bones
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #1961

                                @ARHS said in All Blacks v Ireland - 2nd Test:

                                @number9 said in All Blacks v Ireland - 2nd Test:

                                Has Foster said anything about why he replaced an in form Ardie? And not replaced Dalton? In my opinion this was another one of his brain explosions. Has he been questioned? He may have been but I missed it.

                                It's the rule-book. AB's had it right and argued it. The officials got it wrong. How on earth is that a brain explosion?

                                Can you point out where?

                                antipodeanA 1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • BovidaeB Offline
                                  BovidaeB Offline
                                  Bovidae
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #1962

                                  Taylor and Tu'ungafasi should be embarrassed watching that footage as they are the main culprits missing one-on-one tackles.

                                  BonesB TimT 2 Replies Last reply
                                  5
                                  • BovidaeB Bovidae

                                    Taylor and Tu'ungafasi should be embarrassed watching that footage as they are the main culprits missing one-on-one tackles.

                                    BonesB Offline
                                    BonesB Offline
                                    Bones
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #1963

                                    @Bovidae I like Taylor's attempts at pointing out where to run for the Irish players though. If we can get him to utilise the same ability for our side, maybe it could be lethal?

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    3
                                    • BovidaeB Bovidae

                                      Taylor and Tu'ungafasi should be embarrassed watching that footage as they are the main culprits missing one-on-one tackles.

                                      TimT Offline
                                      TimT Offline
                                      Tim
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #1964

                                      @Bovidae Neither of them have trouble making tackles in Super Rugby, and they used to be pretty good defenders at test level. Maybe the defensive structure is just poor?

                                      BovidaeB canefanC 2 Replies Last reply
                                      5
                                      • mariner4lifeM mariner4life

                                        That vision is damning

                                        How easily do they isolate a front rower?

                                        Notice our shape is not too much different but everyone is flatter. Meaning less options, less time, and often a less effective clean. And Ireland have the one out the back for the 2nd option (which we did a bit on Saturday as well).

                                        Damning of individuals and their so called structure.

                                        I think part of this is why we are more prone to reds. We are trying for individuals to stop momentum, rather than multiple players. Thus we need a bigger hit. Which increases our risk profile.

                                        No QuarterN Offline
                                        No QuarterN Offline
                                        No Quarter
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #1965

                                        @mariner4life said in All Blacks v Ireland - 2nd Test:

                                        That vision is damning

                                        How easily do they isolate a front rower?

                                        Notice our shape is not too much different but everyone is flatter. Meaning less options, less time, and often a less effective clean. And Ireland have the one out the back for the 2nd option (which we did a bit on Saturday as well).

                                        Damning of individuals and their so called structure.

                                        I think part of this is why we are more prone to reds. We are trying for individuals to stop momentum, rather than multiple players. Thus we need a bigger hit. Which increases our risk profile.

                                        Agree, I said in another thread, or maybe this one who knows, that the poor discipline and cards we are getting feel like a symptom of a poorly coached team, and I think you've articulated it well there. As we are being exposed players are getting desperate to try and stop the momentum so taking more and more risks to do so.

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        3
                                        • TimT Tim

                                          @Bovidae Neither of them have trouble making tackles in Super Rugby, and they used to be pretty good defenders at test level. Maybe the defensive structure is just poor?

                                          BovidaeB Offline
                                          BovidaeB Offline
                                          Bovidae
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #1966

                                          @Tim Maybe it says something about SR attack. Sorry, whatever defensive system you are using you still need to make your tackles.

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          2
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Search
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Search